Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric study on the Multangular-Pyramid Concave Friction System (MPCFS) for seismic isolation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of comprehensive parametric studies are conducted on a steel-frame structure Finite-Element (FE) model with the Multangular-Pyramid Concave Friction System (MPCFS) installed as isolators. This new introduced MPCFS system has some distinctive features when compared with conventional isolation techniques, such as increased uplift stability, improved self-centering capacity, non-resonance when subjected to near-fault earthquakes, and so on. The FE model of the MPCFS is first established and evaluated by comparison between numerical and theoretical results. The MPCFS FE model is then incorporated in a steel-frame structural model, which is subjected to three chosen earthquakes, to verify its seismic isolation. Further, parametric study with varying controlling parameters, such as isolation foundation, inclination angle, friction coefficient, and earthquake input, is carried out to extract more detailed dynamic response of the MPCFS structure. Finally, limitations of this study are discussed, and conclusions are made. The simulations testify the significant seismic isolation of the MPCFS. This indicates the MPCFS, viewed as the beneficial complementary of the existing well-established and matured isolation techniques, may be a promising tool for seismic isolation of near-fault earthquake prone zones. This verified MPCFS FE model can be incorporated in future FE analysis. The results in this research can also guide future optimal parameter design of the MPCFS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelly J M. Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber. 2nd ed. 1997. New York: Springer, 2011

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Attary N, Symans M, Nagarajaiah S, Reinhorn A M, Constantinou M C, Sarlis A A, Pasala D T R, Taylor D. Performance evaluation of negative stiffness devices for seismic response control of bridge structures via experimental shake table tests. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 19(2): 249–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wei B, Wang P, Liu W, Yang M, Jiang L. The impact of the concave distribution of rolling friction coefficient on the seismic isolation performance of a spring-rolling system. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, 2016, 83: 65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wei B, Wang P, Yang M, Jiang L. Seismic response of rolling isolation systems with concave friction distribution. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 21(2): 325–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Yang T Y, Shi W. Influence of isolation hysteresis on the seismic performance of isolated buildings. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2015, 22(4): 631–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng C T, Chao C H. Seismic behavior of rocking base-isolated structures. Engineering Structures, 2017, 139: 46–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guay L P, Bouaanani N. Assessment of low temperature exposure for design and evaluation of elastomeric bridge bearings and seismic isolators in Canada. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 43(9): 851–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ismail M. An isolation system for limited seismic gaps in near-fault zones. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(7): 1115–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ismail M, Rodellar J, Pozo F. An isolation device for near-fault ground motions. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2014, 21(3): 249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin T K, Lu L Y, Chang H. Fuzzy logic control of a stiffness-adaptable seismic isolation system. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2015, 22(1): 177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu L Y, Lee T Y, Yeh S W. Theory and experimental study for sliding isolators with variable curvature. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2011, 40(14): 1609–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu L Y, Hsu C C. Experimental study of variable-frequency rocking bearings for near-fault seismic isolation. Engineering Structures, 2013, 46: 116–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsang H H. Seismic isolation by rubber-soil mixtures for developing countries. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37(2): 283–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsang H H, Lo S H, Xu X, Neaz Sheikh M. Seismic isolation for low-to-medium-rise buildings using granulated rubber-soil mixtures: numerical study. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2012, 41(14): 2009–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiong W, Li Y. Seismic isolation using granulated tire-soil mixtures for less-developed regions: Experimental validation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2013, 42(14): 2187–2193

    Google Scholar 

  16. Castaldo P, Amendola G, Palazzo B. Seismic fragility and reliability of structures isolated by friction pendulum devices. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2017, 46(3): 425–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Castaldo P, Palazzo B, Ferrentino T. Seismic reliability-based ductility demand evaluation for inelastic base-isolated structures with friction pendulum devices. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2017, 46(8): 1245–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li C, Jie J, Jiang L Z, Yang T Y. Theory and implementation of a two-step unconditionally stable explicit integration algorithm for vibration analysis of structures. Shock and Vibration, 2016, 2016: 2831206

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saitoh M. An external rotary friction device for displacement mitigation in base isolation systems. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2014, 21(2): 173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarlis A A, Constantinou M C. A model of triple friction pendulum bearing for general geometric and frictional parameters. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2016, 45(11): 1837–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolff E D, Ipek C, Constantinou M C, Morillas L. Torsional response of seismically isolated structures revisited. Engineering Structures, 2014, 59: 462–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang S J, Hwang J S, Chang K C, Shiau C Y, Lin W C, Tsai M S, Hong J X, Yang Y H. Sloped multi-roller isolation devices for seismic protection of equipment and facilities. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2014, 43(10): 1443–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen P C, Wang S J. Improved control performance of sloped rolling-type isolation devices using embedded electromagnets. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2017, 24(1): e1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Siringoringo D M, Fujino Y. Seismic response analyses of an asymmetric base-isolated building during the 2011 Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2015, 22(1): 71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heaton T H, Hall J F, Wald D J, Halling M W. Response of high-rise and base-isolated buildings to a hypothetical Mw 7.0 blind thrust earthquake. Science, 1995, 267(5195): 206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiong W, Zhang S J, Jiang L Z, Li Y Z. Introduction of the convex friction system (CFS) for seismic isolation. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2017, 24(1): e1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong W, Zhang S J, Jiang L Z, Li Y Z. The Multangular-Pyramid Concave Friction System (MPCFS) for seismic isolation: A preliminary numerical study. Engineering Structures, 2018, 160: 383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abaqus 6.13 Documentation. Extracted from website of Abaqus. 2019

  29. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 350: 169–198

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Phase field modeling of brittle compressive-shear fractures in rock-like materials: A new driving force and a hybrid formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 355: 729–752

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou S, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X. Phase field modeling of quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation: COMSOL implementation and case studies. Advances in Engineering Software, 2018, 122: 31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A phase-field modeling approach of fracture propagation in poroelastic media. Engineering Geology, 2018, 240: 189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Zhu H, Rabczuk T. Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 96: 174–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51108467) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2014M562131). The authors would express their sincere gratitude to the referees for their warm-hearted and gracious comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Xiong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, W., Zhang, SJ., Jiang, LZ. et al. Parametric study on the Multangular-Pyramid Concave Friction System (MPCFS) for seismic isolation. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 14, 1152–1165 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0659-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0659-7

Keywords

Navigation