Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomies utilizing a quadratus lumborum block

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been developed in several fields to reduce hospitalization lengths and overall costs. There have also been developments in multimodal analgesia methods to curtail opioid usage after surgery. Herein, we present the results of our initiation of an ERAS protocol for robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomies, employing a quadratus lumborum (QL) regional anesthetic block. We retrospectively reviewed 614 patients in our Institutional Review Board approved database who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomies from January 2017 to February 2020. An ERAS protocol utilizing multimodal analgesia (acetaminophen and gabapentin) and a QL block was developed and introduced in February 2019. We then compared the opioid consumption and perioperative outcomes of patients before and after ERAS protocol initiation. 192 ERAS patients (February 2019 to February 2020) were compared to 422 non-ERAS patients (January 2017 to January 2019). Baseline characteristics and the proportion of preoperative opioids users were similar between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in surgery length, hospitalization length, or complication rates. There were statistically significant differences in our primary endpoint, opioid consumption, on post-operative days 0 (p < 0.001), 1 (p < 0.001), and 2 (p < 0.001). The total opioid requirements over the course of admission were lower in the ERAS group compared to the non-ERAS group (p = 0.03). The initiation of an ERAS protocol employing multimodal analgesia and a QL block, for patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomies, can decrease opioid requirements without compromising perioperative outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Upon request.

Code availability

Upon request.

Abbreviations

ERAS:

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

QL:

Quadratus Lumborum

LOS:

Length of stay

MME:

Morphine Milligram Equivalents

PACU:

Post Anesthesia Care Unit

POD:

Postoperative day

RALPN:

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

RALRN:

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy

References

  1. Chatterjee S, Nam R, Fleshner N, Klotz L (2004) Permanent flank bulge is a consequence of flank incision for radical nephrectomy in one half of patients. Urol Oncol 22(1):36–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Duque JL, Loughlin KR, Kumar S (1999) Morbidity of flank incision for renal donors. Urology 54(5):796–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alameddine M, Koru-Sengul T, Moore KJ, Miao F, Sávio LF, Nahar B et al (2019) Trends in utilization of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for management of cT1 Renal masses. Eur Urol Focus 5(3):482–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali S, Ahn T, Papa N, Perera M, Teloken P, Coughlin G et al (2020) Changing trends in surgical management of renal tumours from 2000 to 2016: a nationwide study of medicare claims data. ANZ J Surg 90(1–2):48–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bahler CD, Monn MF, Flack CK, Gramm AR, Gardner TA, Sundaram CP (2018) Assessing cost of robotic utilization in partial nephrectomy with increasing utilization. J Endourol 32(8):710–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saidian A, Nix JW (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery: urology. Surg Clin North Am 98(6):1265–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nazzani S, Preisser F, Mazzone E, Tian Z, Mistretta FA, Shariat SF et al (2018) In-hospital length of stay after major surgical oncological procedures. Eur J Surg Oncol 44(7):969–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bicket MC, Long JJ, Pronovost PJ, Alexander GC, Wu CL (2017) Prescription opioid analgesics commonly unused after surgery: a systematic review. JAMA Surg 152(11):1066–1071

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Theisen KM, Myrga JM, Hale N, Cochran G, Sewall C, Macleod LC et al (2019) Excessive opioid prescribing after major urologic procedures. Urology 123:101–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elsharkawy H, Ahuja S, DeGrande S, Maheshwari K, Chan V (2019) Subcostal approach to anterior quadratus lumborum block for pain control following open urological procedures. J Anesth 33(1):148–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwak KH, Baek SI, Kim JK, Kim TH, Yeo J (2020) Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided preoperative unilateral lateral quadratus lumborum block for laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomized, double-blinded. Controlled Trial J Pain Res 13:1647–1654

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu M, Qi Y, He H, Lou J, Pei Q, Mei Y (2019) Analgesic effect of the ultrasound-guided subcostal approach to transmuscular quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 19(1):154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xia L, Talwar R, Taylor BL, Shin MH, Berger IB, Sperling CD et al (2019) National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015. Urol Oncol 37(3):182.e17-.e27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laviana AA, Hu JC (2014) Current controversies and challenges in robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomies. World J Urol 32(3):591–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McGuinness LA, Prasad Rai B (2018) Robotics in urology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 100(6_sup):38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pak JS, Lee JJ, Bilal K, Finkelstein M, Palese MA (2017) Utilization trends and outcomes up to 3 months of open, laparoscopic, and robotic partial nephrectomy. J Robot Surg 11(2):223–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Emtage JB, Agarwal G, Sexton WJ (2015) Robotic-assisted renal surgery. Cancer Control 22(3):291–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brummett CM, Waljee JF, Goesling J, Moser S, Lin P, Englesbe MJ et al (2017) New persistent opioid use after minor and major surgical procedures in US adults. JAMA Surg 152(6):e170504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fearon NJ, Benfante N, Assel M, Chesnut GT, Vickers A, Levine M et al (2020) Standardizing opioid prescriptions to patients after ambulatory oncologic surgery reduces overprescription. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 46(7):410–416

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Arumugam S, Lau CS, Chamberlain RS (2016) Use of preoperative gabapentin significantly reduces postoperative opioid consumption: a meta-analysis. J Pain Res 9:631–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gelman D, Gelmanas A, Urbanaitė D, Tamošiūnas R, Sadauskas S, Bilskienė D et al (2018) Role of multimodal analgesia in the evolving enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. Medicina (Kaunas) 54(2):20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T et al (2016) Management of postoperative pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American pain society, the American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine, and the American society of anesthesiologists’ committee on regional anesthesia, executive committee, and administrative council. J Pain 17(2):131–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dam M, Hansen C, Poulsen TD, Azawi NH, Laier GH, Wolmarans M et al (2021) Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block reduces opioid consumption and prolongs time to first opioid demand after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 46(1):18–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by WY, ABC, CM, WW, KY, MS, and XS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by WY, ABC, SCD, MHE, and MPK, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wesley Yip.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yip, W., Chen, A.B., Malekyan, C. et al. An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomies utilizing a quadratus lumborum block. J Robotic Surg 16, 1383–1389 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01379-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01379-9

Keywords

Navigation