Abstract
Numerical simulations were conducted to investigate transient power consumption characteristics in an unbaffled stirred tank. The transient flow field in the stirred tank was simulated using a shear-stress transport k–ω turbulent model. Meanwhile, the transient power number was analyzed based on the predicted impeller torque. The accuracy and reliability of the simulations were verified by experimental data in the literature. The simulation results show that power number undergoes four stages, i.e., plateau value, sharp falling, slow falling and stable stages, after impeller is suddenly started up in quiescent fluid. The curve of transient power number versus dimensionless time is hardly affected by the impeller start-up speed. When impeller speed is accelerated from the same initial speed to higher end speed, the plateau power number becomes higher and the time interval is shorter. With the same speed increment, the plateau power number falls for higher initial speed. Power number falls sharply and then rises gradually to a steady value after impeller speed is decelerated from high to low speed. Time is longer for the power number reaching to steady state when impeller speed is decelerated from same initial speed to lower end speed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Surface area of the blades (m2)
- c :
-
Thickness of blade (m)
- C :
-
Impeller clearance from tank bottom (m)
- D :
-
Impeller diameter (m)
- D ω :
-
Cross-diffusion term (kg m−3 s−2)
- r :
-
Radial location (m)
- \(\tilde{G}_{k}\) :
-
Generation of turbulence kinetic energy (kg m−1 s−3)
- G ω :
-
Generation of ω (kg m−3 s−2)
- h :
-
Impeller height (m)
- k :
-
Turbulent kinetic energy (m2 s−2)
- M :
-
Impeller torque (N m)
- N :
-
Impeller speed (r s−1)
- N 0 :
-
Initial impeller speed (r s−1)
- N 1 :
-
End impeller speed (r s−1)
- Npt :
-
Transient power number
- Np∞ :
-
Plateau power number
- Nps :
-
Steady-state power number
- P t :
-
Transient power consumption (W)
- Re:
-
Reynolds number in the tank
- t :
-
Flow time (s)
- t* :
-
Dimensionless flow time
- T :
-
Tank diameter (m)
- u :
-
Resultant velocity (m s−1)
- u i :
-
Mean velocity component (m s−1)
- \(u_{i}^{{\prime }}\) :
-
Fluctuating velocity of i component (m s−1)
- w :
-
Impeller width (m)
- Y k :
-
Dissipation terms of k (kg m−1 s−3)
- Y ω :
-
Dissipation terms of ω (kg m−3 s−2)
- \(\delta_{ij}\) :
-
Kronecker delta
- μ :
-
Viscosity (Pa s)
- μ t :
-
Turbulent viscosity (Pa s)
- ρ :
-
Density (kg m−3)
- ω :
-
Specific dissipation rate (s−1)
- \(\sigma_{k}\) :
-
Turbulent Prandtl numbers for k
- \(\sigma_{\omega }\) :
-
Turbulent Prandtl numbers for ω
References
Bao YY, Wang BJ, Lin ML, Gao ZM, Yang J (2015) Influence of impeller diameter on overall gas dispersion properties in a sparged multi-impeller stirred tank. Chin J Chem Eng 23:890–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2014.11.030
Chapple D, Kresta SM, Wall A, Afacan A (2002) The effect of impeller and tank geometry on power number for a pitch blade turbine. Chem Eng Res Des 80:364–372. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387602317446407
Deglon DA, Meyer CJ (2006) CFD modelling of stirred tanks: numerical considerations. Miner Eng 19:1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2006.04.001
Derksen JJ, Doelman MS, Van den Akker HEA (1999) Three-dimensional LDA measurements in the impeller region of a turbulently stirred tank. Exp Fluids 27:522–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050376
Furukawa H, Kato Y, Inoue Y, Kato T, Tada Y, Hashimoto S (2012) Correlation of power consumption for several kinds of mixing impellers. Int J Chem Eng 2012:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/106496
Gao DR, Acharya S, Wang Y, Uhm J (2004) Flow field around Rushton turbine in stirred tank by particle image velocimetry measurement. Chin J Chem Eng 12:843–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.200407036
Gao DR, Guo MJ, Li Y, Fan ZL (2006) PIV experimental investigation of chaotic mixing using non-constant speed stirring. Chin J Mech Eng 42:44–49
Ibrahim S, Nienow AW (1995) Power curves and flow pattern for a range of impellers in Newtonian fluids. Chem Eng Res Des 73:485–491
Lamarque N, Zoppé Lebaigue O, Dolias Y, Bertrand M, Ducros F (2010) Large-eddy simulation of the turbulent free-surface flow in an unbaffled stirred tank reactor. Chem Eng Sci 65:4307–4322. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2006.08.044
Li LC, Xu B (2017) Numerical simulation of hydrodynamics in an uncovered unbaffled stirred tank. Chem Pap 71:1863–1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-017-0180-1
Li LC, Wang JJ, Feng LF, Gu XP (2017) Computational fluid dynamics simulation of hydrodynamics in an uncovered unbaffled tank agitated by pitched blade turbines. Korean J Chem Eng 34:2811–2822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0208-9
Liu X, Tan W, Pang C, Liu YJ, Chen D, Xu QY, Wang Y (2012) Numerical simulation of the processes of accidental power cut and the restart of large-scale solid-liquid two-phase stirred tank. J Chem Eng Chin Univ 26:946–951. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-9015.2012.06.007
Liu Q, Su YH, Luo ZH (2018) Numerical simulation of hydrodynamics and concentration distribution in a stirred tank during startup stage for producing phenylboronic acid ester. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.2172
Luan DY, Chen Q, Zhou SJ (2014) Numerical simulation and analysis of power consumption and Metzner-Otto constant for impeller of 6PBT. Chin J Mech Eng 27:635–640. https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2014.03.635
Maynes D, Butcher M (2002) Steady-state and decay dynamics for impellers of varying aspect ratio in unbaffled tanks. AIChE J 48:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690480106
Maynes D, Klewicki J, Mcmurtry P (1999) Spin-up in a tank induced by a rotating bluff body. J Fluid Mech 388:49–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112099004711
Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32:1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
Montante G, Lee KC, Brucato A, Yianneskis M (2001) Numerical simulations of the dependency of flow pattern on impeller clearance in stirred vessels. Chem Eng Sci 56:3751–3770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00089-6
Nagata S (1975) Mixing: principles and applications. Wiley, New York
Ranade VV (1997) An efficient computational model for simulating flow in stirred vessels: a case of Rushton turbine. Chem Eng Sci 52:4473–4484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00292-3
Rao AR, Kumar B, Patel AK (2009) Vortex behaviour of an unbaffled surface aerator. Sci Asia 35:183–187. https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasial513-1874.2009.35.183
Sardeshpande MV, Ranade VV (2012) Simulation of settling of solid particles due to sudden impeller stoppage. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:4112–4118. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2028987
Sardeshpande MV, Juvekar VA, Ranade VV (2010) Hysteresis in cloud heights during solid suspension in stirred tank reactor: experiments and CFD simulations. AIChE J 56:2795–2804. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12191
Steiros K (2017) Transient torque in stirred tanks. J Fluid Mech 831:554–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.652
Steiros K, Bruce PJK, Buxton ORH, Vassilicos JC (2017) Power consumption and form drag of regular and fractal-shaped turbines in a stirred tank. AIChE J 63:843–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15414
Taghavi M, Zadghaffari R, Moghaddas J, Moghaddas Y (2011) Experimental and CFD investigation for power consumption in a dual Rushton turbine stirred tank. Chem Eng Res Des 89:280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.07.006
Tezura S, Kimura A, Yoshida M, Ohkawa A (2010) Agitation requirements for complete solid suspension in an unbaffled agitated vessel with an unsteadily forward-reverse rotating impeller. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82:672–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1726
Torré JP, Fletcher DF, Lasuye T, Xuereb C (2007) Transient hydrodynamics and free surface capture of under-baffled stirred tank during stopping. Chem Eng Res Des 85:626–636. https://doi.org/10.1205/cherd06174
Wang K, Feng LF (2000) Mixing equipment design. China Machine press, Beijing
Wilcox DC (1988) Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J 26:1299–1310. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10041
Wójtowicz R, Lipin AA, Talaga J (2014) On the possibility of using of different turbulence models for modeling flow hydrodynamics and power consumption in mixing vessels with turbine impellers. Theor Found Chem Eng 48:360–375. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579514020146
Yang FL, Zhou SJ, Zhang CX (2015) Turbulent flow and mixing performance of a novel six-blade grid disc impeller. Korean J Chem Eng 32:816–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0255-4
Yao WG, Sato H, Takahashi K, Koyama K (1998) Mixing performance experiments in impeller stirred tanks subjected to unsteady rotational speeds. Chem Eng Sci 53:303l–3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00116-X
Yoshida M, Kitamura A, Yamagiwa K, Ohkawa A (1996) Gas hold-up and volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient in an aerated agitated vessel without baffles having forward–reverse rotating impellers. Can J Chem Eng 74:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450740105
Yoshida M, Shigeyama M, Hiura T, Yamagiwa K, Ohkawa A (2007) Liquid-phase mixing in an unbaffled agitated vessel with an unsteady forward–reverse rotating impeller. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 2:659–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.58
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support by Key Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (15ZA0107).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Xiang, K. & Xiang, B. Numerical simulation of transient power consumption characteristics in an unbaffled stirred tank. Chem. Pap. 74, 2849–2859 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01115-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01115-3