Skip to main content
Log in

Global optimization by small-world optimization algorithm based on social relationship network

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fast global convergence algorithm, small-world optimization (SWO), was designed to solve the global optimization problems, which was inspired from small-world theory and six degrees of separation principle in sociology. Firstly, the solution space was organized into a small-world network model based on social relationship network. Secondly, a simple search strategy was adopted to navigate into this network in order to realize the optimization. In SWO, the two operators for searching the short-range contacts and long-range contacts in small-world network were corresponding to the exploitation and exploration, which have been revealed as the common features in many intelligent algorithms. The proposed algorithm was validated via popular benchmark functions and engineering problems. And also the impacts of parameters were studied. The simulation results indicate that because of the small-world theory, it is suitable for heuristic methods to search targets efficiently in this constructed small-world network model. It is not easy for each test mail to fall into a local trap by shifting into two mapping spaces in order to accelerate the convergence speed. Compared with some classical algorithms, SWO is inherited with optimal features and outstanding in convergence speed. Thus, the algorithm can be considered as a good alternative to solve global optimization problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LINHARES A. preying on optima: A predatory search strategy for combinatorial problems [C]//Proceedings of the Proc IEEE Int Conf Syst. San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE, 1998, 8(11/12/13/14): 2974–2978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. SUN Yi, DAAN W, TOM S, JUERGEN S. Efficient natural evolution strategies [C]// Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO’ 09). New York, USA: ACM, 2009: 539–546.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. HOLLAND J H. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence [M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1975: 1–211.

    Google Scholar 

  4. SU Guo-shao, ZHANG Xiao-fei, CHEN Guang-qiang, FU Xing-yi. Identification of structure and parameters of rheological constitutive model for rocks using differential evolution algorithm [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2008, 15(s1): 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ANAGNOSTOPOULOS A, MICHEL L, VAN P, VERGADOS Y. A simulated annealing approach to the traveling tournament problem [J]. Journal of Scheduling, 2006, 9(2): 177–193.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. GLOVER F. Heuristics for integer programming using surrogate constraints [J]. Decision Sciences, 1977, 8: 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MAHDIYEH E, HUSSAIN S, AZAH M. Power system stabilizer design using hybrid multi-objective particle swarm optimization with chaos [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(5): 1579–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DORIGO M, MANIEZZO V, COLORNI A. Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents [J]. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern, 1996, 26(1): 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. KARABOGA D, BASTURK B. A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm [J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2007, 39(3): 459–471.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. GU Yun-li, XU Xin, DU Jie, QIAN Huan-yan, Optimization algorithm based on artificial life algorithm and particle swarm optimization [C]// Second International Conference on Information and Computing Science. Manchester: IEEE Press, 2009: 173–176.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. NGUYEN T T, YAO X. An experimental study of hybridizing cultural algorithms and local search [J]. Int J Neural Syst, 2008, 18(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MASSIMO F, RONALD M. Navigation in small-world networks: A scale-free continuum model [J]. Journal of Applied Probability, 2006, 43(4): 1173–1180.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. TRAVERS J, MILGRAM S. An experimental study of the small-world problem [J]. Sociometry, 1969, 32(4): 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks [J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. STROGATZ S H. Exploring complex networks [J]. Nature, 2001, 410(6825): 268–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. KLEINBERG J M. The small-world phenomenon: An algorithmic perspective [R]. Cornell Computer Science Technical Report. New York: ACM, 1999: 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  17. WATTS D J, DODDS P S, NEWMAN M E J. Identity and search in social networks [J]. Science, 2002, 296(5571): 1302–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. WALSH T. Search in a small world [C]// Ijcai-99: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1999: 1172–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  19. CHEN Jian-zhen, LIU Wei, ZHU Jian-yang. Two-dimensional small-world networks: Navigation with local information [J]. Phys Rev E, 2006, 73(5): 56111–56117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. CUI Zhi-hua, CHU Yong-fang, CAI Xing-juan. Nearest Neighbor Interaction PSO Based on Small-World Model [J]. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, 2009, 5788: 633–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DU Hai-feng, ZHUANG Jian, ZHANG Jin-hua, WANG Sun-an. Small-world phenomenon for function optimization [J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2005, 39(9): 1011–1015. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. LI Xiao-hu, ZHANG Jin-hua, WANG Sun-an, LI Mao-lin, LI Kun-peng. A small world algorithm for high-dimensional function optimization [C]// Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation (CIRA’09). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 2009: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  23. WANG Shuang-xin, LIU Hai-rui, DONG Yang. Constrained model predictive control based on chaotic small-world optimization algorithm [C]// Proceedings of the 18th IFAC, World Congress, Milano, Italy, 2011: 134–142.

  24. YANG Xin-yan, WANG Xiao-hua. Decentralized small-world optimization strategy [J]. Journal of Suzhou University: Engineering Science Edition, 2007, 3(11): 41–46. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. WANG Xiao-fan, LI Xiang, CHENG Guan-rong. Complex network theory and its applications [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2006: 46–52. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. KLEINBERG J M. Navigation in a small world-It is easier to find short chains between points in some networks than others [J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6798): 845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. SHARMA B D, KHANN R K. On m-ary Gray codes [J]. Information Sciences, 1978, 15(1): 31–43.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. ZHAO Cheng-lin, SUN Xue-bin, SUN Song-lin, JIANG Ting. Fault diagnosis of sensor by chaos particle swarm optimization algorithm and support vector machine [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(8): 9908–9912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. PRICE K V. Differential evolution: A fast and simple numerical optimizer [C]// 1996 Biennial Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society. Nafips: IEEE Press, 1996, 524–527.

    Google Scholar 

  30. EBERHART R C, SHI Y. Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization [C]// Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. La Jollai: IEEE Press, 2000: 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  31. JIAO Li-cheng, DU Hai-feng, LIU Fang, GONG Mao-guo. Immunological computation for optimization, learning and recognition [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2006: 58–118. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  32. LEUNG Yiu-Wing, WANG Yu-ping. An orthogonal genetic algorithm with quantization for global numerical optimization [J]. IEEE T Evolut Comput, 2001, 5(1): 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. MADSEN K. Nonlinear approximation and engineering design [EB/OL]. [2006-12-21]. http://www2immdtudk/~km/GlobOpt/testex/testproblemshtml.Denmark.

  34. DU Hai-feng, WU Xiao-dong, ZHUANG Jian. Small-world optimization algorithm for function optimization [J]. Advances in Natural Computation, 2006, 4222(2006): 264–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. FANG Wei, SUN Jun, XU Wen-bo. A new mutated quantum-behaved particle swarm optimizer for digital IIR filter design [J]. Eurasip J Adv Sig Pr, 2009, 2009: 367465.

    Google Scholar 

  36. LIANG J J, SUGANTHAN P N, DEB K. Novel composition test functions for numerical global optimization [C]// 2005 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium. Pasadena: IEEE Press, 2005: 68–75.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. DODDS P S, MUHAMAD R, WATTS D J. An experimental study of search in global social networks [J]. Science, 2003, 301(5634): 827–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. JARBOUI B, IBRAHIM S, SIARRY P, REBAI A. A combinatorial particle swarm optimization for solving permutation flowshop problems [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2008, 54(3): 526–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. HUANG Gang, TIAN Zhi-peng, SHAO Xin-yu, LI Jin-hang. Small world optimization for multiple objects optimization of mixed-model assembly sequencing problem [M]//GRZECHCA W. Assembly Line-Theory and Practice: Intech, 2011: 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  40. TAILLARD E. Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1993, 64(2): 278–285.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. RUIZ R, MAROTO C, ALCARAZ J. Two new robust genetic algorithms for the flowshop scheduling problem [J]. Omega, 2006, 34(5): 461–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. LIAN Zhi-gang, GU Xing-sheng, JIAO Bin. A novel particle swarm optimization algorithm for permutation flow-shop scheduling to minimize makespan [J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2008, 35(5): 851–861.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. ZHANG Chang-sheng, NING Jia-xu, OUYANG Dan-tong. A hybrid alternate two phases particle swarm optimization algorithm for flow shop scheduling problem [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010, 58(1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-hang Li  (李晋航).

Additional information

Foundation item: Projects(51105157, 50875101) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(2009AA043301) supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Jh., Shao, Xy., Long, Ym. et al. Global optimization by small-world optimization algorithm based on social relationship network. J. Cent. South Univ. 19, 2247–2265 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1269-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1269-x

Key words

Navigation