Skip to main content
Log in

Compressive strength prediction and optimization design of sustainable concrete based on squirrel search algorithm-extreme gradient boosting technique

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concrete is the most commonly used construction material. However, its production leads to high carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and energy consumption. Therefore, developing waste-substitutable concrete components is necessary. Improving the sustainability and greenness of concrete is the focus of this research. In this regard, 899 data points were collected from existing studies where cement, slag, fly ash, superplasticizer, coarse aggregate, and fine aggregate were considered potential influential factors. The complex relationship between influential factors and concrete compressive strength makes the prediction and estimation of compressive strength difficult. Instead of the traditional compressive strength test, this study combines five novel metaheuristic algorithms with extreme gradient boosting (XGB) to predict the compressive strength of green concrete based on fly ash and blast furnace slag. The intelligent prediction models were assessed using the root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and variance accounted for (VAF). The results indicated that the squirrel search algorithm-extreme gradient boosting (SSA-XGB) yielded the best overall prediction performance with R2 values of 0.9930 and 0.9576, VAF values of 99.30 and 95.79, MAE values of 0.52 and 2.50, RMSE of 1.34 and 3.31 for the training and testing sets, respectively. The remaining five prediction methods yield promising results. Therefore, the developed hybrid XGB model can be introduced as an accurate and fast technique for the performance prediction of green concrete. Finally, the developed SSA-XGB considered the effects of all the input factors on the compressive strength. The ability of the model to predict the performance of concrete with unknown proportions can play a significant role in accelerating the development and application of sustainable concrete and furthering a sustainable economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amran M, Murali G, Khalid N H A, Fediuk R, Ozbakkaloglu T, Lee Y H, Haruna S, Lee Y Y. Slag uses in making an ecofriendly and sustainable concrete: A review. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 272: 121942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li J, Xu G. Circular economy towards zero waste and decarbonization. Circular Economy, 2022, 1(1): 100002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang N, Xi B, Li J, Liu L, Song G. Utilization of CO2 into recycled construction materials: A systematic literature review. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2022, 24(6): 2108–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sellami A, Merzoud M, Amziane S. Improvement of mechanical properties of green concrete by treatment of the vegetals fibers. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 47: 1117–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xi B, Zhou Y, Yu K, Hu B, Huang X, Sui L, Xing F. Use of nano-SiO2 to develop a high performance green lightweight engineered cementitious composites containing fly ash cenospheres. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 262: 121274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi C, Li Y, Zhang J, Li W, Chong L, Xie Z. Performance enhancement of recycled concrete aggregate—A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 466–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou Y, Xi B, Sui L, Zheng S, Xing F, Li L. Development of high strain-hardening lightweight engineered cementitious composites: Design and performance. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 104: 103370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malhotra V M. Durability of concrete incorporating high-volume of low-calcium (ASTM Class F) fly ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1990, 12(4): 271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun J, Shen X, Tan G, Tanner J E. Compressive strength and hydration characteristics of high-volume fly ash concrete prepared from fly ash. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2019, 136(2): 565–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kara de Maeijer P, Craeye B, Snellings R, Kazemi-Kamyab H, Loots M, Janssens K, Nuyts G. Effect of ultra-fine fly ash on concrete performance and durability. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 263: 120493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Samad S, Shah A. Role of binary cement including Supplementary Cementitious Material (SCM), in production of environmentally sustainable concrete: A critical review. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2017, 6(2): 663–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo L P, Sun W, Zheng K R, Chen H J, Liu B. Study on the flexural fatigue performance and fractal mechanism of concrete with high proportions of ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(2): 242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Afroughsabet V, Biolzi L, Ozbakkaloglu T. Influence of double hooked-end steel fibers and slag on mechanical and durability properties of high performance recycled aggregate concrete. Composite Structures, 2017, 181: 273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng D C, Liu Z T, Wang X D, Chen Y, Chang J Q, Wei D F, Jiang Z M. Machine learning-based compressive strength prediction for concrete: An adaptive boosting approach. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 230: 117000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Song H, Ahmad A, Farooq F, Ostrowski K A, Maślak M, Czarnecki S, Aslam F. Predicting the compressive strength of concrete with fly ash admixture using machine learning algorithms. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 308: 125021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang M C, Yoo D Y, Gupta R. Machine learning-based prediction for compressive and flexural strengths of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 266: 121117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shariati M, Mafipour M S, Mehrabi P, Ahmadi M, Wakil K, Trung N T, Toghroli A. Prediction of concrete strength in presence of furnace slag and fly ash using Hybrid ANN-GA (Artificial Neural Network-Genetic Algorithm). Smart Structures and Systems, 2020, 25(2): 183–195

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chopra P, Sharma R K, Kumar M. Prediction of compressive strength of concrete using artificial neural network and genetic programming. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 2016: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dao D V, Adeli H, Ly H B, Le L M, Le V M, Le T T, Pham B T. A sensitivity and robustness analysis of GPR and ANN for high-performance concrete compressive strength prediction using a monte carlo simulation. Sustainability, 2020, 12(3): 830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeh I C. Modeling concrete strength with augment-neuron networks. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 1998, 10(4): 263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yeh I C. Design of high-performance concrete mixture using neural networks and nonlinear programming. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 1999, 13(1): 36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Paninski L. Estimation of entropy and mutual information. Neural Computation, 2003, 15(6): 1191–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang Y, Zhang Q. A hierarchical analysis for rock engineering using artificial neural networks. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1997, 30(4): 207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou J, Qiu Y, Armaghani D J, Zhang W, Li C, Zhu S, Tarinejad R. Predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition: A comparative study among six XGB-based metaheuristic techniques. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12(3): 101091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Duan J, Asteris P G, Nguyen H, Bui X N, Moayedi H. A novel artificial intelligence technique to predict compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete using ICA-XGBoost model. Engineering with Computers, 2021, 37(4): 3329–3346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen T, Guestrin C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2016, 785–794

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khishe M, Mosavi M R. Chimp optimization algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 149: 113338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chou J S, Truong D N. A novel metaheuristic optimizer inspired by behavior of jellyfish in ocean. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2021, 389: 125535

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Chopra N, Mohsin Ansari M. Golden jackal optimization: A novel nature-inspired optimizer for engineering applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 198: 116924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Seyyedabbasi A, Kiani F. Sand Cat swarm optimization: A nature-inspired algorithm to solve global optimization problems. Engineering with Computers, 2022, 1–25

  31. Xue J, Shen B. A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 2020, 8(1): 22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li S, Li D. Artificial Intelligence for Materials Science. Cham: Springer, 2021, 115–131

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Li E, Zhou J, Shi X, Jahed Armaghani D, Yu Z, Chen X, Huang P. Developing a hybrid model of salp swarm algorithm-based support vector machine to predict the strength of fiber-reinforced cemented paste backfill. Engineering with Computers, 2021, 37(4): 3519–3540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li E, Yang F, Ren M, Zhang X, Zhou J, Khandelwal M. Prediction of blasting mean fragment size using support vector regression combined with five optimization algorithms. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 13(6): 1380–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van der Gaag M, Hoffman T, Remijsen M, Hijman R, de Haan L, van Meijel B, Vanharten P, Valmaggia L, Dehert M, Cuijpers A. The five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale II: A ten-fold cross-validation of a revised model. Schizophrenia Research, 2006, 85(1–3): 280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bentéjac C, Csörgő A, Martínez-Muñoz G. A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2021, 54(3): 1937–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chidiac S E, Panesar D K. Evolution of mechanical properties of concrete containing ground granulated blast furnace slag and effects on the scaling resistance test at 28 days. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2008, 30(2): 63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mardani-Aghabaglou A, Tuyan M, Yılmaz G, Ariöz Ö, Ramyar K. Effect of different types of superplasticizer on fresh, rheological and strength properties of self-consolidating concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 47: 1020–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rangaraju P R, Olek J, Diamond S. An investigation into the influence of inter-aggregate spacing and the extent of the ITZ on properties of Portland cement concretes. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(11): 1601–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Beshr H, Almusallam A, Maslehuddin M. Effect of coarse aggregate quality on the mechanical properties of high strength concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2003, 17(2): 97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kronlöf A. Effect of very fine aggregate on concrete strength. Materials and Structures, 1994, 27(1): 15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Bin Xi and Enming Li wish to acknowledge the funding provided by the China Scholarship Council (Nos. 202008440524 and 202006370006). This research was partially supported by the Distinguished Youth Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China (No. 2022JJ10073), Innovation Driven Project of Central South University (No. 2020CX040), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan (No. JCYJ20190808123013260).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Xi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix for

11709_2023_997_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Compressive strength prediction and optimization design of sustainable concrete based on squirrel search algorithm-extreme gradient boosting technique

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, E., Zhang, N., Xi, B. et al. Compressive strength prediction and optimization design of sustainable concrete based on squirrel search algorithm-extreme gradient boosting technique. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 17, 1310–1325 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0997-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0997-3

Keywords

Navigation