Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Study of In-Situ CO2 Foam Technique and Application in Yangsanmu Oilfield

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

The Yangsanmu oilfield of Dagang is a typical heavy oil reservoir. After the maximum primary production (waterflooding), more than half of the original oil is still retained in the formation. Therefore, the implementation of an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process to further raise the production scheme is inevitable. In this work, a novel in-situ CO2 foam technique which can be used as a potential EOR technique in this oilfield was studied. A screening of gas producers, foam stabilizers and foaming agents was followed by the study of the properties of the in-situ CO2 foam systems through static experiments. Core-flooding experiments and field application were also conducted to evaluate the feasibility of this technique. The results indicated that the in-situ CO2 foam system can improve both the sweep and displacement efficiencies, due to the capacity of this system in reducing oil viscosity and interfacial tension, respectively. The EOR performance of the in-situ CO2 foam system is better than the single-agent and even binary system (surfactant-polymer) flooding. The filed data demonstrated that the in-situ CO2 technique can significantly promote oil production and control water cuts. These results are believed to be beneficial in making EOR strategies for similar reservoirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wei B (2015) Flow characteristics of three enhanced oil recovery polymers in porous media. J Appl Polym Sci 132(10). doi:10.1002/app.41598

  2. Bakhtiyarov S (2009) Core Flood Tests of in-Situ CO2 Generation Technology. In: ASME 2009 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  3. Bing W, Romero-Zerón L, Rodrigue D (2014) Evaluation of Two New Self-assembly Polymeric Systems for Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:16600–16611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pu WF, Wei B, Jin FY, Li YB, Jia H, Liu PG, Tang ZJ (2016) Experimental investigation of co2 huff-n-puff process for enhancing oil recovery in tight reservoirs. Chem Eng Res Des. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2016.05.012

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dyunushkin PI, Namiot AY (1978) Investigation of Conditions for Oil and CO2. Miscibility. Neft Khoz, Moscow 7:59–61

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glazova VM, Rizhik VM (1980) Implementation of CO2 Injection in the World. Neftepromislovoye Delo, VNIIOENG, Moscow, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khisamutdinov NI, Ibragimov GZ (1991) In: Telin AG (ed) Successive Injection of CO2 and Water to Improve Oil Recovery. VNIIOENG, Moscow p 62

  8. Gumersky KH, Dzhafarov IS, Shakhverdiev AK, Mamedov YG (2000) In-situ generation of carbon dioxide: New way to increase oil recovery. In: SPE European Petroleum Conference, Paris, pp 24–25. SPE-65170-MS

  9. Bakhtiyarov SI, Shakhverdiyev AK, Panakhov GM, Abbasov EM (2006) Oil Recovery by In-Situ Gas Generation: Volume and Pressure Measurements. In: ASME 2006 2nd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting Collocated With the 14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  10. Bakhtiyarov SI, Shakhverdiyev AK, Panakhov GM, Abbasov EM (2007) Polymer/Surfactant Effects on Generated Volume and Pressure of CO2 in EOR Technology. In: ASME/JSME 2007 5th Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  11. Shiau BJB, Hsu TP, Roberts BL, Harwell JH (2010) Improved Chemical Flood Efficiency by In Situ CO2 Generation. In: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, pp 24–28 SPE-129893-MS

  12. Lee HO, Heller JP (1990) Laboratory measurements of CO2-foam mobility. SPE Reserv Eng 5:193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoefner ML, Evans EM, Buckles JJ, Jones TA (1995) CO2 foam: results from four developmental field trials. SPE Reserv Eng 10:273–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang SH, Grigg R (1999) Effects of foam quality and flow rate on CO2-foam behavior at reservoir temperature and pressure. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 2:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim JS, Dong Y, Rossen WR (2005) Steady-state flow behavior of CO2 foam. SPE J 10:405–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cui L, Ma K, Puerto M, Abdala AA, Tanakov I, Lu LJ, Hirasaki G (2016) Mobility of ethomeen C12 and carbon dioxide (CO2) foam at high temperature/high salinity and in carbonate cores. SPE J

  17. Chen Y, Elhag AS, Reddy PP, Chen H, Cui L, Worthen AJ, Nguyen QP (2016) Phase behavior and interfacial properties of a switchable ethoxylated amine surfactant at high temperature and effects on CO2-in-water foams. J Coll Interface Sci 470:80–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support received from the National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2015CB250904). The valuable comments made by the anonymous reviewers are also sincerely appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wanfen Pu or Bing Wei.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, F., Liu, Z., Pu, W. et al. Experimental Study of In-Situ CO2 Foam Technique and Application in Yangsanmu Oilfield. J Surfact Deterg 19, 1231–1240 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-016-1862-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-016-1862-3

Keywords

Navigation