Skip to main content
Log in

Best compromising crashworthiness design of automotive S-rail using TOPSIS and modified NSGAII

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to reduce both the weight of vehicles and the damage of occupants in a crash event simultaneously, it is necessary to perform a multi-objective optimal design of the automotive energy absorbing components. Modified non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA II) was used for multi-objective optimization of automotive S-rail considering absorbed energy (E), peak crushing force (F max) and mass of the structure (W) as three conflicting objective functions. In the multi-objective optimization problem (MOP), E and F max are defined by polynomial models extracted using the software GEvoM based on train and test data obtained from numerical simulation of quasi-static crushing of the S-rail using ABAQUS. Finally, the nearest to ideal point (NIP) method and technique for ordering preferences by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method are used to find the some trade-off optimum design points from all non-dominated optimum design points represented by the Pareto fronts. Results represent that the optimum design point obtained from TOPSIS method exhibits better trade-off in comparison with that of optimum design point obtained from NIP method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ABDEL-NASSER Y A. Frontal crash simulation of vehicles against lighting columns using FEM [J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2013, 52(3): 295–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ATAHAN A O, YÜCEL A Ö, ERDEM M M. Crash testing and evaluation of a new generation L1 containment level guardrail [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2014, 38: 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. BELINGARDI G, BORIA S, OBRADOVIC J. Energy absorbing sacrificial structures made of composite materials for vehicle crash design [J]. Dynamic Failure of Composite and Sandwich Structures, 2013, 192: 577–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. PAWLUS W, KARIMI H R, ROBBERSMYR K G. Mathematical modeling of a vehicle crash test based on elasto-plastic unloading scenarios of spring-mass models [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 55(1/2/3/4): 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. OHKAMI Y, TAKADA K, MOTOMURA K, SHIMAMURA M. Collapse of thin-walled curved beam with closed-hat section—Part 1: Study on collapse characteristics [J]. SAE Paper, 1990, doi: 10.42711900460.

    Google Scholar 

  6. KIM H S, WIERZBICKI T. Effect of the cross-sectional shape on crash behavior of a 3-D space frame [R]. Impact and Crashworthiness Laboratory Report No. 34, May 2000, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  7. HAN J, YAMAZAKI K. Crashworthiness optimization of S-shape square tubes [J]. Int J Vehicle Design, 2013, 31(1): 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. KIM H S, WIERZBICKI T. Closed-form solution for crushing response of three-dimensional thin-walled S frames with rectangular section [J]. Int J Impact Engineering, 2004, 30: 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. KHAKHALI A, DARVIZEH A, MASOUMI A, NARIMAN-ZADEH N. Experimental and numerical investigation into the quasi-static crushing behaviour of the S-shape square tubes [J]. Journal of Mechanics, 2011, 27(4): 585–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. KHALKHALI A, AGHA HOSSEINALI SHIRAZI V, MOHSENI KABIR M. Closed-form solution for peak crushing force of the S-rails [J]. International Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2013, 3(2): 446–456.

    Google Scholar 

  11. COLLETTE Y, SIARRY P. Multiobjective optimization: Principles and case studies (decision engineering) [M]. Germany, Berlin, Heidelberg Springer, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  12. KALYANMOY D E B. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms [M]. 1st ed. United States Wiley, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. NARIMAN-ZADEH N, DARVIZEH A, JAMALI A. Pareto optimization of energy absorption of square aluminum columns using multi-objective genetic algorithms [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Part B- Int J Engineering Manufacture, 2006, 220(2): 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ETGHANI M M, SHOJAEEFARD M H, KHALKHALI A, AKBARI M. A hybrid method of modified NSGA-II and TOPSIS to optimize performance and emissions of a diesel engine using biodiesel [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 59: 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. KHALKHALI A, KHAKSHOURNIA S, NARIMAN-ZADEH N. A hybrid method of FEM, modified NSGAII and TOPSIS for structural optimization of sandwich panels with corrugated core [J]. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 2014, DOI: 10.1177/1099636214531516.

    Google Scholar 

  16. KHALKHALI A, SAFIKHANI H. Pareto based multi-objective optimization of cyclone vortex finder using CFD, GMDH type neural networks and genetic algorithms [J]. Engineering Optimization, 2012, 44(1): 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. KHALKHALI A, FARAJPOOR M, SAFIKHANI H. Modeling and multi-objective optimization of forward-curved blades centrifugal fans using CFD and neural networks [J]. Transaction of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 35(1): 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SAFIKHANI H, KHALKHALI A, FARAJPOOR M. Pareto based multi-objective optimization of centrifugal pumps using CFD, neural networks and genetic algorithms [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 2011, 5(1): 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. FARLOW S J. Self-organizing method in modeling: GMDH type algorithm [M]. Boca Raton: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ARORA. Introduction to optimum design [M]. 3rd ed. Waltham: Academic Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. TANG K S, CHAN T M, YIN R J, MAN K F. Multiobjective optimization methodology: A jumping gene approach (industrial electronics) [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ZBIGNIEW MICHALEWICZ. Genetic algorithms+data structures=evolution programs [M]. Springer, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  23. DAN SIMON. Evolutionary optimization algorithms [M]. 1st ed. United States: Wiley, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  24. GOLDBERG D E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning [M]. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abolfazl Khalkhali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalkhali, A. Best compromising crashworthiness design of automotive S-rail using TOPSIS and modified NSGAII. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 121–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2502-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2502-1

Key words

Navigation