Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction about residual stress and microhardness of material subjected to multiple overlap laser shock processing using artificial neural network

基于人工神经网络的多次搭接激光冲击作用下材料残余应力与显微硬度预测方法

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the nickel-based powder metallurgy superalloy FGH95 was selected as experimental material, and the experimental parameters in multiple overlap laser shock processing (LSP) treatment were selected based on orthogonal experimental design. The experimental data of residual stress and microhardness were measured in the same depth. The residual stress and microhardness laws were investigated and analyzed. Artificial neural network (ANN) with four layers (4-N-(N-1)-2) was applied to predict the residual stress and microhardness of FGH95 subjected to multiple overlap LSP. The experimental data were divided as training-testing sets in pairs. Laser energy, overlap rate, shocked times and depth were set as inputs, while residual stress and microhardness were set as outputs. The prediction performances with different network configuration of developed ANN models were compared and analyzed. The developed ANN model with network configuration of 4-7-6-2 showed the best predict performance. The predicted values showed a good agreement with the experimental values. In addition, the correlation coefficients among all the parameters and the effect of LSP parameters on materials response were studied. It can be concluded that ANN is a useful method to predict residual stress and microhardness of material subjected to LSP when with limited experimental data.

摘要

本文通过人工神经网络方法实现多次搭接激光冲击作用下材料残余应力与显微硬度的预测。以 镍基粉末冶金高温合金FGH95 为实验材料,基于正交实验设计的思路,确定了多次搭接激光冲击强化 的实验参数。利用X射线应力测量仪和显微硬度计分别测量了实验试件激光冲击强化处理前后的残余 应力和显微硬度分布,并对残余应力和显微硬度变化规律进行了简要分析。构建了4 层网络结构(4-N-(N−1)-2)的人工神经网络预测模型,其中输入为激光能量、光斑搭接率、冲击次数和深度,输出为残 余应力和显微硬度。对不同网络结构的预测性能进行了比较和分析。在最优的模型下(网络结构为4-7-6-2),预测值与实验值十分吻合,预测效果极佳。此外,基于人工神经网络的方法,还研究了激光冲 击强化工艺参数对材料响应的影响。研究表明,在实验数据较为缺乏的情况下,人工神经网络是预测 多次搭接激光冲击作用下材料残余应力和显微硬度的有效方法。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SEMBIRING J P B A, AMANOV A, PYUN Y S. Artificial neural network-based prediction model of residual stress and hardness of nickel-based alloys for UNSM parameters optimization [J]. Materials Today Communications, 2020, 25: 101391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. SHEN Xiao-jun, SHUKLA P, SUBRAMANIYAN A K, et al. Residual stresses induced by laser shock peening in orthopaedic Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy [J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2020, 131: 106446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. LU Guo-xin, SOKOL D W, ZHANG Yong-kang, et al. Nanosecond pulsed laser-generated stress effect inducing macro-micro-nano structures and surface topography evolution [J]. Applied Materials Today, 2019, 15: 171–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SADEGHI H, ALITAVOLI M, DARVIZEH A, et al. Dynamic plastic behaviour of strain rate sensitive tubes under axial impact [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 143: 106220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ALIKHANI A, BEYGI R, ZAREZADEH MEHRIZI M, et al. Effect of Mg and Si on intermetallic formation and fracture behavior of pure aluminum-galvanized carbon-steel joints made by weld-brazing [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2021, 28(11): 3626–3638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-021-4880-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ZHU Zhuo, WU Jun-rui, WU Zhi-peng, et al. Femtosecond laser micro/nano fabrication for bioinspired superhydrophobic or underwater superoleophobic surfaces [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2021, 28(12): 3882–3906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-021-4886-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. PAEK U C, GAGLIANO F. Thermal analysis of laser drilling processes [J]. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 1972, 8(2): 112–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1972.1076946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. CHU J P, RIGSBEE J M, BANAŚ G, et al. Laser-shock processing effects on surface microstructure and mechanical properties of low carbon steel [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 1999, 260(1–2): 260–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00889-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ARIF A F M. Numerical prediction of plastic deformation and residual stresses induced by laser shock processing [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003, 136(1–3): 120–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)01122-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. NILSSON N J. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1996, 82(1–2): 369–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. CHEN Lian-wei, YIN Yu-meng, LI Yang, et al. Multifunctional inverse sensing by spatial distribution characterization of scattering photons [J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2019, 2(9): 19001901–19001908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2019.190019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ARTRITH N, URBAN A. An implementation of artificial neural-network potentials for atomistic materials simulations: Performance for TiO2 [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2016, 114: 135–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.11.047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. HUANG Zheng, WU Jia-jun, XIE Feng. Automatic recognition of surface defects for hot-rolled steel strip based on deep attention residual convolutional neural network [J]. Materials Letters, 2021, 293: 129707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. WANG Yu-heng, LOUIE D C, CAI Jia-yue, et al. Deep learning enhances polarization speckle for in vivo skin cancer detection [J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2021, 140: 107006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. MATHEW J, KSHIRSAGAR R, ZABEEN S, et al. Machine learning-based prediction and optimisation system for laser shock peening [J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(7): 2888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11072888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. WU Jia-jun, LI Ying-hao, ZHAO Ji-bin, et al. Prediction of residual stress induced by laser shock processing based on artificial neural networks for FGH4095 superalloy [J]. Materials Letters, 2021, 286: 129269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.129269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ZHOU Liu-cheng, LI Ying-hong, HE Wei-feng, et al. Deforming TC6 titanium alloys at ultrahigh strain rates during multiple laser shock peening [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2013, 578: 181–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Academic Committee of the Superalloys (CSM). China superalloys handbook [M]. Beijing, China: Standards Press of China, 2012. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. TANG Zhang-han, WANG Ke-dian, GENG Yong-xiang, et al. An investigation of the effect of warm laser shock peening on the surface modifications of [001]-oriented DD6 superalloy [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 113(7–8): 1973–1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06763-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. VILD A, TEIXEIRA S, KÜHN K, et al. Orthogonal experimental design of titanium dioxide—Poly(methyl methacrylate) electrospun nanocomposite membranes for photocatalytic applications [J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2016, 4(3): 3151–3158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.06.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DHAKAL B, SWAROOP S. Effect of laser shock peening on mechanical and microstructural aspects of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2020, 282: 116640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. SCHALKOFF R-J. Artificial neural networks [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. YIN Yan-jun. Study of flow law, microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel by selective laser melting [D]. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2019. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. WU Jia-jun, ZHAO Ji-bin, QIAO Hong-chao, et al. A method to determine the material constitutive model parameters of FGH4095 alloy treated by laser shock processing [J]. Applied Surface Science Advances, 2020, 1: 100029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. WANG Cheng-tao, LI Wei, WANG Yu-qiao, et al. Study of electrochemical corrosion on Q235A steel under stray current excitation using combined analysis by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and artificial neural network [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 247: 118562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. GUO Wei, SUN Ru-jian, SONG Bin-wen, et al. Laser shock peening of laser additive manufactured Ti6Al4V titanium alloy [J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2018, 349: 503–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.06.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. GILL A, TELANG A, MANNAVA S R, et al. Comparison of mechanisms of advanced mechanical surface treatments in nickel-based superalloy [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2013, 576: 346–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. QIAO Hong-chao, ZHAO Ji-bin, GAO Yu. Experimental investigation of laser peening on TiAl alloy microstructure and properties [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(2): 609–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2015.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. SUNG A H. Ranking importance of input parameters of neural networks [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 1998, 15(3–4): 405–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(98)00041-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. LU G X, LIU J D, QIAO H C, et al. Microscopic surface topography of a wrought superalloy processed by laser shock peening [J]. Vacuum, 2016, 130: 25–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.04.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Projects(51875558, 51471176) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project (2017YFB1302802) supported by the National Key R&D Program of China

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zheng Huang  (黄钲) or Ji-bin Zhao  (赵吉宾).

Additional information

Contributors

WU Jia-jun developed the overarching research goals and edited the draft of manuscript. HUANG Zheng conducted the literature review and wrote the manuscript. QIAO Hong-chao wrote the manuscript. WEI Bo-xin, ZHAO Yong-jie and LI Jing-feng edited the manuscript. ZHAO Ji-bin validated the proposed method with practical experiments and wrote the first draft of manuscript.

Conflict of interest

WU Jia-jun, HUANG Zheng, QIAO Hong-chao, WEI Bo-xin, ZHAO Yong-jie, LI Jing-feng and ZHAO Ji-bin declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Jj., Huang, Z., Qiao, Hc. et al. Prediction about residual stress and microhardness of material subjected to multiple overlap laser shock processing using artificial neural network. J. Cent. South Univ. 29, 3346–3360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-5158-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-5158-7

Key words

关键词

Navigation