Abstract
As the major source of air pollution, sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions have become the focus of global attention. However, existing studies rarely consider spatial effects when discussing the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and SO2 emissions. This study took the Yangtze River Delta as the research area and used the spatial panel data of 26 cities in this region for 2004–2017. The study investigated the spatial agglomeration effects and dynamics at work in FDI and SO2 emissions by using global and local measures of spatial autocorrelation. Then, based on regression analysis using a results of traditional ordinary least squares (OLS) model and a spatial econometric model, the spatial Durbin model (SDM) with spatial-time effects was adopted to quantify the impact of FDI on SO2 emissions, so as to avoid the regression results bias caused by ignoring the spatial effects. The results revealed a significant spatial autocorrelation between FDI and SO2 emissions, both of which displayed obvious path dependence characteristics in their geographical distribution. A series of agglomeration regions were observed on the spatial scale. The estimation results of the SDM showed that FDI inflow promoted SO2 emissions, which supports the pollution haven hypothesis. The findings of this study are significant in the prevention and control of air pollution in the Yangtze River Delta.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbostanc E, Türüt-Aşık S, Tunç G İ, 2009. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy, 37(3): 861–867. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.088
Albornoz F, Cole M A, Elliott R J R et al., 2014. The environmental actions of firms: examining the role of spillovers, networks and absorptive capacity. Journal of Environmental Management, 146: 150–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.011
Asghari M, 2013. Does FDI promote MENA region’s environment quality? Pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences, 1(6): 92–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.12983/ijsres-2013-p092-100
Baek J, 2016. A new look at the FDI-income-energy-environment nexus: dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy, 91: 22–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.045
Bakhsh K, Rose S, Ali M F et al., 2017. Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: new evidences from 3SLS. Journal of Environmental Management, 196: 627–632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.029
Birdsall N, Wheeler D, 1993. Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens? The Journal of Environment & Development, 2(1): 137–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/107049659300200107
Chen S M, Zhang Y, Zhang Y B et al., 2019. The relationship between industrial restructuring and China’s regional haze pollution: a spatial spillover perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239: 115808. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.078
Chen X Y, Shao S, Tian Z H et al., 2017. Impacts of air pollution and its spatial spillover effect on public health based on China’s big data sample. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142: 915–925. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.119
Chudnovsky D, López A, 2007. Foreign direct investment and development: the MERCOSUR experience. CEPAL Review, 92: 7–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.18356/121766cf-en
Eskeland G S, Harrison A E, 2003. Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1): 1–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00084-6
He J, 2006. Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: the case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecological Economics, 60(1): 228–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.008
Hoffmann R, Lee C G, Ramasamy B et al., 2005. FDI and pollution: a granger causality test using panel data. Journal of International Development, 17(3): 311–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1196
Hu Zhiqiang, Miao Jianming, Miao Changhong, 2016. Agglomeration characteristics of industrial pollution and their influencing factors on the scale of cities in China. Geographical Research, 35(8): 1470–1482. (in Chinese)
Jiang L, Zhou H F, Bai L et al., 2018. Does foreign direct investment drive environmental degradation in China? An empirical study based on air quality index from a spatial perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176: 864–872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.048
Letchumanan R, Kodama F, 2000. Reconciling the conflict between the ‘pollution-haven’ hypothesis and an emerging trajectory of international technology transfer. Research Policy, 29(1): 59–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00033-5
Levinson A, Taylor M S, 2008. Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International Economic Review, 49(1): 223–254. doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w10629
Liang F H, 2017. Does foreign direct investment improve the productivity of domestic firms? Technology spillovers, industry linkages, and firm capabilities. Research Policy, 46(1): 138–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.08.007
Liu Y S, Lu S S, Chen Y F, 2013. Spatio-temporal change of urban-rural equalized development patterns in China and its driving factors. Journal of Rural Studies, 32: 320–330. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.08.004
Liu Q Q, Wang S J, Zhang W Z et al., 2018. Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China’s cities? A spatial econometric perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 613: 521–529.
Manderson E, Kneller R, 2012. Environmental regulations, outward FDI and heterogeneous firms: are countries used as pollution havens? Environmental and Resource Economics, 51(3): 317–352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9500-z
Mielnik O, Goldemberg J, 2002. Foreign direct investment and decoupling between energy and gross domestic product in developing countries. Energy Policy, 30(2): 87–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00080-5
NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2005–2018. China City Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
Poon J P H, Casas I, He C F, 2006. The impact of energy, transport, and trade on air pollution in China. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47(5): 568–584. doi: https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.47.5.568
Shen J, Wei Y D, Yang Z, 2017. The impact of environmental regulations on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148: 785–794. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.050
Sheng B, Lü Y, 2012. Impact of foreign direct investment on China’s environment: an empirical study based on industrial panel data. Social Sciences in China, 33(4): 89–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2012.735899
UNCTAD, 2019. World Investment Report 2019. Available at: https://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=2460. Cited 12 June 2019.
Walter I, Ugelow J L, 1979. Environmental policies in developing countries. AMBIO, 8(2–3): 102–109.
Wang Guoxia, Shi Xiaowei, Cui Haiyan et al., 2020. Impacts of migration on urban environmental pollutant emissions in China: a comparative perspective. Chinese Geographical Science, 30(1): 45–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1096-1
Wang H, Dong C G, Liu Y, 2019a. Beijing direct investment to its neighbors: a pollution haven or pollution halo effect? Journal of Cleaner Production, 239: 118062. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118062
Wang S J, Zhou C S, Wang Z B et al., 2017. The characteristics and drivers of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) distribution in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142: 1800–1809. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.104
Wang X Y, Zhang C T, Zhang Z J, 2019b. Pollution haven or porter? The impact of environmental regulation on location choices of pollution-intensive firms in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 248: 109248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.019
Wu Xing, 2016. The new changes of China-Japan relations after China’s GDP surpassed Japan. Academic Exploration, 2: 25–31. (in Chinese)
Xiao Q Y, Geng G N, Liang F C et al., 2020. Changes in spatial patterns of PM2.5 pollution in China 2000–2018: impact of clean air policies. Environment International, 141: 105776. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105776
Xu F, Xiang N, Higano Y, 2017. How to reach haze control targets by air pollutants emission reduction in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China? PLoS One, 12(3): e0173612. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173612
Xu W X, Sun J Q, Liu Y X et al., 2019. Spatiotemporal variation and socioeconomic drivers of air pollution in China during 2005–2016. Journal of Environmental Management, 245: 66–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.041
Yan M, An Z, 2017. Foreign direct investment and environmental pollution: new evidence from China. Econometrics Letters, 4(1): 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.5455/ELET.2017.4.1.1
Yang W Y, Li T, Cao X S, 2015. Examining the impacts of socioeconomic factors, urban form and transportation development on CO2 emissions from transportation in China: a panel data analysis of China’s provinces. Habitat International, 49: 212–220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.030
Yang Zhen, Zhang Xiaolei, Lei Jun et al., 2019. Spatio-temporal pattern characteristics of relationship between urbanization and economic development at county level in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 29(4): 553–567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1053-z
Yu H Y, 2012. The influential factors of China’s regional energy intensity and its spatial linkages: 1988–2007. Energy Policy, 45: 583–593. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.009
Yu S W, Zhang J J, Zheng S H et al., 2015. Provincial carbon intensity abatement potential estimation in China: a PSO-GA-optimized multi-factor environmental learning curve method. Energy Policy, 77: 46–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.035
Zhang Y J, Peng Y L, Ma C Q et al., 2017. Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 100: 18–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.005
Zhang S Y, Li H X, Zhang Q et al., 2019. Uncovering the impacts of industrial transformation on low-carbon development in the Yangtze River Delta. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150: 104442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104442
Zhou C S, Wang S J, Wang J Y, 2019. Examining the influences of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions in the Yangtze River Delta, China: Kuznets curve relationship. Science of the Total Environment, 675: 472–482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.269
Zhou Liang, Zhou Chenhu, Yang Fan et al., 2017. Spatio-temporal evolution and the influencing factors of PM2.5 in China between 2000 and 2011. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(11): 2079–2092. (in Chinese)
Zhu L, Gan Q M, Liu Y et al., 2017. The impact of foreign direct investment on SO2 emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: a spatial econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166: 189–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.032
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Qiao Wenyi from Nanjing University, Damas William Mapuuda from Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for their help during the preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item
Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41771140), National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFE0105900)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Z., Chen, S.S., Yao, S. et al. Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect SO2 Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta? A Spatial Econometric Analysis. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 31, 400–412 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1197-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1197-5