Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conséquences fonctionnelles de la chirurgie de résection rectale : évaluation et stratégie de prise en charge simple

Functional consequences of rectal resection

  • Dossier Thématique / Thematic File
  • Published:
Côlon & Rectum

Résumé

Les options thérapeutiques du cancer du rectum poursuivent les objectifs principaux d’un meilleur contrôle local du cancer et d’une amélioration de la survie des malades traités. Cependant, la défécation et la continence sont parfois altérées. Les patients doivent donc être pleinement informés des effets indésirables, et les chirurgiens doivent mettre en place les meilleures options afin d’en réduire les risques (réservoir colique, préservation sphinctérienne).

Abstract

Therapeutic options for rectal cancer aim to improve local control of the cancer and improve survival rates. However, fecal continence and defecation are impaired in some patients. Unpredictable bowel function may be the factor that impacts most on quality of life. Patients need to be properly informed about possible adverse effects and surgeons need to offer the best options (colonic pouch, sphincter saving procedure) in order to minimize these complaints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Allal AS, Bieri S, Pelloni A, et al. (2000) Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomes. Br J Cancer 82: 1131–1137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dehni N, Tiret E, Singland JD, et al. (1998) Long-term functional outcome after low anterior resection: comparison of low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon rectum 41: 817–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2001) Prospective analysis of quality of life and survival following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88: 1617–1622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA, Schlag PM (2001) Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 233: 149–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, et al. (1992) Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 79: 1082–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matzel KE, Stademeier U, Muehldorfer S, Hohenberger W (1997) Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection: impact of level anastomosis. Int J Colorect Dis 12: 82–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M (2001) Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 25: 876–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Joo JS, Latulippe JF, Alabaz O, et al. (1998) Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 41: 740–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris GJ, Lavery IC, Fazio VW (2001) Function of a colonic J-pouch continues to improve with time. Br J Surg 88: 1623–1627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, et al. (2004) Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 832–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Graf W, Påhlman L (1998) Preoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer. Results from a randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 543–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. L. Siproudhis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Siproudhis, L. Conséquences fonctionnelles de la chirurgie de résection rectale : évaluation et stratégie de prise en charge simple. Colon Rectum 2, 198–201 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-008-0114-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-008-0114-8

Mots clés

Keywords

Search

Navigation