Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of variable cross-section on pressure transients and unsteady slipstream in a long tunnel when high-speed train passes through

列车通过变截面长大海底隧道时的隧道内瞬变压力和列车风研究

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When constructing a long undersea tunnel, cross-sectional area of some parts of the tunnel will be changed to strengthen the tunnel or save construction costs, which will cause a change in aerodynamic characteristics of the tunnel. By comparing variable cross-section(VCS) tunnel and constant cross-section (CCS) tunnel, the influence of abrupt cross-section on pressure transients and slipstream in the long tunnel was studied. The RNG k-ε turbulence model was adopted for numerical simulation, which was validated by the moving model test. The results show that the closer it to the abrupt cross-section, the larger the difference between the positive peak pressure of the VCS tunnel and that of the CCS tunnel, reaching a maximum of 7.63% at 5.43 km. The difference in slipstream velocity in the longitudinal direction between the two tunnels can reach 18.7% at most, but it is almost the same in the other two directions. In addition, the impact of the abrupt section on slipstream in different areas of the tunnel is different. This research has an important reference value for parameter design of long variable cross-section tunnel and layout of auxiliary facilities in tunnel.

摘要

在建造长大海底隧道时, 为了加固隧道结构并节省成本, 通常会改变隧道部分区段的截面面 积, 这将导致隧道内的空气动力学特性发生变化。本文通过对比变截面(VCS)隧道和常规(CCS)隧道, 研究了突变截面对长隧道内压力瞬变和列车风的影响。数值模拟采用RNG k-ε 湍流模型, 通过动模型 试验进行了验证。结果表明, 越接近突变截面VCS隧道和CCS隧道内的正峰值压力之间的差异越大, 在5.43 km处达到最大值7.63%。在两种隧道之间纵向列车风的差异最高达18.7%, 但在其他两个方向 上几乎相同。此外, 突变截面对隧道不同区域的影响不相同。本研究对长大变截面隧道的参数设计和 隧道内附属设施的布置具有参考价值。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ANGUERA R. The channel tunnel—An ex post economic evaluation [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2006, 40(4): 291–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. THOMAS P, O’DONOGHUE D. The channel tunnel: Transport patterns and regional impacts [J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2013, 31: 104–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MAINWARING G, OLSEN T O. Long undersea tunnels: Recognizing and overcoming the logistics of operation and construction [J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(2): 249–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LIU Feng, YAO Song, ZHANG Jie, et al. Effect of increased linings on micro-pressure waves in a high-speed railway tunnel [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 52: 62–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LU Yi-bin, WANG Tian-tian, YANG Ming-zhi, et al. The influence of reduced cross-section on pressure transients from high-speed trains intersecting in a tunnel [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 201: 104161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WANG Tian-tian, WU Fan, YANG Ming-zhi, et al. Reduction of pressure transients of high-speed train passing through a tunnel by cross-section increase [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 183: 235–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. WANG Tian-tian, LEE C H, YANG Ming-zhi. Influence of enlarged section parameters on pressure transients of highspeed train passing through a tunnel [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2018, 25(11): 2831–2840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-018-3956-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LIU Tang-hong, CHEN Xiao-dong, LI Wen-hui, et al. Field study on the interior pressure variations in high-speed trains passing through tunnels of different lengths [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 169: 54–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. BAKER C, JOHNSON T, FLYNN D, et al. Chapter 12— Tunnel aerodynamics issues [M]//BAKER C, JOHNSON T, FLYNN D, et al. Train Aerodynamics. ButterworthHeinemann, 2019: 267–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813310-1.00012-5.

  10. NIU Ji-qiang, SUI Yang, YU Qiu-jun, et al. Aerodynamics of railway train/tunnel system: A review of recent research [J]. Energy and Built Environment, 2020, 1(4): 351–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2020.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LI Wen-hui, LIU Tang-hong, CHEN Zheng-wei, et al. Comparative study on the unsteady slipstream induced by a single train and two trains passing each other in a tunnel [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 198: 104095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ANTHOINE J. Alleviation of pressure rise from a high-speed train entering a tunnel [J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(9): 2132–2142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.41109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MIYACHI T, FUKUDA T, SAITO S. Model experiment and analysis of pressure waves emitted from portals of a tunnel with a branch [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2014, 333(23): 6156–6169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.06.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. HENSON D A, FOX J A. First paper: An investigation of the transient flows in tunnel complexes of the type proposed for the channel tunnel [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1974, 188(1): 153–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1243/pime_proc_1974_188_018_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. HENSON D A, FOX J A. Second paper: Application to the channel tunnel of a method of calculating the transient flows in complex tunnel systems [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1974, 188(1): 162–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1243/pime_proc_1974_188_019_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ZHANG Zhi-qiang, ZHANG Heng, TAN Yin-jun, et al. Natural wind utilization in the vertical shaft of a super-long highway tunnel and its energy saving effect [J]. Building and Environment, 2018, 145: 140–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.08.062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. BARON A, MOSSI M, SIBILLA S. The alleviation of the aerodynamic drag and wave effects of high-speed trains in very long tunnels [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001, 89(5): 365–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00071-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. GILBERT T, BAKER C J, QUINN A. Gusts caused by highspeed trains in confined spaces and tunnels [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2013, 121: 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LI Wen-hui, LIU Tang-hong. Three-dimensional characteristics of the slipstream induced by a high-speed train passing through a tunnel [J]. DEStech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, 2017(icia): 502–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12783/dtetr/icia2017/15673.

  20. CEN 14067-3. Railway applications-aerodynamics-Part 3: Aerodynamics in tunnels [S]. 2003.

  21. FEI Rui-zhen, PENG Li-min, SHI Cheng-hua, et al. Characteristics of train wind and analysis of personnel safety in double-line shield tunnel [J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 444–445: 264–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.444-445.264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. CHOI J K, KIM K H. Effects of nose shape and tunnel cross-sectional area on aerodynamic drag of train traveling in tunnels [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 41: 62–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. HEINE D, EHRENFRIED K, KÜHNELT H, et al. Influence of the shape and size of cavities on pressure waves inside high-speed railway tunnels [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 189: 258–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. KHAYRULLINA A, BLOCKEN B, JANSSEN W, et al. CFD simulation of train aerodynamics: Train-induced wind conditions at an underground railroad passenger platform [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2015, 139: 100–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. LUO Jian-jun, MA Wei-bin. Analysis of aerodynamic effect of buffer structure in long tunnel of high speed railway [J]. China Railway Science, 2016, 37(2): 48–55. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. HUANG Yuan-dong, HONG T H, KIM C N. A numerical simulation of train-induced unsteady airflow in a tunnel of Seoul subway [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2012, 26(3): 785–792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-1237-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. HUANG Yuan-dong, GAO Wei, KIM C N. A numerical study of the train-induced unsteady airflow in a subway tunnel with natural ventilation ducts using the dynamic layering method [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics: Ser B, 2010, 22(2): 164–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60042-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. LIANG Xi-feng, CHEN Guang, LI Xiao-bai, et al. Numerical simulation of pressure transients caused by highspeed train passage through a railway station [J]. Building and Environment, 2020, 184: 107228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. CHEN Zheng-wei, LIU Tang-hong, ZHOU Xi-sai, et al. Impact of ambient wind on aerodynamic performance when two trains intersect inside a tunnel [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 169: 139–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.07.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ANGEL J B, BANKS J W, HENSHAW W D. High-order upwind schemes for the wave equation on overlapping grids: Maxwell’s equations in second-order form [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2018, 352: 534–567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.09.037.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. ZHANG Lei, YANG Ming-zhi, LIANG Xi-feng, et al. Oblique tunnel portal effects on train and tunnel aerodynamics based on moving model tests [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 167: 128–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.04.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. CEN 14067-5. Railway applications-aerodynamics-Part 5: Requirements and test procedures for aerodynamics in tunnels [S]. 2010.

  33. LI Wen-hui, LIU Tang-hong, HUO Xiao-shuai, et al. Influence of the enlarged portal length on pressure waves in railway tunnels with cross-section expansion [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 190: 10–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. JIANG Zhen-hua, LIU Tang-hong, CHEN Xiao-dong, et al. Numerical prediction of the slipstream caused by the trains with different marshalling forms entering a tunnel [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 189: 276–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai-wen Wang  (王凯文).

Additional information

Contributors

XUE Ru-dai edited the draft of the manuscript and provide the conceptualization and formal analysis. XIONG Xiao-hui provided supervision and funding acquisition and revised the manuscript. WANG Kai-wen conducted the literature review and edited the manuscript. JIAO Qi-zhu provided the funding acquisition. LI Xiao-bai edited the manuscript. DONG Tian-yun revised the manuscript. WANG Jun-yan revised the manuscript.

Foundation item

Project(2020YFA0710903) supported by the National Key R&D Program of China; Project(2021JJ30849) supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China; Projects(2020zzts111, 2020zzts117) supported by the Graduate Student Independent Innovation Project of Central South University, China; Project(CX20200196) supported by the Graduate Student Independent Innovation Project of Hunan Province, China

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, Rd., Xiong, Xh., Wang, Kw. et al. Influence of variable cross-section on pressure transients and unsteady slipstream in a long tunnel when high-speed train passes through. J. Cent. South Univ. 30, 1027–1046 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-023-5273-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-023-5273-0

Key words

关键词

Navigation