Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scenario analysis of the energy demand and CO2 emission reduction potential of the urban transport system of Beijing through 2030

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Energy and Power Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An assessment of the energy demand and the potential for sector-based emission reductions will provide necessary background information for policy makers. In this paper, Beijing was selected as a special case for analysis in order to assess the energy demand and potential of CO2 abatement in the urban transport system of China. A mathematical model was developed to generate three scenarios for the urban transport system of Beijing from 2010 to 2030. The best pattern was identified by comparing the three different scenarios and assessing their urban traffic patterns through cost information. Results show that in the high motorization-oriented pattern scenario, total energy demand is about 13.94% higher, and the average CO2 abatement per year is 3.38 million tons less than in the reference scenario. On the other hand, in the bus and rail transit-oriented scenario, total energy demand is about 11.57% less, and the average CO2 abatement is 2.8 million tons more than in the reference scenario. Thus, Beijing cannot and should not follow the American pattern of high motorization-oriented transport system but learn from the experience of developed cities of Europe and East Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mao H X. Research on person trip characteristics of Chinese citizens. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Beijing Polytechnic University, 2005 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Langel A. Sustainable transport in Davis. World Transport Policy & Practice, 2007, 13(3): 8–22

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pucher J, Renne J. Socioeconomics of urban travel: evidence from the 2001 NTHS. Transportation Quarterly, 2003, 57(3): 12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ranjan K B. Energy demand and environmental implications in urban transport-case of Delhi. Atmospheric Environment, 1996, 30(3): 403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper J, Ryley T, Smyth A, Granzow E. Energy use and transport correlation linking personal and travel related energy uses to the urban structure. Environmental Science & Policy, 2001, 4(6): 307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang C, Chen C H, Wang B Y, Dai Y, Zhao J, Wang H K. Urban travel modal split and its impact on energy and environment. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2005, 22(11): 163–166 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Qiu L X, Chen Y, Zhao D Q, Cai G T, Chen Y, Hu X L, Jiang K J. Scenario analysis of passenger traffic development in Guangzhou until 2020. Acta Scentlarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatsen, 2008, 47(Z1): 114–118 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu X L, Jiang K J. Evaluation of Technology and countermeasure for greenhouse gas mitigation in China. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2001 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou D D. China Sustainable Energy Scenarios in 2020. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2003 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruee B, The Future of the US Motor Vehicle Emission Control Program, Manufactures of Emission Control Association, 1997

  11. Wang J W. Research on air environment influence of sustainable development urban transport. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2005 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. IPCC Working Group III. The Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. London: Cambridge University Press, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  13. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2009.

  14. Xiong W, Chen X H. Comparison of urban traffic patterns between domestic and overseas cities. City Planning Review, 2009, 33(3): 56–66 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stephen M. Street & Patterns. New York: Spon Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen G, Cao G Y, Liu Y B, Pang L H, Zhang L, Ren Q, Wang H T, Zheng X Y. The Future Population of Beijing-A Projection on the Population. Human Capital and Urbanization using PDE Model, Population and Development, 2006, 12(4): 29–41 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ma X H, Hou Y F. A Study on Beijing’s Population Variation Trend in the Future 50 Years. Market and Demographic Analysis, 2004, 10(2): 46–62 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Caltrop E, Proost S. Road transport externalities. Environment and Resource Economics, 1998, 11(3,4): 335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Litman T. Full cost accounting of urban transportation: Implication and tools. Software Review, 1997, 14(3): 169–174

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Bosi M, Ellis J. Exploring options for sectoral crediting mechanisms. OECD/IEA, 2005

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Zhou, J., Hu, G. et al. Scenario analysis of the energy demand and CO2 emission reduction potential of the urban transport system of Beijing through 2030. Front. Energy Power Eng. China 4, 459–468 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-010-0119-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-010-0119-5

Keywords

Navigation