Skip to main content
Log in

3D simulation of near-fault strong ground motion: comparison between surface rupture fault and buried fault

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, near-fault strong ground motions caused by a surface rupture fault (SRF) and a buried fault (BF) are numerically simulated and compared by using a time-space-decoupled, explicit finite element method combined with a multi-transmitting formula (MTF) of an artificial boundary. Prior to the comparison, verification of the explicit element method and the MTF is conducted. The comparison results show that the final dislocation of the SRF is larger than the BF for the same stress drop on the fault plane. The maximum final dislocation occurs on the fault upper line for the SRF; however, for the BF, the maximum final dislocation is located on the fault central part. Meanwhile, the PGA, PGV and PGD of long period ground motions (≤1 Hz) generated by the SRF are much higher than those of the BF in the near-fault region. The peak value of the velocity pulse generated by the SRF is also higher than the BF. Furthermore, it is found that in a very narrow region along the fault trace, ground motions caused by the SRF are much higher than by the BF. These results may explain why SRFs almost always cause heavy damage in near-fault regions compared to buried faults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barka AHS (2001), “The Surface Rupture and Slip Distribution of the August 17, 1999 Izmit Earthquake, M 7.4, North Anatolian Fault,” Bull, Seism. Soc. Am, 92: 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRI(1996), “Final Report on the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake,” Vol 1. (in Japnese)

  • Dahel FA (1974), “On the Ratio of P-wave to S-wave Corner Frequencies for Shallow Earthquake Sources,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 64: 1159–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalguer L, AK Irikura, JD Riera and HC Chiu (2001), “Importance of the Dynamic Source on Strong Ground Motion During the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Brief Interpretation of the Damage Distribution on Buildings,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91: 1112–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T and T Miyatake (1998), “3D Simulation of Near-Field Ground Motion Based on Dynamic Modeling,” Bull, Seism.Soc.Am., 88: 1445–1456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostrov BV (1964), “Self-similar Problems of Propagation of Shear Cracks,” J. Appl. Math. Mech., 28: 1077–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao ZP (1996), “Normal Transmitting Boundary Condition,” Science in China, Series E, 39(3), 244–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao ZP (1998), The Decoupling Numerical Simulation of Wave Motion, in Dynamic Soil-structure Interaction (ed. Zhang, CH, Wolf JP), Amsterdam, pp. 125–140.

  • Miyatake T (1980), “Numerical Simulation of Earthquake Source Process by a Three-dimensional Crack Model, Part I, Rupture Process,” J. Phys. Earth., 28: 565–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen K, R Madaraga and R Archuleta (1997), “Three Dimensional Dynamic Simulation of the 1992 Landers Earthquake,” Science, 278: 834–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin TC and TengTa-liang (2001), “An Overview of the 1999 Chi-chi, Taiwan Earthquake,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91: 895–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Qifang  (刘启方).

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China Under Grant No. 50408003; National Scientific and Technical Supporting Programs Funded by Ministry of Science & Technology of China Under Grant No. 2006BAC13B01

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Q., Yuan, Y. & Jin, X. 3D simulation of near-fault strong ground motion: comparison between surface rupture fault and buried fault. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 6, 337–344 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-007-0753-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-007-0753-z

Keywords

Navigation