Where does pride lead? Corporate managerial hubris and strategic emphasis
- 901 Downloads
A firm’s strategic emphasis on value creation versus appropriation, which is typically reflected in its resource allocation between R&D and advertising, is a central corporate decision that significantly influences financial performance. However, the drivers of such decisions remain underexplored. This study identifies a significant predictor of strategic emphasis, namely, corporate managerial hubris, and reveals some of its boundary conditions. Leveraging a unique dataset based on text mining of press releases issued by over 400 firms across 13 years, the authors demonstrate that high corporate managerial hubris predicts low strategic emphasis on advertising relative to R&D. However, this effect is mitigated significantly by firm maturity, corporate governance, and industry-level strategic emphasis. The results provide novel insights into the effects of hubris on firm spending, the situations wherein marketing decisions tend to be subject to managers’ psychological bias, the means of preventing over- or under-investment in marketing strategy, and the recruitment and training of managers.
KeywordsCorporate managerial hubris Advertising R&d Strategic emphasis
This work was supported by the 2017 Research Fund (1.170022.01) of UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) and Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2016. Xiong would like to acknowledge research support from the University of Massachusetts Boston.
- Baber, W. R., Fairfield, P. M., & Haggard, J. A. (1991). The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. Accounting Review, 66(4), 818–829.Google Scholar
- Bulan, L. T., & Subramanian, N. (2009). The firm life cycle theory of dividends. In K. H. Baker (Ed.), Dividends and Dividend Policy (pp. 201–213). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamics of strategy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.Google Scholar
- Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
- Han, K., Mittal, V., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Relative strategic emphasis and firm idiosyncratic risk: The moderating role of relative performance and demand instability. Forthcoming: Journal of Marketing.Google Scholar
- Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Industry Week. (2007). Is executive hubris ruining companies? http://www.industryweek.com/companies-amp-executives/executive-hubris-ruining-companies.
- Jordan, R. R. (1999). Academic writing course: Study skills in English (Vol. 160). Longman.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1995). Conflict resolution: A cognitive perspective. In K. Arrow, R. H. Mnookin, L. Ross, A. Tversky, & R. Wilson (Eds.), Barriers to conflict resolution (pp. 44–61). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Kashmiri, S., Nicol, C. D., & Arora, S. J. (2017). Me, myself, and I: Influence of CEO narcissism on firms’ innovation strategy and the likelihood of product-harm crises. Forthcoming: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.Google Scholar
- Knowledge@Wharton. (2015). How overconfident CEOs could take down the firm. Google Scholar
- Laseter, T. (2016). The line between confidence and hubris. Strategy & Leadership, Issue 86, (November 21, 2016).Google Scholar
- March, J.G. (1981). Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In a. Van de Ven and W. F. Joyce (eds.). Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior; 205-244. New York; Wiley.Google Scholar
- Varghese, S. (2009). Beware Of Hubris. http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/hubris-gamblers-ruin-leadership-managing-varghese.html.
- Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222–240.Google Scholar
- Wright, O. (2015). Monsanto chief admits ‘hubris’ is to blame for public fears over GM. In The Independent Accessed at www.independent.co.uk/news/science/monsanto-chief-admits-hubris-is-to-blame-for-public-fears-over-gm-10128951.html.Google Scholar