The loss of the marketing department’s influence: is it really happening? And why worry?
- 2.7k Downloads
Although research and managerial practice have demonstrated great interest in the role of marketing departments within firms and have raised repeated concerns that their influence is in sharp decline, prior research has not analyzed whether marketing departments are truly losing ground. To do so, we build on the work of Homburg et al. (1999), which assessed the influence of the marketing department two decades ago. Drawing on structurally equivalent data, the results demonstrate that the marketing department has indeed lost significant influence. Additionally, we analyze which department has benefited from this loss of influence. Interestingly, it is the sales department that has gained influence, rather than the finance department, as one might assume. We also study the performance consequences of the intraorganizational distribution of influence among the marketing, sales, R&D, operations, and finance departments. Our results are alarming because an influential marketing department makes the greatest contribution to company performance.
KeywordsMarketing department’s influence Sales department’s influence Marketing function Firm performance
- Bauerly, R. J., Johnson, D. T., & Singh, M. (2005). Readability and the impact of marketing. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.Google Scholar
- Cespedes, F. (1994). Industrial marketing: managing new requirements. Sloan Management Review, 35, 45–60.Google Scholar
- Hyde, P., Landry, E., & Tipping, A. (2004). Making the perfect marketer: a study from the association of national advertisers and Booz Allen Hamilton suggests five ways to make marketing more relevant than ever. Strategy & Business, 37, 36–43.Google Scholar
- Lehmann, D. R. (1996). Some thoughts on the futures of marketing. In D. R. Lehmann & K. E. Jocz (Eds.), Reflections on the futures of marketing: practice and education (pp. 121–135). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
- Mizik, N. (2014). Assessing the total financial performance impact of brand equity with limited time-series data. Journal of Marketing Research, in press [http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1509/jmr.13.0431].
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Schultz, D. E. (2005). MR deserves blame for marketing’s decline. Marketing News, 39, 7.Google Scholar
- Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (2005). Does marketing need reform? in: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.Google Scholar
- Tavassoli, N. T., Sorescu, A., & Chandy, R. (2014). Employee-based brand equity: Why firms with strong brands pay their executives less. Journal of Marketing Research, in press [http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1509/jmr.13.0435].
- U.S. News and World Report. (2014). Retrieved September 17, 2014 from http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities
- Verhoef, P. C., Leeflang, P. S. H., Reiner, J., Natter, M., Baker, W., Grinstein, A., Gustafsson, A., Morrison, P., & Saunders, J. (2011). A cross-national investigation into the marketing department’s influence within the firm: Toward initial empirical generalizations. Journal of International Marketing, 19, 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Webster, F. E. (2005). Back to the future: integrating marketing as tactic, strategy, and organizational culture. In: marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1–25.Google Scholar
- Webster, F. E., Malter, A. J., & Ganesan, S. (2005). The decline and dispersion of marketing competence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 35–43.Google Scholar