Abstract
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plant growth decreases when cultivated under salinity or irrigated with salty water. Inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) is a method for mitigating the harmful effects of salinity on plants growth. To investigate salt-tolerant PGPB with salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive alfalfa cultivar interactions under salinity, some physiological and agronomical aspects were investigated. The inoculated plants of alfalfa cultivars with Hartmannibacter. diazotrophicus and Pseudomonas sp. bacteria were compared with non-inoculated plants. Plants were grown in growth room and irrigated with tap water until 6–7 weeks, and then, salinity stress imposed by irrigating with tap water (control), 10 dS m−1 and 20 dS m−1 NaCl. Salinity reduced relative water content (RWC), membrane stability index (MSI), K+, photosynthesis rate (Pn) and stomatal conductance (gs), leaf number, height, and dry weight, and increased sodium in all cultivars. Inoculation of cultivars with both PGPB mitigated the negative effects of salinity on plants growth by increasing the root length and weight, nodule number, chlorophyll pigments, RWC, MSI, Pn, and gs. Chlorophyll pigments, plant height and leaf number, Na+, K+/Na+, and nodule number improved more pronounced through inoculating with Pseudomonas sp., whereas K+, carotenoids, and RWC improved more pronounced through H. diazotrophicus under salinity. The results showed inoculation with two bacteria improved growth performance in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars under 10 dS m−1, but at high salinity (20 dS m−1), inoculation was successful only in salt-tolerant alfalfa cultivars.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Soil salinity is one of the most important factors that restricts plants’ productivity and quality. It also spreads out in the world year to year. All growth aspects and yield components decrease under salinity in many plants (Munns and Tester 2008; Shahbaz and Ashraf 2013). Photosynthesis, gas exchanges, and plant growth decrease due to the osmotic and ionic stress of salinity stress (Chaves et al. 2009). Two main strategies to overcome salinity stress include (i) technological strategy which is expensive; (ii) biological strategy which is economically feasible (Ashraf and Foolad 2013). One biological method for decreasing deleterious effects of salinity is application of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) (Bacilio et al. 2004; Shrivastava and Kumar 2015; Trdan et al. 2019). Alleviation of salt stress by PGPB has been reported in alfalfa (Noori et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2016), legume (Zahran 1999), barley (Suarez et al. 2015), okra (Habib et al. 2016), lettuce (Han and Lee 2005), and pepper (Del Amor and Cuadra-Crespo 2012). Recent studies emphasize on the mitigating effect of PGPB on plants growth by nutrient solubilization, nitrogen fixation, and phytohormone production mechanisms (Dodd, and Pérez-Alfocea 2012; Paul and Lade 2014).
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is a perennial plant which is cultivated as a forage in large areas of irrigated lands in the world. This plant has high economical and agronomical importance due to its high forage quality and N2 fixation ability (Anower et al. 2013). Alfalfa is moderately saline tolerant plant among the legumes; however, its production decreases at salinity above 2 dS m−1 (Maas and Hoffman 1977). With regard to high water need of alfalfa production among plants, and also water shortages in many areas, the need to use saline or wastewater for alfalfa irrigation increases every day. Reports show that PGPB has improving effects on alfalfa germination indices and growth aspects under salinity (Bertrand et al. 2015; Ansari et al. 2017; Noori et al. 2018). Bertrand et al. (2015) showed that combining salt-tolerant rhizobial strains with salt-tolerant alfalfa cultivars was an effective strategy to improve alfalfa productivity under salinity. Noori et al. (2018) showed that nodule non-rhizobial strains in alfalfa plants had PGPB abilities and could use for improving salinity tolerance as a Rhizobium bio-fertilizers in salinity conditions.
In the previous study, we selected two salt-tolerant bacteria (two strains) among four commercial PGPB strains and we showed their significant positive influence on improving germination indices in nine alfalfa cultivars under salinity (Ansari et al. 2017). In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that salt-tolerant bacteria can improve salinity tolerance in alfalfa and this effect in salt-tolerant cultivars is more than salt-sensitive cultivars under saline conditions. The aims of this study were to investigate (i) whether inoculation with PGPB alleviates growth parameters and physiological properties in alfalfa cultivars, (ii) the interaction between salt-tolerant PGPB with salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive alfalfa cultivars, (iii) the differences between inoculated plants of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive alfalfa cultivars under salinity, and (iv) evaluation of the effect of inoculation with PGPB on Na+ and K+ ions absorption.
Materials and methods
Salt-tolerant bacteria strains
This study is continuation of the previous experiments about the effects of alfalfa cultivar inoculation with salt-tolerant bacteria under salinity. To inoculate salt-tolerant and sensitive alfalfa cultivars seeds with salt-tolerant bacteria, two representative soil bacteria (Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 proradix and Hartmannibacter diazotrophicus) were prepared and used (Ansari et al. 2017). The Pseudomonas sp. bacteria came from an industrial product used in BIOFECTOR project (https://www.biofector.info) and H. diazotrophicus came from the Justus-Liebig-University, of Giessen in Germany from the collection of Prof. Sylvia Schnell and Stefan Ratering.
Alfalfa cultivars, inoculum procedure, and cultivation
Four alfalfa cultivars Hamadan, Hashtrod, Heris salt-tolerant, and Local 253 (salt-sensitive) were selected in germination test (Ansari et al. 2017). Alfalfa seeds were scarified for 2 min in 98% sulphuric acid and then surface-sterilized for 3 min in 5% sodium hypochloride. After washing, the seeds were placed in separated and sterile Petri dishes and 10 ml microbial solution cells (1.6 × 1013 CFU mL−1) added to each of them. The Petri dishes were placed in room temperature for 1 h, and then, the seeds were dried. Forty seeds of alfalfa cultivars were planted in plastic pots (20 cm diameter) that were filled with mixture of farm soil and perlite (4, 1). The pots were placed in the growth room of the Soil Science and Water Management Department of Szent Istvan University under a 25/15 °C day/night temperatures, a 15 h photoperiod, and a photosynthetic photon flux density of 600–800 mmol photons m−2 s−1. The Pots were irrigated with tap water after sowing and extra seedlings were cut after establishment and 20 plants retained in each pot.
Salinity treatments and experimental design
The pots irrigated with tap water until 6–7 weeks, and then, salinity treatments (tap water: 0 dS m−1 (control), 10 dS m−1, and 20 dS m−1) imposed by irrigating with salty water every 5 days. Irrigation was continued until the end of two harvests. The experimental design was factorial and comprised three levels of salt, four alfalfa cultivars (randomized complete block design), two bacteria, three replicates, and two harvests in 108 pots.
Measurement
Relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI) were measured after the first and second week salinity treatment. RWC, six leaf samples were detached in each treatment and replication and weighed immediately to measure fresh weight (FW); after that, the samples were dipped in the distilled water for 24 h. The leaves were weighed to record fully turgid weight (TW) and were subjected to oven drying at 70 °C for 48 h to record the dry weight (DW). The RWC were calculated by the equation of RWC = [FW − DW]/[TW − DW] × 100 (Smart and Bingham 1974). MSI, fresh leaf sample (0.1 g) was taken in 10 cm3 of double distilled water in two sets. One set was subjected to 40 °C for 30 min and its conductivity was recorded using a conductivity meter (C1). The second set was kept in a boiling water bath (100 °C) for 10 min and its conductivity was also recorded (C2). MSI = [1 − (C1/C2)] × 100 (Sairam et al. 2005).
Photosynthesis rate (Pn) and stomatal conductance (gs) were measured using a portable infrared gas analyzer (two times) after the first week and second week salinity by LCi (ADC Bioscientific LTD. UK). Water-use efficiency (WUE) calculated by dividing photosynthesis rate to transpiration (T) \(\left( {{\text{WUE}} = \frac{Pn}{T}} \right)\).
Chlorophyll pigments were measured (one time) 2 weeks after salinity treatment. The content of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b was extracted and quantified by the modified method of Arnon (1949). 500 mg (W) fresh leaf tissue was extracted using the volume (V) of 10 ml 80% Acetone. The extracted solutions were measured using a spectrophotometer (Biochrom Libra S22, UK) at wavelengths 470, 663, and 645 nm (Shivakrishna et al. 2018). The chlorophyll a (Chla) and chlorophyll b (Chlb) were calculated according to the following equations:
where A is the optical density at specific wavelength (Arnon 1949).
Plants dry weight, height, and leaf number were measured at two harvests and after 10% starting flowering. Dry weight was measured by lab balance and expressed as a dry weight per plant after cutting the whole plants and drying in an oven at 55 °C for 72 h (Neres et al. 2010). The plant height was measured by ruler (cm) and the leaf number accounted per plant.
Root growth and nodule number were measured at the end of experiment. Root length was measured by ruler (cm), root weight was measured by lab balance and expressed as a root weight per plant, and nodule number was extracted at the end of experiment (after two harvest) and accounted after extracting the whole plants roots from pots and exact washing with distilled water.
Ion content
100 mg of alfalfa leaves samples were oven-dried and ashed at 600 °C for 5 h. Afterwards, samples were dissolved in 2 ml concentrated HNO3 with gentle heating. The samples were adjusted to a volume of 50 ml with distilled water and filtered through a paper filter. Na+ and K+ contents were measured using flame photometry (Jenvey-PFP7 Flame Photometer, Japan) (Gao et al. 2016).
Statistical analysis
Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and means were compared using Duncan’s range test and Fisher’s protected least significant difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05. All calculations were performed using SAS software, version 9.4.
Results
Effect of inoculation with bacteria on dry weight, height, and leaf number
To understand the effect of inoculation with bacteria on alfalfa growth and dry mass, the plant height, leaf number, and dry weight were measured at two harvests. Data showed that in all cultivars, dry weight, height, and leaf number decreased under salinity at both harvests, and all of the mentioned aspects in inoculated plants were higher than non-inoculated plants (Fig. 2). Investigating the harvest, bacteria, and salinity interactions showed that dry weight, plant height and leaf number at second harvest were more than the first harvest at control. Dry weight, plant height, and leaf number at second harvest were less than the first harvest in all cultivars under salinity. Inoculated plants of Hashtrod at control and salinity had higher dry weight than non-inoculated plants at the first harvest. At second harvest, dry weight of inoculated plants of Hamadan and Local 253 was higher significantly than non-inoculated plants. The improvement effect of inoculation with bacteria was more pronounced in Heris and Local 253 at 10 dS m−1. Inoculation with bacteria had no significant effect on the dry weight of alfalfa cultivars except Heris at the second harvest at 20 dS m−1. The dry weight of inoculated plants of Heris was more than non-inoculated plants. Also, the inoculated plants with Pseudomonas sp. bacteria had higher height and leaf number than inoculated plants with H. diazotrophicus (Fig. 2). Plant height in inoculated plant improved 14% and 15% and leaf number improved 18% and 23% at control and salinity, respectively, compared with non-inoculated plants. Study of interactions among harvest, salinity, and bacteria showed that at the first harvest, Heris and Local 253, at 10 dS m−1 and Local 253 at 20 dS m−1 had higher plant height and leaf number, but at second harvest, there was no significant difference among cultivars under salinity.
Effect of inoculation with bacteria on nodule number, root length, and root weight
Nodule number and root length decreased with increase in salinity in all cultivars; however, both of them in inoculated plants were more than non-inoculated at control and salinity. Study of the interactions between salinity and cultivar showed nodule number in inoculated plants with Pseudomonas sp. bacteria was more than inoculated plants with H. diazotrophicus and non-inoculated plants in control (Table 1). There was no significant difference in nodule number of inoculated plants with either bacterium at 10 dS m−1. Also, the nodule number of inoculated plants of Heris and Hamadan was higher than non-inoculated plants, but in Local 253 and Hashtrod, there was no significant difference between inoculated and non-inoculated plants at 10 dS m−1. At 20 dS m−1, there was no significant difference in nodule number between inoculated and non-inoculated plants except Local 253. The interaction between salinity and cultivar showed at control Local 253, at 10 dS m−1 Hashtrod, and at 20 dS m−1 Hamadan had the highest root length among the cultivars. Root weight increased under salinity in all cultivars, and in inoculated plants, it was higher than non-inoculated. Investigating the interactions of salinity and cultivar showed that Heris and Hashtrod at control, Heris at 10 dS m−1, and Local 253 at 20 dS m−1 had the highest root weight (Table 1).
Effect of inoculation with bacteria on relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability (MSI)
To understand the inoculation effect on RWC and MSI in alfalfa plants under salinity, both of them were measured at the first and the second week after salinity. Data showed that RWC and MSI decreased under salinity stress during 2 weeks after salinity, and in inoculated plants, RWC and MSI were higher than non-inoculated plants (Fig. 1). Investigating the interactions among harvest, salinity, bacteria, and cultivar showed that there was no significant difference between inoculated and non-inoculated plants at 20 dS m−1 a week after salinity; however, inoculated plants had relatively higher RWC compared with non-inoculated plants. Inoculated plants of the Local 253 and Heris had higher RWC compared with other cultivars at 10 dS m−1 a week after salinity. At the second week, the inoculated plants of Heris and Hashtrod had a high RWC among the cultivars at 10 dS m−1 and there was no significant difference among cultivars at 20 dS m−1. Inoculated plants with H. diazotrophicus had higher RWC than inoculated plants with Pseudomonas sp. bacteria. Investigating the interaction harvest with bacteria and salinity with bacteria showed that the inoculated plants of Heris and Hashtrod had a higher MSI than other cultivars at 20 dS m−1, but there was no significant difference in MSI between inoculated and non-inoculated plants at 10 dS m−1 a week after salinity treatment (Fig. 1). At the second week, the inoculated plants of Hamadan and Local 253 had a higher MSI than other cultivars at 10 dS m−1, but there was no significant difference among cultivars at 20 dS m−1.
Chlorophyll a (Chla), chlorophyll b (Chlb), total chlorophyll (Chlab), and carotenoids content (Car)
To understand the effects of inoculation with bacteria on chlorophyll pigments in alfalfa plants under salinity, Chla, Chlb, Chlab, and Car were measured 2 weeks after salinity treatment. Data showed that Chla, Chlb, Chlab, and Car decreased under salinity, but the rate of reduction in inoculated plants was less than non-inoculated plants (Table 1). Moreover, inoculated plants with Pseudomonas sp. had a higher Chla, Chlb, and Chlab than the inoculated plants with H. diazotrophicus. The study of interactions among salinity, bacteria, and cultivar showed that Chla in inoculated plants of all cultivars except Local 253 was more than non-inoculated under salinity. The study of the interaction between salinity and cultivar showed Heris and Hamadan had higher Chlb than other cultivars at 10 dS m−1, but there was no significant difference among cultivars at 20 dS m−1. And also, the study of the interactions between salinity and cultivars showed Heris had higher Chlab and Car content compared with other cultivars at 10 dS m−1 and 20 dS m−1. Inoculated plants with H. diazotrophicus had higher Car than the inoculated plants with Pseudomonas sp. (Table 1).
Photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), and water-use efficiency (WUE)
Pn, gs, and WUE were measured to understand the effect of inoculation with bacteria on the photosynthesis process in alfalfa plants under salinity at the first week and the second week after salinity treatment. Data showed that Pn, gs, and WUE in inoculated plants with bacteria were higher than non-inoculated plants under control and salinity. Pn and gs decreased, but WUE increased in all cultivars with the increase in salinity. There was no significant difference between the inoculated plants of Pseudomonas sp. and H. diazotrophicus bacteria in Pn and gs (Fig. 1). The interactions between salinity and cultivar showed that inoculated plants of Hamadan at control and Hashtrod at 10 dS m−1 had the highest gs among the cultivars, and there was no significant difference among the cultivars at 20 dS m−1. The study of the interactions harvest with salinity and salinity with cultivar showed that Pn in the second week significantly was less than the first week at 10 dS m−1. And there was no significant difference in Pn between the first week and the second week at control and 20 dS m−1 treatments. Hamadan at control and 20 dS m−1 and Local 253 at 10 dS m−1 had the highest Pn among the cultivars. Study of the interactions among harvest, salinity and cultivar showed that WUE increased in the second week compared with the first week also WUE at 10 dS m−1 was more than control and 20 dS m−1. Moreover, Hamadan at control and Local 253 at 20 dS m−1 had the lowest WUE, and there was no significant difference among other cultivars; besides, Local 253 at 10 dS m−1 had the highest WUE (Fig. 2).
Ion content
Potassium (K+) and K+/Na+ ratio decreased and sodium (Na+) increased by increasing salinity in all cultivars. The interactions among salinity, bacteria, and cultivar showed that Na+ in inoculated plants with Pseudomonas sp. bacteria was less than inoculated plants with H. diazotrophicus and non-inoculated plants at 10 dS m−1. Also, the inoculated plants with both bacteria had fewer Na+ at 20 dS m−1. The inoculated plants of Local 253 had fewer Na+ than other cultivars under salinity (Table 1). Investigating the interaction among salinity and cultivar showed that K+ in Local 253 which inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. at 10 dS m−1 and Hashtrod inoculated with H. diazotrophicus at 20 dS m−1 was higher than other cultivars. The inoculated cultivars by H. diazotrophicus had higher K+ than inoculated by Pseudomonas sp. (Table 1). The interaction among salinity, cultivar, and bacteria showed that K+/Na+ in Local 253 and Heris was higher than other cultivars at 10 dS m−1, but there was no significant difference among cultivars at 20 dS m−1. Moreover, the K+/Na+ ratio in inoculated plants with Pseudomonas sp. was higher than inoculated plants with H. diazotrophicus at 10 dS m−1. Local 253 which inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. had higher K+/Na+ ratio compared with other inoculated cultivars at 10 dS m−1.
Discussion
Salinity reduced significantly alfalfa dry weight production and growth due to increase in Na+ and reduction in RWC, chlorophyll pigments, photosynthesis rate, nodule number, and K+. The same results were reported by Munns and Tester (2008), Chaves et al. (2009), Ashraf and Foolad (2013) and Acosta-Motos et al. (2017). The results showed that inoculation by bacteria reduced the negative effects of salinity on alfalfa growth and dry weight, because the inoculated plants had high gs, Pn, RWC, K+, leaf number, and height under salinity compared with non-inoculated plants. Also, there was no significant difference in dry weight of salt-tolerant cultivars with salt-sensitive cultivar (Local 253) at 10 dS m−1. However, at 20 dS m−1, inoculated plants of salt-tolerant cultivar (Heris) had higher dry weight than salt-sensitive cultivar and non-inoculated plants which showed under 10 dS m−1, salinity tolerance in both salt-tolerant and sensitive cultivars improved by inoculation. However, at high salinity, salinity tolerance improved by inoculation only in salt-tolerant cultivars. Moreover, no difference between the inoculated plants with both bacteria showed that either bacterium could increase dry weight, height, and leaf number under salinity. The reports showed in inoculated plants with bacteria, root length and nutrient absorption such as phosphor, potassium, and nitrogen (Babalola 2010), synthesis of auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins (Glick et al. 2007), growth rate, and dry mass production were higher than non-inoculated plant under stress and control conditions (Gupta et al. 2015; Xiao et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2019; Trdan et al. 2019). Liu et al. (2019) and Xiao et al. (2018) suggested that inoculation with rhizomicrobiome increased significantly plant growth in alfalfa plants and also plant biomass was affected by the composition of the rhizomicrobiome, soil pH, N, P, and plant growth stage and species. Also, Liu et al. (2019) showed that shoot height, fresh and dry weights, yield, crude protein, and antioxidant enzyme activity of alfalfa-inoculated plants were higher than non-inoculated plants, but ethylene content was lower in inoculated plants. Trdan et al. (2019) reported that mixture of two PGPB (Pseudomonas fluorescens and Azospirillum brasilense) increased the potato yield 17–31% under dry conditions. Also, investigating data and literature suggested that the reducing effect of salinity on growth aspects of inoculated plants at high salinity was related to root number reduction, root hair deformation (Gopalakrishnan et al. 2015), K+ ion depletion, carbohydrate composition alteration of bacterial cell surface, bacterial mobility inhibition (Paul and Lade 2014), nodule functions suppress, and photosynthesis rate decrease (Wang et al. 2016).
Reduction in nodule number, root length, and weight of alfalfa plants under salinity was similar to other plants (Zahran 1991; Manchanda, and Garg 2008; Zahaf et al. 2012). The previous studies on root growth under salinity showed that increased synthesis of ethylene and reactive oxygen species under salinity could decrease roots length and weight (Steffens 2014; Habib et al. 2016). Also, reduction in the root hair number, the formation of infection threads, the nutrient availability via photosynthesis products, nodule metabolism, atmospheric nitrogen diffusion, and deformation of root hairs could reduce nodule number under salinity (Gopalakrishnan et al. 2015; Egamberdieva et al. 2017). Our study showed inoculation with bacteria alleviated the harmful effects of salinity on root length, weight, and nodule number at 10 dS m−1, but it had no significant effect at 20 dS m−1. Inoculated plants of Heris, the salt tolerant, had a higher root growth and nodule number under salinity which showed the interaction between salt-tolerant cultivar and salt-tolerant bacteria was stronger than the interaction between salt-sensitive cultivar and salt-tolerant bacteria. Our results were similar to Noori et al. (2018)’s results. Noori et al. (2018) showed that PGPB significantly increased alfalfa plant growth indices in the absence of rhizobial strains. Moreover, PGPB could even provide plant nitrogen in the absence of rhizobial strains and nitrogen in the soil. The previous studies demonstrated that inoculated plants had higher RWC and less ethylene content (Babalola 2010; Arora et al. 2012; Cedeno-Garcia et al. 2018). Also, Cedeno-Garcia et al. (2018) reported that nodulation in inoculated alfalfa plants improved earlier than non-inoculated plants under greenhouse conditions. Besides, it was known that bacteria could produce a higher content of phytohormones such as auxin that could increase nodule number, and root and shoot growth under salinity (Gupta et al. 2015; Gopalakrishnan et al. 2015). Auxin had an important role in xylem and root development, nodule formation, and pigment formation (Gupta et al. 2015; Cedeno-Garcia et al. 2018). Therefore, the increase in auxin content and the decrease in ethylene content are the main reasons for increasing the nodule number, and root and shoot growth under salinity in inoculated plants.
Salinity stress decreased RWC and MSI in alfalfa cultivars similar to other plants (Munns and Tester 2008). RWC reduction during 2 weeks after salinity was related to the reduction of soil water potential and water absorption by plants roots. Salinity disturbed the balance between transpiration and water uptake by plants and reduces RWC. Inoculation plants with bacteria increased water absorption and RWC compared with non-inoculated under salinity, because inoculated plants had higher root length and root weight than non-inoculated plants. It appeared that inoculation plant with bacteria could change lateral root system architecture and increase RWC. Similar results were reported in alfalfa (Bertrand et al. 2015), Zea mays (Bano and Fatima 2009), and pea plants (Ali et al. 2015). Na+ ions could disturb MSI as soon as they enter the cells (Volkov 2015). Water shortage and high level of reactive oxygen species under salinity stress could decrease MSI (Parida and Das 2005; Ashraf and Foolad 2013). MSI in inoculated plants was higher than non-inoculated plants because of less absorption of Na+ ions and high RWC. Similarly, Werner and Newton (2005) reported that the inoculated plants had fewer symptoms of oxidative damage and high membrane stability under salinity due to high water and nutrient absorption. Inoculated plants of Heris and Hashtrod, the salt-tolerant cultivars, had the highest RWC and MSI at 10 dS m−1, but inoculation had no significant effect at 20 dS m−1 during 2 weeks after salinity.
Salinity stress by increasing chlorophyllase activity, decreasing chlorophyll synthesis, and destroying pigments proteins caused to decrease chlorophyll pigments in alfalfa and other plants (Santos 2004; Jaleel et al. 2008; Anower et al. 2013). Our results showed inoculation with bacteria saved alfalfa chlorophyll pigments from the harmful effects of salinity. Inoculation with bacteria had no significant effect on chlorophyll pigments in Local 253, the salt-sensitive cultivar. It appeared that the interaction between salt-tolerant cultivar and salt-tolerant bacteria was more effective in saving chlorophyll pigments than the interaction between salt-sensitive cultivar and salt-tolerant bacteria. Similar results reported in inoculated plants of lettuce (Han and Lee 2005), wheat (Bashan et al. 2006), and basil (Heidari and Golpayegani 2012). Investigating the studies showed that higher content of chlorophyll pigments in inoculated plants was related to higher absorption of iron, magnesium, nitrogen (Hosseinzadah et al. 2011), and less ethylene synthesis (Nadeem et al. 2010; Habib et al. 2016).
Reduction in stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthesis (Pn) is normal under salinity (Li et al. 2010; Torabi et al. 2014). Inoculation with bacteria could improve the negative effects of salinity on gs and Pn in all cultivars at 10 dS m−1, but it had less effect at 20 dS m−1. Inoculated plants of Local 253, the salt-sensitive cultivar, had the highest Pn and WUE at 10 dS m−1, but they had the lowest at 20 dS m−1. Inoculated plants of Hamadan and Hashtrod, the salt-tolerant cultivars, had the highest Pn and gs, respectively, among the cultivars at 20 dS m−1. It is accepted that gs reduction under salinity is related to decreasing water absorption by roots, increasing abscisic acid, and closing stomata that lead to decrease CO2 availability for Pn (Chaves et al. 2009; Li et al. 2010). Also, stomatal closure, chlorophyll pigments, and photosynthesis enzyme activities reduction, electron-transport chain activity inhibition, and chloroplast structure change could lead to Pn and gs reduction under salinity (Chaves et al. 2009; Ashraf and Harris 2013). Reduction in stomatal conductance saved water in plant leaves and increased water-use efficiency (WUE) in mild stress (Chaves et al. 2009). The higher rate of gs in inoculated plants compared with non-inoculated plants may relate to less absorption of chloride ions (Cl−) (del Amor and Cuadra-Crespo 2012), cytokinin increase, and abscisic acid reduction and better hormonal balance alteration (Dodd and Pérez-Alfocea 2012). It appeared that high Pn of inoculated plants in this study was related to higher gs, RWC, and chlorophyll pigments. Similar results were reported in lettuce (Han and Lee 2005), legume (Zahran 1999), sweet pepper (del Amor and Cuadra-Crespo 2012), and other plants (Babalola 2010) under salinity. These results suggested that all photosynthesis aspects improved by inoculation with bacteria in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars.
Na+ in alfalfa cultivars increased and K+ and K+/Na+ ratio decreased under salinity, and these results are common (Munns and Tester 2008; Acosta-Motos et al. 2017). The results also indicated that inoculation with both bacteria increased roots growth and contact with soil and K+ uptake, but decreased Na+ uptake under salinity. In addition, inoculated plants had higher K+/Na+ ratio at 10 dS m−1, but there was no significant difference between inoculated and non-inoculated plants at 20 dS m−1. Recent studies of inoculated plants with different bacteria demonstrated that bacteria change the selectivity of Na+ and K+ by plant roots and decrease Na+ uptake and transport in the whole of the plants under salinity (Volkov 2015). Moreover, the reports showed that inoculation with bacteria could increase root growth, macro–micronutrient absorption, organic acid production, pH reduction, and siderophore exudation in the rhizosphere of inoculated plants (Baset et al. 2010; Dodd and Pérez-Alfocea 2012). Also, Etesami and Beattie (2018) showed that salt-tolerant bacteria could enhance K+ absorption by mediating the expression of an ion high-affinity K+ transporter (AtHKT1) in plants under salinity. Local 253, the salt-sensitive cultivar, which inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. bacteria had less Na+ that showed high dry weight production under salinity was related to less Na+ absorption.
Comparing inoculated and non-inoculated plants showed that all measured aspects in inoculated plants were higher than non-inoculated plants (Table 2). Inoculation with both bacteria could improve all aspects of plants growth and performance under control and salinity. The improving effect of inoculation with bacteria was less under high salinity (20 dS m−1), but it was higher at salinity levels below 10 dS m−1. Comparing the performance of salt-tolerant bacteria showed chlorophyll pigments (Chla, Chlb, and Chlab), plant height, and leaf number, Na+, K+/Na+ ratio, and nodule number were improved highly by Pseudomonas sp., while K+, carotenoids, and RWC were improved highly by H. diazotrophicus under salinity (Table 2). Comparing inoculated plants of salt-tolerant cultivars and salt-sensitive cultivar showed that, in most measured aspects, Local 253, the salt-sensitive cultivar, was the same or similar to other salt-tolerant cultivars at 10 dS m−1. The inoculated plants of Local 253 had high membrane stability, photosynthesis rate and water-use efficiency, dry weight and plant height, root weight, Na+ and K+, and K+/Na+ ratio among the cultivars at 10 dS m−1, but, at 20 dS m−1, Heris, the salt-tolerant cultivar, had the highest dry weight. These results suggested that inoculation with both salt-tolerant bacteria improved growth and dry weight in the salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars under low salinity, but at high salinity, inoculation improved growth aspects only in salt-tolerant cultivars.
Conclusion
Inoculation alfalfa seeds with two salt-tolerant bacteria improved growth aspects such as dry weight, plant height, leaf number, photosynthesis performance (Pn, gs, and WUE), and chlorophyll pigments (Chla, Chlb, Chlab) under salinity and non-salinity. Also, inoculation was successful under salinity blew 10 dS m−1 in all cultivars, but inoculation was successful at 20 dS m−1 only in salt-tolerant cultivars. The results of this study emphasized alleviated effects of inoculation with salt-tolerant bacteria on growth aspects under salinity in alfalfa cultivars under salinity.
Author contribution statement
MA (PhD Student of university of Zanjan and research visitor in Department of Soil Science and Water Management, Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary), FS, and MH M (supervisor of PhD thesis) help MA to design, perform, and data analysis of the research, and write and revise the article. GV and BB prepared experiment condition (soil, growth room, pots, and bacteria media) and supervisor during scholarship in Hungary also help to perform, write, and revise the article, and KJ measured potassium and sodium content.
References
Acosta-Motos JR, Ortuño MF, Bernal-Vicente A, Diaz-Vivancos P, Sanchez-Blanco MJ, Hernandez JA (2017) Plant responses to salt stress: adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy. 7(1):1–18
Ali ZN, Ullah S, Naseem M, Inam-U H, Jacobsen HJ (2015) Soil bacteria conferred a positive relationship and improved salt stress tolerance in transgenic pea (Pisum sativum L.) harboring Na+/H+ antiporter. Turkish J Bot 39:962–972
Anower RM, Mott IW, Peel MD, Wu Y (2013) Characterization of physiological responses of two alfalfa half-sib families with improved salt tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem 71:103–111
Ansari M, Shekari F, Mohammadi MH, Biró B, Végvári G (2017) Improving germination indices of alfalfa cultivars under saline stress by inoculation with beneficial bacteria. Seed Sci Technol 45(2):475–484
Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta Vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15
Arora NK, Tewari S, Singh S, Lal N, Maheshwari DK (2012) PGPR for protection of plant health under saline conditions. Bacteria in agrobiology: stress management. Springer, Berlin, pp 239–258
Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2013) Crop breeding for salt tolerance in the era of molecular markers and marker-assisted selection. Plant Breed 132(1):10–20
Ashraf M, Harris PJC (2013) Photosynthesis under stressful environments: an overview. Photosynthetica. 51(2):163–190
Babalola OO (2010) Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotech Lett 32(11):1559–1570
Bacilio M, Rodriguez H, Moreno M, Hernandez JP, Bashan Y (2004) Mitigation of salt stress in wheat seedlings by a gfp-tagged Azospirillum lipoferum. Biol Fertil Soils 40:188–193
Bano A, Fatima M (2009) Salt tolerance in Zea mays (L.) following inoculation with Rhizobium and Pseudomonas. Biol Fertil Soils 45:405–413
Baset M, Shamsuddin ZH, Wahab Z, Marziah M (2010) Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) inoculation on growth and nitrogen incorporation of tissue-cultured ‘Musa’ plantlets under nitrogen-free hydroponics condition. Aust J Crop Sci 4(2):85
Bashan Y, Bustillos JJ, Leyva LA, Hernandez JP, Bacilio M (2006) Increase in auxiliary photoprotective photosynthetic pigments in wheat seedlings induced by Azospirillum brasilense. Biol Fertil Soils 42(4):279–285
Bertrand A, Dhont C, Bipfubusa M, Chalifour F, Drouin P, Beauchamp CJ (2015) Improving salt stress responses of the symbiosis in alfalfa using salt-tolerant cultivar and rhizobial strain. Appl Soil Ecol 87:108–117
Cedeno-Garcia GA, Gerding M, Moraga G, Inostroza L, Fischer S, Sepúlveda-Caamaño M, Oyarzúa P (2018) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria with ACC deaminase activity isolated from Mediterranean dryland areas in Chile: effects on early nodulation in alfalfa. Chilean J Agric Res 78(3):360–369
Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C (2009) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 103(4):551–560
Del Amor FM, Cuadra-Crespo P (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as a tool to improve salinity tolerance in sweet pepper. Funct Plant Biol 39(1):82–90
Dodd IC, Pérez-Alfocea F (2012) Microbial amelioration of crop salinity stress. J Exp Bot 63(9):3415–3428
Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Jabborova D, Räsänen LA, Liao H (2017) Coordination between Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas alleviates salt stress in soybean through altering root system architecture. J Plant Interact 12(1):100–107
Etesami H, Beattie G (2018) Mining halophytes for plant growth-promoting halotolerant bacteria to enhance the salinity tolerance of non-halophytic crops. Front Microbiol 9(148):1–20
Gao Y, Lu Y, Wu M, Liang E, Li Y, Zhang D, Yin Z, Ren X, Dai Y, Deng D, Chen J (2016) Ability to remove Na+ and retain K+ correlates with salt tolerance in two maize inbred lines seedlings. Front Plant Sci 7:1–15
Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:329–339
Gopalakrishnan S, Sathya A, Vijayabharathi R, Varshney RK, Gowda CL, Krishnamurthy L (2015) Plant growth promoting rhizobia: challenges and opportunities. 3 Biotech. 5(4):355–377
Gupta G, Parihar SS, Ahirwar NK, Snehi SK, Singh V (2015) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J Microb Biochem Technol. 7(2):096–102
Habib SH, Kausar H, Saud HM (2016) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance salinity stress tolerance in okra through ROS-scavenging enzymes. Biomed Res Int 2016:1–10
Han HS, Lee KD (2005) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria effect on antioxidant status, photosynthesis, mineral uptake and growth of lettuce under soil salinity. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 1(3):210–215
Heidari M, Golpayegani A (2012) Effects of water stress and inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on antioxidant status and photosynthetic pigments in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 11(1):57–61
Hosseinzadah F, Satei A, Ramezanpour MR (2011) Effects of mycorrhiza and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, nutrients uptake and physiological characteristics in Calendula officinalis L. Middle-East J Sci Res 8:947–953
Jaleel CA, Sankar B, Sridharan R, Panneerselvam R (2008) Soil salinity alters growth, chlorophyll content, and secondary metabolite accumulation in Catharanthus roseus. Turkish J Biol 32(2):79–83
Li R, Shi F, Fukuda K, Yang Y (2010) Effects of salt and alkali stresses on germination, growth, photosynthesis and ion accumulation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 56(5):725–733
Liu J, Tang L, Gao H, Zhang M, Guo C (2019) Enhancement of alfalfa yield and quality by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under saline-alkali conditions. J Sci Food Agric 99(1):281–289
Maas EV, Hoffman GJ (1977) Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. J Irrig Drain Division 103(2):115–134
Manchanda G, Garg N (2008) Salinity and its effects on the functional biology of legumes. Acta Physiol Plant 30(5):595–618
Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 59:651–681
Nadeem SM, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Ashraf M (2010) Microbial ACC-Deaminase: prospects and applications for inducing salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 29:360–393
Neres MA, Castagnara DD, Mesquita EE, Zambom MA, Souza LCD, Oliveira PSRD, Jobim CC (2010) Production of alfalfa hay under different drying methods. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 39(8):1676–1683
Noori F, Etesami H, Zarini HN, Khoshkholgh-Sima NA, Salekdeh GH, Alishahi F (2018) Mining alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) nodules for salinity tolerant non-rhizobial bacteria to improve growth of alfalfa under salinity stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 162:129–138
Parida AK, Das AB (2005) Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60:324–349
Paul D, Lade H (2014) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria to improve crop growth in saline soils: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34(4):737–752
Sairam RK, Srivastava GC, Agarwal S, Meena RC (2005) Differences in antioxidant activity in response to salinity stress in tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes. Biol Plant 49(1):85–91
Santos CV (2004) Regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation by salt stress in sunflower leaves. Sci Hortic 103(1):93–99
Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2013) Improving salinity tolerance in cereals. Crit Rev Plant Sci 32:237–249
Shivakrishna P, Reddy KA, Rao DM (2018) Effect of PEG-6000 imposed drought stress on RNA content, relative water content (RWC), and chlorophyll content in peanut leaves and roots. Saudi J Biol Sci 25:285–289
Shrivastava P, Kumar R (2015) Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci 22(2):123–131
Smart RE, Bingham GE (1974) Rapid estimates of relative water concentration. Plant Physiol 53:258–260
Steffens B (2014) The role of ethylene and ROS in salinity, heavy metal, and flooding responses in rice. Front Plant Sci 5:1–5
Suarez C, Cardinale M, Ratering S, Steffens D, Jung S, Montoya AMZ, Geissler-Plauma R, Schnell S (2015) Plant growth-promoting effects of Hartmannibacter diazotrophicus on summer barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under salt stress. Appl Soil Ecol 95:23–30
Torabi M, Halim RA, Choukan R (2014) Physiological adaptation of alfalfa genotypes to salt stress (one of deleterious impacts of climate change). Science, policy and politics of modern agricultural system. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 181–194
Trdan S, Vučajnk F, Bohinc T, Vidrih M (2019) The effect of a mixture of two plant growth-promoting bacteria from Argentina on the yield of potato, and occurrence of primary potato diseases and pest–short communication. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 69(1):89–94
Volkov V (2015) Salinity tolerance in plants. Quantitative approach to ion transport starting from halophytes and stepping to genetic and protein engineering for manipulating ion fluxes. Front Plant Sci 6:1–25
Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang P, Cao Y, Hu T, Yang P (2016) Rhizobium symbiosis contribution to short-term salt stress tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Soil 402(1–2):247–261
Werner D, Newton WE (eds) (2005) Nitrogen fixation in agriculture, forestry, ecology, and the environment, vol 4. Springer Science & Business Media, New York
Xiao X, Fan M, Wang E, Chen W, Wei G (2018) Interactions of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and soil factors in two leguminous plants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(23–24):8485–8497
Zahaf O, Blanchet S, De Zélicourt A, Alunni B, Plet J, Laffont C et al (2012) Comparative transcriptomic analysis of salt adaptation in roots of contrasting Medicago truncatula genotypes. Molecular plant. 5(5):1068–1081
Zahran HH (1991) Conditions for successful Rhizobium-legume symbiosis in saline environments. Biol Fertil Soils 12(1):73–80
Zahran HH (1999) Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63(4):968–989
Acknowledgements
Open access funding provided by Szent István University (SZIE). M. Ansari scholarship was supported by the University of Zanjan, Iran. Thanks also should be given to German-Hungarian bilateral agreement and EU-Fp7 BIOFECTOR project (www.biofector.info) and thanks for Prof. Sylvia Schnell and Prof. Stefan Ratering, Justus-Liebig-Universsity, Gießen, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by M. J. Reigosa.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Ansari, M., Shekari, F., Mohammadi, M.H. et al. Salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria enhanced salinity tolerance of salt-tolerant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars at high salinity. Acta Physiol Plant 41, 195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2988-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2988-5