Skip to main content
Log in

Methods for performance monitoring and diagnosis of multivariable model-based control systems

  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methods for performance monitoring and diagnosis of multivariable closed loop systems have been proposed aiming at application to model predictive control systems for industrial processes. For performance monitoring, the well-established traditional statistical process control method is empolyed. To meet the underlying premise that the observed variable is univariate and statistically independent, a temporal and spatial decorrelation procedure for process variables has been suggested. For diagnosis of control performance deterioration, a method to estimate the model-error and disturbance signal has been devised. This method enables us to identify the cause of performance deterioration among the controller, process, and disturbance. The proposed methods were evaluated through numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Box, G. and Luceno, A., “Statistical Control by Monitoring and Feedback,” John Wiley, NY (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. J., “Assessment of Control Loop Performance,”Can. J. Chem. Engng.,67(10), 856 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. J., Boudreau, F. and MacGregor, J. F, “Performance Assessment of Multivariable Feedback Controllers,”Automatica,32, 1505 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, B., Shah, S. L. and Kwok, E. K., “On-Line Control Performance Monitoring of MIMO Processes,” Proc. ACC, 1250–1254 (1995).

  • Huang, B., “Multivariable Statistical Methods for Control Loop Performance Assessment,” Ph.D thesis, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesavan, P. and Lee, J. H., “Diagnostic Tools for Multivariable Model-Based Control Systems,”Ind. Eng. Chem.,36, 2725 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kozub, D. J. and Garcia, C. E., “Monitoring and Diagnosis of Automated Controllers in the Chemical Process Industries,” 1993 AIChE Annual Meeting, Nov. (1993).

  • Ljung, L., “System Identification: Theory for the User,” Prentice-Hall, NJ (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamzic, C. L. (ed.), “Statistical Process Control,” ISA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matrikon homepage, www.matrikon.com (2003).

  • Overschee, P. Van and DeMoore, B., “N4SID: Subspace Algorithms for the Identification of Combined Deterministic-Stochastic Systems,”Automatica,30, 75 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, W. F, “Computational Methods for Process Simulation,” 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Boulder, CO (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, S. J., “Control Performance Monitoring - a Review and Assessment,”Comp. Chem. Engng.,23, 173 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, S. J. and Badgwell, T A., “A Survey of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology,”Control Eng. Practice,11, 733 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanfelj, N, Marlin, T. E. and MacGregor, J. F, “Monitoring and Diagnosing Process Control Performance: the Single-loop Case,”Ind. Eng. Chem.,32, 301 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang Soon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S., Yeom, S. & Lee, K.S. Methods for performance monitoring and diagnosis of multivariable model-based control systems. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 21, 575–581 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705490

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705490

Key words

Navigation