Skip to main content
Log in

Real-time reliability evaluation based on damaged measurement degradation data

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method was proposed to evaluate the real-time reliability for a single product based on damaged measurement degradation data. Most researches on degradation analysis often assumed that the measurement process did not have any impact on the product’s performance. However, in some cases, the measurement process may exert extra stress on products being measured. To obtain trustful results in such a situation, a new degradation model was derived. Then, by fusing the prior information of product and its own on-line degradation data, the real-time reliability was evaluated on the basis of Bayesian formula. To make the proposed method more practical, a procedure based on expectation maximization (EM) algorithm was presented to estimate the unknown parameters. Finally, the performance of the proposed method was illustrated by a simulation study. The results show that ignoring the influence of the damaged measurement process can lead to biased evaluation results, if the damaged measurement process is involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ELWANG A, GEBRAEEL N Z. Real-time estimation of mean remaining life using sensor-based degradation models [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2009, 131(5): 0510051–0510059.

    Google Scholar 

  2. LIAO Chen-mao, TSENG S T. Optimal design for step-stress accelerated degradation tests [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2006, 55(1): 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ZHAO Jian-yin, LIU Fang. Reliability assessment of the metallized film capacitors from degradation data [J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2007, 47(2): 434–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LU J C, JINHO P, QING Y. Statistical inference of a time-to-failure distribution derived from linear degradation data [J]. Technometrics, 1997, 39(4): 391–400.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. GEBRAEEL N Z, LAWLEY M A, LI R, RYAN J K. Residual-life distributions from component degradation signals: A Bayesian approach [J]. IIE Transactions, 2005, 37(6): 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. GEBRAEEL N Z. Sensory-updated residual life distributions for components with exponential degradation patterns [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2006, 3(4): 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LU J C, MEEKER W Q. Using degradation measures to estimate a time-to-failure distribution [J]. Technometrics, 1993, 35(2): 161–174.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. WANG Wen-bin. A model to determine the optimal critical level and the monitoring intervals in condition-based maintenance [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2000, 38(6): 1425–1436.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. BAE S J, KVAM P H. A nonlinear random-coefficients model for degradation [J]. Technometrics, 2004, 46(4): 460–469.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. YUAN X X, PANDEY M D. A nonlinear mixed-effects model for degradation data obtained from in-service inspections [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94(2): 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. SI Xiao-sheng, WANG Wen-bin, HU Chang-hua, ZHOU Dong-hua. Remaining useful life estimation-A review on the statistical data driven approaches [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 213(1): 1–14.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. PANDEY M D, YUAN X X, NOORTWIJK J M. The influence of temporal uncertainty of deterioration on life-cycle management of structures [J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2009, 5(2): 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. YANG Kai, XUE Jian-an. Continuous state reliability analysis [C]// Proceedings of the Annual Reliability & Maintainability Symposium. Las Vegas: Elsevier, 1996: 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  14. ZUO Ming-jian, JIANG Ren-yan, YAM R. Approaches for reliability modeling of continuous-state devices [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1999, 48(1): 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. HUANG Wei. Reliability analysis considering product performance degradation [D]. The University of Arizona, 2002.

  16. NOORTWIJK J M, FRANGOPOL D M. Two probabilistic life-cycle maintenance models for deteriorating civil infrastructures [J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 19(4): 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. NOORTWIJK J M, WEIDE J A M, KALLEN M J, PANDEY M D. Gamma processes and peaks-over-threshold distributions for time-dependent reliability [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92(12): 1651–1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. NOORTWIJK J M. A survey of the application of Gamma processes in maintenance [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94(1): 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. TSENG S T, BALAKRISHNAN N, TSAI C C. Optimal step-stress accelerated degradation test plan for gamma degradation processes [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2009, 58(4): 611–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. WHITMORE G A. Estimating degradation by a wiener diffusion process subject to measurement error [J]. Lifetime Data Analysis, 1995, 1(3): 307–319.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. WANG Xiao. Wiener processes with random effects for degradation data [J]. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 2010, 101(2): 340–351.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. ROSS S M. Introduction to probability models [M]. New York: Academic Press, 2000: 625–662.

    Google Scholar 

  23. BAI J M, LI Z H, KONG X B. Generalized shock models based on a cluster point process [J]. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 2006, 55(3): 542–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WANG Zhong-lai, HUANG Hong-zhong, DU Li. Reliability analysis on competitive failure processes under fuzzy degradation data [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2011, 11(3): 2964–2973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. PANDEY M D, YUAN X X, NOORTWIJK, J M. The influence of temporal uncertainty of deterioration on life-cycle management of structures [J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2009, 5(2): 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. CHINNAM R B. On-line reliability estimation for individual components using statistical degradation signal models [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2002, 18(1): 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. DEMPSTER A P, LAIRD N M, RUBIN D B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1977, 39(1): 1–38.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. XU An-cha, TANG Yin-cai. EM algorithm for degradation data analysis [J]. Journal of East China Normal University, 2010, 5(5): 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-lin Wang  (王小林).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(60904002) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Xl., Jiang, P., Guo, B. et al. Real-time reliability evaluation based on damaged measurement degradation data. J. Cent. South Univ. 19, 3162–3169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1391-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1391-9

Key words

Navigation