Abstract
Betahistine serves as a medicament widely used in curing some diseases related to the nervous system. Its molecular properties have been studied by ab initio MO-LCAO-SCF method followed by the correction to the electron correlation (MP2) in vacuo as well as in water as a solvent. The chemical potential (electronegativity) and chemical hardness were verified as valuable molecular descriptors and compared with structurally analogous species.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Betahistine is a simple organic molecule (N-methyl-2-(pyridin-2-yl)ethanamine, C8H12N2) consisting of the pyridine ring and an aliphatic chain containing amine group (Fig. 1). Is structure is closely related to phenethylamine, amphetamine and/or histamine.
Structural formula and molecular structure of betahistine (PubChem CID 2366 (2004)). Color codes: C—cyan, N—blue, H—white
Betahistine belongs to the drugs that amplify effects of neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine, histamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Betahistine primarily affects the histaminergic system: It acts as a partial agonist of the H1 histamine receptor, and as an antagonist of the H3 histamine receptor, it changes the generation of neuronal excitation, e.g., in the vestibular nuclei, thereby facilitating vestibular compensation. Betahistine can increase blood flow in the brain, especially in the inner ear, both cochlear and vestibular parts. Based on its pharmacological properties, betahistine is an effective medicament administrated in some diseases such as hearing loss, dizziness, vertigo, tinnitus and Menière's syndrome (Zamergrad et al. 2021; Murdin et al 2016; Wegner et al 2018; Kloos et al 2022). Biological effects of these species are encoded in their molecular and electronic structure. Nowadays, molecular properties can be effectively studied using high-quality ab initio calculations that include a part of the correlation energy.
Structural data have been retrieved from database (PubChem CID 2366 (2004)); it serves as an initial guess for the full geometry optimization in vacuo. For such a purpose the ab initio HF-MO-LCAO-SCF method was utilized using the ORCA package (Neese 2012, 2020, 2022). The basis set def2-TZVP consisting of 382 basis functions (N, C: {62,111/411/11/1}; H: {311/1}) was utilized (Weigend and Ahlrichs 2005). The stationary geometry has been confirmed by the complete vibrational analysis showing no imaginary frequencies.
Molecular properties were calculated at the Hartree–Fock SCF level, namely the energies of the HOMO (the highest occupied molecular orbital) and LUMO (the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital), the permanent dipole moment p and quadrupole moment Q and the dipole polarizability α (one-third trace of the polarizability tensor). The vertical ionization energy Ei and electron affinity Eeg were calculated upon the energy of the positively and/or negatively charged open-shell system in the UHF (unrestricted Hartree–Fock) variant (frozen optimum geometry for the neutral species). They allow expression of the chemical potential μ via the Mulliken electronegativity χM and the Pearson hardness ηP, i.e.,
These quantities can be viewed as an electronic gradient and electronic force constant with respect to the number of electrons N, respectively (Sen 1993). The hardness serves as a measure of the Lewis acidity/basicity (Pearson 1997). The molecular electrostatic potential is plotted as a 3D contour map on the isovalue surface of charge density (Politzer and Murray 2002; Politzer et al 1985). This indicates the basic and/or acidic sites suitable for electrophilic or nucleophilic interactions along the molecule. In the optimized geometry, full vibrational–rotational analysis was applied giving rise to the partition function and related thermodynamic functions: the internal energy U, entropy S and Gibbs energy G. A partial inclusion of the correlation energy by the 2nd-order perturbative configuration interaction using the Moller–Plesset partitioning (abbr. MP2) improves the calculated energetic properties: ionization energy, electron affinity, Mulliken electronegativity and the Pearson hardness.
All data calculated in vacuo have been recalculated by involvement of the solvent effect (water). For this purpose, the CPCM (Conductor-like Polarizable Continuum Model) has been utilized (Takano and Houk 2005). Prior to evaluation of molecular properties, the full geometry optimization has been done followed by the complete vibrational analysis. The calculated molecular properties of betahistine are listed in Table 1.
The internal energy and entropy are divided into contributions from vibrations, rotations and translation. The most important correction to the internal energy is the vibrational contribution of the value of 131 kcal mol−1 dominated by the zero-point energy. The overall entropy contribution S·Tø = 28 kcal mol−1 has a visible impact to the Gibbs energy.
A comparison of the solvent-free and solvent–water data shows: (i) The energies of HOMO and LUMO are not influenced by the solvent; (ii) total energies of the molecule and its ions are lower in the presence of the solvent; (iii) the solvation reduces the ionization energy and electron affinity; (iv) consequently the Pearson hardness is reduced; (v) the value of the dipole moment increases substantially in the solvent, whereas the isotropic quadrupole moment is insensitive; (vi) the polarizability increases owing to the solvation; (vii) thermodynamic functions are little sensitive to solvation.
The Pearson hardness reflects the resistance of the molecule against the electron transfer, and for the betahistine, it is 108 and 119 kcal mol−1 in vacuo by SCF and MP2 calculations, respectively. Upon solvation, these data are reduced to 53 and 74 kcal mol−1. They can be compared to the series of aminoacids, monoaminergic neurotransmitters and related drugs (Table 2).
A similarity of the species listed in Table 2 can be assessed by the cluster analysis (CA). CA is a classification method designed to group observations or variables into clusters based upon similarities between them using a numerical criterion (distance). Ward’s method defines the distance between 2 clusters in terms of the increase in the sum of squared deviations around the cluster means that would occur if the two clusters were joined (Statgraphics 2006).
Figure 2 shows that according to the applied Ward’s method and squared Euclidean norm as a distance criterion, three clusters are relevant. The target molecule No 1 (betahistine) has similar descriptors to No 2, 3, 4 and 5 (N-methylphenethylamine, phenethylamine and amphetamine, 1-phenethylamine), different from No 6, 7 and 8 (methamphetamine, ephedrine and octopamine) and very different from species No 9 and 10 (tyramine and histamine).
Cluster analysis (Wards method) showing similarity of species in Table 2 based upon the chemical potential (electronegativity), chemical hardness and polarizability calculated at MP2 level
Simple QSAR calculations (Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships) based upon increments gave the surface area S = 343 Å2, volume V = 514 Å3, molar refractivity R = 22.1 Å3, hydration energy − 4.14 kcal mol−1 and octanol–water partition coefficient logP = 0.61 (Hyperchem 2008).
The molecular electrostatic potential is drawn in Fig. 3. This brings information about the active sites for the ligation; it can help in understanding the docking inside the receptor such as 3D orientation of the docked conformations of 1ETH with ligands—betahistine (Chaturvedi and Gupta 2021; Fossati et al 2001).
On conclusions, ab initio MO-LCAO-SCF + MP2 calculations show that the molecule of betahistine, in comparison with some monoaminergic neurotransmitters, possesses a rather high ionization energy and consequently high electronegativity (84 kcal mol−1). Its hardness is rather low (119 kcal mol−1 in vacuo and 74 kcal mol−1 in water) and similar to analogous species like amphetamine. To this end, the calculated chemical potential and chemical hardness could be considered as new, non-additive collective molecular descriptors of the electronic structure of small bioactive molecules.
References
Chaturvedi S, Gupta P (2021) Evaluation of bioactive metabolites and antioxidant-rich extracts of amaranths with possible role in pancreatic lipase interaction: in silico and in vitro studies. Metabolites 11:676. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11100676
Fossati A, Barone D, Benvenuti C (2001) Binding affinity profile of betahistine and its metabolites for central histamine receptors of rodents. Pharmacol Res 43:389–392. https://doi.org/10.1006/phrs.2000.0795
HyperChem (2008) Molecular modeling system, ver. 8.0.6. Hypercube Inc
Kloos B, Bertlich M, Spiegel JL, Freytag S, Lauer SK, Canis M, Weiss BG, Ihler F (2022) Low dose betahistine in combination with selegiline increases cochlear blood flow in guinea pigs. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 3:34894221098803. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894221098803
Murdin L, Hussain K, Schilder AG (2016) Betahistine for symptoms of vertigo. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010696.pub2
Neese F (2012) The ORCA program system. Wires Comput Mol Sci 2:73–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.81
Neese F, Wennmohs F, Becker U, Riplinger C (2020) The ORCA quantum chemistry program package. J Chem Phys 152:224108. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004608
Neese F (2022) ORCA-An ab initio, density functional and semi-empirical program package, version 5.0.3
Pearson RG (1993) Chemical hardness. In: Sen KD (ed) Structure and Bonding, vol 80. Springer, Berlin
Pearson RG (1997) Chemical hardness. Wiley, Weinheim
Politzer P, Murray JS (2002) The fundamental nature and role of the electrostatic potential in atoms and molecules. Theor Chem Acc 108:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-002-0363-9
Politzer P, Laurence PR, Jayasuriya K (1985) Molecular electrostatic potentials: an effective tool for the elucidation of biochemical phenomena. Envir Health Persp 61:191–202. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8561191
Pubchem (2004) National Center for Biotechnology Information, CID 2366. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/betahistine
Statgraphics centurion XV, Ver.15.1.02. StatPoint, Inc., 1982–2006
Takano Y, Houk KN (2005) Benchmarking the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM) for aqueous solvation free energies of neutral and ionic organic molecules. J Chem Theory Comput 1:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct049977a
Wegner I, Hall DA, Smit AL, McFerran D, Stegeman I (2018) Betahistine for tinnitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013093.pub2
Weigend F, Ahlrichs R (2005) Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: design and assessment of accuracy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:3297–3305. https://doi.org/10.1039/b508541a
Zamergrad MV, Kunelskaya NL, Guseva AL, Amelin AV, Lilenko SV, Samartcev IN, Zaytseva OV, Melnikov OA, Voronov VA, Lyapin AV (2021) Sovremennye predstavleniya o roli betagistina v lechenii zabolevanii vestibulyarnoi sistemy [Betahistine in vestibular disorders: current concepts and perspectives]. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 86:73–81. Russian. https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20218602173
Acknowledgements
Grant agencies of Slovakia are acknowledged for the financial support (projects APVV 19-0087 and VEGA 1/0191/22).
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic in cooperation with Centre for Scientific and Technical Information of the Slovak Republic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Boča, R., Štofko, J. Molecular properties of betahistine—an ab initio study. Chem. Pap. 77, 6419–6423 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-023-02873-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-023-02873-6