Abstract
The aim of this research is to assess the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns under different axial load and transverse reinforcement ratios. These two parameters are very important as for the ductility, strength, stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity for a given reinforced concrete column. Effects of variable axial load ratio and transverse reinforcement ratio on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns are thoroughly analyzed. The finite element computer program Seismo-Structure was used to perform the analysis of series of reinforced concrete columns tested by the second author and other researchers. In order to reflect the reality and grasp the actual behavior of the specimens, special attention was paid to select the models for concrete, confined concrete, and steel components. Good agreements were obtained between the experimental and the analytical results either for the lateral force-drift relationships or for the damage progress prediction at different stages of the loading.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sargin M, Ghosh S K, Handa V K. Effects of lateral reinforcement upon the strength and deformation properties of concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1971, 23(75–76): 99–110
Azizinamini A, Corley W G, Johal L S P. Effects of transverse reinforcement on seismic performance of columns. ACI Structural Journal, 1992, 89(4): 442–450
ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 1983
Lynn A C, Moehle J P, Mahin S A, HolmesWT. Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete building columns. Earthquake Spectra, 1996, 12(4): 715–739
Skeikh S A, Khoury S S. Confined concrete columns with stubs. ACI Structural Journal, 1993, 90(4): 414–431
ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 1989
Saatciolglu M, Ozcebe G. Response of reinforced concrete columns to simulated seismic loading. ACI Structural Journal, 1989, 86(1): 3–12
Wehbe N I, Saiidi M S, Sanders D H. Seismic performance of rectangular bridge columns with moderate confinement. ACI Structural Journal, 1999, 96(2): 248–259
Lam S S E, Wu B, Wong Y L, Wang Z Y, Liu Z Q, Li C S. Drift capacity of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with low lateral confinement. Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 733–742
Xiao J, Zhang C. Seismic behavior of RC columns with circular: square and diamond sections. Construction & Building Materials, 2008, 22(5): 801–810
Seismosoft. SeismoStruct v7.0–A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. 2014
Mo Y L,Wang S J. Seismic behavior of RC columns with various tie configurations. Structural Engineering, 2000, 126(10): 1122–1130
Saatcioglu M, Grira M. Confinement of reinforced concrete columns with welded reinforcement grids. ACI Structural Journal, 1999, 96 (1): 29–39
Watson, Soesianawati M T, Park R. Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames of Limited Ductility, Report 89–4. 1989
Soesianawati M T, Park R, Priestley M J N. Limited Ductility Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns, Report 86–10. 1986
Shibata A, SozenMA. Substitute-structuremethod for seismic design in R/C. Journal of the Structural Division, 1976, 102(S1): 1–18
Bechtoula H, Kono S, Watanabe F. Experimental and analytical investigation of seismic performance of cantilever reinforced concrete columns under varying transverse and axial loads. Journal of Asian Architecture & Building Engineering, 2005, 4(2): 467–474
Kono S, Bechtoula H, Sakashita M, Tanaka H, Watanabe F, Eberhard M O. Damage assessment of reinforced concrete columns under high axial loading. ACI Special Publication, 2006, 237(SP): 165–176
Correia A A, Virtuoso F B E. Nonlinear Analysis of Space Frames, Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computational Mechanics: Solids, Structures and Coupled Problems in Engineering. Lisbon, 2006
Filippou F C, Fenves G L. Earthquake Engineering -From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004
Fragiadakis M, Papadrakakis M. Modeling, analysis and reliability of seismically excited structures: computational issues. Computational Methods, 2008, 5(4): 483–511
Hellesland J, Scordelis A. Analysis of RC bridge columns under imposed deformations. In: Proceeding of the IABSE Colloquium. Delft, 1981, 545–559
Mari A, Scordelis A. Nonlinear Geometric Material and Time Dependent Analysis of Three Dimensional Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Frames. SESM Report 82–12. 1984
Spacone E, Ciampi V, Filippou F C. Mixed formulation of nonlinear beam finite element. Computers & Structures, 1996, 58(1): 71–83
Neuenhofer A, Filippou F C. Evaluation of nonlinear frame finiteelement models. Structural Engineering, 1997, 123(7): 958–966
Freitas J A T, Almeida J P M, Pereira E M B R. Non-conventional formulations for the finite element method. Computational Mechanics, 1999, 23(5–6): 488–501
Alemdar B N, White D W. Displacement, flexibility, and mixed beam-column finite element formulations for distributed plasticity analysis. Structural Engineering, 2005, 131(12): 1811–1819
Calabrese A, Almeida J P, Pinho R. Numerical issues in distributed inelasticity modeling of RC frame elements for seismic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 14(S1): 38–68
Mpampatsikos V, Nascimbene R, Petrini L. A critical review of the RC frame existing building assessment procedure according to Eurocode 8 and Italian seismic code. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 12(S1): 52–58
Yassin M H M. Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete structures under monotonic and cyclic loads. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Berkeley: University of California, 1994
Menegotto M, Pinto P E. Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R. C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering. Zurich: 1973, 15–22
Filippou F C, Popov E P, Bertero V V. Effects of Bond Deterioration on Hysteretic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Joints. Report EERC 83–19. 1983
Monti G, Nuti C, Santini S. Cyrus-cyclic Response of Upgraded Sections. Report 96–2. 1996
Prota A, de Cicco F, Cosenza E. Cyclic behavior of smooth steel reinforcing bars: experimental analysis and modeling issues. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 13(4): 500–519
Madas P. Advanced modeling of composite frames subjected to earthquake loading. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. London: University of London, 1993
Mander J B, Priestley MJ N, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1804–1826
Martínez-Rueda J E, Elnashai A S. Confined concrete model under cyclic load. Materials and Structures, 1997, 30(3): 139–147
Williams M S, Sexsmith R G. Seismic damage indices for concrete structures: A state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra, 1995, 11 (2): 319–349
Park Y J, Ang A H S. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Structural Engineering, 1985, 111(4): 722–739
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belkacem, M.A., Bechtoula, H., Bourahla, N. et al. Effect of axial load and transverse reinforcements on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 13, 831–851 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0513-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0513-3