Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An adaptive and integrated reference model for supplier selection: application to product development and serialized component supply

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 07 October 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to present an adaptive and integrated reference model for the Supplier Selection Process (SSP) to integrate it into the Product Development Process (PDP) or the serialized component supply. The research methodology adopted a broad literature review on indexed databases and a logical deductive analysis of the identified constructs and factors. The two main results obtained were: compilation and categorization (moderating factors, connecting factors) of critical SSP success factors; and proposal of a reference model so that the SSP can serve the PDP and the serialized component supply. Regarding originality we can mention: (a) this reference model covers all the critical SSP success factors; (b) it makes a clear distinction between moderating and connecting factors (c) while addressing both the PDP and the serialized component supply. The considerable number of factors identified in this research suggests that the vast majority of models proposed in the literature are based on an incomplete set of variables, restricting the conceptual view of the SSP. Finally, the results contribute to reducing the risk of the SSP not adding value to the Original Equipment Manufacturers' (OEMs) strategic purpose or causing losses. Additionally, the proposed model can be adapted according to the company's business strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Bäck I, Kohtamäki M (2015) Boundaries of R&D Collaboration. Technovation 45–46:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Herstad S, Asleen HW, Ebersberger B (2014) On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Res Policy 43:495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scandura A (2016) University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort. Res Policy 45(9):1907–1922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krause DR, Scannell TV (2002) “Supplier development practices: product- and service-based industry comparisons. J Suppl Chain Manag 38(1):13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peled M, Dvir D (2012) Towards a contingent approach of customer involvement in defence projects: an exploratory study. Int J Project Manage 30:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosell DT, Lakemond N, Melander L (2017) Integrating supplier knowledge in new product development projects: decoupled and coupled approaches. J Knowl Manag 21(5):1035–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonner JM, Walker OC (2004) Selecting influential business-to-business customers in new product development: Relational embeddedness and knowledge heterogeneity considerations. J Prod Innov Manag 21:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carbonell P, Rodriguez-Escudero AI, Pujari D (2012) Performance effects of involving lead users and close customers in new service development. J Serv Mark 26:497–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fang E (2008) Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market. J Marketing 72:90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arabsheybani A, Paydar MM, Safaei AS (2018) An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk. J Clean Prod 190:577–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Çebi F, Otay I (2016) A two-stage fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and order allocation problem with quantity discounts and lead time. Information Sci 339:143e157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Westphal P, Sohal AS (2013) Taxonomy of outsourcing decision models. Prod Plan Control 24(4–5):347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheraghalipour A, Farsad S (2018) A bi-objective sustainable supplier selection and order allocation considering quantity discounts under disruption risks: a case study in plastic industry. Comput Ind Eng 118:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moheb-Alizadeh H, Handfield R (2019) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: a novel multi-objective programming model with a hybrid solution approach. Comput Ind Eng 129:192–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dey PK, Bhattacharya A, Ho W, Clegg B (2015) Strategic supplier performance evaluation: a case-based action research of a UK manufacturing organisation. Int J Prod Econ 166:192–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee ABS, Chan FTS, Pu X (2018) Impact of supplier development on supplier’s performance. Ind Manag Data Syst 118(6):1192–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Talluri S, Narasimhan R, Chung W (2010) Manufacturer cooperation in supplier development under risk. Eur J Oper Res 207:165–173

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Wowak KD, Craighead CW, Ketchen DJ Jr, Hult GTM (2016) Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for the supplier-enabled fuzzy front end of the new product development process. J Supply Chain Manag 52(1):66–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mortensen M, Arlbjorn J (2012) Inter-organisational supplier development: the case of customer attractiveness and strategic fit. Supply Chain Manag 17(2):152–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan KC, Lyman SB, Wisner JD (2002) Supply chain management: a strategic perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 22(6):614–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lima Junior FR, Osiro L, Carpinetti LCR (2013) A fuzzy inference and categorization approach for supplier selection using compensatory and non-compensatory decision rules. Appl Soft Comput 13:4133–4147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oinonen M, Ritala P, Jalkala A, Blomqvist K (2018) In search of paradox management capability in supplier–customer codevelopment. Ind Mark Manage 74:102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  24. Akrout H (2015) A process perspective on trust in buyer-supplier relationships. ‘Calculus’ an intrinsic component of trust evolution. Eur Business Rev 27(1):17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Araujo L, Gadde L-E, Dubois A (2016) Purchasing and supply management and the role of supplier interfaces. IMP J 10(1):2–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aune T, Gressetvold E (2011) Supplier involvement in innovation processes: a taxonomy. Int J Innov Manag 15(1):121–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Axelsson B, Wynstra F (2002) Buying Business Services, 1st edn. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  29. Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  30. Capaldo A (2007) Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strateg Manag J 28:585–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Day M, Fawcett SE, Fawcett AM, Magnan GM (2013) Trust and relational embeddedness: exploring a paradox of trust pattern development in key supplier relationships. Ind Mark Manage 42:152–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Day M, Magnan GM, Moeller MM (2010) Evaluating the bases of supplier segmentation: a review and taxonomy. Ind Mark Manage 39:625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Demil B, Lecocq X (2006) Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: the emergence of Bazaar governance. Organ Stud 27(10):1447–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):660–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Echtelt FEA, Wynstra F, van Weele AJ, Duysters G (2008) Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a multiple-case study. J Prod Innov Manag 25:180–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fossas-Olalla M, Minguela-Rata B, López-Sánchez J, Fernández-Menéndez (2015) Product innovation: when should suppliers begin to collaborate? J Business Res 68:1404–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Handfield RB, Krause DR, Scannell TV, Monczka RM (2000) Avoid the pitfalls in supplier development. Sloan Manag Rev 41(2):37–49

  38. Johnsen TE (2009) Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: taking stock and looking to the future. J Purchasing Suppl Manag 15:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Laage-Hellman J, Lind F, Perna A (2014) Customer involvement in product development: an industrial network perspective. J Business Business Marketing 21(4):257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Melander L, Tell F (2014) Uncertainty in collaborative NPD: effects on the selection of technology and supplier. J Eng Technol Manage 31:103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Noshad K, Awasthi A (2015) Supplier quality development: a review of literature and industry practices. Int J Prod Res 53(2):466–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schiele H (2010) Early supplier integration: the dual role of purchasing in new product development. R&D Manag 40:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Caldarelli G, Zardini A, Rossignoli C (2021) Blockchain adoption in the fashion sustainable supply chain: pragmatically addressing barriers. J Organ Chang Manag 34(2):507–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Williamson O (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. J Law Econ 22:233–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Adobor H, McMullen RS (2018) Supply chain resilience: a dynamic and multidimensional approach. Int J Logist Manag 29(4):1451–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Whitehead K, Zacharia Z, Prater E (2019) Investigating the role of knowledge transfer in supply chain collaboration. Int J Logistics Manag 30(1):284–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Delbufalo E, Bastl M (2018) Multi-principal collaboration and supplier’s compliance with codes-of-conduct. Int J Logistics Manag 29(4):1237–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Koller M (2016) Exploring adaptability in organizations: Where adaptive advantage comes from and what it is based upon. J Organizational Change Manag 29(6):837–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Will MG (2017) Successful organizational change through win-win: how change managers can create mutual benefits. J Model Manag 12(4):671–689

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jayaram J (2008) Supplier involvement in new product development projects: dimensionality and contingency effects. Int J Prod Res 46(13):3717–3735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ragatz GL, Handfield RB, Petersen KJ (2002) Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. J Bus Res 55(5):389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lui SS, Ngo H-Y (2012) Drivers and outcomes of long-term orientation in cooperative relationships. Br J Manag 23(1):80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Su J, Gargeya VB (2016) Supplier selection in small- and medium-sized firms: the case of the US textile and apparel industry. Am J Business 31(4):166–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Trautrims A, Maccarthy BL, Okade C (2017) Building an innovation-based supplier portfolio: the use of patent analysis in strategic supplier selection in the automotive sector. Int J Prod Econ 194:228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wuyts S, Geyskens I (2005) The formation of buyer-supplier relationships: detailed contract drafting and close partner selection. J Marketing 69(4):103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yoo SH, Hin H (2015) PARK, New product development and the effect of supplier involvement. Omega 51:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Handfield RB, Bechtel C (2002) The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Ind Mark Manage 31(4):367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kou T, Chiang C, Chiang A (2018) Effects of IT-based supply chains on new product development activities and the performance of computer and communication electronics manufacturers. J Business Indust Marketing 33(7):869–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bai C, Sarkis J (2016) Supplier development investment strategies: a game theoretic evaluation. Ann Oper Res 240:583–615

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. Govindan K, Kannan D, Haq AN (2010) Analyzing supplier development criteria for an automobile industry. Ind Manag Data Syst 110(1):43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Worthmann K, Braun P, Proch M, Schlüchtermann J, Pannek J (2016) On contractual periods in supplier development. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49–2:060–065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Singh RK, Koul S, Kumar P (2017) Analyzing the interaction of factors for flexibility in supply chains. J Model Manag 12(4):671–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lau AKW, Yam RCM, Tang EPY (2007) Supply chain product co-development, product modularity and product performance: empirical evidence from Hong Kong manufacturers. Ind Manag Data Syst 107(7):1036–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Carrera DA, Mayorga RV (2008) Supply chain management: a modular Fuzzy Inference System approach in supplier selection for new product development. J Intell Manuf 19:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Mirmousa S, Dehnavi HD (2016) Development of criteria of selecting the supplier by using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 230:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Omurca SI (2013) An intelligent supplier evaluation, selection and development system. Appl Soft Comput 13:690–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ordoobadi SM (2009) Development of a supplier selection model using fuzzy logic. Supply Chain Manag 14(4):314–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Rezaei J, Ortt R (2013) Supplier segmentation using fuzzy logic. Ind Mark Manage 42:507–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Hosseininasab A, Ahmadi A (2015) Selecting a supplier portfolio with value, development, and risk consideration. Eur J Oper Res 245:146–156

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  70. Li L, Zabinsky ZB (2011) Incorporating uncertainty into a supplier selection problem. Int J Prod Econ 134:344–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Rezaei J, Wang J, Travasszzy L (2015) Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using best worst method. Expert Syst Appl 42:9152–9164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Prasannavenkatesan S, Goh M (2016) Multi-objective supplier and order allocation under disruption risk. Transp Res Part E 95:124–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wu DD, Zhang Y, Wu D, Olson DL 2010 Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: a possibility approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 200

  74. Chen L, Ellis SC, Suresh N (2016) A supplier development adoption framework using expectancy theory. Int J Oper Prod Manag 36(5):592–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Chen Y (2011) Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain. Information Sci 181:1651–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Noorizadeh A, Rashidi K, Peltokorpi A (2018) Categorizing suppliers for development investments in construction: application of DEA and RFM concept. Constr Manag Econ 36(9):487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wagner SM (2010) Indirect and direct supplier development: performance implications of individual and combined effects. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 57(4):536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Song M, di Benedetto CA (2008) Supplier’s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. J Oper Manag 26(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Venkatesan SP, Goh M (2016) Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk. Transp Res Part E 95:124–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Eltantawy RA, Giunipero L, Fox GL (2009) A strategic skill based model of supplier integration and its effect on supply management performance. Ind Mark Manag 38:925–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Park H, Ballamy MA, Basole RC (2018) Structural anatomy and evolution of supply chain alliance networks: a multi-method approach. J Oper Manag 63:79–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Hallikas J, Karvonen I, Pulkkinen U, Virolainen V, Tuominen M (2004) Risk management processes in supplier networks. Int J Prod Econ 90:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin Sci Q 35(1):128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Hoang H, Rothaemel FT (2005) The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Acad Manag J 48(2):332–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Prajogo DI, Ahmed PK (2006) Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Manag 36(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00450.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Knell M, Srholec M (2008) Technological collaboration and foreign ownership across firms in Europe. Report, Innovation Watch-Systematic

  87. Vroom VH (1964) Work and Motivation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  88. Oinonen M, Falkala AM (2015) Divergent goals in supplier-customer co-development process: an integrated framework. J Bus Ind Mark 30(3/4):290–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Anderson DR, Sweeney DJ, Williams TA (2009) Essentials of statistics for business and economics, 5th edn. Thomson South-Western, Mason

    Google Scholar 

  90. Matook S, Lasch R, Tamaschke R (2009) Supplier development with benchmarking as part of a comprehensive supplier risk management framework. Int J Oper Prod Manag 29(3):241–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Yan T, Ribbink D, Pun H (2018) Incentivizing supplier participation in buyer innovation: experimental evidence of non-optimal contractual behaviors. J Oper Manag 57:36–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Lo H, Liou JJH, Wang H, Tsai Y (2018) An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. J Clean Prod 190:339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Fritsch M, Kauffeld-Monz M (2010) The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. Ann Reg Sci 44:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Büchel B, Nieminen L, Armbruster-Domeyer H, Denison D (2013) Managing stakeholders in team-based innovation: the dynamics of knowledge and trust networks. Eur J Innov Manag 16(1):22–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Ozman M (2009) Inter-firm networks and innovation: a survey of literature. Econ Innov New Technol 18(1):39–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Roxenhall T (2013) Network structure and innovation in strategic innovation networks. Int J Innov Manag 17:1350002-1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Li S, Kang M, Haney MH (2017) The effect of supplier development on outsourcing performance: the mediating roles of opportunism and flexibility. Prod Plan Control 28(S68):599–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Wagner SM (2011) Supplier development and the relationship life-cycle. Int J Prod Econ 129:277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Myers SC (1987) Finance theory and financial strategy. Midl Corp Finance J 5:6–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Campinas-Unicamp, R. Pedro Zaccaria, 1300, Limeira, SP, 13484-350, Brazil

    Adauto Lucas da Silva, Antonio Carlos Pacagnella Junior, Paulo Sérgio de Arruda Ignácio & Alessandro Lucas da Silva

Authors
  1. Adauto Lucas da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Carlos Pacagnella Junior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paulo Sérgio de Arruda Ignácio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alessandro Lucas da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adauto Lucas da Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Original version of this article corrected for missing keywords in Abstract.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, A.L., Junior, A.C.P., de Arruda Ignácio, P.S. et al. An adaptive and integrated reference model for supplier selection: application to product development and serialized component supply. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 18, 141–156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-023-01221-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-023-01221-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation