Abstract
Purpose
Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment may lead to late effects and impaired health-related quality of life of survivors. Knowledge on long-term late effects after radiotherapy (RT) and potential underlying biological mechanisms is lacking. We assessed the prevalence of xerostomia, dysphagia, and chronic fatigue (CF) in HNC survivors ≥ 5 years post-RT, and examined associations between pro-inflammatory cytokines and late effects.
Methods
In a cross-sectional study, 263 HNC survivors treated between 2007 and 2013 were enrolled. They completed validated questionnaires assessing xerostomia and dysphagia (the EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and CF (the Fatigue Questionnaire), and underwent blood sampling and clinical examination. Pro-inflammatory cytokines were analyzed in 262 survivors and 100 healthy age- and gender-matched controls.
Results
Median time since treatment was 8.5 years. The proportions of survivors reporting xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF were 58%, 31%, and 33%, respectively, with a preponderance of females. We found no significant associations between IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, TARC, TNF, or ENA-78 and the three late effects. The odds of having elevated levels of IL-6 and IP-10 were significantly higher in the survivors compared to the controls.
Conclusions
More than one-third of long-term HNC survivors experienced xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF. Persistent inflammation, with elevated systemic cytokines, was not associated with these late effects, although HNC survivors had higher levels of some cytokines than the controls.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
This study provides new knowledge on late effects that can serve as grounds for informing patients with HNC about risk of late effects more than 5 years after RT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The prevalence of long-term survivors after treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) is increasing [1, 2]. Consequently, a substantial proportion may live with late effects as the head and neck area encompasses vital and susceptible structures subjected to treatment-related harm. Lasting functional, physiological, and esthetic consequences commonly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [3,4,5,6]. Knowledge of underlying biological mechanisms of cancer- and treatment-related late effects is lacking. A more comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms is crucial to identify individuals at risk of developing severe late effects, thereby enabling optimized preventive measures, follow-up, and supportive care.
In HNC, late effects are usually defined as disease- or treatment-related side effects occurring or persisting more than 3 months post-treatment [7, 8]. Most late effects are subjective and the patients themselves should be the primary source of information. Such data can be collected successfully using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) [9,10,11]. Current knowledge on late effects in HNC patients is mostly derived from the early years following treatment. Pain, swallowing difficulties, problems with dry mouth and sticky saliva, hoarseness, edema, and fatigue are frequently reported up to 5 years after treatment [12, 13]. Literature concerning late effects in survivors beyond this time span is scant [7, 14], specially related to patients receiving modern radiotherapy (RT). Hence, more knowledge on the prevalence and possible biological mechanisms for persistent xerostomia, dysphagia, and chronic fatigue (CF) more than 5 years post-treatment is needed and will be addressed in this study. Approximately 15 years ago, two major changes in treatment of HNC were introduced that might influence late effects: intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concomitant chemotherapy [15,16,17,18]. IMRT reduces the dose to normal tissue compared to 3D-conformal RT [15], but still the prevalence of xerostomia in HNC survivors is reported to be up to 40% and 30% at 12 months and 24 months post-treatment, respectively [19, 20]. To date, the literature has not uniformly elucidated the prevalence of dysphagia in HNC survivors as studies have used different measurement methods and dysphagia-related endpoints [6, 21]. Fatigue is a distressing and subjective sense of physical, emotional, and/or cognitive tiredness [22,23,24]. The most established definition of CF is fatigue that lasts 6 months or longer [25]. In general, cancer patients report increased fatigue in the first year, and 20–25% report CF several years following treatment, potentially deteriorating HRQoL [12, 22, 26].
There is growing evidence for the role of inflammation in the progression of cancer and treatment-related side effects [24, 27, 28]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines have been shown to be activated by malignant tumors and cancer treatment [3], but an association with late effects in HNC survivors has not been described [24]. Cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1 beta (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) have been linked to oral mucositis, and possibly xerostomia, during RT, manifested by elevated levels in saliva immediately after treatment in HNC patients [29, 30]. Chronic inflammation may further cause fibrosis, one of the key pathological features in radiation-induced late effects such as dysphagia [4, 31]. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and TNF are involved in the formation of fibrosis in irradiated tissue, predominantly found in lung cancer studies [4, 32,33,34,35]. The etiology and pathophysiology of CF remain unclear, but significantly higher serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines have been measured in individuals with cancer-related fatigue compared to non-fatigued survivors or healthy controls [26,27,28, 36].
The main objective of the present study was to provide knowledge on late effects after RT in HNC survivors and associations with systemic inflammatory markers. We investigated the (1) prevalence of patient-reported xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF in long-term HNC survivors, (2) systemic cytokine levels in HNC survivors and controls, and (3) associations between cytokines and late effects in long-term HNC survivors.
Materials and methods
Data collection and patients
This cross-sectional HNC survivorship study was conducted at Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Norway, over a 2-year period from October 2018. The study was linked to an international multi-center study by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) on late toxicity and quality of life in HNC survivors [37]. Two user representatives, both HNC survivors, were involved as project partners from the start. The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (reference number 2018/1005), the local protocol committee, and the OUH privacy office approved the study.
Eligible survivors were aged ≥ 18 years at survey and had received RT for HNC at OUH in the period 2007–2013. They had ability to understand and respond to PROMs, and to attend a 1-day visit at OUH. The study team identified the HNC survivors in the hospital diagnosis register. An invitation letter with study information and consent form was sent by mail to eligible candidates. A subgroup of participants was also invited to participate in the international EORTC multi-center study. HNC survivors who agreed to participate provided written informed consents before inclusion.
Participants completed a set of validated PROMs prior to the visit, including the EORTC core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) [38], the HNC specific module EORTC QLQ-H&N35 [39], and the Fatigue Questionnaire (FQ) [40]. During the visit at the hospital, the study coordinator checked the completed questionnaires together with the participant and addressed any questions in order to minimize missing items. On arrival, the laboratory collected fasting blood samples and the participant met with a clinician at the oncology outpatient department. The appointment included clinical examination of the head and neck area and assessment of weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, and WHO performance status (PS). The medical history and treatment details were extracted from the medical record and radiation registry system. Comorbidities were scored according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index [41].
Treatment
Treatment was applied according to the Danish Head and Neck Study Group (DAHANCA) guidelines [42]. The standard primary RT regimen for patients with curative intention was 2 Gy per fraction, 5 to 6 days a week, up to a total dose of 70 Gy to the tumor and lymph node metastases, and 46 Gy to the elective neck regions with concomitant nimorazole, a hypoxic radiosensitizer [43,44,45]. Patients < 70 years with stage III and IV disease also received concomitant weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 [46, 47]. In the postoperative setting, patients received a total dose of 50–66 Gy, 2 Gy per fraction, to the tumor bed(s), and 46 Gy to the elective neck regions, 5 days a week, with or without weekly cisplatin.
PROMs and definition of selected late effects
The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 was used to measure patient-reported xerostomia and dysphagia as endpoints in this study. It consists of 35 questions arranged in seven scales (pain, swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality) and six single items (teeth, opening mouth, dry mouth, sticky saliva, coughing, and felt ill). The items had responses on Likert scales ranging from 1 = “not at all” to 4 = “very much” [38, 39]. The scores from scales and single items were linearly transformed to scores ranging from 0 to 100. High scores on the symptom scales indicated more severe symptoms [48]. In this study, dysphagia was defined as a score of ≥ 25 on the dysphagia scale (q5–q8) and xerostomia as ≥ 66 on the dry mouth single item (q11).
The FQ consists of 11 items related to mental and physical fatigue. Each item was answered on a 4-point Likert scale. The dichotomous variant of the scoring procedure was used: “better than usual” and “no more than usual” scored as 0 and “worse than usual” and “much more than usual” scored as 1. Accordingly, summation gave a total score of maximum 11. Two additional items evaluated the duration and extent of fatigue symptoms. CF was defined as a dichotomized score of ≥ 4 lasting 6 months or longer [49].
Sample collection
Serum was collected using standard procedure (Supplementary S1, Online Resource 1) from all study participants and 100 blood donors. The healthy controls were frequency-matched with the study group by age and gender (Supplementary S1, Online Resource 1), and consisted of 30 females (median age 62 years, range 47–68) and 70 males (median age 62 years, range 43–68).
Quantification of cytokines
Cytokine analyses were performed using a Luminex IS 200 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). All serum samples were thawed and centrifuged at 10.000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min and further diluted (1:4) with sample diluent HB (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and 50 μL was loaded into 96-well plates. The multiplex analysis was performed according to the manufacture’s description. All wash steps were performed using the Bio-Plex Pro™ Wash Station (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). An in-house spiked serum control was used to determine intra-assay and inter-assay percent of coefficient of variation (CV) that ranged from 0.4 to 7.8% and from 5.2 to 17.7%, respectively.
A representative selection of study participants and healthy control serum samples were screened with a 40 plex Bio-Plex Pro Human Chemokine panel (cat. no.: 171AK99MR2, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), in addition to a separate measurement of TGF-β. This was done to select potentially relevant cytokines and to minimize analytical uncertainties by limiting the size of the final panel. Based on the screening with correlation analyses and literature search [27, 28, 50, 51], a custom-made 9 plex (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), containing targets against macrophage colony–stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, interferon-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), TNF, and epithelial-neutrophil activating peptide 78 (ENA-78), was used to analyze serum samples from 262 study participants and 100 healthy controls. One study sample was not brought to the laboratory by administrative failure.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were presented as frequency and proportion for categorical data and median and range for continuous data. Comparison of groups was performed by the independent sample t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and chi-square test as appropriate. Spearman’s rho was calculated to examine the correlation between cytokines, and between each cytokine and biochemical parameters, respectively, where r ≥ 0.6 was interpreted as moderate [52]. To investigate the associations between a panel of biomarkers in HNC survivors and controls, we performed a set of multinomial logistic regression analyses. The dependent variables had three categories (HNC survivors with and without the specific late effect (i.e., xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF) and controls). The cytokines served as covariates, while we adjusted for available variables in the controls, i.e., age and gender. To examine the associations between cytokines and late effects within the HNC survivors, we performed binary logistic regression analyses, where we also adjusted for comorbidity (yes/no), and further explorative analyses stratified by gender. As the cytokine values were highly skewed, outliers were truncated to five times the interquartile range to reduce the influence of extreme values. No multicollinearity between the independent variables was observed. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The statistical analyses were performed in SPSS version 26 and Stata version 16.
Results
Of the 522 HNC survivors identified from the hospital diagnosis register, 310 provided written informed consents. Forty-five of these later withdrew their consent, and two survivors were excluded since they had not received RT (Fig. 1). Of the 263 HNC survivors included, 148 also participated in the EORTC multi-center study [37]. In the survey, the 263 participants were younger (median age 65 years) than the survivors not included (median age 70 years), but there were no differences in gender or geographical distance to the hospital (Supplementary S2, Online Resource 1). The participants’ median age at diagnosis was 56 years, and the median time since treatment was 8.5 years (Table 1). There were 67% males, and 47% had one or more comorbidities. The majority had been treated for oropharyngeal cancer (52%) and had presented with stage III or IV disease (69%). Most of the participants had received RT as the primary modality (62%) or in a postoperative setting (33%). Concomitant chemotherapy was administered in 79% of cases of definitive RT, and only in 2% of the operated patients (Supplementary S3, Online Resource 1).
Of the 263 HNC survivors examined, 58% had xerostomia, 31% had dysphagia, and 33% had CF and the characteristics for each subgroup are displayed in Table 1. Females reported more xerostomia (72% versus 52%), dysphagia (39% versus 27%), and CF (49% versus 25%) compared to males. All study participants completed the PROMs, and there were no missing values for these symptoms.
Biochemical parameters, radiation dose, use of chemotherapy, BMI, and smoking status were similar in survivors reporting late effects and those who did not (Supplementary S4, Online Resource 1).
In both the study group and in the control group, levels of GM-CSF, IL-1β, and IL-4 were either below detection or reported with high uncertainty (stipulated values), and were therefore omitted. The remaining six cytokines IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, TARC, TNF, and ENA-78 were included in the final analyses. There were higher serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, and IP-10 in study participants compared to controls, while no differences were observed for TARC, TNF, and ENA-78 (Fig. 2a-f; Supplementary S5, Online Resource 1). When mutually adjusting for all cytokines as well as age and gender, the multinomial regression analyses showed positive associations for IL-6 and IP-10, and negative associations for TNF in HNC survivors both with and without late effects compared to controls (Table 2). An increase in pg/mL:5 in IL-6 was associated with an OR of 41–74 and an increase in pg/mL:50 in IP-10 was associated with an OR of 1.82–1.97 for HNC survivors compared to controls (all p values < 0.001).
Cytokine levels in head and neck cancer survivors with (yes) and without (no) xerostomia, dysphagia, and chronic fatigue more than 5 years post-treatment. The cytokine levels in healthy controls are also shown. Each plot shows the median values with whiskers and outliers of a IL-6, b IL-8, c IP-10, d TARC, e TNF, and f ENA-78
Within HNC survivors, we did not exhibit any associations between cytokine levels and the late effects xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF (Table 3). However, females had lower OR of dysphagia and CF compared to males. Explorative analyses of associations between cytokine levels and late effects stratified by gender yield similar results (Supplementary S6, Online Resource 1).
Discussion
We found that more than half of the survivors had persisting problems with xerostomia and that approximately one-third had dysphagia and CF more than 5 years after RT. In order to get a better understanding of the biological mechanisms involved, we explored potential links between late effects and biomarkers. We did not find any significant associations between a selection of pro-inflammatory cytokines and xerostomia, dysphagia, or CF among HNC survivors. Although these results were negative, HNC survivors had higher levels of some cytokines compared to healthy controls. This could indicate persistent systemic changes in the survivors.
The high prevalence of xerostomia in this study verifies that this symptom is a long-term problem for many HNC survivors [53]. Our result is in line with prior reports on xerostomia being a significant problem in the first years following treatment and increases the understanding of the irreversibility of this condition [19, 54, 55]. This should encourage health care professionals to inform HNC survivors that xerostomia commonly persists, and provide them with advice including how to prevent oral and dental complications such as candida infection and caries.
Higher prevalence of dysphagia was found in this study (31%) compared to the previously reported prevalence of 14% at 2 years [56]. This may be due to development of soft tissue fibrosis, which tend to progress over time [31, 57]. The finding of this study is of great importance as literature on long-term patient-reported dysphagia is scarce. One small study of 39 HNC survivors found that 26% had persistent patient-reported dysphagia at 5 years, while five of the 21 individuals (24%) who underwent assessment of swallowing function by videofluoroscopy had impaired function [58].
Until now, data on CF in HNC survivors have been limited, but this study showed that as many as one-third of the survivors suffered from this condition. While a previous report of a more selected HNC population described lower levels [59], the proportion of HNC survivors affected by CF in this study was at the same high level as for survivors treated for breast cancer and lymphoma [23, 26, 36]. This added information suggests that a considerable number of HNC survivors may require assistance and guidance in handling CF, and efforts should be made to accommodate these needs.
The finding that late effects were more prevalent in females than in males is consistent with other reports [60]. In the Norwegian reference population scores for the EORTC QLQ-C30 [61], women reported more problems with functioning, more symptoms, and lower overall quality of life compared to men, across different age groups. This argues for gender differences being a general issue and not specific to HNC survivors. Such gender variety may be genetic, biological, behavioral, or a combination [62,63,64].
We found higher levels of IL-6 and IP-10 in HNC survivors, independent of reported late effects, compared to blood donor controls. This is an interesting observation as the explanation is not known, and similar findings have not been reported previously. Both these cytokines are associated with tumor progression and poor survival in cancer patients [65,66,67,68]. IL-6 is a multifunctional protein and has both pro- and inflammatory properties. It is an important component of the immune system, as well as of the cancer microenvironment and in other biological processes such as aging, autoimmune processes, and hematopoiesis [65, 69]. IP-10 is a chemokine which, through binding to its receptor chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 3 (CXCR3), attracts immune cells to inflammatory sites. It is involved in several biological processes, especially related to autoimmune diseases, and is linked to lymphocyte infiltration at tumor cancer sites [67, 70, 71]. How this might be connected to being a HNC survivor is unknown, but may be related to an ongoing inflammatory process and as such our result may be hypothesis generating for future studies. We were surprised to find that the HNC survivors did not have higher levels of TNF and TGF-β than the controls, as these cytokines have been linked to fibrotic processes following irradiation [4, 32,33,34].
We did not observe any associations between levels of IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, TARC, TNF, and ENA-78 in the HNC survivors who reported xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF scores above thresholds, and those who did not. Because the subgroups did not exhibit differences in tobacco smoking and BMI, these potential confounders were not included in the final models. Documentation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in HNC survivors is scarce and predominantly detected in saliva in the early years after treatment [29, 30, 72]. In one study, increased serum levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 were detected 7 weeks after treatment initiation with return to pre-treatment levels at 3 months, but IL-1β and IL-10 were slightly rising again 1 year after treatment completion. However, the observed cytokine levels were not explored in connection to treatment-related side effects [3]. Persistent inflammation as an etiological factor has primarily been proposed and investigated for cancer-related fatigue [26]. One of the hypotheses is that activation of peripheral pro-inflammatory cytokine networks transmits signals to the brain, which promote sickness behavior [27, 36]. Although several publications have indicated an association between fatigue and systemic cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IP-10, and TNF in cancer patients, the results are conflicting. Retrospective study design, small cohorts, and incomparable cytokine quantification methods across studies limit the significance of the results [28, 51, 67, 73]. Ongoing acute infections, autoimmune diseases, aging, smoking, and physical activity can potentially give elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines [65, 74, 75], but there is limited knowledge in this field. We cannot rule out high levels of cytokines in the HNC survivors’ blood samples due to other causes. In addition, cytokines have short half-life, and they can degrade during sampling handling which may give false low measurements, or release from cells during storage can lead to false elevated levels [76].
A strength of this study was the inclusion of an unselected sample of HNC patients treated at OUH during a 5-year period. The participants matched survivors who declined to participate by gender and travel distance to the hospital, but not by age. Still, the age distribution of the participants was broad, ranging from 20 to 87 years. Another strength was the involvement of user representatives from the start, who pointed out the insufficient knowledge of late effects after completion of the 5-year follow-up. They emphasized that many HNC survivors are struggling alone without adequate support and lack relevant information and coping strategies. By taking the aspects of user representatives into account, we believe that the relevance of this research was enhanced, which is also in accordance with the National Cancer Strategy of Norway 2018–2022 [77]. Using PROMs is an advantage compared to observer-reported outcomes, as observers tend to underrate the patients’ experiences and introduce inter-rater variability [9, 10]. Xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF are subjective experiences and best reported by patients themselves [11, 78]. The 100% compliance and no missing values in the completed PROMs strengthen the results of this study and underline the importance of having dedicated study personnel to monitor data collection closely. Experienced personnel carefully handled blood sampling, storage, and cytokine analyses according to procedures, which minimized the uncertainties. All of our study samples were collected in the morning, to eliminate discrepancy as several cytokines have a diurnal variation [74]. By recruiting healthy blood donor controls, we were able to obtain a basis for comparison of cytokine levels against the study samples as cut-offs have not yet been established for pro-inflammatory cytokines, partly because there is a lack of standardization of analyzing methods [76].
The cross-sectional design was a limitation of this study as the pre-treatment status of the participants was not available and it does not account for possible pre-existing xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF. Future strategies would be to use prospectively registered data in the evaluation of late effects. In addition, the choice of the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 single-item scale to measure dry mouth might be questioned, as single items are known to be less robust than multi-item scales [78]. Hence, other questionnaires such as Xerostomia Questionnaire, Groningen Radiotherapy-Induced Xerostomia Scale, and Summated Xerostomia Inventory-Dutch version could have provided more robust results [79,80,81]. In 2020, the final year of our study, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic might have imposed a selection bias by causing delays and withdrawals, primarily affecting individuals > 70 years. Younger patients were more likely to have received comprehensive and/or multimodal therapy with increased risk of late effects, which in turn would motivate them to take part in this study.
Conclusions
This study provided new knowledge on late effects in HNC survivors more than 5 years after receiving IMRT and chemoradiotherapy introduced 10–15 years ago. This can serve as grounds for informing patients with HNC about risks of these late effects. Improved self-management and coping may reduce the need for health services. The results may contribute to increased understanding of HNC survivors’ long-term challenges among clinicians, dental personnel, speech pathologists, nutritionists, physiotherapists, psychologists, and other social actors, e.g., the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration (NAV) and social workers. Further efforts should be made to better comprehend the biological mechanisms, for instance by collecting biomaterial in a prospective longitudinal study. This is time-consuming and demanding, but it will be worth the endeavors if preventive measures and better customized management of HNC patients can be achieved. There is also a need for more interventional studies, which aim to improve or treat the late effects.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2019 - cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway; 2020.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.
Astradsson T, Sellberg F, Berglund D, Ehrsson YT, Laurell GFE. Systemic inflammatory reaction in patients with head and neck cancer-an explorative study. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1177.
Ridner SH, Dietrich MS, Sonis ST, Murphy B. Biomarkers associated with lymphedema and fibrosis in patients with cancer of the head and neck. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018.
Head MDA, Neck Cancer Symptom Working G, Kamal M, Rosenthal DI, Volpe S, Goepfert RP, et al. Patient reported dry mouth: instrument comparison and model performance for correlation with quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol. 2018;126(1):75–80.
Nilsen ML, Belsky MA, Scheff N, Johnson JT, Zandberg DP, Skinner H, et al. Late and long-term treatment-related effects and survivorship for head and neck cancer patients. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020;21(12):92.
Taylor K, Krüger M, Singer S. Long-term toxicity among head and neck cancer patients—a systematic review. Onkologe. 2021;27(S2):145–9.
Baudelet M, Van den Steen L, Tomassen P, Bonte K, Deron P, Huvenne W, et al. Very late xerostomia, dysphagia, and neck fibrosis after head and neck radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2019;41(10):3594–603.
Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregory WM. Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer. 1988;57(1):109–12.
Xiao C, Polomano R, Bruner DW. Comparison between patient-reported and clinician-observed symptoms in oncology. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36(6):E1–16.
Falchook AD, Green R, Knowles ME, Amdur RJ, Mendenhall W, Hayes DN, et al. Comparison of patient- and practitioner-reported toxic effects associated with chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(6):517–23.
Cohen EE, LaMonte SJ, Erb NL, Beckman KL, Sadeghi N, Hutcheson KA, et al. American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(3):203–39.
Taberna M, Rullan AJ, Hierro C, Navarro V, Vazquez S, Lozano A, et al. Late toxicity after radical treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2015;51(8):795–9.
Bjordal K, Kaasa S, Mastekaasa A. Quality of life in patients treated for head and neck cancer: a follow-up study 7 to 11 years after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;28(4):847–56.
Al-Mamgani A, van Rooij P, Verduijn GM, Mehilal R, Kerrebijn JD, Levendag PC. The impact of treatment modality and radiation technique on outcomes and toxicity of patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(2):386–93.
Marta GN, Silva V, de Andrade CH, de Arruda FF, Hanna SA, Gadia R, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2014;110(1):9–15.
Pignon JP, le Maitre A, Maillard E, Bourhis J, Group M-NC. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92(1):4–14.
Lacas B, Carmel A, Landais C, Wong SJ, Licitra L, Tobias JS, et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group. Radiother Oncol. 2021;156:281–93.
Strojan P, Hutcheson KA, Eisbruch A, Beitler JJ, Langendijk JA, Lee AWM, et al. Treatment of late sequelae after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;59:79–92.
Hawkins PG, Lee JY, Mao Y, Li P, Green M, Worden FP, et al. Sparing all salivary glands with IMRT for head and neck cancer: longitudinal study of patient-reported xerostomia and head-and-neck quality of life. Radiother Oncol. 2018;126(1):68–74.
Hutcheson KA, Nurgalieva Z, Zhao H, Gunn GB, Giordano SH, Bhayani MK, et al. Two-year prevalence of dysphagia and related outcomes in head and neck cancer survivors: an updated SEER-Medicare analysis. Head Neck. 2019;41(2):479–87.
Fabi A, Bhargava R, Fatigoni S, Guglielmo M, Horneber M, Roila F, et al. Cancer-related fatigue: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(6):713–23.
Ebede CC, Jang Y, Escalante CP. Cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivorship. Med Clin North Am. 2017;101(6):1085–97.
Wulff-Burchfield E, Dietrich MS, Ridner S, Murphy BA. Late systemic symptoms in head and neck cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(8):2893–902.
Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121(12):953–9.
Bower JE. Cancer-related fatigue–mechanisms, risk factors, and treatments. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11(10):597–609.
O’Higgins CM, Brady B, O’Connor B, Walsh D, Reilly RB. The pathophysiology of cancer-related fatigue: current controversies. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(10):3353–64.
Wang XS, Woodruff JF. Cancer-related and treatment-related fatigue. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136(3):446–52.
Bossi P, Bergamini C, Miceli R, Cova A, Orlandi E, Resteghini C, et al. Salivary cytokine levels and oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(5):959–66.
Russo N, Bellile E, Murdoch-Kinch CA, Liu M, Eisbruch A, Wolf GT, et al. Cytokines in saliva increase in head and neck cancer patients after treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;122(4):483-90 e1.
Ramia P, Bodgi L, Mahmoud D, Mohammad MA, Youssef B, Kopek N, et al. Radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with head and neck cancer: a review of pathogenesis and clinical outcomes. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2022;16:11795549211036898.
Deng J, Wulff-Burchfield EM, Murphy BA. Late soft tissue complications of head and neck cancer therapy: lymphedema and fibrosis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2019;2019(53).
Farhood B, Khodamoradi E, Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi M, Motevaseli E, Mirtavoos-Mahyari H, Eleojo Musa A, et al. TGF-beta in radiotherapy: mechanisms of tumor resistance and normal tissues injury. Pharmacol Res. 2020;155: 104745.
Sliwinska-Mosson M, Wadowska K, Trembecki L, Bil-Lula I. Markers useful in monitoring radiation-induced lung injury in lung cancer patients: a review. J Pers Med. 2020;10(3).
Wang S, Campbell J, Stenmark MH, Zhao J, Stanton P, Matuszak MM, et al. Plasma levels of IL-8 and TGF-beta1 predict radiation-induced lung toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer: a validation study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98(3):615–21.
Thong MSY, van Noorden CJF, Steindorf K, Arndt V. Cancer-related fatigue: causes and current treatment options. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020;21(2):17.
EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Group, EORTC Quality of Life Group. Clinical trial details EORTC-1629-HNCG-QLG 2018 [cited 2022 June 3]. Available from: https://www.eortc.org/research_field/clinical-detail/1629/.
de Bjordal K, Graeff A, Fayers PM, van Hammerlid E, Pottelsberghe C, Curran D, et al. A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients. EORTC Quality of Life Group. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36(14):1796–807.
Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF, et al. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(3):1008–19.
Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, et al. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147–53.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.
DAHANCA Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Group. DAHANCA radiotherapy guidelines [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.dahanca.dk/.
Metwally MA, Frederiksen KD, Overgaard J. Compliance and toxicity of the hypoxic radiosensitizer nimorazole in the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Acta Oncol. 2014;53(5):654–61.
Overgaard J, Hansen HS, Specht L, Overgaard M, Grau C, Andersen E, et al. Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9388):933–40.
Bentzen J, Toustrup K, Eriksen JG, Primdahl H, Andersen LJ, Overgaard J. Locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with accelerated radiotherapy, the hypoxic modifier nimorazole and weekly cisplatin Results from the DAHANCA 18 phase II study. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(7):1001–7.
Melotek JM, Cooper BT, Koshy M, Silverman JS, Spiotto MT. Weekly versus every-three-weeks platinum-based chemoradiation regimens for head and neck cancer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;45(1):62.
Noronha V, Joshi A, Patil VM, Agarwal J, Ghosh-Laskar S, Budrukkar A, et al. Once-a-week versus once-every-3-weeks cisplatin chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase III randomized noninferiority trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(11):1064–72.
Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual: EORTC Quality of Life Group; 2001 [cited 2022 February 10]. 3rd:[Available from: https://qol.eortc.org/manuals.
Hjermstad MJ, Oldervoll L, Fossa SD, Holte H, Jacobsen AB, Loge JH. Quality of life in long-term Hodgkin’s disease survivors with chronic fatigue. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(3):327–33.
Paulsen O, Laird B, Aass N, Lea T, Fayers P, Kaasa S, et al. The relationship between pro-inflammatory cytokines and pain, appetite and fatigue in patients with advanced cancer. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177620.
Al MM. Cancer-related fatigue: an overview. Br J Nurs. 2021;30(4):S36–43.
Chan YH. Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. Singapore Med J. 2003;44(12):614–9.
Townes TG, Navuluri S, Pytynia KB, Gunn GB, Kamal MJ, Gilmore KR, et al. Assessing patient-reported symptom burden of long-term head and neck cancer survivors at annual surveillance in survivorship clinic. Head Neck. 2020;42(8):1919–27.
Jensen SB, Vissink A, Limesand KH, Reyland ME. Salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in head and neck radiation patients. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2019;2019(53).
Wang X, Eisbruch A. IMRT for head and neck cancer: reducing xerostomia and dysphagia. J Radiat Res. 2016;57(Suppl 1):i69–75.
Christianen ME, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Doornaert P, Chouvalova O, Steenbakkers RJ, Koken PW, et al. Patterns of long-term swallowing dysfunction after definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117(1):139–44.
Nachalon Y, Nativ-Zeltzer N, Evangelista LM, Dhar SI, Lin SJ, Shen SC, et al. Cervical fibrosis as a predictor of dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(3):548–52.
Frowen J, Drosdowsky A, Perry A, Corry J. Long-term swallowing after chemoradiotherapy: prospective study of functional and patient-reported changes over time. Head Neck. 2016;38(Suppl 1):E307–15.
Aggarwal P, Hutcheson KA, Goepfert RP, Garden AS, Garg N, Mott FE, et al. Risk factors associated with patient-reported fatigue among long-term oropharyngeal carcinoma survivors. Head Neck. 2022;44(4):952–63.
Meyer F, Fortin A, Wang CS, Liu G, Bairati I. Predictors of severe acute and late toxicities in patients with localized head-and-neck cancer treated with radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(4):1454–62.
Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Bjordal K, Kaasa S. Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: the QLQ=C30 (+ 3). J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(3):1188–96.
De Courcy L, Bezak E, Marcu LG. Gender-dependent radiotherapy: the next step in personalised medicine? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020;147:102881.
Wagner AD, Oertelt-Prigione S, Adjei A, Buclin T, Cristina V, Csajka C, et al. Gender medicine and oncology: report and consensus of an ESMO workshop. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(12):1914–24.
Unger JM, Vaidya R, Albain KS, LeBlanc M, Minasian LM, Gotay CC, et al. Sex differences in risk of severe adverse events in patients receiving immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or chemotherapy in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(13):1474–86.
Spanko M, Strnadova K, Pavlicek AJ, Szabo P, Kodet O, Valach J, et al. IL-6 in the ecosystem of head and neck cancer: possible therapeutic perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(20).
Lippitz BE. Cytokine patterns in patients with cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(6):e218–28.
Ter Veer E, Prinsen H, Sprangers MAG, Zwinderman KAH, Bleijenberg G, van der Pouw KT, et al. Interferon gamma-induced protein (IP-10) as potential biomarker for cancer-related-fatigue: results from a 6-month randomized controlled trial. Cancer Invest. 2018;36(7):371–7.
de Raaf PJ, Sleijfer S, Lamers CH, Jager A, Gratama JW, van der Rijt CC. Inflammation and fatigue dimensions in advanced cancer patients and cancer survivors: an explorative study. Cancer. 2012;118(23):6005–11.
Uz U, Eskiizmir G. Association between interleukin-6 and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;14(1):50–60.
Karin N, Razon H. Chemokines beyond chemo-attraction: CXCL10 and its significant role in cancer and autoimmunity. Cytokine. 2018;109:24–8.
Tokunaga R, Zhang W, Naseem M, Puccini A, Berger MD, Soni S, et al. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11/CXCR3 axis for immune activation - a target for novel cancer therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;63:40–7.
Aqrawi LA, Chen X, Hynne H, Amdal C, Reppe S, Aass HCD, et al. Cytokines explored in saliva and tears from radiated cancer patients correlate with clinical manifestations, influencing important immunoregulatory cellular pathways. Cells. 2020;9(9).
Maurer T, Jaskulski S, Behrens S, Jung AY, Obi N, Johnson T, et al. Tired of feeling tired - the role of circulating inflammatory biomarkers and long-term cancer related fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Breast. 2021;56:103–9.
de Jager W, Bourcier K, Rijkers GT, Prakken BJ, Seyfert-Margolis V. Prerequisites for cytokine measurements in clinical trials with multiplex immunoassays. BMC Immunol. 2009;10:52.
Andersson BA, Sayardoust S, Lofgren S, Rutqvist LE, Laytragoon-Lewin N. Cigarette smoking affects microRNAs and inflammatory biomarkers in healthy individuals and an association to single nucleotide polymorphisms is indicated. Biomarkers. 2019;24(2):180–5.
Keustermans GC, Hoeks SB, Meerding JM, Prakken BJ, de Jager W. Cytokine assays: an assessment of the preparation and treatment of blood and tissue samples. Methods. 2013;61(1):10–7.
Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. Leve med kreft - Nasjonal kreftstrategi (2018–2022) 2018 [cited 2022 May 15]. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/266bf1eec38940888a589ec86d79da20/regjeringens_kreftstrategi_180418.pdf.
McDowell L, Gough K, King M, Corry J, Rischin D. Patient-reported quality of life and symptom burden measures in human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal cancer - a review of the literature and PRO methodology. Oral Oncol. 2021;118:105309.
Assas M, Wiriyakijja P, Fedele S, Porter S, Ni RR. Evaluating the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures in radiotherapy-induced xerostomia. Oral Dis. 2021;27(5):1097–105.
Mendez AI, Wihlidal JGJ, Eurich DT, Nichols AC, MacNeil SD, Seikaly HR. Validity of functional patient-reported outcomes in head and neck oncology: a systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2022;125:105701.
Thomson WM, van der Putten GJ, de Baat C, Ikebe K, Matsuda K, Enoki K, et al. Shortening the xerostomia inventory. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(3):322–7.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our appreciation to Gunhild Maria Gjerset for administrative and practical support in the execution of the study. We also sincerely thank Siril Marie Viste Kroepelien for coordinating and facilitating blood sampling from the study participants.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Oslo (incl Oslo University Hospital) The first author TTMH received funding from University of Oslo: Life science through the convergence environment Protons contra cancer (project number 102375110).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KB, BBH, CEK, and CDA conceived the idea, and planned and managed the project. RSF, ÅH, TB, ED, EM, and TO contributed to the study conception and design. TTMH, HCDA, GLA, BBH, and CDA collected the data. TTMH, HCDA, RSF, GLA, and CDA performed the analyses. All authors participated in the discussion and interpretation of the results. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TTMH and CDA. All authors were involved in editing successive drafts and approved the final submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (date 06/13/2018/reference number 2018/1005), the local protocol committee (date 06/12/2018/reference 2018–21/22), and the Oslo University Hospital privacy office (date 05/29/2018).
Consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before inclusion in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Huynh, T.T.M., Aass, H.C.D., Falk, R.S. et al. Associations between patient-reported late effects and systemic cytokines in long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy. J Cancer Surviv 17, 1082–1093 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01273-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01273-1