Abstract
The Yangtze River Delta (YRD) is a region in China with a serious contradiction between economic growth and environmental pollution. Exploring the spatiotemporal effects and influencing factors of air pollution in the region is highly important for formulating policies to promote the high-quality development of urban industries. This study uses the spatial Durbin model (SDM) to analyze the local direct and spatial spillover effects of industrial transformation on air pollution and quantifies the contribution of each factor. From 2008 to 2018, there was a significant spatial agglomeration of industrial sulfur dioxide emissions (ISDE) in the YRD, and every 1% increase in ISDE led to a synchronous increase of 0.603% in the ISDE in adjacent cities. The industrial scale index (ISCI) and industrial structure index (ISTI), as the core factors of industrial transformation, significantly affect the emissions of sulfur dioxide in the YRD, and the elastic coefficients are 0.677 and −0.368, respectively. The order of the direct effect of the explanatory variables on local ISDE is ISCI>ISTI>foreign direct investment (FDI)>enterprise technological innovation (ETI)>environmental regulation (ER)> per capita GDP (PGDP). Similarly, the order of the spatial spillover effect of all variables on ISDE in adjacent cities is ISCI>PGDP>FDI>ETI>ISTI>ER, and the coefficients of the ISCI and ISTI are 1.531 and 0.113, respectively. This study contributes to the existing research that verifies the environmental Kuznets curve in the YRD, denies the pollution heaven hypothesis, indicates the Porter hypothesis, and provides empirical evidence for the formation mechanism of regional environmental pollution from a spatial spillover perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselin L, 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Springer Sci. Business Media.
Anselin L, Florax RJ, 1995. Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results, New Directions in Spatial Econometrics. Springer, 21–74.
Baek J, 2016. A new look at the FDI–income–energy–environment nexus: Dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy, 91: 22–27.
Becker R, Henderson V, 2000. Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries. Journal of Political Economy, 108(2): 379–421.
Chen J, Xu C, Li K et al., 2018. A gravity model and exploratory spatial data analysis of prefecture-scale pollutant and CO2 emissions in China. Ecological Indicators, 90: 554–563.
Chen Y, Lu J, Yu P, 2019. Does technology innovation reduce environmental pollution? Empirical research based on 285 Chinese cities. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 39(1): 73–84. (in Chinese)
Cheng Y, Wang Z, Ye X et al., 2014. Spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon intensity from energy consumption in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(4): 631–650.
Cheung K Y, Ping L, 2004. Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data. China Economic Review, 15(1): 25–44. (in Chinese)
Cole M A, Elliott R J R, 2003. Determining the trade-environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 46(3): 363–383.
Copeland B R, Taylor M S, 2004. Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1): 7–71.
Demsetz H, 2004. The core disagreement between Pigou, the profession, and Coase in the analyses of the externality question. European Journal of Political Economy, 12(4): 565–579.
Du Y, Sun T, Peng J et al., 2018. Direct and spillover effects of urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in China’s top three urban agglomerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190: 72–83.
Du Y, Wan Q, Liu H et al., 2019. How does urbanization influence PM2.5 concentrations? Perspective of spillover effect of multi-dimensional urbanization impact. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220: 974–983.
Duc T A, Vachaud G, Bonnet M P et al., 2007. Experimental investigation and modelling approach of the impact of urban wastewater on a tropical river: A case study of the Nhue River, Hanoi, Viet Nam. Journal of Hydrology, 334(3): 347–358.
Elhorst J P, 2010. Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(1): 9–28.
Elhorst J P, 2014. Spatial Regressions: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Heidelberg: Springer, New York Dordrecht London.
Grossman G M, Krueger A B, 1995. Economic growth and the environment. NBER Working Papers, 110(2): 353–377.
Han L, Zhou W, Li W, 2015. City as a major source area of fine particulate (PM2.5) in China. Environmental Pollution, 206: 183–187.
Hao Y, Zheng S Q, Zhao M Y et al., 2020. Reexamining the relationships among urbanization, industrial structure, and environmental pollution in China: New evidence using the dynamic threshold panel model. Energy Reports, 6: 28–39.
Hosoe M, Naito T, 2006. Trans-boundary pollution transmission and regional agglomeration effects. Papers in Regional Science, 85(1): 99–120.
Hou B, Ma R F, Dou S M, 2018. Environmental scale effects on economic development of urban agglomeration in Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Ningbo University (Natural Science & Engineering Edition), 31(2): 108–114. (in Chinese)
Huang X Y, 2014. The analysis of spatial spillover effects in regional tourism economic: A case study on Sichuan province [D]. Chengdu: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics. (in Chinese)
Ji Y J, Shao H Z, 2018. The impact of industrial agglomeration on environmental pollution: Aggravation or restraint. Economy and Management, 32(3): 59–64. (in Chinese)
Jia Z, Qiang W, Wang Y et al., 2020. The spatial characteristics and spatial effect of industrial pollution agglomeration in Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration. Economic Geography, 40: 68–75, 84.
Kou D, 2021. A study on the relationship between industrial agglomeration mode and environmental pollution. Economic Survey, 38(4): 73–82. (in Chinese)
Leeuw F A A M D, Moussiopoulos N, Sahm P et al., 2001. Urban air quality in larger conurbations in the European Union. Environmental Modelling & Software, 16(4): 399–414.
Lesage J P, 2014. Spatial econometric panel data model specification: A Bayesian approach. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 9: 122–145.
Lesage J P, Sheng Y, 2014. A spatial econometric panel data examination of endogenous versus exogenous interaction in Chinese province-level patenting. Journal of Geographical Systems, 16(3): 233–262.
Li J, 2017. Urbanization, institutional arrangement and regional environmental pollution [D]. Changsha: Hunan University. (in Chinese)
Li L Z, Fu Z Q, Wang Y H et al., 2017. Empirical study on manufacturing transfer and environmental impacts in Jing-Jin-Ji region. Research of Environmental Sciences, 30(12): 1813–1821.
Li Q, 2018. Has industrial upgrading promoted the ecological environment optimization of the Yangtze River Economic Belt? Based on the urban panel data of 108 cities. Finance and Trade Research, 29(12): 39–47.
Li S, Wang S, 2014. An empirical test of the impact of industrial agglomeration on China’s industrial pollution emissions. Statistics & Decision, (8): 128–130. (in Chinese)
Liu F, Liu C, 2019. Regional disparity, spatial spillover effects of urbanization and carbon emissions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241: 1–10.
Liu G Y, Yang Z F, Tang Y C et al., 2017. Spatial correlation model of economy-energy-pollution interactions: The role of river water as a link between production sites and urban areas. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69: 1018–1028.
Liu H, Fang C, Huang J et al., 2018. The spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of air pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(1): 177–191. (in Chinese)
Liu H, Liu B, Zheng S, 2019. The impact of environmental regulation on manufacturing upgrading. China Soft Science, (5): 40–52. (in Chinese)
Liu H J, Liu C M, Yang Q, 2015. Spatial spillover and the source of environment pollution: Empirical study on the perspective of network analysis. Economist, (10): 28–35.
Liu M, Chen H, Xu Y, 2021. Study on the effect of environmental regulation on industrial pollution spillover: Empirical evidence from 285 cities nationwide. Economic Geography, 41(2): 194–202. (in Chinese)
Liu M F, Xie H J, 2014. The convergence research of economy aggregation and pollution aggregation among China’s provinces. Economic Geography, 34(4): 25–32. (in Chinese)
Liu N, Sun Y, Tang J et al., 2019. The environmental effects of pollution-intensive industry agglomeration based on the perspective of spatial spillover. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 39(7): 2442–2454. (in Chinese)
Liu S, Zhang J, 2019. Space distance, spillover effect and environmental pollution. Inquiry into Economic Issues, (1): 149–158. (in Chinese)
Liu X, Li L, Ge J et al., 2019. Spatial spillover effects of environmental regulations on China’s haze pollution based on static and dynamic spatial panel data models. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 28(4): 2231–2241.
Meng H, Zhang M, 2021. Environmental pollution, intensity of technological innovation and transformation and upgrading of industrial structure. Modern Economic Science, 43(4): 65–76. (in Chinese)
Miao J, Guo H, 2019. The influence mechanism of industrial cooperative agglomeration on environmental pollution: An empirical study based on panel data of urban agglomeration in Yangtze River Delta. Modernization of Management, 39(3): 76–82. (in Chinese)
Mulatu A, Gerlagh R, Rigby D et al., 2010. Environmental regulation and industry location in Europe. Environmental & Resource Economics, 45(4): 459–479.
Pan W, 2012. Regional linkages and spatial spillovers of economic growth in China. Economic Research Journal, (1): 54–65.
Porter M E, 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6): 77.
Qiu J L, Pan A L, Zhang G Z, 2018. Formal environmental regulation, informal environmental regulation and green merger and acquisition of heavily polluted enterprises. Social Sciences in Guangdong, (2): 51–59. (in Chinese)
Ran Q, Xu L, 2019. Environmental regulation, inter-provincial industrial transfer and pollution spillover effect: Based on spatial Durbin model and dynamic threshold panel model. East China Economic Management, 33(7): 5–13. (in Chinese)
Sapkota P, Bastola U, 2017. Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: Panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Economics, 64: 206–212.
Shao S, Yang Z, Yang L et al., 2019. Can China’s energy intensity constraint policy promote total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from the industrial sector. The Energy Journal, 40(4): 101–128.
Tobler W R, 1979. Lattice tuning. Geographical Analysis, 11(1): 36–44.
Virkanen J, 1998. Effect of urbanization on metal deposition in the bay of Töölönlahti, Southern Finland. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 36(9): 729–738.
Wang B, Hong G, Qin T et al., 2019. Factors governing the willingness to pay for air pollution treatment: A case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235: 1304–1314.
Wang J, 2018. Empirical research on the impact of industrial agglomeration on environmental pollution: Based on the panel data of prefecture-level city [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University. (in Chinese)
Wang S, Meng D, 2019. Study on the environmental effects of industrial transformation under the haze spillover: Empirical analysis based on Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and 31 surrounding cities. Ecological Economy, 35(1): 144–149.
Wang X, Li Y, 2020. Research on measurement and improvement path of industrial green development in China: A perspective of environmental welfare efficiency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27: 42738–42749.
Wang X, Tian G, Yang D et al., 2018. Responses of PM2. 5 pollution to urbanization in China. Energy Policy, 123: 602–610. (in Chinese)
Wang Z, Jia H F, Xu T et al., 2018. Manufacturing industrial structure and pollutant emission: An empirical study of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(1): 462–471.
Wu H, Li Y, Hao Y et al., 2020. Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: evidence from China. Science of The Total Environment, 708: 135085.
Xiao Z, Shen Z, 2019. The temporal and spatial evolution of population & industrial agglomeration and environmental pollution and the relevance analysis. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 33(2): 3–10. (in Chinese)
Xiong L, de Jong M, Wang F et al., 2018. Spatial spillover effects of environmental pollution in China’s Central Plains Urban Agglomeration. Sustainability, 10(4): 994.
Zeng D Z, Zhao L, 2009. Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 58(2): 141–153. (in Chinese)
Zhao X, Huang X, Liu Y, 2012. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of Chinese inter-provincial industrial chemical oxygen demand discharge. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9: 2031–2044.
Zhong J, Wei Y, 2019. Spatial effects of industrial agglomeration and open economy on pollution abatement. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(5): 98–107. (in Chinese)
Zhou K, Fan J, Liu H C, 2017. Spatiotemporal patterns and driving forces of water pollutant discharge in the Bohai Rim Region. Progress in Geography, 36(2): 171–181. (in Chinese)
Zhou K, Liu H C, Wang Q, 2019. The impact of economic agglomeration on water pollutant emissions from the perspective of spatial spillover effects. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(12): 2015–2030.
Funding
Foundation: The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDA23020101; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41901181
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author
Chen Yufan (1994–), PhD Candidate, specialized in environmental economy and sustainable development. E-mail: chenyf.16s@igsnrr.ac.cn
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Xu, Y. & Wang, F. Air pollution effects of industrial transformation in the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of spatial spillover. J. Geogr. Sci. 32, 156–176 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1929-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1929-6