Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of dynamic soil-pile raft-structure interaction: an experimental approach

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally seismic design of structures supported on piled raft foundation is performed by considering fixed base conditions, while the pile head is also considered to be fixed for the design of the pile foundation. Major drawback of this assumption is that it cannot capture soil-foundation-structure interaction due to flexibility of soil or the inertial interaction involving heavy foundation masses. Previous studies on this subject addressed mainly the intricacy in modelling of dynamic soil structure interaction (DSSI) but not the implication of such interaction on the distribution of forces at various elements of the pile foundation and supported structure. A recent numerical study by the authors showed significant change in response at different elements of the piled raft supported structure when DSSI effects are considered. The present study is a limited attempt in this direction, and it examines such observations through shake table tests. The effect of DSSI is examined by comparing dynamic responses from fixed base scaled down model structures and the overall systems. This study indicates the possibility of significant underestimation in design forces for both the column and pile if designed under fixed base assumption. Such underestimation in the design forces may have serious implication in the design of a foundation or structural element.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abghari A and Chai J (1995), “Modeling of Soil-pilesuperstructure Interaction for Bridge Foundations in Performance of Deep Foundations under Seismic Loading,” Geotechnical Spec. Pub. 51, ASCE, 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (1978), Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations of Buildings: A Cooperative Effort with the Design Profession, Building Code Interests and the Research Community, National Bureau of Standards, Supt. of Docs, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya S, Lombardi D, Dihoru L, Dietz MS, Crewe AJ and Taylor AC (2012), “Model Container Design for Soil-structure Interaction Studies,” Role of Seismic Testing Facilities in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering, Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering Series Workshop, pp.135–158, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boominathan A and Ayothiraman R (2005), “Dynamic Behaviour of Laterally Loaded Model Piles in Clay,” ICE, GE 4: 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Curras CJ, Kutter BL, Wilson WD and Abghari AA (1999), “Seismic Soil-pile-structure Interaction Experiments and Analyses,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 125(9): 750–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles JE (1997), Foundation Analysis and Design, 6th ed., McGraw-hill Book Company, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau KT, Shen CY and Guo X (2009), “Nonlinear Seismic Soil-pile-structure Interactions: Shaking Table Tests and FEM Analyses,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29: 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy P and Randolph MF (1996), “Simple Design Tools for Piled Raft Foundations,” Geotechnique, 46: 2(3): 13–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curras JC, Boulanger WR, Kutter BL and Wilson DW (2001), “Dynamic Experiments and Analysis of a Pilegroup- supported Structure,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 127(7): 585–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash SR (2010), “Lateral Pile-liquefied Soil Interaction during Earthquakes,” PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 440 (2005), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 451 (2005), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Design Examples, Geotechnical, Topic 15-4-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas, G (1984), “Seismic Response of Endbearing Single Oiles,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 3(2): 82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G (1996), Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering—Case Studies, Athens (in Greek): Simeon Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G and Mylonakis G (1998), “Seismic Soilstructure Interaction: New Evidence and Emerging Issues,” State of the Art Paper, Geotechnical Earthquake Eng and Soil Dynamics Geo-Institute ASCE Conference, Vol.II, pp.1116–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh B and Lubkowski Z (2007), “Modelling Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction under Seismic Loads,” Bhattacharya S, Design of Foundations in Seismic Areas: Principles and Applications, NICEE, IIT Kanpur India, pp.118–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha I, Olson SM, Seo M and Kim M (2011), “Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance Using Shaking Table Tests,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31: 682–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han YC (2002), “Seismic Response of Tall Building Considering Soil-pile-structure Interaction,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1(1): 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horikoshi K and Randolph MF (1998), “A Contribution to Optimum Design of Piled Rafts,” Geotechnique, 48(3): 301–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilyas T, Leung CF, Chow YK, and Budi SS (2004), “Centrifuge Model Study of Laterally Loaded Pile Groups in Clay,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 130(3): 274–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeremic B, Kunnath S and Xiong F (2008), “Influence of Soil-foundation-structure Interaction on Seismic Response of the I-880 Viaduct,” International Journal of Engineering Structure, 26(3): 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaynia AM and Kausel E (1992), “Dynamic Behavior of Pile Groups,” Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Numerical Methodes In Offshore Piling, Prustin, Texas, pp. 509–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaynia MA and Mahzoon PS (1996), “Forces in Pile Foundations under Seismic Loading”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 122(1): 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (2007), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, 1st Impression, Pearson Education Inc, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi D and Bhattacharya S (2013), “Modal Analysis of Pile-supported Structures during Seismic Liquefaction,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, DOI: 10.1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makris N and Gazetas G (1992), “Dynamic Pile-soilpile Interaction. Part II: Lateral and Seismic Response,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21: 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maravas A, Mylonakis G and Karabalis D (2007), “Dynamic Characteristics of Simple Structures on Piles and Footings,” Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Gngineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, paper No.1672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin CM (1994), “Physical and Numerical Modelling of Shore Foundations under Combined Loads,” PhD Thesis, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meymand PJ (1998), “Shaking Table Scale Model Tests of Nonlinear Soil-pile-superstructure Interaction in Soft Clay,” PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylonakis G and Gazatas G (2000), “Seismic Soilstructure Interaction: Beneficial or Detrimental-” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 4(3): 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEHRP (1997), Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures: Parts 1 and 2, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogami T and Novak M (1976), “Soil-pile Interaction in Vertical Vibration”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 4(3): 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak M (1974), “Dynamic Stiffness and Damping of Piles,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 11: 574–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulos HG and Davis EH (1980), Pile Foundation Analysis and Design, John Willey and Sons, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad SK, Towhata I, Chandradhara GP and Nanjundaswamy P (2004), “Shaking Table Tests in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering,” Geotechnics and Earthquake Hazards, 87(10): 1398–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovithis E, Pitilakis NKD and Mylonakis GE (2009), “Seismic Analysis of Coupled Soil-pile-structure Systems Leading to the Definition of a Pseudo-natural SSI Frequency,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29: 1005–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha R, Dutta SC and Haldar S (2015), “Seismic Response of Soil-pile Foundation Structure System,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(2): 144–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MG (1993), “A Laboratory Study of the Marchetti Dilatometer,” PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokimatsu K, Suzuki K and Sato M (2005), “Effects of Inertial and Kinematic Interaction on Seismic Behaviour of Pile with Embedded Foundation,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25: 753–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler WA (1988), “Small Strain Shear Modulus of Clay,” Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation, 20: 331–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu G and Finn W (1997), “Dynamic Elastic Analysis of Pile Foundations Using Finite Element Method in the Frequency Domain”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34(1): 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yashinsky M (1998), “The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989–Highway Systems,” Professional Paper 1552-B, USGS, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sekhar Chandra Dutta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saha, R., Haldar, S. & Dutta, S.C. Influence of dynamic soil-pile raft-structure interaction: an experimental approach. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 14, 625–645 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0050-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0050-1

Keywords

Navigation