Abstract
The issue of assessing variance components is essential in deciding on the inclusion of random effects in the context of mixed models. In this work we discuss this problem by supposing nonlinear elliptical models for correlated data by using the score-type test proposed in Silvapulle and Silvapulle (1995). Being asymptotically equivalent to the likelihood ratio test and only requiring the estimation under the null hypothesis, this test provides a fairly easy computable alternative for assessing one-sided hypotheses in the context of the marginal model. Taking into account the possible non-normal distribution, we assume that the joint distribution of the response variable and the random effects lies in the elliptical class, which includes light-tailed and heavy-tailed distributions such as Student-t, power exponential, logistic, generalized Student-t, generalized logistic, contaminated normal, and the normal itself, among others. We compare the sensitivity of the score-type test under normal, Student-t and power exponential models for the kinetics data set discussed in Vonesh and Carter (1992) and fitted using the model presented in Russo et al. (2009). Also, a simulation study is performed to analyze the consequences of the kurtosis misspecification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cysneiros FJA, Paula GA (2005) Restricted methods in symmetrical linear regression models. Comput Stat Data Anal 49:689–708
Giampaoli V, Singer JM (2009) Likelihood ratio tests for variance components in linear mixed models. J Stat Plan Inference 139:1435–1448
Gómez E, Gómez-Villegas MA, Martín JM (1998) A multivariate generalization of the power exponential family of distributions. Commun Stat, Theory Methods 27:589–600
Lange KL, Little RJA, Taylor JMG (1989) Robust statistical modeling using the t-distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 84:881–896
Li Z, Zhu L (2010) On variance components in semiparametric mixed models for longitudinal data. Scand J Stat 37:442–457
Magnus JR, Vasnev AL (2007) Local sensitivity and diagnostic tests. Econom J 10:166–192
Meza C, Osorio F, De la Cruz R (2010) Estimation in nonlinear mixed-effects models using heavy-tailed distributions. Stat Comput. doi:10.1007/s11222-010-9212-1
Osorio F, Paula GA, Galea M (2007) Assessment of local influence in elliptical linear models with longitudinal structure. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:4354–4368
Patriota AG (2011) A note on influence diagnostics in nonlinear mixed-effects elliptical models. Comput Stat Data Anal 55:218–225
Russo CM, Paula GA, Aoki R (2009) Influence diagnostics in nonlinear mixed-effects elliptical models. Comput Stat Data Anal 53:4143–4156
Russo CM (2010) Modelos não lineares elípticos para dados correlacionados. PhD thesis, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade de São Paulo (in Portuguese)
Savalli C, Paula GA, Cysneiros FJA (2006) Assessment of variance components in elliptical linear mixed models. Stat Model 6:59–76
Shapiro A (1985) Asymptotic distribution of test statistics in the analysis of moment structures under inequality constraints. Biometrika 72(1):133–144
Silvapulle MJ, Silvapulle P (1995) A score test against one-sided alternatives. J Am Stat Assoc 90:342–349
Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2003) The use of score tests for inference on variance components. Biometrics 59:254–262
Vonesh EF, Carter RL (1992) Mixed-effects nonlinear regression for unbalanced repeated measures. Biometrics 48:1–17
Vu HTV, Zhou S (1997) Generalization of likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. Ann Stat 25(2):897–916
Zhang D, Lin X (2008) Variance component testing in generalized linear mixed models for longitudinal/clustered data and other related topics. In: Random Effect and Latent Variable Model Selection. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russo, C.M., Aoki, R. & Paula, G.A. Assessment of variance components in nonlinear mixed-effects elliptical models. TEST 21, 519–545 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-011-0262-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-011-0262-2