Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of axial load and transverse reinforcements on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this research is to assess the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns under different axial load and transverse reinforcement ratios. These two parameters are very important as for the ductility, strength, stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity for a given reinforced concrete column. Effects of variable axial load ratio and transverse reinforcement ratio on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns are thoroughly analyzed. The finite element computer program Seismo-Structure was used to perform the analysis of series of reinforced concrete columns tested by the second author and other researchers. In order to reflect the reality and grasp the actual behavior of the specimens, special attention was paid to select the models for concrete, confined concrete, and steel components. Good agreements were obtained between the experimental and the analytical results either for the lateral force-drift relationships or for the damage progress prediction at different stages of the loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sargin M, Ghosh S K, Handa V K. Effects of lateral reinforcement upon the strength and deformation properties of concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1971, 23(75–76): 99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azizinamini A, Corley W G, Johal L S P. Effects of transverse reinforcement on seismic performance of columns. ACI Structural Journal, 1992, 89(4): 442–450

    Google Scholar 

  3. ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 1983

  4. Lynn A C, Moehle J P, Mahin S A, HolmesWT. Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete building columns. Earthquake Spectra, 1996, 12(4): 715–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Skeikh S A, Khoury S S. Confined concrete columns with stubs. ACI Structural Journal, 1993, 90(4): 414–431

    Google Scholar 

  6. ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 1989

  7. Saatciolglu M, Ozcebe G. Response of reinforced concrete columns to simulated seismic loading. ACI Structural Journal, 1989, 86(1): 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wehbe N I, Saiidi M S, Sanders D H. Seismic performance of rectangular bridge columns with moderate confinement. ACI Structural Journal, 1999, 96(2): 248–259

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lam S S E, Wu B, Wong Y L, Wang Z Y, Liu Z Q, Li C S. Drift capacity of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with low lateral confinement. Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 733–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao J, Zhang C. Seismic behavior of RC columns with circular: square and diamond sections. Construction & Building Materials, 2008, 22(5): 801–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seismosoft. SeismoStruct v7.0–A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. 2014

  12. Mo Y L,Wang S J. Seismic behavior of RC columns with various tie configurations. Structural Engineering, 2000, 126(10): 1122–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saatcioglu M, Grira M. Confinement of reinforced concrete columns with welded reinforcement grids. ACI Structural Journal, 1999, 96 (1): 29–39

    Google Scholar 

  14. Watson, Soesianawati M T, Park R. Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames of Limited Ductility, Report 89–4. 1989

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soesianawati M T, Park R, Priestley M J N. Limited Ductility Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns, Report 86–10. 1986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shibata A, SozenMA. Substitute-structuremethod for seismic design in R/C. Journal of the Structural Division, 1976, 102(S1): 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bechtoula H, Kono S, Watanabe F. Experimental and analytical investigation of seismic performance of cantilever reinforced concrete columns under varying transverse and axial loads. Journal of Asian Architecture & Building Engineering, 2005, 4(2): 467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kono S, Bechtoula H, Sakashita M, Tanaka H, Watanabe F, Eberhard M O. Damage assessment of reinforced concrete columns under high axial loading. ACI Special Publication, 2006, 237(SP): 165–176

    Google Scholar 

  19. Correia A A, Virtuoso F B E. Nonlinear Analysis of Space Frames, Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computational Mechanics: Solids, Structures and Coupled Problems in Engineering. Lisbon, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  20. Filippou F C, Fenves G L. Earthquake Engineering -From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fragiadakis M, Papadrakakis M. Modeling, analysis and reliability of seismically excited structures: computational issues. Computational Methods, 2008, 5(4): 483–511

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hellesland J, Scordelis A. Analysis of RC bridge columns under imposed deformations. In: Proceeding of the IABSE Colloquium. Delft, 1981, 545–559

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mari A, Scordelis A. Nonlinear Geometric Material and Time Dependent Analysis of Three Dimensional Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Frames. SESM Report 82–12. 1984

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spacone E, Ciampi V, Filippou F C. Mixed formulation of nonlinear beam finite element. Computers & Structures, 1996, 58(1): 71–83

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Neuenhofer A, Filippou F C. Evaluation of nonlinear frame finiteelement models. Structural Engineering, 1997, 123(7): 958–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Freitas J A T, Almeida J P M, Pereira E M B R. Non-conventional formulations for the finite element method. Computational Mechanics, 1999, 23(5–6): 488–501

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Alemdar B N, White D W. Displacement, flexibility, and mixed beam-column finite element formulations for distributed plasticity analysis. Structural Engineering, 2005, 131(12): 1811–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Calabrese A, Almeida J P, Pinho R. Numerical issues in distributed inelasticity modeling of RC frame elements for seismic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 14(S1): 38–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mpampatsikos V, Nascimbene R, Petrini L. A critical review of the RC frame existing building assessment procedure according to Eurocode 8 and Italian seismic code. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 12(S1): 52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yassin M H M. Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete structures under monotonic and cyclic loads. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Berkeley: University of California, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  31. Menegotto M, Pinto P E. Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R. C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering. Zurich: 1973, 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  32. Filippou F C, Popov E P, Bertero V V. Effects of Bond Deterioration on Hysteretic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Joints. Report EERC 83–19. 1983

    Google Scholar 

  33. Monti G, Nuti C, Santini S. Cyrus-cyclic Response of Upgraded Sections. Report 96–2. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  34. Prota A, de Cicco F, Cosenza E. Cyclic behavior of smooth steel reinforcing bars: experimental analysis and modeling issues. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 13(4): 500–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Madas P. Advanced modeling of composite frames subjected to earthquake loading. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. London: University of London, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mander J B, Priestley MJ N, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Martínez-Rueda J E, Elnashai A S. Confined concrete model under cyclic load. Materials and Structures, 1997, 30(3): 139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Williams M S, Sexsmith R G. Seismic damage indices for concrete structures: A state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra, 1995, 11 (2): 319–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Park Y J, Ang A H S. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Structural Engineering, 1985, 111(4): 722–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mounir Ait Belkacem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belkacem, M.A., Bechtoula, H., Bourahla, N. et al. Effect of axial load and transverse reinforcements on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 13, 831–851 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0513-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0513-3

Keywords

Navigation