Skip to main content
Log in

Power to gas: addressing renewable curtailment by converting to hydrogen

Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Renewable energy is the key to meeting increasing electricity demand and the decarburization targets in the generation mix. However, due to constrained power network capacity, a large volume of renewable generation is curtailed particularly from wind power, which is a huge waste of resources. There are typically three approaches to addressing excessive renewable: direct curtailment, the reinforcement of networks to expand transfer capacity, and the conversion of excessive renewable into other energy types, such as hydrogen, to transport. The costs and benefits of the three approaches could vary significantly across location, time, and penetration of renewable energy. This paper conducts a cost-benefit analysis and comparison of the three techniques to address wind curtailment. It uses a reduced 16-busbar UK transmission network to analyze the performance of the three approaches. The UK 2020 generation mix is used to quantify the saved renewable energy and incurred costs. The payback time and net present value of the two investment techniques are compared. From demonstration, it is reasonable to conclude that converting excessive wind power into hydrogen to transport is an environmentally friendly and cost-effective way to address wind curtailment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jennifer Rogers S F, Porter K. Examples of wind energy curtailment practices. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2010

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. National Grid. Winter Outlook 2014/15. National Grid, 2014

  3. Lew D, Bird L, Milligan M, et al. Wind and solar curtailment. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Luo X, Wang J, Dooner M, Clarke J. Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation. Applied Energy, 2015, 137(C): 511–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang H L, Redfern M A. The advantages and disadvantages of using HVDC to interconnect AC networks. In: 45th International Universities Power Engineering Conference. Cardiff, Wales, UK, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lori Bird J C, Wang X. Wind and solar energy curtailment: experience and practices in the United States. 2017–10, https://doi.org/www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/60983.pdf

  7. GOV.UK. Wind imbalance in UK Technical solutions for mitigation. 2017–12, https://doi.org/www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253178/Technical_mitigation_of_imbalance_risk__analysis_by_Mott_MacDonald___Presentation_at_April_workshop_.pdf

  8. Zhang N, Lu X, McElroy M B, et al. Reducing curtailment of wind electricity in China by employing electric boilers for heat and pumped hydro for energy storage. Applied Energy, 2016, 184: 987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waite M, Modi V. Modeling wind power curtailment with increased capacity in a regional electricity grid supplying a dense urban demand. Applied Energy, 2016, 183: 299–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ursua A, Gandia L M, Sanchis P. Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: current status and future trends. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(2): 410–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rozendal R A, Hamelers H V, Euverink G J, Metz S J, Buisman C J. Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(12): 1632–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kavadias K, Apostolou D, Kaldellis J. Modelling and optimisation of a hydrogen-based energy storage system in an autonomous electrical network. Applied Energy, 2017, 227: 574–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cai W, Zhang Z, Ren G, et al. Quorum sensing alters the microbial community of electrode-respiring bacteria and hydrogen scavengers toward improving hydrogen yield in microbial electrolysis cells. Applied Energy, 2016, 183: 1133–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ehteshami S M M, Vignesh S, Rasheed R K A, Chan S H. Numerical investigations on ethanol electrolysis for production of pure hydrogen from renewable sources. Applied Energy, 2016, 170: 388–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nursebo S, Chen P, Carlson O, Tjernberg L B. Optimizing wind power hosting capacity of distribution systems using cost benefit analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2014, 29(3): 1436–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu Z, Li F. Cost-benefit analyses of active distribution network management, part II: investment reduction analysis. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2012, 3(3): 1075–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parissis O S, Zoulias E, Stamatakis E, et al. Integration of wind and hydrogen technologies in the power system of Corvo island, Azores: a cost-benefit analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(13): 8143–8151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schouten J A, Michels J P J, Janssen R. Mixtures of hydrogen and natural gas: thermodynamic and transportation properties. 2017–10, www.waterstof.org/20030725EHECP2-49.pdf

  19. Sarrias-Mena R, Fernández-Ramírez L M, García-Vázquez C A, Jurado F. Electrolyzer models for hydrogen production from wind energy systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40 (7): 2927–2938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Windpower Program. Wind turbine power output variation with steady wind speed. 2017–10, https://doi.org/www.wind-power-program.com/turbine_characteristics.htm

  21. Manyonge A W, Ochieng R M, Onyango F N, Shichikha J M. Mathematical modelling of wind turbine in a wind energy conversion system: power coefficient analysis. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 2012, 6(6): 4527–4536

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chaudry M, Jenkins N, Qadrdan M, Wu J. Combined gas and electricity network expansion planning. Applied Energy, 2014, 113 (6): 1171–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Investopedia. Net present value—NPV. 2017–11, https://doi.org/www.investopedia.com/terms/n/npv.asp

  24. Qadrdan M. Modelling of an integrated gas and electricity network with significant wind capacity. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Welsh: Cardiff University, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  25. MSW.Weather Stations. 2017–10, https://doi.org/magicseaweed.com/UKIreland-Wave-Buoys/1/?zoom=10&11=51.539867177045686,0.8548011962890323&filters=wind&type=station

  26. Npower. Wind turbine power calculations. 2017–10, https://doi.org/www.raeng.org.uk/publications/other/23-wind-turbine

  27. KAPSOM. Water electrolysis hydrogen generator. 2017–11, https://doi.org/www.kapsom.com/portfolio-items/water-electrolysis-hydrogengenerator/

  28. NERA Economic Consulting. Energy supply margins: commentary on Ofgem’s SMI. 2017–09, https://doi.org/www.energy-uk.org.uk/publication.html?task=file.download&id=5008

  29. ECUITY. A vision for the UK hydrogen economy. 2018–07, https://doi.org/www.ecuity.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/johnson-matthey-20-04.pdf

  30. Ogden J M. Cost and performance sensitivity studies for solar photovoltaic/electrolytic hydrogen systems. Solar Cells, 1991, 30 (1–4): 515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. GOV.UK. Social impact bonds: discount rates and net present value. 2017–10, https://doi.org/data.gov.uk/sib_knowledge_box/discount-ratesand-net-present-value

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is in partially supported by the EPSRC project EP/M000141/1 and Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohe Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, X., Zhang, X., Gu, C. et al. Power to gas: addressing renewable curtailment by converting to hydrogen. Front. Energy 12, 560–568 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0588-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0588-5

Keywords

Navigation