Skip to main content
Log in

Developments, expectations of wave energy converters and mooring anchors in the UK

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Ocean University of China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper introduces the important developments of Wave Energy Converters (WECs) in the UK, and the generic anchor types for WECs and similar structures. Several WECs and their characteristics are introduced to explain the development direction. The anchors are discussed in relation to the behaviour and performance of WECs, and comparisons are made with similar aspects of the offshore industry. Typical and desirable features of anchors for WECs are summarized. Additionally, expectations and research suggestions for WECs and their anchor design are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AEA Technology Future Energy Solutions, 2002. Status and Research and Development Priorities 2003, Wave and Marine Current Energy. http://www.engineering.lancs.ac.uk/REGROUPS/LUREG/REPORTS/DTI_wave_and_tidal.pdf, accessed 19 March 2006

  • Aggidis, G. A., A. Bradshaw, M. J. French, A. P. McCabe, J. A. C. Meadowcroft, and M. B. Widden, 2005. PS Frog MK 5 WEC developments and design progress. Proc. World Renewable Energy Congress (WREC), Aberdeen, UK., 2005: 1199–1204.

  • Agostini A., V. Di Tella, E. Gnone, and G. Sebastiani, 1980. TSG integrated storage platform for early production in the North Sea. Proc., 12th Annual Offshore Technol. Conf., OTC 3880. Houston, 245–260.

  • American Petroleum Institute (API), 1996. Recommended practice for design and analysis of station keeping system for floating structure. API Recommended Practice 2SK. API publishing company, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barltrop, N., 1998. Floating Structures: A Guide for Design and Analysis. Ltd Oilfield Publications, CMPT, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates J., and N. Hill, 2005. The Role of Physics in Renewable Energy RD&D. Institute of Physics Report, 2005: http://physics.iop.org/IOP/Press/RENEWABLES%20FINAL.pdf, accessed 19 March 2006.

  • Budal, K., and J. Falnes, 1980. Interacting Point Absorbers with Controlled Motion. In: Power from Sea Waves. Count B. M., ed., Academic Press, New York, 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. W., G. T. Houlsby, C. M. Martin, and P. M. Fish, 2002. Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines. Wind Engineering, 26(3): 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, R. V., and M. J. French, 1980. Aspects of the French Flexible Bag Device. Power from Sea Waves. Count B. M. ed., Proc. Conf. on Power from Sea Waves, Edinburgh. Academic Press, London, 401–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, J. M. B. P., and S. H. Salter, 2006. Numerical and experimental modelling of a modified version of the Edinburgh Duck wave energy device. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part M: J. Eng. Mar. Environ., 220(3): 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. J., and R. H. Bracewell, 1995. The systematic design of economic wave energy converters. ISOPE-95, The Hague: 11–16.

  • Harris, R. E., L. Johanning, and J. Wolfram, 2004, Mooring systems for wave energy converter: A review of design issues and choices. http://www.supergen-marine.org.uk/documents/papers/Public/Moorings/Marec_2004_RHLJJW.pdf, accessed 2 August 2005.

  • He, Y., and J. Tan, 2002. Typical breakout failure of suction anchor and computation of breakout force. J. East Chin. Shipbuild. Inst. (Natural Science Edition), 16(12): 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heriot-Watt University, and The University of Edinburgh, 2007. Preliminary Wave Energy Device Performance Protocol — Supporting Commentary. Version 1.3, March 2007. http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file38990.pdf, accessed 20 April 2007.

  • Johanning, L., G. H. Smith, and J. Wolfram, 2005. Towards Design Standards for WEC Moorings. 6th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, 30th August–2nd September 2005, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, C. M., C. Bronsdon, J. Wolfram, I. Bryden, R. Wallace, and A. Bradshaw, 2003. EPSRC Supergen Marine Energy research Programme: The Focus and Methodology. 5th European Wave Energy Conference. Hydraulics and Maritime Research Centre, Cork, Ireland: 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, T. P., and J. Meunier, 1990. Design Guides for Offshore Structure (2) Anchoring of Floating Structure. Technip, ed., Paris, 226pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leishman, J. M., and G. Scobie, 1976. The development of wave power-A techno-economic study. Department of Industry, National Engineering Laboratory. East Kilbride, Strathclyde, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z. Z., and Y. Y. Ye, 2000. Design and construction of the 100,000 DWT mooring buoy in Meizhou Bay anchorage. Port & Waterway Engineering, 317(6): 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A. P., A. Bradshaw, J. A. C. Meadowcroft, and G. A. Aggidis, 2006. Developments in the design of the PS Frog MK 5 Wave Energy Converter. Renewable Energy Journal, 31(2): 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senperr, D., and G. A. Auvergne, 1982. Suction anchor piles — a proven alternative to driving or drilling. OTC4206, OTC’ 14:483–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallard, T., R. Rothschild, and G. A. Aggidis, 2007. A comparative approach to the economic modeling of a large-scale wave power scheme. European Journal of Operational Research, In Press, accepted 15 Jan 2007. Available online: http://www.sciencedirect.com.

  • Taylor, C. J., A. Bradshaw, R.V. Chaplin, M. French, and M. B. Widden, 2002. Wave Energy Research at Lancaster University: PS Frog and Frond. World Renewable Energy Congress VII. Cologne, Germany.

  • The Bruce Anchor Group, 2005. The Bruce KT Connector. http://www.bruceanchor.co.uk/, accessed 6 Sept. 2005.

  • The Open University Course Team, 1999. Waves, Tides and Shallow-Water Processes. 2nd edition. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 228pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, T. W., 1999. A brief review of wave energy. A report produced for The UK Department of Trade and Industry. Report number: ETSU Report R-120, 187pp.

  • Vryhof anchors, 2005. Anchor Manual, http://www.vryhof.com/ammanual.htm, accessed 7 Sept. 2005.

  • Wolfram, J., 2006. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. Vol. 220, Guest ed., i–ii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz, H., T. J. Stallard, A. P. McCabe, and G. A. Aggidis, 2007. Time series analysis-based adaptive tuning techniques for a heaving wave energy converter in irregular seas. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A: J. Pwr. Energy. 221(1): 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huang Ming.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, M., Aggidis, G.A. Developments, expectations of wave energy converters and mooring anchors in the UK. J. Ocean Univ. China 7, 10–16 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-008-0010-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-008-0010-8

Key words

Navigation