Skip to main content
Log in

Identification and categorization of climate change risks

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scientific evidence that climate is changing due to greenhouse gas emission is now incontestable, which may put many social, biological, and geophysical systems in the world at risk. In this paper, we first identified main risks induced from or aggravated by climate change. Then we categorized them applying a new risk categorization system brought forward by Renn in a framework of International Risk Governance Council. We proposed that “uncertainty” could be treated as the classification criteria. Based on this, we established a quantitative method with fuzzy set theory, in which “confidence” and “likelihood”, the main quantitative terms for expressing uncertainties in IPCC, were used as the feature parameters to construct the fuzzy membership functions of four risk types. According to the maximum principle, most climate change risks identified were classified into the appropriate risk types. In the mean time, given that not all the quantitative terms are available, a qualitative approach was also adopted as a complementary classification method. Finally, we get the preliminary results of climate change risk categorization, which might lay the foundation for the future integrated risk management of climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bunting C, 2006. Applying the IRGC Risk Governance Framework: What we have learned about risks and about the IRGC framework ESOF, Munich. http://www.irgc.org

  • Burrough P A, Heuvelink G B M, 1992. The sensitivity of boolean and continuous (fuzzy) logical modeling to uncertain data. In: EGIS 92. Proceedings of EGIS 92. VL, Munich, Germany: 1032–1041.

  • Chen Yiyu, Ding Yongjian, She Zhixiang et al., 2005. Assessment of climate and environment changes in China (II): Measures to adapt and mitigate the effects of climate and environment changes. Advances in Climate Change Research, 1(2): 51–57. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt D, 2001. The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2): 307–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial Committee of National Assessment Report on Climate Change, 2007. China’s National Assessment Report on Climate Change. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz M H, 1999. Creeping Environmental Problems and Sustainable Development in the Aral Sea Basin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Chongfu, Wang Jiading, 1992. Fuzzy Information Analysis and Application. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability of Climate Change (Working Group II Report). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2005. The Guidance Notes for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on Addressing Uncertainties. Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.ipcc.ch/activity

  • IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability—Working Group II Contribution to IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinen T, Petschel-Held G, 2007. Integrated assessment of changes in flooding probabilities due to climate change. Climatic Change, 81: 283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning M R, 2006. The treatment of uncertainties in the fourth IPCC assessment report. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2(Suppl. 1): 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning M R, Petit M, Easterling D et al., 2004. IPCC workshop on describing scientific uncertainties in climate change to support analysis of risk and of options. http://www.ipcc.ch

  • McInnes K L, Walsh K J E, Hubbert G D et al., 2003. Impact of sea-level rise and storm surges on a coastal community. Natural Hazards, 30: 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly P C D, Dunne K A, Vecchia A V, 2005. Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature, 438(7066), 347–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan M G, Florig H K, Michael L D, 2000. Categorizing risks for risk ranking. Risk Analysis, 20(1): 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, 1997. Rediscovering Geography: New Relevance for Science and Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls R J, Tol R S J, 2006. Impacts and responses to sea-level rise: A global analysis of the SRES scenarios over the twenty-first century. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 364: 1073–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obersteiner M, Azar C, Kauppi P et al., 2001. Managing climate risk. Science, 294(5543): 786–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2003. Emerging Systemic Risks. Final Report to the OECD Futures Project. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer M, 2005. Defining dangerous anthropogenic interference: The role of science, the limits of science. Risk Analysis, 25(6): 1399–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer M, Petsonk A, 2005. Article 2 of the UNFCCC: Historical origins, recent interpretations. Climatic Change, 73: 195–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan A, Schneider S H, Semenov S M, 2003. Assessing the Science to Address UNFCCC Article 2: A Concept Paper Relating to Cross Cutting Theme Number Four. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter P, Thomas C J, Atkinson P et al., 2004. Global warming and malaria: A call for accuracy. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 4: 323–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, 2005. White Paper on Risk Governance—Towards an integrative approach. White paper No.1 of the International Risk Governance Council. http://www.irgc.org

  • Risbey J S, Kandlikar M, 2007. Expressions of likelihood and confidence in the IPCC uncertainty assessment process. Climatic Change, 85: 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roger N J, 2004. When do POETS become dangerous? In: Manning M R et al. (eds.). IPCC Workshop on Describing Scientific Uncertainties in Climate Change to Support Analysis of Risk and of Options. http://www.ipcc.ch

  • Rogers D J, Randolph S E, 2000. The global spread of malaria in a future, warmer world. Science, 289: 1763–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W S, Lavorel M B, Araujo M T et al., 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102: 8245–8250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubiello F N, 2005. Climate variability and agriculture: Perspectives on current and future challenges. In: Knight B (ed). Impact of Climate Change, Variability and Weather Fluctuations on Crops and Their Produce Markets. Cambridge, UK.

  • Van Aalst M, 2004. Mainstreaming climate risk management into development planning. The Global Forum on Sustainable Development (GFSD). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Shaohong, Yin Yunhe, Zhao Huixia et al., 2005. Recongnition of ecosystem response to climate change impact. Advances in Climate Change Research, 1(3): 115–118. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuehong Zhang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Science & Technology Pillar Program During the 11th Five-Year Plan Period (No. 2006BAD20B05)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Wu, S., Dai, E. et al. Identification and categorization of climate change risks. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 18, 268–275 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-008-0268-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-008-0268-1

Keywords

Navigation