Skip to main content
Log in

On the two-stage assembly flow shop problem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous operational constraints within both industry and service sectors mandate the concurrent scheduling of tasks. This need is particularly evident in the assembly of products within manufacturing processes. This paper concentrates on minimizing makespan in the two-stage assembly flow shop problem. Our contributions include the introduction of novel dominance rules, a proposal for a heuristic method, and the development of a branch and bound algorithm. Additionally, we conduct an empirical analysis of makespan distribution for small-size instances. Through extensive experimentation, our study demonstrates the efficiency of the introduced dominance rules and the strong performance of the developed branch and bound algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Framinan JM, Perez-Gonzalez P, Fernandez-Viagas V (2019) Deterministic assembly scheduling problems: a review and classification of concurrent-type scheduling models and solution procedures. Eur J Oper Res 273:401–417

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dridi N, Hadda H, Hajri-Gabouj S (2009) Heuristic method applied to the hybrid flow shop problem with dedicated machines. RAIRO Oper Res 43:421–436

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hadda H, Dridi N, Hajri-Gabouj S (2007) The two-stage assembly flow shop scheduling with an availability constraint. In: Proc. 3rd Multidisciplinary International Conference on scheduling: theory and application, Paris, France, pp 184–191

  • Hadda H, Dridi N, Hajri-Gabouj S (2014a) Exact resolution of the two-stage hybrid flow shop with dedicated machines. Optim Lett 8:2329–2339

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hadda H, Dridi N, Hajri-Gabouj S (2014b) The two-stage assembly flow shop scheduling with an availability constraint: worst case analysis. J Math Model Algorithms Oper Res 13:233–245

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hadda H, Hajji MK, Dridi N (2015) On the two-stage Hybrid flow shop with dedicated machines. RAIRO Oper Res 49:795–804

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hadda H, Dridi N, Hajji MK (2018) On the optimality conditions of the two-machine flow shop problem. Eur J Oper Res 266:426–435

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haouari M, Daouas T (1999) Optimal scheduling of the 3-machine assembly-type flow shop. RAIRO Oper Res 33:439–445

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hariri AMA, Potts CN (1997) A branch and bound algorithm for the two-stage assembly scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 103:547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SM (1954) Optimal two- and three-stage production schedules with setup times included. Res Log Q 1:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komaki GM, Sheikh Shaya, Malakooti Behnam (2019) Scheduling problems with assembly operations: a review and new trends. Int J Prod Res 57:2926–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koulamas C, Kyparisis GJ (2001) The three-stage assembly flowshop scheduling problem. Comput Oper Res 28:689–704

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Koulamas C, Kyparisis GJ (2007) A note on the two-stage assembly flow shop scheduling problem with uniform parallel machines. Eur J Oper Res 182:945–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CY, Cheng TCE, Lin BMT (1993) Minimizing the makespan in the 3-machine assembly-type flowshop scheduling problem. Manag Sci 39:616–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navaeia J, Ghomib SMTF, Jolaic F, Mozdgird A (2014) Heuristics for an assembly flow-shop with non-identical assembly machines and sequence dependent setup times to minimize sum of holding and delay costs. Comput Oper Res 44:52–65

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz M, Enscore EE, Ham I (1983) A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flowshop sequencing problem. Omega 11:91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts CN, Sevast’janov SV, Strusevich VA, Van wassenhove LN, Zwaneveld CM (1995) The two-stage assembly scheduling problem: complexity and approximation. Oper Res 43:346–355

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shoaardebili N, Fattahi P (2015) Multi-objective meta-heuristics to solve three-stage assembly flow shop scheduling problem with machine availability constraints. Int J Prod Res 53:944–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi S, Kazuko M, Hiroyuki N (2003) Powerful heuristics to minimize makespan in fixed, 3-machine, assembly-type flowshop scheduling. Eur J Oper Res 146:498–516

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama M (2004) Scheduling for Two-Stage Production System with Setup and Assembly Operations. Comput Oper Res 31:2063–2078

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hatem Hadda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hadda, H., Dridi, N. & Hajri-Gabouj, S. On the two-stage assembly flow shop problem. TOP (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-024-00664-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-024-00664-0

Keywords

Navigation