Skip to main content
Log in

Recent developments on applications of sequential loop closing and diagonal dominance control schemes to industrial multivariable system

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With a focus on an industrial multivariable system, two subsystems including the flow and the level outputs are analysed and controlled, which have applicability in both real and academic environments. In such a case, at first, each subsystem is distinctively represented by its model, since the outcomes point out that the chosen models have the same behavior as corresponding ones. Then, the industrial multivariable system and its presentation are achieved in line with the integration of these subsystems, since the interaction between them can not actually be ignored. To analyze the interaction presented, the Gershgorin bands need to be acquired, where the results are used to modify the system parameters to appropriate values. Subsequently, in the view of modeling results, the control concept in two different techniques including sequential loop closing control (SLCC) scheme and diagonal dominance control (DDC) schemes is proposed to implement on the system through the Profibus network, as long as the OPC (OLE for process control) server is utilized to communicate between the control schemes presented and the multivariable system. The real test scenarios are carried out and the corresponding outcomes in their present forms are acquired. In the same way, the proposed control schemes results are compared with each other, where the real consequences verify the validity of them in the field of the presented industrial multivariable system control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LEE S, YEOM S, LEE K S. Methods for performance monitoring and diagnosis of multivariable model-based control systems [J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2004, 21(3): 575–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. OU-YANG C, JUAN Y. Applying process mining approach to support the verification of a multi-agent system [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2010, 19(2): 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. RUSANOV V A, DANEEV A V, KUMENKO A E, SHARPINSKIY D Y. On existence of non-stationary realization of a linear multivariable control system [C]// In Proc 19th International Conference on Systems Engineering. Las Vegas, 2008: 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. SUN J, WANG S, FU Z. Process capability analysis and estimation scheme for autocorrelated data [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2010: 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  5. HARRIS T J, YU W. Analysis of multivariable controllers using degree of freedom data [J]. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 2003, 17: 569–588.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. SALGADO M, OYARZUN D. Double objective optimal multivariable ripple-free deadbeat control [J]. International Journal of Control, 2007, 80(5): 763–773.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. OYARZUN D, SALGADO M. Optimal triangular approximation for linear stable multivariable systems [C]// In Proc of American Control Conference. New York, USA, 2007: 5158–5153.

    Google Scholar 

  8. HU T, KIM W J. Modeling and multivariable control of a novel multi-dimensional levitated stage with high precision [J]. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2006, 4(1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. JOSHI A A, KIM W J. Modeling and multivariable control design methodology for hexapod-based satellite vibration isolation [J]. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 2005, 127(4): 700–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. JOSHI A A, KIM W J. System identification and multivariable control design for a satellite ultraquiet isolation technology experiment [J]. European Journal of Control, 2004, 10(2): 174–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. KIM W J. Nanoscale dynamics, stochastic modeling, and multivariable control of planar magnetic levitator [J]. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2003, 1(2): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. VEERACHARY M. Optimal control strategy for a current source inverter fed induction motor [J]. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2002, 28(4): 255–267.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. MAZINAN A H, SADATI N. Fuzzy multiple models predictive control of tubular heat exchanger [C]// In Proc of IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. Hong Kong, 2008: 1845–1852.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MAZINAN A H, SADATI N. Multiple modeling and fuzzy predictive control of a tubular heat exchanger system [J]. Transaction on Systems and Control, 2008, 3: 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  15. MAZINAN A H, SADATI N. Fuzzy multiple modeling and fuzzy predictive control of a tubular heat exchanger system [C]// International Conference on Application of Electrical Engineering. Stevens Point, 2008: 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MAZINAN A H, SADATI N. Fuzzy multiple modeling and fuzzy predictive control of a tubular heat exchanger system [C]// 7th WSEAS International Conference on Robotics, Control and Manufacturing Technology. Stevens Point, 2008: 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  17. MAZINAN A H, SADATI N. Fuzzy predictive control based multiple models strategy for a tubular heat exchanger system [J]. Applied Intelligence, 2010, 33: 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MAZINAN A H, SADATI N. An intelligent multiple models based predictive control scheme with its application to industrial tubular heat exchanger system [J]. Applied Intelligence, 2011, 34: 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MAZINAN A H, SADATI N, AHMADI-NOUBARI H. A case study for fuzzy adaptive multiple models predictive control strategy [C]// In Proc of IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Seoul, 2009: 1172–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  20. PRASAD R. Pade type model order reduction for multivariable systems using routh approximation [J]. Computer and Electrical Engineering, 2000, 26: 445–459.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. PARK P. A delay-dependent stability criterion for systems with uncertain time-invarient delays [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic control, 1999, 44(4): 876–877.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. YOU Wei, KONG Min-xiu, SUN Li-ning. Optimal design of dynamic and control performance for planar manipulator [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(1): 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. LI Yi-guo, SHEN Jiong, LEE K Y. Data-driven nonlinear control of a solid oxide fuel cell system [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(7): 1892–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. GU Jun, SEWARD D. Improved control of intelligent excavator using proportional-integral-plus gain scheduling [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(2): 384–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. H. Mazinan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazinan, A.H., Kazemi, M.F. Recent developments on applications of sequential loop closing and diagonal dominance control schemes to industrial multivariable system. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 3401–3420 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1865-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1865-4

Key words

Navigation