Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Early Confucianism is a System for Social-Functional Influence and Probably Does Not Represent a Normative Ethical Theory

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To the question “What normative ethical theory does early Confucianism best represent?” researchers in the history of early Confucian philosophy respond with more than half a dozen different answers. They include sentimentalism, amoralism, pragmatism, Kantianism, Aristotelian virtue theory, care ethics, and role ethics. The lack of consensus is concerning, as three considerations make clear. First, fully trained, often leading, scholars advocate each of the theories. Second, nearly all participants in the debate believe that the central feature of early Confucianism is its moral thought. However, these normative ethical theories are logically inconsistent with one another, the third point. The entailment is unavoidable: the majority of scholars of early Confucian normative ethics must be incorrect about their attributions of a normative theory to early Confucianism. It would appear, then, that we need a new dao 道 or pathway for the study of early Confucian moral thought. One alternative is to adopt an immersively interdisciplinary research methodology that pivots on the recognition that early Confucianism is a social-functional system the governing purpose of which is to influence cultural leaders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger. 2001. “New Confucianism: A Native Response to Western Philosophy.” In Chinese Political Culture: 1989–2000, edited by Hua Shiping. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2011. Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analects: With Selection from Traditional Commentaries. 2003. Translated by Edward G. Slingerland. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Angle, Stephen C. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, Stephen C., Michael A. Slote, and Chen Lai, eds. 2013. Virtue Ethics and Confucianism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostolou, Menelaos. 2007. “Sexual Selection under Parental Choice: The Role of Parents in the Evolution of Human Mating.” Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 403–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2008. “Parent-Offspring Conflict over Mating: The Case of Family Background.” Evolutionary Psychology 6.3: 456–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2009. “Parent-Offspring Conflict over Mating: The Case of Mating Strategies.” Personality and Individual Differences 47: 895–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Limin. 2005. Shaping the Ideal Child: Children and Their Primers in Late Imperial China. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Robert, and Peter J. Richerson. 1988. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Paperback ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, E. Bruce, and A. Taeko Brooks. 1998. The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and His Successors. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruya, Brian J. 2010a. “The Rehabilitation of Spontaneity: A New Approach in Philosophy of Action.” Philosophy East and West 60.2: 207–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____, ed. 2010b. Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in the Cognitive Science of Attention and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____, ed. 2015. The Philosophical Challenge from China. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D., M. Abbott, A. Angleitner, A. Biaggio, A. Blanco-Villasenor, et al. 1990. “International Preferences in Selecting Mates: A Study of 37 Cultures.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21: 4–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, A. P., J. H. Park, and S. L. Dubbs. 2008. “Parent-Offspring Conflict in Mate Preferences.” Review of General Psychology 12: 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, A. P., J. H. Park, and L. A. Duncan. 2009. “Cultural Variation in Parental Influence on Mate Choice.” Cross-Cultural Research 44.1: 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Xin’an 蔡信安. 1987. “Mencius’ Theory of Moral Choice 論孟子的道德抉擇.” Taiwan University Philosophical Review 台大哲學評論 10: 135–174.

  • Cheng, Chung-Ying. 2006. “Theoretical Links between Kant and Confucianism: Preliminary Remarks.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33.1: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching, Julia. 1978. “Chinese Ethics and Kant.” Philosophy East and West 28.2: 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, Kim-chong. 1998. “Confucius’ Virtue Ethics: Li, Yi, Wen and Chih in the Analects.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25: 101–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalmiya, Vrinda. 2009. “Caring Comparisons: Thoughts on Comparative Care Ethics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36.2: 192–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, Benjamin A. 1991. “Political, Social, and Cultural Reproduction via Civil Service Examinations in Late Imperial China.” The Journal of Asian Studies 50.1: 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2000. A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. L., R. Thornhill, D. R. Murray, and M. Schaller. 2008. “Pathogen Prevalence Predicts Human Cross-Cultural Variability in Individualism/Collectivism.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275.1640: 1279–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., H.-C. Chen, and J. Vaid. 2006. “Proverb preferences across cultures: dialecticality or poeticality?” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13: 353–359.

  • Geisz, Steven F. 2008. “Mengzi, Strategic Language, and the Shaping of Behavior.” Philosophy East and West 58.2: 190–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108.4: 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, David, and Roger Ames. 1984. “Getting It Right: On Saving Confucius from the Confucians.” Philosophy East and West 35.1: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1995. Anticipating China: Thinking through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Hamburger, Max. 1956. “Aristotle and Confucius: A Study in Comparative Philosophy.” Philosophy 31: 324–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Chad. 1972. “Freedom and Moral Responsibility in Confucian Ethics.” Philosophy East and West 22.2: 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1985. “Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy, and ‘Truth.’” The Journal of Asian Studies 44.3: 491–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2000. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, Ranjoo Seodu. 2003. “Is Confucianism Compatible with Care Ethics? A Critique.” Philosophy East and West 53.4: 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hruschka, Daniel J., and Joseph Henrich. 2013. “Institutions, Parasites and the Persistence of In-Group Preferences.” PLoS ONE 8.5: e63642. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, Arthur. 1952. “Some Basic Moral Principles in Chinese Culture.” In Moral Principles of Action, edited by Ruth Nanda Ashen. New York: Harper & Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss, B. 2004. “Cultural differences and the law of noncontradiction: Some criteria for further research.” Philosophical Psychology 17: 375–389.

  • Ihara, Craig K., and Ryan Nichols. 2012. “Ames, Roger, Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press/Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2011, xvii + 332.” Dao 11.4: 521–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, Manyul. 2011. “Mencius as Consequentialist.” In Ethics in Early China an Anthology, edited by Chris Fraser, Dan Robins, and Timothy O’Leary. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, P. J. 1991. “Character Consequentialism: An Early Confucian Contribution to Contemporary Ethical Theory.” The Journal of Religious Ethics 19.1: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2013. “Virtue Ethics and the Chinese Confucian Tradition.” See Angle, Slote, and Chen 2013.

  • Keightley, David N. 1990. “Early Civilization in China: Reflections on How It Became Chinese.” In Heritage of China: Contemporary Perspectives on Chinese Civilization, edited by Paul S. Ropp. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C., trans. with an introduction. 1979. Analects. Harmondsworth and New York: Penguin Books.

  • Lee, Ming-huei. 2013. “Confucianism, Kant, and Virtue Ethics.” See Angle, Slote, and Chen 2013.

  • Lewis, Mark Edward. 2007. The Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Chenyang. 1994. “The Confucian Concept of Jen and the Feminist Ethics of Care: A Comparative Study.” Hypatia 9.1: 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2002. “Revisiting Confucian Jen Ethics and Feminist Care Ethics: A Reply to Daniel Star and Lijun Yuan.” Hypatia 17.1: 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2008. “Does Confucian Ethics Integrate Care Ethics and Justice Ethics? The Case of Mencius.” Asian Philosophy 18.1: 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Qingping. 2003. “Filiality versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as ‘Consanguinitism.’” Philosophy East and West 53.2: 234–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2009. “To Become a Filial Son, a Loyal Subject, or a Humane Person?—On the Confucian Ideas about Humanity.” Asian Philosophy 19.2: 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996. Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into Ancient Greek and Chinese Science. Ideas in Context 42. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2011. Disciplines in the Making: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Elites, Learning, and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Shirong. 2007. “Relation, Virtue, and Relational Virtue: Three Concepts of Caring.” Hypatia 22.3: 92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1991. “Incommensurability, Truth, and the Conversation Between Confucians and Aristotelians about the Virtues.” In Culture and Modernity: East-West Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Eliot Deutsch. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahood, George H. 1974. “Human Nature and the Virtues in Confucius and Aristotle.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 1.3–4: 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, Donald J. 1975. “The Chinese View of Modeling.” Human Development 18.5: 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Ryan. 2011. “A Genealogy of Early Confucian Moral Psychology.” Philosophy East and West 61.4: 609–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2013. “The Origins and Effects of Filial Piety (Xiao 孝): How Culture Solves an Evolutionary Problem for Parents.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 13.3–4: 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, Ara, Edward E. Smith, Beom Jun Kim, and Richard E. Nisbett. 2002. “Cultural Preferences for Formal versus Intuitive Reasoning.” Cognitive Science 26.5: 653–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olberding, Amy. 2012. Moral Exemplars in the Analects: The Good Person Is That. Routledge Studies in Ethics and Moral Theory 15. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang-White, Ann A. 2009. “Reconstructing Modern Ethics: Confucian Care Ethics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36.2: 210–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2011. “Caring in Confucian Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 6.6: 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Kaiping, and Richard E. Nisbett. 1999. “Culture, Dialectics, and Reasoning about Contradiction.” American Psychologist 54.9: 741–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, Jesse J. 2014. Beyond Human Nature: How Culture and Experience Shape the Human Mind. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, Henry. 1997. “Classical Confucian and Contemporary Feminist Perspectives on the Self: Some Parallels and Their Implications.” In Culture and Self: Philosophical and Religious Perspectives, East and West, edited by Douglas Allen and Ashok Kumar Malhotra. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkissian, Hagop. 2010a. “Minor Tweaks, Major Payoffs: The Problems and Promise of Situationism in Moral Philosophy.” Philosophers’ Imprint 10.9: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2010b. “Recent Approaches to Confucian Filial Morality.” Philosophy Compass 5.9: 725–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, Barry R. 1980. Impression Management: The Self-concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Monterey: Brooks and Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seok, Bongrae. 2006. “Diversity and Unity of Modularity.” Cognitive Science 30.2: 347–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2007. “Change, Contradiction, and Overconfidence: Chinese Philosophy and Cognitive Peculiarities of Asians.” Dao 6.3: 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2008. “Mencius’s Vertical Faculties and Moral Nativism.” Asian Philosophy 18.1: 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2013. Embodied Moral Psychology and Confucian Philosophy. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward G. 2007. Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2008. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • ____. 2014. Trying Not to Try: The Art and Science of Spontaneity. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward G., and Mark Collard, eds. 2012. Creating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, Michael. 1998. “The Justice of Caring.” In Virtue and Vice, edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller, and Jeffrey Paul. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2001. “The Justice of Caring.” In The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, edited by Hugh LaFollette. Blackwell Philosophy Guides. West Sussex: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Daniel. 2002. “Do Confucians Really Care? A Defense of the Distinctiveness of Care Ethics: A Reply to Chenyang Li.” Hypatia 17.1: 77–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwald, Justin. 2010. “Confucianism and Virtue Ethics: Still a Fledgling in Chinese and Comparative Philosophy.” Comparative Philosophy 1.2: 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. 1974. “Parent-Offspring Conflict.” American Zoologist 14.1: 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 2012. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wawrytko, Sandra. 1982. “Confucius and Kant: The Ethics of Respect.” Philosophy East and West 32.3: 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Lijun. 2002. “Ethics of Care and Concept of Jen: A Reply to Chenyang Li.” Hypatia 17.1: 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, 92834-6868, USA

    Ryan Nichols

Authors
  1. Ryan Nichols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Nichols.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nichols, R. Early Confucianism is a System for Social-Functional Influence and Probably Does Not Represent a Normative Ethical Theory. Dao 14, 499–520 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9464-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9464-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation