Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of pore size and membrane surface properties on arsenic removal by nanofiltration membranes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nanofiltration (NF) has a great potential in removing arsenate from contaminated water. The performance including arsenate rejection, water permeability and resistance to fouling could however differ substantially among NF membranes. This study was conducted to investigate the influence of membrane pore size and surface properties on these aspects of membrane performance. Four fullyaromatic NF membranes with different physicochemical properties were adopted for this study. The results showed that surface charge, hydrophobicity, roughness and pore size could affect water permeability and/or arsenate rejection considerably. A more negative surface charge was desirable to enhance arsenate rejection rates. NF90 and a non-commercialized membrane (M#1) demonstrated the best performance in terms of arsenate rejection and water permeability. The M#1 membrane showed less membrane fouling than NF90 when used for filtration of real arsenic-containing groundwater. This was mainly due to its distinct chemical composition and surface properties. A severe membrane fouling could lead to a substantial reduction of arsenic rejection. The M#1 membrane showed the best performance, which indicated that membrane modification could indeed enhance the overall membrane performance for water treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang F F, Liu W J, Wang X M (2014). Comparison of polyamide nanofiltration and low-pressure reverse osmosis membranes on As (III) rejection under various operational conditions. Desalination, 334 (1): 10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X Q, Ding S G, Guo J, Zhang C, Guo Z H, Shao L (2017). In-situ interfacial formation of TiO2/polypyrrole selective layer for improving the separation efficiency towards molecular separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 536: 19–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X Q, Wang Z X, Jiang X, Li T X, Lau C H, Guo Z H, Ma J, Shao L (2018). Towards sustainable ultrafast molecular-separation membranes: From conventional polymers to emerging materials. Progress in Materials Science, 92: 258–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Deng B (2014). Rejection and modeling of arsenate by nanofiltration: Contributions of convection, diffusion and electromigration to arsenic transport. Journal of Membrane Science, 453: 42–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Figoli A, Cassano A, Criscuoli A, Mozumder M S, Uddin M T, Islam M A, Drioli E (2010). Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration. Water Research, 44(1): 97–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harisha R S, Hosamani K M, Keri R S, Nataraj S K, Aminabhavi T M (2010). Arsenic removal from drinking water using thin film composite nanofiltration membrane. Desalination, 252(1–3): 75–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Liu J, Han G, Chung T S (2018). Novel thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes consisting of a zwitterionic co-polymer for selenium and arsenic removal. Journal of Membrane Science, 555: 299–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He Y R, Tang Y P, Ma D, Chung T S (2017). UiO-66 incorporated thinfilm nanocomposite membranes for efficient selenium and arsenic removal. Journal of Membrane Science, 541: 262–270

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirose M, Ito H, Kamiyama Y (1996). Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behaviour of RO membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 121(2): 209–215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E M, Elimelech M (2003). Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(24): 5581–5588

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jadhav S V, Marathe K V, Rathod V K (2016). A pilot scale concurrent removal of fluoride, arsenic, sulfate and nitrate by using nanofiltration: Competing ion interaction and modelling approach. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 13: 153–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, Ye K, Deng J, Lin J, Ye W, Zhao S, Van der Bruggen B (2018). Conventional ultrafiltration as effective strategy for dye/salt fractionation in textile wastewater treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(18): 10698–10708

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lau W J (2016). Nanofiltration Membranes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications. Abingdon: CRC Press Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau WJ, Ismail A F, Goh P S, Hilal N, Ooi B S (2015). Characterization methods of thin film composite nanofiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Methods, 44(2): 135–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J Y, Ye W Y, Zeng H M, Yang H, Shen J G, Darvishmanesh S, Luis P, Sotto A, Van der Bruggen B (2015). Fractionation of direct dyes and salts in aqueous solution using loose nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 477: 183–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y L, Chiang P C, Chang E E (2007). Removal of small trihalomethane precursors from aqueous solution by nanofiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 146(1–2): 20–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mojarrad M, Noroozi A, Zeinivand A, Kazemzadeh P (2018). Response surface methodology for optimization of simultaneous Cr(VI) and As (V) removal from contaminated water by nanofiltration process. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 37(1): 434–443

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nghiem L D, Schäfer A I, Elimelech M (2004). Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(6): 1888–1896

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen C M, Bang S, Cho J, Kim K W (2009). Performance and mechanism of arsenic removal from water by a nanofiltration membrane. Desalination, 245(1–3): 82–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oh J I, Yamamoto K, Kitawaki H, Nakao S, Sugawara T, Rahman M M, Rahman M H (2000). Application of low-pressure nanofiltration coupled with a bicycle pump for the treatment of arseniccontaminated groundwater. Desalination, 132(1–3): 307–314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards L A, Richards B S, Schäfer A I (2011). Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Salt and inorganic contaminant removal by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 369(1–2): 188–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saitúa H, Campderrós M, Cerutti S, Padilla A P (2005). Effect of operating conditions in removal of arsenic from water by nanofiltration membrane. Desalination, 172(2): 173–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato Y, Kang M, Kamei T, Magara Y (2002). Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal. Water Research, 36(13): 3371–3377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su M, Wang D X, Wang X L, Ando M, Shintani T (2006). Rejection of ions by NF membranes for binary electrolyte solutions of NaCl, NaNO3, CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2. Desalination, 191(S1–3): 303–308

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang C Y, Kwon Y N, Leckie J O (2007). Probing the nano-and microscales of reverse osmosis membranes-A comprehensive characterization of physiochemical properties of uncoated and coated membranes by XPS, TEM, ATR-FTIR, and streaming potential measurements. Journal of Membrane Science, 287(1): 146–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang C Y, Kwon Y N, Leckie J O (2009). Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes: I. FTIR and XPS characterization of polyamide and coating layer chemistry. Desalination, 242(1–3): 149–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanninen J, Mänttäri M, Nyström M (2006). Effect of salt mixture concentration on fractionation with NF membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 283(1–2): 57–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin M T, Mozumder M S I, Islam M A, Deowan S A, Hoinkis J (2007). Nanofiltration membrane process for the removal of arsenic from drinking water. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 30(9): 1248–1254

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrijenhoek EM, Waypa J J (2000). Arsenic removal from drinking water by a “loose” nanofiltration membrane. Desalination, 130(3): 265–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waypa J J, Elimelech M, Hering J G (1997). Arsenic removal by RO and NF membranes. Journal-American Water Works Association, 89 (10): 102–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu R, Zhang P, Wang Q, Wang X M, Yu K C, Xue T, Wen X H (2019). Influences of multi influent matrices on the retention of PPCPs by nanofltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 212: 299–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ye W Y, Lin J Y, Borrego R, Chen D, Sotto A, Luis P, Liu H M, Zhao S F, Tang C Y, Van der Bruggen B (2018). Advanced desalination of dye/NaCl mixures by a loose nanofiltration membrane for digital inkjet printing. Separation and Purification Technology, 197: 27–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S Y, Williams P N, Luo JM, Zhu Y G (2017). Microbial mediated arsenic biotransformation in wetlands. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11 (1): 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y Y, Kong F X, Wang Z, Yang HW, Wang X M, Xie Y F, Waite T D (2017). Role of membrane and compound properties in affecting the rejection of pharmaceuticals by different RO/NF membranes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(6): 20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the International Cooperation Program of MOST of China (No. 2016YFE0118800) and the major water project of China (No. 2017ZX07103). There is no conflicts of interest in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Nathalie Tanne, Rui Xu, Mingyue Zhou, Pan Zhang, Xiaomao Wang & Xianghua Wen

Authors
  1. Nathalie Tanne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mingyue Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaomao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xianghua Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaomao Wang or Xianghua Wen.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanne, N., Xu, R., Zhou, M. et al. Influence of pore size and membrane surface properties on arsenic removal by nanofiltration membranes. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 13, 19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1105-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1105-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation