Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated assessment of changes in flooding probabilities due to climate change

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach to considering changes in flooding probability in the integrated assessment of climate change is introduced. A reduced-form hydrological model for flood prediction and a downscaling approach suitable for integrated assessment modeling are presented. Based on these components, the fraction of world population living in river basins affected by changes in flooding probability in the course of climate change is determined. This is then used as a climate impact response function in order to derive emission corridors limiting the population affected. This approach illustrates the consideration of probabilistic impacts within the framework of the tolerable windows approach. Based on the change in global mean temperature, as calculated by the simple climate models used in integrated assessment, spatially resolved changes in climatic variables are determined using pattern scaling, while natural variability in these variables is considered using twentieth century deviations from the climatology. Driven by the spatially resolved climate change, the hydrological model then aggregates these changes to river basin scale. The hydrological model is subjected to a sensitivity analysis with regard to the water balance, and the uncertainty arising through the different projections of changes in mean climate by differing climate models is considered by presenting results based on different models. The results suggest that up to 20% of world population live in river basins that might inevitably be affected by increased flood events in the course of global warming, depending on the climate model used to estimate the regional distribution of changes in climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP (2003) Adjustment of global gridded precipitation for systematic bias. J Geophys Res 108(D9):4257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo J, Leemans R, Kreileman E (eds) (1998) Global change scenarios of the 21st century. Elsevier, Oxford, UK

  • Alcamo J, Endejan MB, Kaspar F, Rösch T (2001) The GLASS model: a strategy for quantifying global environmental security. Environ Sci Policy 4(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW (1999a) Climate change and global water resources. Glob Environ Change 9(S1):S31–S49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW (1999b) A simple water balance model for the simulation of streamflow over a large geographic domain. J Hydrol 217(3–4):314–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora VK, Boer GJ (2001) Effects of simulated climate change on the hydrology of major river basins. J Geophys Res 106(D4):3335–3348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berz G (1999) Catastrophes and climate change: concerns and possible countermeasures of the insurance industry. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 4(3–4):283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodo BA (2001a) Monthly discharge data for world rivers (excluding former Soviet Union). Version 1.3, available online at http://dss.ucar.edu/datasets/ds552.1

  • Bodo BA (2001b) Monthly discharges for 2400 rivers and streams of the former Soviet Union. Version 1.1, available online at http://dss.ucar.edu/datasets/ds553.2

  • Bronstert A, Niehoff D, Bürger G (2002) Effects of climate and land-use change on storm runoff generation: present knowledge and modelling capabilities. Hydrol Process 16(2):509–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner T, Petschel-Held G, Leimbach M, Toth FL (2003) Methodological aspects of the tolerable windows approach. Clim Change 56(1–2):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron D, Beven K, Tawn J (2000) An evaluation of three stochastic rainfall models. J Hydrol 228(1–2):130–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIESIN (2000) Gridded Population of the World (GPW), Version 2. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); and World Resources Institute (WRI). CIESIN, Columbia University, Palisades, New York. Available at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/plue/gpw

  • Döll P, Kaspar F, Lehner B (2003) A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. J Hydrol 270(1–2):105–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds J, Pitcher MWH, Richels R, Wigley TML, MacCracken C (1996) An integrated assessment of climate change and the accelerated introduction of advanced energy technologies: an application of MiniCAM 1.0. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 1:311–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Federer CA, Vörösmarty C, Fekete B (1996) Intercomparison of methods for calculating potential evaporation in regional and global water balance models. Water Resour Res 32(7):2315–2321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete BM, Vörösmarty CJ (2004) Uncertainties in precipitation and their impacts on runoff estimates. J Climate 17(2):294–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete BM, Vörösmarty CJ, Grabs W (1999) Global composite runoff fields on observed river discharge and simulated water balances. Report 22, Global Runoff Data Center

  • Fekete BM, Vörösmarty CJ, Grabs W (2002) High-resolution fields of global runoff combining observed river discharge and simulated water balances. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 16(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999GB001254

  • Füssel H-M (2003) Impacts analysis for inverse integrated assessment of climate change. PhD thesis, Universität Potsdam

  • Füssel HM, Toth FL, van Minnen JG, Kaspar F (2003) Climate impact response functions as impact tools in the tolerable windows approach. Clim Change 56(1–2):91–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerten D, Schaphoff S, Haberlandt U, Lucht W, Sitch S (2004) Terrestrial vegetation and water balance – hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model. J Hydrol 286(1–4):249–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamon WR (1963) Computation of direct runoff amounts from storm rainfall. Int Assoc Sci Hydrol Publ 63:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmann K, Hasselmann S, Giering R, Ocana V, Storch Hv (1997) Sensitivity study of optimal CO2 emission paths using a Simplified Structural Integrated Assessment Model (SIAM). Clim Change 37(2):345–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy KJ, Gregory JM, Mitchell JFB (1997) Changes in daily precipitation under enhanced greenhouse conditions. Clim Dyn 13(9):667–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipple JD, Drazkowski B, Thorsell PM (2005) Development in the upper Mississippi basin: 10 years after the great flood of 1993. Landsc Urban Plan 72:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson MF (1995) Stochastic space–time weather models from ground-based data. Agric For Meteorol 73(3–4):237–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns TC, Carnell RE, Crossley JF, Gregory JM, Mitchell JFB, Senior CA, Tett SFB, Wood RA (1997) The second Hadley Centre coupled ocean–atmosphere GCM: model description, spinup and validation. Clim Dyn 13:103–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharin VV, Zwiers FW (2000) Changes in the extremes in an ensemble of transient climate simulations with a coupled atmosphere–ocean GCM. J Climate 13(21):3760–3788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriegler E, Bruckner T (2004) Sensitivity analysis of emissions corridors for the 21st century. Clim Change 66(3):345–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Schellnhuber H-J (2004) Floods in the IPCC TAR perspective. Nat Hazards 31:111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Graczyk D, Maurer T, Przymusiñska I, Radziejewski M, Svensson C, Szwed M (2004) Detection of change in world-wide hydrological time series of maximum annual flow. WCASP-64, WMO Geneva

  • Leemans R, Cramer W (1991) The IIASA database for mean monthly values of temperature, precipitation and cloudiness of a global terrestrial grid. Rr-91-18, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

  • Leimbach M, Bruckner T (2001) Influence of economic constraints on the shape of emission corridors. Comput Econ 18:173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Saxena KML, Cong S (1999) Estimation of the extreme flow distributions by stochastic models. Extremes 1(4):423–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Burges SJ (1994) A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J Geophys Res 99:14415–14428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JG (1999) Is potential evapotranspiration and its relationship with actual evapotranspiration sensitive to elevated atmospheric CO2 levels? Clim Change 41(2):193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz W, Sanderson WC, Scherbov S (eds) (2004) The end of world population growth in the 21st century: new challenges for human capital formation and sustainable development. Earthscan, London

  • Madsen H, Rasmussen PF, Rosbjerg D (1997) Comparison of annual maximum series and partial duration series methods for modeling extreme hydrologic events. 1. At-site modeling. Water Resour Res 33:747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne AS, Mendelsohn R, Richels RG (1995) MERGE – a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 23:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meigh JR, McKenzie AA, Sene KJ (1999) A grid-based approach to water scarcity estimates for eastern and southern Africa. Water Resour Manag 13:85–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Wetherald RT, Dunne KA, Delworth TL (2002) Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415:514–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza MMQ (2002) Global warming and changes in the probability of occurrence of floods in Bangladesh and implications. Glob Environ Change 12(2):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TD (2003) Pattern scaling: an examination of the accuracy of the technique for describing future climates. Clim Change 60(3):217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JFB, Johns TC, Eagles M, Ingram WJ, Davis RA (1999) Towards the construction of climate change scenarios. Clim Change 41(3–4):547–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munich Re (2003) Topics-annual review: natural catastrophes 2002

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones P (2000) Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II. Development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J Climate 13(13):2217–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen B, O’Donnell G, Lettenmaier DP, Lohmann D, Wood EF (2001) Predicting the discharge of global rivers. J Climate 14:3307–3323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (1994) Managing the global commons. The economics of climate change. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Oki T, Nishimura T, Dirmeyer P (1999) Assessment of annual runoff from land surface models using Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (TRIP). J Meteorol Soc Jpn 77:235–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Österle H, Gerstengarbe F-W, Werner P-C (2003) Homogenisierung und Aktualisierung des Klimadatensatzes der Climate Research Unit of East Anglia, Norwich. In: Proc. 6. Deutsche Klimatagung, Klimavariabilität, pp 326–329

  • Petschel-Held G, Schellnhuber H-J, Bruckner T, Tóth FL, Hasselmann K (1999) The tolerable windows approach: theoretical and methodological foundations. Clim Change 41(3/4):303–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeckner E, Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Christoph M, Claussen M, Dümenil L, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Schlese U, Schulzweida U (1996) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: model description and simulation of present-day climate. Report 218, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology

  • Rotmans J, de Boois H, Swart RJ (1989) IMAGE: an integrated model to assess the greenhouse effect. Technical Report 758471009, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

  • Russell GL, Miller JR (1990) Global river runoff calculated from a global atmospheric general circulation model. J Hydrol 117:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (2002) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change. Part I. Benchmark estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21:47–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth FL (2003) Climate policy in light of climate science: the ICLIPS project. Clim Change 56(1–2):7–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1974) Discharge of selected rivers of the world; a contribution to the International Hydrological Decade, Vol. 5. Unesco, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss R, Sausen R, Cubasch U (1998) Periodically synchronously coupled integrations with the atmosphere–ocean general circulation model ECHAM3/LSG. Clim Dyn 14:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss R, May W, Roeckner E (2002) Enhanced resolution modelling study on anthropogenic climate change: changes in extremes of the hydrological cycle. Int J Climatol 22(7):755–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Willmott CJ, Choudhury BJ, Schloss AL, Stearns TK, Robeson SM, Dorman TJ (1996) Analyzing the discharge regime of a large tropical river through remote sensing, ground-based climatic data, and modeling. Water Resour Res 32(10):3137–3150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Federer CA, Schloss AL (1998) Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling. J Hydrol 207(3–4):147–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Fekete BM, Meybeck M, Lammers RB (2000) Global system of rivers: its role in organizing continental land mass and defining land-to-ocean linkages. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 14(2):599–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML (1997) Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Prog Phys Geogr 21(4):530–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML, Conway D, Jones PD, Hewitson BC, Main J, Wilks DS (1998) Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: a comparison of methods. Water Resour Res 34(11):2995–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS, Wilby RL (1999) The weather generation game: a review of stochastic weather models. Prog Phys Geogr 23(3):329–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63:1309–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2001) Terrestrial air temperature and precipitation: monthly and annual time series (1950–1999). Available online at http://climate.geog.udel.edu/~climate/html_pages/archive.html

  • Xu C-Y (1999) From GCMs to river flow: a review of downscaling methods and hydrologic modelling approaches. Prog Phys Geogr 23(2):229–249

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kleinen.

Additional information

This article is dedicated to the memory of the late Gerhard Petschel-Held. He was an inspiring colleague, as well as a good friend. His sudden departure leaves me deeply shocked, and I am sure he will sorely be missed by all who had the pleasure of meeting him. Thomas Kleinen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinen, T., Petschel-Held, G. Integrated assessment of changes in flooding probabilities due to climate change. Climatic Change 81, 283–312 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9159-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9159-6

Keywords

Navigation