Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of Homburg et al. (1999), which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
Bauerly, R. J., Johnson, D. T., & Singh, M. (2005). Readability and the impact of marketing. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.
Brown, S. W. (2005). When executives speak, we should listen and act differently. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.
Cespedes, F. (1994). Industrial marketing: managing new requirements. Sloan Management Review, 35, 45–60.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.
Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 135–145.
Day, G. S. (2004). Invited commentaries on ‘evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing’: achieving advantage with a new dominant logic. Journal of Marketing, 68, 18–19.
Engelen, A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A cross-cultural perspective of marketing departments’ influence tactics. Journal of International Marketing, 19, 73–94.
Ernst, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Rübsaamen, C. (2010). Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 74, 80–92.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192.
Grayson, K. (2007). Friendship versus business in marketing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 71, 121–139.
Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 191–215.
Gruca, T. S., & Rego, L. L. (2005). Customer satisfaction, cash flow, and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 69, 115–130.
Gupta, S., Lehmann, D. R., & Stuart, J. A. (2004). Valuing customers. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 7–18.
Homburg, C., & Jensen, O. (2007). The thought worlds of marketing and sales: which differences make a difference? Journal of Marketing, 71, 124–142.
Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., Jr., & Krohmer, H. (1999). Marketing’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 63, 1–17.
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42–54.
Hyde, P., Landry, E., & Tipping, A. (2004). Making the perfect marketer: a study from the association of national advertisers and Booz Allen Hamilton suggests five ways to make marketing more relevant than ever. Strategy & Business, 37, 36–43.
Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.
Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 24–41.
Kohli, A., & Jaworski, B. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–18.
Kumar, V., & Shah, D. (2009). Expanding the role of marketing: from customer equity to market capitalization. Journal of Marketing, 73, 119–136.
Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of Marketing, 75, 16–30.
Lehmann, D. R. (1996). Some thoughts on the futures of marketing. In D. R. Lehmann & K. E. Jocz (Eds.), Reflections on the futures of marketing: practice and education (pp. 121–135). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Lehmann, D. R. (2004). Metrics for marketing matter. Journal of Marketing, 68, 73–75.
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.
Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Kim, Y. C. (2011). Salespeople’s knowledge-sharing behaviors with coworkers outside the sales unit. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 31, 103–122.
Mizik, N. (2014). Assessing the total financial performance impact of brand equity with limited time-series data. Journal of Marketing Research, in press [http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0431].
Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2008). The financial value impact of perceptual brand attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 15–32.
Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2009). Valuing branded businesses. Journal of Marketing, 73, 137–153.
Moorman, C., & Rust, R. T. (1999). The role of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63, 180–197.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Sullivan, D., & Abela, A. V. (2007). Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 71, 79–93.
Park, C. S., & Srinivasan, V. (1994). A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 271–288.
Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69, 167–176.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Ramani, G., & Kumar, V. (2008). Interaction orientation and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72, 27–45.
Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2004a). Measuring marketing productivity: current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Marketing, 68, 76–89.
Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004b). Return on marketing: using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68, 109–127.
Schultz, D. E. (2005). MR deserves blame for marketing’s decline. Marketing News, 39, 7.
Sethi, R., & Iqbal, Z. (2008). Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effect on novel new products. Journal of Marketing, 72, 118–134.
Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (2005). Does marketing need reform? in: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.
Stock, R. M., & Reifenscheid, I. (2014). Who should be in power to encourage product program innovativeness, R&D or marketing? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42, 264–276.
Tavassoli, N. T., Sorescu, A., & Chandy, R. (2014). Employee-based brand equity: Why firms with strong brands pay their executives less. Journal of Marketing Research, in press [http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0435].
U.S. News and World Report. (2014). Retrieved September 17, 2014 from http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities
Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009). Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73, 14–37.
Verhoef, P. C., Leeflang, P. S. H., Reiner, J., Natter, M., Baker, W., Grinstein, A., Gustafsson, A., Morrison, P., & Saunders, J. (2011). A cross-national investigation into the marketing department’s influence within the firm: Toward initial empirical generalizations. Journal of International Marketing, 19, 59–86.
Webster, F. E. (2005). Back to the future: integrating marketing as tactic, strategy, and organizational culture. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.
Webster, F. E., Malter, A. J., & Ganesan, S. (2005). The decline and dispersion of marketing competence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 35–43.
About this article
Cite this article
Homburg, C., Vomberg, A., Enke, M. et al. The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 43, 1–13 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3
- Marketing department’s influence
- Sales department’s influence
- Marketing function
- Firm performance