Skip to main content
Log in

Cleaner geopolymer prepared by co-activation of gasification coal fly ash and steel slag: durability properties and economic assessment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geopolymer is a material with high early strength. However, the insufficient durability properties, such as long-term strength, acid-base resistance, freeze–thaw resistance, leaching toxicity, thermal stability, sulfate resistance and carbonation resistance, restrain its practical application. Herein, a long-term stable geopolymer composite with high final strength (ASK1) was synthesized from shell coal gasification fly ash (SFA) and steel slag (SS). Additionally, a geopolymer composite with high early strength (ASK2) was also synthesized for comparison. The results showed that ASK1 exhibited better performance on freezing-thawing resistance, carbonization resistance and heavy metals stabilization compared to the ASK2 at long-term curing. Raising the curing temperature could accelerate the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) development at initial curing ages of 3 to 7 d. Both ASK1 and ASK2 exhibited excellent acid-base and sulfate corrosion resistance. An increase for UCS was seen under KOH solution and MgSO4 solution corrosion for ASK1. All leaching concentrations of heavy metals out of the two geopolymers were below the standard threshold, even after 50 freezing-thawing cycles. Both ASK1 and ASK2 geopolymer concrete exhibited higher sustainability and economic efficiency than Portland cement concrete. The result of this study not only provides a suitable way for the utilization of industrial solid waste in civil and environmental engineering, but also opens a new approach to improve the long-term stabilities of the geopolymers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adesina A (2021). Performance and sustainability overview of sodium carbonate activated slag materials cured at ambient temperature. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 3: 100016

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Majidi M H, Lampropoulos A, Cundy A, Meikle S (2016). Development of geopolymer mortar under ambient temperature for in situ applications. Construction & Building Materials, 120: 198–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aygörmez Y, Canpolat O, Al-Mashhadani M M (2020a). Assessment of geopolymer composites durability at one year age. Journal of Building Engineering, 32: 101453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aygörmez Y, Canpolat O, Al-Mashhadani M M, Uysal M (2020b). Elevated temperature, freezing-thawing and wetting-drying effects on polypropylene fiber reinforced metakaolin based geopolymer composites. Construction & Building Materials, 235: 117502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai T, Song Z, Wang H, Wu Y, Huang W (2019). Performance evaluation of metakaolin geopolymer modified by different solid wastes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226: 114–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bortnovsky O, Dědeček J, Tvarůžková Z, Sobalík Z, Šubrt J (2008). Metal ions as probes for characterization of geopolymer materials. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 91(9): 3052–3057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers H J H (2006). Particle-size distribution and packing fraction of geometric random packings. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 74(3): 031309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang J, Jiang T, Cui K (2021). Influence on compressive strength and CO2 capture after accelerated carbonation of combination β-C2S with γ-C2S. Construction & Building Materials, 312: 125359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Wu D, Xia L, Cai Q, Zhang Z (2021). Geopolymer concrete durability subjected to aggressive environments: a review of influence factors and comparison with ordinary Portland cement. Construction & Building Materials, 279: 122496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Chen F, Zhou F, Lu M, Hou H, Li J, Liu D, Wang T (2022). Early solidification/stabilization mechanism of heavy metals (Pb, Cr and Zn) in Shell coal gasification fly ash based geopolymer. Science of the Total Environment, 802: 149905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhou X, Wan S, Zheng R, Tong J, Hou H, Wang T (2019). Synthesis and characterization of geopolymer composites based on gasification coal fly ash and steel slag. Construction & Building Materials, 211: 646–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Hongqiang M, Hongyu C, Jiaxin W, Jing S, Zonghui L, Mingkai Y (2018). Preparation and characterization of coal gangue geopolymers. Construction & Building Materials, 187: 318–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chindaprasirt P, Jitsangiam P, Rattanasak U (2022). Hydrophobicity and efflorescence of lightweight fly ash geopolymer incorporated with calcium stearate. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364: 132449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidovits J (2017). Geopolymers: ceramic-like inorganic polymers. Journal of Ceramic Science and Technology, 8(3): 335–350

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira L B, de Azevedo A R G, Marvila M T, Pereira E C, Fediuk R, Vieira C M F (2022). Durability of geopolymers with industrial waste. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16: e00839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Q, Xu W, Zhao X, Bu M, Yuan Q, Niu D (2021). The microstructure and durability of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: a review. Ceramics International, 47(21): 29550–29566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao B, Jang S, Son H, Park S, Lee H S, Bae C J (2022). Phase transformation and microstructure evolution of a kaolin-based precursor. Ceramics International, 48(24): 36066–36075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gholampour A, Danish A, Ozbakkaloglu T, Yeon J H, Gencel O (2022). Mechanical and durability properties of natural fiber-reinforced geopolymers containing lead smelter slag and waste glass sand. Construction & Building Materials, 352: 129043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo C M, Wang K T, Liu M Y, Li X H, Cui X M (2016). Preparation and characterization of acid-based geopolymer using metakaolin and disused polishing liquid. Ceramics International, 42(7): 9287–9291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan A, Arif M, Shariq M (2019). Use of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner and sustainable environment: a review of mechanical properties and microstructure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223: 704–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang T, Zhou L, Chen L, Liu W, Zhang S, Liu L (2020). Mechanism exploration on the aluminum supplementation coupling the electrokinetics-activating geopolymerization that reinforces the solidification of the municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 103: 361–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y, Feng W, Zheng D, Dong Z, Cui H (2020). Structure refinement of fly ash in connection with its reactivity in geopolymerization. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 118: 350–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Amritphale S S, Matthews J C, Lynam J G, Alam S, Abdulkareem O A (2021). Synergistic utilization of diverse industrial wastes for reutilization in steel production and their geopolymerization potential. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 126: 728–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiorowski R, Gerle A, Dudek K, Związek K (2021). Application of hard coal combustion residuals in the production of ceramic building materials. Construction & Building Materials, 304: 124506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lahoti M, Tan K H, Yang E H (2019). A critical review of geopolymer properties for structural fire-resistance applications. Construction & Building Materials, 221: 514–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lan T, Meng Y, Ju T, Chen Z, Du Y, Deng Y, Song M, Han S, Jiang J (2022). Synthesis and application of geopolymers from municipal waste incineration fly ash (MSWI FA) as raw ingredient: a review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 182: 106308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Mailhiot S, Kantola A M, Niu H, Sreenivasan H, Telkki V V, Kinnunen P (2022a). Longitudinal single-sided NMR study: silicato-alumina ratio changes the reaction mechanism of geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Research, 160: 106921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Tao Y, Zhuang E, Cui X, Yu K, Yu B, Boluk Y, Bindiganavile V, Chen Z, Yi C (2022b). Optimal amorphous oxide ratios and multifactor models for binary geopolymers from metakaolin blended with substantial sugarcane bagasse ash. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377: 134215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Fei M E, Huyan C, Shi X (2021). Nano-engineered, fly ash-based geopolymer composites: an overview. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168: 105334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, He H, Li Y, Hu T, Ni H, Zhang H (2021a). Coupling effect of steel slag in preparation of calcium-containing geopolymers with spent fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalyst. Construction & Building Materials, 290: 123194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Doh J H, Dinh H L, Ong D E L, Zi G, You I (2022a). Effect of Si/Al molar ratio on the strength behavior of geopolymer derived from various industrial waste: a current state of the art review. Construction & Building Materials, 329: 127134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, Guan X, Li C, Zhao K, Yang X, Fu R, Li Y, Yu F (2022). Global perspectives and future research directions for the phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil: a knowledge mapping analysis from 2001 to 2020. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(6): 73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Deng P, Zhang Z (2022b). Application of silica-rich biomass ash solid waste in geopolymer preparation: a review. Construction & Building Materials, 356: 129142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma F, Zhou L, Luo Y, Wang J, Ma B, Qian B, Zang J, Hu Y, Ren X (2022). The mechanism of pristine steel slag for boosted performance of fly ash-based geopolymers. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 99(8): 100602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meek A H, Beckett C T S, Elchalakani M (2021). Reinforcement corrosion in cement- and alternatively-stabilised rammed earth materials. Construction & Building Materials, 274: 122045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oyebisi S, Olutoge F, Kathirvel P, Oyaotuderekumor I, Lawanson D, Nwani J, Ede A, Kaze R (2022). Sustainability assessment of geopolymer concrete synthesized by slag and corncob ash. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17: e01665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaidi S M A, Sulaiman Atrushi D, Mohammed A S, Unis Ahmed H, Faraj R H, Emad W, Tayeh B A, Mohammed Najm H (2022). Ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete: a review. Construction & Building Materials, 346: 128495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ragalwar K, Heard W F, Williams B A, Ranade R (2020). Significance of the particle size distribution modulus for strain-hardening-ultra-high performance concrete (SH-UHPC) matrix design. Construction & Building Materials, 234: 117423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasaki S A, Bingxue Z, Guarecuco R, Thomas T, Minghui Y (2019). Geopolymer for use in heavy metals adsorption, and advanced oxidative processes: a critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213: 42–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raza M H, Zhong R Y (2022). A sustainable roadmap for additive manufacturing using geopolymers in construction industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 186: 106592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva P D, Sagoe-Crenstil K, Sirivivatnanon V (2007). Kinetics of geopolymerization: role of Al2O3 and SiO2. Cement and Concrete Research, 37(4): 512–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang J, Ji X, Liu X, Zhou W, Chang X, Zhang S (2022). Mechanical and microstructural properties of phosphate-based geopolymers with varying Si/Al molar ratios based on the sol-gel method. Materials Letters, 308: 131178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trincal V, Multon S, Benavent V, Lahalle H, Balsamo B, Caron A, Bucher R, Diaz Caselles L, Cyr M (2022). Shrinkage mitigation of metakaolin-based geopolymer activated by sodium silicate solution. Cement and Concrete Research, 162: 106993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Zhu Y, Yao D, Chen G, Wang L (2017). Assessing human bioaccessibility of trace contaminants in size-fractionated red mud, derived precipitates and geopolymeric blocks. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(6): 12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westrum E F, Essene E J, Perkins D (1979). Thermophysical properties of the garnet, grossular: Ca3Al2Si3O12. Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 11(1): 57–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Lu B, Bai T, Wang H, Du F, Zhang Y, Cai L, Jiang C, Wang W (2019). Geopolymer, green alkali activated cementitious material: sSynthesis, applications and challenges. Construction & Building Materials, 224: 930–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Yu T, Deng L, Li Y, Guo H, Zhou J, Li L, Peng Y (2022a). Ion-adsorption type rare earth tailings for preparation of alkali-based geopolymer with capacity for heavy metals immobilization. Cement and Concrete Composites, 134: 104768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Zheng M, Zhu L, Lv Y (2022b). Mix design and characteristics evaluation of high-performance concrete with full aeolian sand based on the packing density theory. Construction & Building Materials, 349: 128814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng L, Wang W, Qiao W, Shi Y, Liu X (2015). Immobilization of Cu2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Cd2+ during geopolymerization. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 9(4): 642–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Chen Y, Dong S, Li H (2022). Geopolymerization kinetics of steel slag activated gasification coal fly ash: a case study for amorphous-rich slags. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379: 134671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Li W, Du Z, Zhou S, Zhang Y, Li F (2021). Recycling and utilization assessment of steel slag in metakaolin based geopolymer from steel slag by-product to green geopolymer. Construction & Building Materials, 305: 124654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Jiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering Open Project Fund (No. 2021SKSG04); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51979011); the Central Non-Profit Scientific Research Fund for Institutes (Nos. CKSF2021483/CL, CKSF2023359/HL, and CKSF2023397/HL); the Knowledge Innovation Program of Science and Technology Bureau of Wuhan, China (No. CKSD2022360/CL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ziling Peng or Yuchi Chen.

Additional information

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Highlights

• Better packing density and higher early strength of SS-rich geopolymer.

• C-S-H and portlandite as the main hydration phase in SS-rich geopolymer.

• Increased Si/Al of geopolymer gel and better long-term performance of SFA-rich geopolymer.

• Low cost of SFA-SS geopolymers concrete.

Supplementary Material

11783_2023_1750_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Cleaner geopolymer prepared by co-activation of gasification coal fly ash and steel slag: durability properties and economic assessment

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Chen, X., Peng, Z. et al. Cleaner geopolymer prepared by co-activation of gasification coal fly ash and steel slag: durability properties and economic assessment. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 17, 150 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1750-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1750-9

Keywords

Navigation