Abstract
Due to the high reproductive investment, females are the decisive sex when making decisions about whether or not to reproduce. Generally, female scorpions display aggressive sexual behavior in response to male reproductive advances when they are not receptive. However, female receptivity can vary over time, depending on environmental factors favorable to reproduction Thus, the current study aimed to examine the correlation between the number of reproductive attempts by male Tityus pusillus scorpion and mating success over time, considering the female's behavioral response. Behavioral analyses were monthly conducted on 150 T. pusillus field-caught pairs over a five-month period. Our results indicate that despite females reacting aggressively to male advances, the persistence of the male has a positive effect in courtship probability. Furthermore, we observed variations in female behavior throughout the studied period, suggesting that female receptivity might be linked to the reproductive season. Therefore, environmental factors may play a significant role in regulating scorpion reproduction in Neotropical forests.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sexual receptivity in females varies over time, generally increasing in the period of increased availability of resources. This is particularly true in scorpions, where, for example, species of the Brazilian semiarid region have their reproductive period during the rainy season (Lira et al. 2018a, b). Females are often the decisive sex when it comes to choosing reproductive partners due to their greater investment in offspring. Therefore, scorpion females tend to resist a male sexual initiative (e.g., Peretti 2001; Chantall-Rocha and Japyassú 2017), primarily outside the reproductive period. In these arachnids, unreceptive females may perform antagonistic interactions against male sexual initiative, such as pushing and stinging (Polis and Sissom 1990; Peretti 2001; Peretti and Carrera 2005; Carlson et al. 2014). Because of the aggressive and predatory tendency of females, males reduce their aggression through sequence of specific movements (Polis and Farley 1979; reviewed in Simone and van der Meijden 2021). For example, males may perform behavioral actions such as sexual stings, juddering, and cheliceral massage to induce females to cooperate during courtship (e.g., Polis and Sissom 1990; Peretti and Carrera 2005; Foerster et al. 2021).
Courtship and mating behavior of scorpions consists of ritualistic processes composed of four phases: initiation, promenade à deux, sperm transfer and termination (e.g., Polis and Sissom 1990; Tallarovic et al. 2000; Pordeus 2016). The initial contact by the couple, which consists of a sequence of behaviors that either stimulate the female or decrease her aggressiveness (Polis and Farley 1979). The promenade à deux also inhibits aggressive female tendencies, and allows the couple to find an ideal substrate for the deposition of the spermatophore (Alexander 1956; Polis and Sissom 1990). Finally, in the sperm transfer phase the semen in the spermatophore is transferred to the genital tract of the female and each individual goes to one side (Polis and Sissom 1990; Tallarovic et al. 2000; Peretti 2003).
In the Atlantic Forest of Northeastern Brazil, there are not well-determined seasons, a dry and a wet period (Dias et al. 2006) that directly influence scorpion foraging activity (Lira et al. 2018a, b). For example, an increase of foraging activity in Tityus pusillus Pocock, 1893 occurs during the dry season, mainly in November and January (Lira et al. 2013; Dionisio-da-Silva et al. 2018). Dionisio-da-Silva et al. (2018) based on increases in male foraging activity suggests that the reproductive period of T. pusillus occurs during the dry season. Therefore the lack of well-defined seasons and a broad reproductive season may indicate that the sexual receptivity of female T. pusillus varies over time. In this way, our goal was to investigate the receptivity of females of T. pusillus to male reproductive advances over time. Therefore, the following hypothesis was tested: females will be more receptive to male advances during the reproductive period.
Materials and methods
Scorpion sampling
Individuals of T. pusillus individuals were collected from the Tapacurá Ecological Station (8º 2′28''S, 35º11′46''W), an Atlantic Forest fragment with approximately 400 ha, located in the municipality of São Lourenço da Mata, Pernambuco, Brazil. The animals were collected for five months (November 2019 to March 2020) at night (19:00–22:00 h), using ultraviolet light flashlights and tweezers measuring approximately 20 cm. The scorpions were kept in the laboratory under natural conditions with a mean temperature of 26.7 ± 0.2 °C, 73.4 ± 2.4% relative humidity, and a 12:12 h light:dark photoperiod. Before the experiments, the scorpions were quarantined for 7 days in individual plastic terraria with cardboard as shelter and wet cotton as a water source. During this period, the T. pusillus scorpions were fed a cockroach nymph N. cinerea.
Female receptivity essays
For behavioral analyzes, 300 adult individuals of T. pusillus were used, 150 males and 150 nonpregnant females (no embryos visible through the mesosoma). Behavioral essays were carried out monthly during five months (November 2019 to March 2020) in the laboratory, at night (19:00–22:00 h) under red light (Machan 1968). In this way, 30 wild-caught couples were used each month, without repeating individuals. To simulate what happens in nature, the couples were randomly paired. The females were individually placed in circular arenas of 12 cm in diameter, containing a sheet of filter paper as substrate, and after 10 min of acclimatization, the males were inserted, one in each arena. The activities of each couple were observed for 20 min, in which the following parameters were analyzed: the number of reproductive attempts by the male, the female's body reaction and the occurrence or not of copulation. We considered each male action of holding a part of the female's body (e.g., legs, metasoma, or pedipalp) with the pedipalp as a reproductive attempt. The reaction of the female was noted and specified individually among the six categories observed (Table 1).
Statistical analyses
Tityus pusillus females presented only one behavioral act in response to males reproductive attempts or approaching. Therefore, their reactions were converted into binomial response variables (1 = occurred, 0 = did not occur). A similar procedure was adopted to the probability of courtship (complete or incomplete). To analyze the sexual receptivity of T. pusillus females to male reproductive advances through time, we used linear models (LM) and generalized linear models (GLM). Then, models were made in which we placed the number of male attempts and the probabilities of courtship (complete or incomplete) and female reactions as response variables. In these models, the month in which the tests were performed was placed as a fixed effect. Furthermore, in the courtship (complete or incomplete) occurrence models, the number of male attempts and female reaction as explanatory variables. The normality, homoscedasticity, and overdispersion of the variables were evaluated graphically using the fitdistrplus package (Delignette-Muller and Dutang 2015). When the assumptions were not met, the variables were modeled according to their best distribution. For data with binomial distributions, the 'glm' function from the stats package was used (R Core Team 2018). Variables with negative binomial distribution were modeled with the 'glm.nb' function of the MASS package (Ripley et al. 2013) and the statistical significance of the GLMs was calculated with the 'ANOVA' function of the car package (Fox et al. 2012). A posteriori tests were carried out with the 'glht' function of the multcomp package (Hothorn et al. 2009). All analyzes were performed on the R software v. 3.3.3 (R Core Team 2018).
Results
The females of Tityus pusillus exhibited differences in behavior in relation to the male approach between the months (Table 2). Overall, 14.8% of females show a nonreceptive reaction (tail wagging or escape) in male approaching; however, when males attempt to reproduce ca. 92.7% of females exhibits nonreceptive reactions (Online resource: Table S1). These scorpions were more prone to mobility in January and less in March (χ2 = 14.120; p = 0.007) (Fig. 1a). However, in February and March, T. pusillus females pushed more than the males (χ2 = 16.445; p = 0.003) (Fig. 1b) than December and January. Other behaviors also varied temporally (sting: χ2 = 12.642; p = 0.013; tail wagging: χ2 = 12.874; p = 0.012), although trends were less clear. The escape and avoid males occurred in a low proportion and did not vary temporally (escape: χ2 = 3.705; p = 0.447; avoid: χ2 = 7.678; p = 0.104). Males also differed in the number of attempts to court females over the months (χ2 = 13.595; p = 0.009) (Fig. 2a). During January, the males made significantly fewer attempts than in February and March (Fig. 2a). Female behaviors of T. pusillus were related to the number of attempts (χ2 = 13.153; p = 0.001). When males made more attempts, the most common female reactions were push and sting (Fig. 2b). However, the number of attempts increases the probability of successful mating (χ2 = 4.206; p = 0.040) (Fig. 2c), and was marginally related to the probability of courting (χ2 = 3.672; p = 0.055). However, 41.67% of the couples resulted in unsuccessful mattings. The probability of successfully courting or mating did not differ significantly between months (courting: χ2 = 2.26; p = 0.587; mating: χ2 = 6.582; p = 0.160).
Discussion
In the present work, we investigated the sexual receptivity of females scorpion Tityus pusillus to male reproductive advances over a 5-month period. In our work, females of T. pusillus were more receptive to males’ sexual advances in February and March months, suggesting that this is a breeding season. However, our results contrast with the suggested breeding season for T. pusillus that occurs between the October and January months (Dionisio-da-Silva et al. 2018). It is important to note that our study was performed in a different forest fragment distant ca. 30 km from the studied area analyzed by Dionisio-da-Silva et al. (2018). Although the two study areas are classified as semi-deciduous seasonal forests (Dionisio-da-Silva et al. 2018), the two locations where the studies were carried out differ in some characteristics. Our study area consists of a 400 hectare fragment immersed in a sugar cane matrix (Moura 2019). The study area of Dionisio-da-Silva et al. (2018) corresponds to a fragment with 7,324 hectares immersed in a matrix mosaic of uses. These differences in fragment size and surrounding matrix are important modulators of the population dynamics of Atlantic forest scorpions, especially T. pusillus (Lira et al. 2015, 2021). Therefore, our findings indicate that different populations of T. pusillus may have different reproductive periods depending on the habitat.
The females of T. pusillus reacted in different ways according to the number of sexual attempts made by their partner, increasing the probability of pushing and stinging the males. Similar female reactions were described in the buthid Zabius fuscus (Thorell, 1876) (Peretti 2001). According to the author, this type of aggressive reaction reflects the resistance of females to sexual courtship, indicating an intermediate receptivity. Chantall-Rocha and Japyassú (2017) show that unsuccessful courtships in Jaguajir rochae (Borelli, 1910) are characterized by reduced complexity in interactions, with females refusing the male approximation during the initiation phase. Here we found that T. pusillus male reproductive success increased in more insistent individuals, suggesting that repeated actions are able to decline female aggressiveness. Furthermore, males did not exhibit greater insistence with all females, indicating that males of T. pusillus may select their partner. However, this hypothesis needs to be tested in future studies.
Our results also showed that, in pairs in which males made few attempts, females reacted more aggressively. In these couples, the T. pusillus females usually performed a tail wagging behavior. Although this behavior commonly occurs in males at the time of spermatophore deposition (e.g., Alexander 1959; Chantall-Rocha and Japyassú 2017; Lira et al. 2018a), in females this is related to aggressiveness and little receptivity (Outeda-Jorge 2010). According to Lira et al. (2020), moving the metasoma before stinging may be considered as a warning of the level of aggressiveness of the scorpion against potential predators or competitors. Considering that T. pusillus females react more aggressively after male touch may be indicative of the quality of their potential pair. The ability to overcome the aggressive behavior of females can be an indication of the quality of males. Low-quality males are less vigorous in their attempt to reproduce (Nobile and Johns 2005; Olivero et al. 2019). Thus, suggesting that T. pusillus females showed low receptivity to males that performed few reproductive attempts. It is important to note that, although we did not measure the individual body size, this functional trait may play an important role in sexual interaction. In scorpions of the genus Tityus, males of different sizes are common to occur (e.g., Lourenço 1979; Lourenço and Cloudsley-Thompson 2010), some due to the occurrence of an extra molt (Albuquerque and Lira 2016). The body size of males may directly influence reproductive behavior, since larger males may be more insistent than smaller males (Olivero et al. 2019).
Conclusions
The higher incomplete mattings reported in this study, is a common event in scorpions in which after the male deposits the spermatophore, the female refuses it and the individuals separate, with no passage of sperm to the female's genital operculum (e.g., Alexander 1956; Peretti 1996, 2001, 2003; Tallarovic et al. 2000; Briceño and Bonilla 2009). Females present a greater parental effort in terms of reproductive investment, as they are responsible for generating and caring for their offspring (Polis and Sissom 1990). In addition, the number of female gametes is produced in small quantities, having a high metabolic cost in reproduction (Trivers 1972). This leads us to believe that there is some criterion for choosing partners in T. pusillus, however this hypothesis will be tested in future works. In summary, our study reported two main findings, I) scorpion females showed differences in their sexual receptivity to males advances, II) male insistence increases the chances of a successful matting decreasing female aggressivity.
Data availability
Data will provided in supplementary material.
References
Albuquerque CMR, Lira AFAL (2016) Insights into reproductive strategies of Tityus (Archaeotityus) pusillus Pocock, 1893 (Scorpiones, Buthidae). C R Biologies 339:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2016.03.003
Alexander AJ (1956) Mating in scorpions. Nature 178:867–868
Alexander AJ (1959) Courtship and mating in the buthid scorpions. Proc Zool Soc Lond 133:145–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1959.tb05557.x
Briceño RD, Bonilla F (2009) Substrate vibrations in the scorpion Centruroides margaritatus (Scorpiones: Buthidae) during courtship. Rev Biol Trop 57:267–274
Carlson BE, McGinley S, Rowe MP (2014) Meek males and fighting females: sexually-dimorphic antipredator behavior and locomotor performance is explained by morphology in bark scorpions (Centruroides vittatus). PLoS One 9:e97648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097648
Chantall-Rocha S, Japyassú HF (2017) Diffuse resistance courtship in the scorpion Rhopalurus rochai (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Behav Process 135:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.11.017
Delignette-Muller ML, Dutang C (2015) Fitdistrplus: An R package for fitting distributions. J Stat Softw 64:1–34. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v064.i04
Dias SC, Candido DM, Brescovit AD (2006) Scorpions from Mata do Buraquinho, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil, with ecological notes on a population of Ananteris mauryi Lourenço (Scorpiones, Buthidae). Rev Braz Zool 23:707–710. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752006000300014
Dionisio-da-Silva W, Lira AFA, Albuquerque CMR (2018) Distinct edge effects and reproductive periods of sympatric litter-dwelling scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones) in a Brazilian Atlantic forest. Zoology 129:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2018.06.001
Foerster SÍA, Dionisio-da-Silva W, Santos AB, Albuquerque CMR, Lira AFA (2021) Notes on the courtship behavior of the parthenogenetic scorpion Tityus stigmurus. Acta Arachnol 70:83–86. https://doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.70.83
Fox J, Weisberg S, Price B, Adler D, Bates D, Baud-Bovy G, Bolker B, Ellison S, Firth D, Friendly M, Gorjanc G, Graves S, Heiberger R, Krivitsky P, Laboissiere R, Maechler M, Monette G, Murdoch D, Nilsson H, Ogle D, Ripley B, Short T, Venables W, Walker S, Winsemius D, Zeileis A, R-Core (2012) Package ‘car’. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. In: CRAN Repos. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car/car.pdf
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2009) The multcomp package. The R project for statistical computing. www.r-project.org, version 1.0.143
Lira AFA, DeSouza AM, Silva Filho AAC, Albuquerque CMR (2013) Spatio-temporal microhabitat use by two co-occurring species of scorpions in Atlantic rainforest in Brazil. Zoology 116:182–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2013.01.002
Lira AFA, Rego FNAA, Albuquerque CMR (2015) How important are environmental factors for the population structure of co-occurring scorpion species in a tropical forest? Can J Zool 93:15–19. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2014-0238
Lira AFA, DeSouza AM, Albuquerque CMR (2018a) Environmental variation and seasonal changes as determinants of the spatial distribution of scorpion (Arachnida: Scorpiones) in Neotropical forests. Can J Zool 96:963–972. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2017-0251
Lira AFA, Pordeus LM, Rego FNAA, Iannuzzi K, Albuquerque CMR (2018b) Sexual dimorphism and reproductive behavior in the Brazilian scorpion Tityus pusillus (Scorpiones, Buthidae). Invertebr Biol 137:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12221
Lira AFA, Almeida FMF, Albuquerque CMR (2020) Reaction under the risk of predation: effects of age and sexual plasticity on defensive behavior in scorpion Tityus pusillus (Scorpiones: Buthidae). J Ethol 38:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-019-00615-4
Lira AFA, Rego FNAA, Salomão RP, Albuquerque CMR (2021) Effects of habitat quality on body size of the litter dwelling scorpion Tityus pusillus in fragmented rainforests of Brazil. J Arachnol 48:295–299. https://doi.org/10.1636/JoA-S-19-081
Lourenço WR (1979) La biologie sexuelle et le développement post embryonnaire du scorpion Buthidae: Tityus trivittatus fasciolatus, Pessoa 1935. Rev Nordest Biol 2:49–96
Lourenço WR, Cloudsley-Thompson JL (2010) The life cycle of Tityus (Atreus) neblina Lourenço, 2008 (Scorpiones, Buthidae) in Cerro de la Neblina: Brazil/Venezuela. Bol Soc Entomol Aragon 47:293–298
Machan L (1968) Spectral sensitivity of scorpion eyes and the possible role of shielding pigment effect. J Exp Biol 49:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.49.1.95
Moura GJB (2019) Contribuições para a Gestão Ambiental na Estação Ecológica do tapacurá. Editora ariaersitária da Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife
Nobile CJ, Johns PM (2005) Prelude to a kiss: evidence for mate discrimination in the striped bark scorpion, Centruroides vittatus. J Insect Behav 18:405–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-3699-x
Olivero PA, Vrech DE, Oviedo-Diego MA, Mattoni CI, Peretti AV (2019) Courtship performance as function of body condition in na ‘ancient’ form of sperm transfer. Anim Biol 69:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1163/15707563-00001041
Outeda-Jorge S (2010) Corte e aspectos da biologia reprodutiva do escorpião brasileiro Tityus bahiensis (Scorpiones: Buthidae). PhD Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo
Peretti AV (1996) Comportamiento de transferencia espermática de Bothriurus flavidus (Scorpiones: Bothriuridae). Rev Soc Entomol Argent 55:7–20
Peretti AV (2001) Patrones de resistencia femenina y respuesta del macho durante el apareamiento en escorpiones Bothriuridae y Buthidae: qué hipótesis puede explicarlos mejor. Rev Etol 3:25–45
Peretti AV (2003) Functional morphology of spermatophores and female genitalia in bothriurid scorpions: genital courtship, coercion and other possible mechanisms. J Zool 261:135–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095283690300400X
Peretti AV, Carrera P (2005) Female control of mating sequences in the mountain scorpion Zabius fuscus: males do not use coercion as a response to unreceptive females. Anim Behav 69:453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.04.019
Polis GA, Farley RD (1979) Behavior and ecology of mating in the cannibalistic scorpion, Paruroctonus mesaensis Stahnke (Scorpionida: Vaejovidae). J Arachnol 7:33–46
Polis GA, Sissom WD (1990) Life history. In: Polis GA (ed) The biology of scorpions. Stanford University Press, California, pp 81–86
Pordeus LM (2016) Reprodução do escorpião Tityus pusillus Pocock, 1893: comportamento de corte e dimorfismo. Dissertation. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
Ripley B, Venables B, Bates DM, Hornik K, Gebhardt A, Firth D (2013) Package ‘mass.’ Cran R 538:113–120
Simone Y, van der Meijden A (2021) Armed stem to stinger: a review of the ecological roles of scorpion weapons. J Venom Anim Incl Trop Dis 3:e20210002. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2021-0002
Tallarovic SK, Melville JM, Brownell PH (2000) Courtship and mating in the giant hairy desert scorpion, Hadrurus arizonensis (Scorpionida, Iuridae). J Insect Behav 13:827–838. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007858400402
Trivers R (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man: the darwinian pivot. Transaction Publishers, New York, pp 136–179
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA) postdoctoral fellowship from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México to AFAL. To Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the research productivity scholarship of the author GJBM. Finally, we are indebting to Dra. Mariela Oviedo-Diego for their valuable statistical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AFAL, MOMM conceived the ideas and designed the methodology; AFAL, MOMM collected the data; MOMM, GJBM led the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and revised the submitted manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. Experiments using invertebrate animals conducted in Brazil do not require approval by the Ethics Committees, as established by the Brazilian Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) (Law 11.794/08, § 3).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Moreira, M.O.M., Moura, G.J.B. & Lira, A.F.A. Sexual receptivity of females on Neotropical scorpion Tityus pusillus Pocock, 1893 in response to male reproductive advances. Biologia 79, 2119–2124 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-024-01691-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-024-01691-9