Skip to main content
Log in

Influence factors analysis of removing heavy metals from multiple metal-contaminated soils with different extractants

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some key factors on the heavy metals removal efficiencies were studied when soil washing technology was used in the remediation of soils contaminated by multiple heavy metals. The results show that the dissolubilities of Cu and Zn are promoted by humic acids, but Pb and Cd are inhibited by humic acids; heavy metals in the clay are more difficult to be extracted than silt; the strong acidic soils can cause the protonation of EDTA and weaken its extracting ability; EDTA is effective for extracting Pb and Cd, while oxalate (OX) is effective for extracting Cu and Zn; and biosurfactant can be used as additive to improve the removal of some particular heavy metals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CICCU R, GHIANI M, SERCI A, FADDA S, PERETTI R, ZUCC A. Heavy metal immobilization in the mining-contaminated soils using various industrial wastes [J]. Miner Eng, 2003, 16(3): 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. LIU Yun-guo, ZHANG Hui-zhi, ZENG Guang-ming, HUANG Bao-rong, LI Xin, XU Wei-hua. Characteristics of tailings from the metal mines in Hunan Province, China [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2005, 12(2): 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LESTAN D, LUO C L, LI X D. The use of chelating agents in the remediation of metal-contaminated soils: A review [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2008, 153(1): 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ZHANG W H, TSANG D C W, LO I M C. Removal of Pb by EDTA—washing in the presence of hydrophobic organic contaminants or anionic surfactant [J] Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 155(3): 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. BARONA A, ARANGUIZ I, ELIAS A. Metal associations in soils before and after EDTA extractive decontamination: Implications for the effectiveness of further clean-up procedures [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2001, 113(1): 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MAKKINA T, TAKANO H, KAMIYA T, ITOU T, SEKIYA N, INAHARA M, SAKURAI Y. Restoration of cadmium-contaminated paddy soils by washing with ferric chloride: Cd extraction mechanism and bench-scale verification. [J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 70(6): 1035–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. KEDZIOREK M A M, BOURG A C M. Solubilization of lead and cadmium during the percolation of EDTA through a soil polluted by smelting activities [J]. Contam Hydrol, 2000, 40(4): 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ELLIOTT H A, SHASTRI L. Extractive decontamination of metal-polluted soils using oxalate [J]. Water Air Soil Pollut, 1999, 110(3): 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. XI Dan-li. Environment monitoring of China [M]. Beijing: Science and Environment Literature Press, 1992: 56–79. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. CHANG C S W, HUANG C C, WANG M C. Analytical and spectroscopic characteristics of refuse compost-derived humic substances [J]. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 2003, 1(1): 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  11. CLEMENTE R, WALKER D J, ROIG A, BERNAL M P. Heavy metal bioavailability in a soil affected by mineral sulphides contamination following the mine spillage at Aznalco’llar (Spain) [J]. Biodegradation, 2003, 14(3): 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. LO I M C, YANG X Y. EDTA extraction of heavy metal from different soil fraction and synthetic soils [J]. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 1999, 109(1): 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ZHUANG J, YU G R, LIU X Y. Characteristics of lead sorption on clay minerals in relation to metal oxides [J]. Pedosphere, 2000, 10(1): 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. NÚÑEZ-LÓPEZ R A, MEAS Y, GAMA S C, BORGES R O, OLGUIN E J. Leaching of lead by ammonium salts and EDTA from Salvinia minima biomass produced during aquatic phytoremediation [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 154(2): 623–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ORTEGA L M, LEBRUN R, BLAIS J F, HAUSLER R, DROGUI P. Effectiveness of soil washing, nanofiltration and electrochemical treatment for the recovery of metal ions coming from a contaminated soil [J]. Water Research, 2008, 42(8): 1943–1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LO I M C, ZHANG W. Study on the optimal conditions for the recovery of EDTA from soil washing effluents [J]. Environ Eng, 2005, 131(11): 1507–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MULLIGAN C N, YONG R N, GIBBS B F, JAMES S, BENNETT H P J. Metal removal from contaminated soil and sediments by the biosurfactant surfactant [J]. Environment Science and Technology, 1999, 33(21): 3812–3820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-guo Liu  (刘云国).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(20050532009) supported by the Doctoral Foundation of Ministry of Education of China; Projects(2006BAD03A1704, 2006BAD03A1706) supported by the National 11th-Five Technology Supporting Project

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xia, Wb., Li, X., Gao, H. et al. Influence factors analysis of removing heavy metals from multiple metal-contaminated soils with different extractants. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 16, 108–111 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-009-0018-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-009-0018-2

Key words

Navigation