Abstract
This essay explores the correlation between shu 恕 and ren 仁 in Confucius’ teachings and its broader implications concerning the role of the golden rule. It first shows that whereas the golden rule is premised on equality between agent and recipient, Confucius’ correlation of shu with ren aims mainly at establishing a more solid foundation for the hierarchy-specific duty of the ruler to care for the ruled. It thus reveals that this conflict arises from the golden rule’s incompatibility with asymmetrical relationships, a long-standing issue concerning its validity as a moral axiom. It then addresses this conflict by demonstrating that the golden rule can effectively function in conformity with humanity even in asymmetrical relationships by way of inducing an agent’s viewpoint to shift from existing sociopolitical asymmetry to one-to-one human equality. On this basis, lastly, it examines the concurrence of the ideas of shu, human nature, and ren in ancient China.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, Roger T. 2011. Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Aristotle. 1998. The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford World’s Classics. Trans. by W. D. Ross, and edited by J. L. Ackrill and J. O. Urmson. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, Irene. 1997. “Three Visions of Jen.” In Meeting of Minds: Intellectual and Religious Interaction in East Asian Traditions of Thought: Essays in Honor of Wing-Tsit Chan and William Theodore De Bary, edited by Irene Bloom and Joshua A. Fogel. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chan, Wing-tsit. 1955. “The Evolution of the Confucian Concept Jên.” Philosophy East and West 4.4: 295–315.
______. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
______. 1975. “Chinese and Western Interpretations of Jen (Humanity).” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2: 107–129.
Fung, Yu-lan (Feng, Youlan). 1966. A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. Edited by Derk Bodde. 1st Free Press pbk. ed. New York: Free Press.
Fingarette, Herbert. 1979. “Following the ‘One Thread’ of the Analects.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 47: 373–405.
______. 1998. Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
Gardner, Daniel K. 2003. Zhu Xi’s Reading of the Analects: Canon, Commentary, and the Classical Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gensler, Harry J. 2013. Ethics and the Golden Rule. New York: Routledge.
Gewirth, Alan. 1980. “The Golden Rule Rationalized.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 3: 133–147.
Goldin, Paul Rakita. 2017. “Introduction: Confucius and Confucianism.” In A Concise Companion to Confucius, edited by Paul Rakita Goldin. Hoboken: Wiley.
Goodman, John. 1688. The Golden Rule: Or, the Royal Law of Equity Explained. London: Printed by S. Roycroft for R. Clavell.
Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1987. Thinking through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hare, R. M. 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Huang, Huaixin 黃懷信 et al. 2008. A Comprehensive Compilation of the Commentaries and Interpretations of the Analects 論語彙校集釋. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.
Huang, Yong. 2005. “A Copper Rule versus the Golden Rule: A Daoist-Confucian Proposal for Global Ethics.” Philosophy East and West 55.3: 394–425.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1990. “Reweaving the ‘One Thread’ of the Analects.” Philosophy East and West 40.1: 17–33.
______. 2008. “The ‘Golden Rule’ in the Analects.” In Confucius Now: Contemporary Encounters with the Analects, edited by David Edward Jones. Chicago: Open Court.
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. and edited by Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kong, Yingda 孔穎達 et al. 1999. The Corrected Version of the Zuo Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals 春秋左傳正義. In The Thirteen Classics with Commentaries and Appended Collation Notes 十三經注疏, vol. 17. Beijing 北京: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe 北京大學出版社.
Lee, Junghwan. 2019. “‘The golden rule of our Saviour ... had been inculcated by Confucius, almost in the same words, four centuries before’: The Clash of the Christian and Confucian Golden Rules in 17th- to 19th-century England.” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 31: 75–116.
Legge, James. 1861. The Chinese Classics: With a Translation, Critical and Exegetical Notes, Prolegomena, and Copious Indexes, vol. I. Hong Kong: At the Authors; London: Trübner.
______. 1877. Confucianism in Relation to Christianity: A Paper Read before the Missionary Conference in Shanghai on May 11th, 1877. Shanghai and London: Kelly and Walsh, Trübner.
Munro, Donald J. 1969. The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Nivison, David. 1996. “Golden Rule Arguments in Chinese Moral Philosophy.” In The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2003. “Golden Rule Arguments: A Missing Thought?” In The Moral Circle and the Self: Chinese and Western Approaches, edited by Kim Chong Chong, Sor-hoon Tan, and C. L. Ten. Chicago: Open Court.
Russell, L. J. 1942. “Ideals and Practice.” Philosophy 17.66: 99–116.
Shun, Kwong-Loi. 2002. “Ren 仁 and Li 禮 in the Analects.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Sidgwick, Henry. 1981. The Methods of Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co.
Singer, Marcus G. 1963. “The Golden Rule.” Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy 38: 293–314.
Slingerland, Edward. 2005. “Kongzi (Confucius) ‘The Analects’.” In Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy, edited by P. J. Ivanhoe and Bryan W. Van Norden, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co.
Takeuchi, Teruo 竹內照夫. 1964. A Study of the Ancient Meanings of Ren 仁の古義の研究. Tokyo 東京: Meiji Shoin 明治書院.
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2002. “Unweaving the ‘One Thread’ of Analects 4:15.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Wattles, Jeffrey. 1996. The Golden Rule. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J. The Golden Rule, Humanity, and Equality: Shu and Ren in Confucius’ Teachings and Beyond. Dao 21, 347–368 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-022-09837-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-022-09837-9