Abstract
Erin M. Cline expresses skepticism of several dimensions of Chun Hin Tsoi’s attempt to establish a classical Confucian view of distributive justice. She admonishes us to distinguish the constructive derivation or development of such a concept from Confucian views from descriptive attribution of those views to the early thinkers themselves. Cline also dissuades us from constructivism that draws indiscriminately across a diversity of texts, since the Analects, Mencius, and Xunzi each offer their own distinct views on matters of justice, which may variously align or conflict. She then further defends her particular interpretations of Analects passages. These rebuttals conclude by pointing to a shared sensitivity to moral luck in early Confucianism and contemporary liberalism that again draws together the sense of justice in Rawls and Confucius. In closing, Cline reminds us that the dimensions of justice she and Tsoi discuss are deeply interwoven into the rich fabric of values and concerns presented in the Analects, and encourages that we take account of the more robust content and context of these records of Confucius’ teachings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
References
Cline, Erin M. 2013. Confucius, Rawls, and the Sense of Justice. New York: Fordham University Press.
———. 2015. Families of Virtue: Confucian Views on Childhood Development. New York: Columbia University Press.
Harris, Eirik L. 2013. The Role of Virtue in Xunzi’s Political Philosophy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12: 93–110.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1999. The Concept of De (‘Virtue’) in the Laozi. In Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi, ed. Mark Csikszentmihalyi and Philip J. Ivanhoe, 239–257. Albany: SUNY Press.
———. 2017. Oneness: East Asian Conceptions of Virtue, Happiness, and How We Are All Connected. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Pauline C. 2000. Li Zhi and John Stuart Mill: A Confucian Feminist Critique of Liberal Feminism. In The Sage and the Second Sex, ed. Chenyang Li, 113–132. Chicago: Open Court.
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Tiwald, Justin. 2008. A Right of Rebellion in the Mengzi? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7: 269–282.
Tsoi, Chun Hin. 2021. Distributive Justice in Pre-Qin Confucianism: Equality, Priority, and Sufficiency. In Confucian Political Philosophy: Dialogues on the State of the Field, ed. Robert A. Carleo III and Yong Huang, 137–163. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cline, E.M. (2021). Thinking About Justice and Interpreting the Analects. In: Carleo III, R.A., Huang, Y. (eds) Confucian Political Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70611-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70611-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70610-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70611-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)