Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of Waffle procedure for constrictive pericarditis with epicardial thickening

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Waffle procedure, a small grid-like incision of epicardium, is a surgical technique for constrictive pericarditis with epicardial thickening. Yet evidences to endorse this approach for improved outcomes are lacking. The aim of this study is to elucidate better surgical treatment strategy for constrictive pericarditis with epicardial thickening.

Methods

Twenty-five patients (mean 64.1 years) who underwent pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis between January 1992 and July 2012 were included in this study and were classified into two groups according to the procedure they received; single total pericardiectomy (Group A, n = 17) and total pericardiectomy with the Waffle procedure (Group B, n = 8). Early and mid-term outcomes were analyzed for each group.

Results

No major postoperative complications or all-cause deaths at 30 days were observed in each group. Upon discharge, postoperative echocardiography showed statistically significant increase of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (from 76.6 ± 30.3 to 91.0 ± 27.3 ml; p < 0.02) and systolic volume (from 44.4 ± 19.1 to 54.5 ± 17.3 ml; p < 0.05) in Group B than those in Group A. The 5-year cardiac event-free rate was similar between groups [83.6 ± 10.8 % for group A and 83.3 ± 15.2 % for group B (p = NS)] as well as the mean value of NYHA classification for each at the mid-term periods (1.5 for Group A and 1.3 for Group B).

Conclusion

Waffle procedure improved echocardiographic elements of diastolic function of patients with epicardial thickening more than did total pericardiectomy without additional compromises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang SH, Song JM, Kim M, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Kang DH, et al. Prognostic predictors in pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:598–605.

  2. Bertog SC, Thambidorai SK, Parakh K, Schoenhagen P, Ozduran V, Houghtaling PL, et al. Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1445–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tirilomis T, Unverdorben S, von der Emde J. Pericardectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis: risks and outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8:487–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trotter MC, Chung KC, Ochsner JL, McFadden PM. Pericardiectomy for pericardial constriction. Am Surg. 1996;62:304–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Somerville W. Constrictive pericarditis. With special reference to the change in natural history brought about by surgical intervention. Circulation. 1968;38:102–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gopaldas RR, Dao TK, Caron NR, Markley JG. Predictors of in-hospital complications after pericardiectomy: a nationwide outcomes study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:1227–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nataf P, Cacoub P, Dorent R, Jault F, Bors V, Pavie A, et al. Results of subtotal pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1993;7:252–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamoto N, Ohara K, Nie M, Torii S, Inoue N, Miyaji K. For what type of constrictive pericarditis is the Waffle procedure effective? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2011;19:115–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Talreja DR, Edwards WD, Danielson GK, Schaff HV, Tajik AJ, Tazelaar HD, et al. Constrictive pericarditis in 26 patients with histologically normal pericardial thickness. Circulation. 2003;108:1852–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heimbecker RO, Smith D, Shimizu S, Kestle J. Surgical technique for the management of constrictive epicarditis complicating constrictive pericarditis (the Waffle procedure). Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;36:605–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Mahoney DW, Seward JB, et al. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation. 1999;100:1380–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moosdorf R. Indications, results, and pitfalls in the surgery of constrictive pericarditis. Herz. 2000;25:794–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ha JW, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Ling LH, Higano ST, Mahoney DW, et al. Impact of left ventricular function on immediate and long-term outcomes after pericardiectomy in constrictive pericarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1136–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No external funding was obtained for the work presented here.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manabu Shiraishi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiraishi, M., Yamaguchi, A., Muramatsu, K. et al. Validation of Waffle procedure for constrictive pericarditis with epicardial thickening. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 63, 30–37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-014-0434-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-014-0434-6

Keywords

Navigation