Abstract
Two calcium-based absorbents, hydrated lime and calcium carbonate slurries, were employed for studies on absorption of SO2 from simulated flue gases in semi-batch bubble column and foam-bed slurry reactors. The concentration of SO2 at the inlet to, and exit from, the reactor was measured using a ZRJFAY36, Fuji, Japan make infrared SO2 analyzer. Different surface-active agents were used for studies of performance of the foam-bed reactor for the desulfurization operation. With the bubble column reactor, the maximum value of the transient SO2 removal efficiency obtained was 99.4% with hydrated lime slurry, while with the use of calcium carbonate slurry this value was 97.7%. In the foam-bed reactor, the maximum removal efficiencies were found to reduce, more with lime slurry: 91% with each of Triton X-100 and Tween 80, but to 95.2% and 96%, respectively, when calcium carbonate was used as the absorbent. The products obtained from the desulfurization operation were characterized using FT-IR and TGA analyses. Calcium sulfate hemihydrate was obtained for all the combinations of absorbents without and with the surfactant additives, except in the case where Teepol was added to the hydrated lime slurry and gypsum was obtained as the FGD product.
Graphic abstract
Highlights
-
Hydrated lime and calcium carbonate slurries were employed for absorption of SO2 from simulated flue gases in semi-batch bubble column and foam-bed slurry reactors.
-
With the bubble column reactor, the maximum value of the transient SO2 removal efficiency obtained was 99.4% with hydrated lime slurry and 97.7% for calcium carbonate slurry.
-
In the foam-bed reactor, the maximum removal efficiencies were found to be 91% with each of Triton X-100 and Tween 80, but 95.2% and 96%, respectively, when calcium carbonate was used as the absorbent.
-
The products obtained from the desulfurization operation were characterized using FT-IR and TGA analyses.
-
Calcium sulfate hemihydrate was obtained for all the combinations of absorbents without and with the surfactant additives except in the case of adding Teepol to the hydrated lime slurry when gypsum was obtained as the FGD product.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
12 February 2020
In the original version of this article, unfortunately S.K. Jana was omitted as an author.
Abbreviations
- \( {\text{C}}_{{{\text{SO}}_{ 2} }} \) :
-
Initial concentration of SO2 in inlet gas, ppm
- u G :
-
Superficial velocity of gas, m s−1
- V sl :
-
Volume of slurry, m3
- CA, out :
-
Outlet SO2 gas concentration, ppm
- \( m_{B}^{T} (0) \) :
-
Initial solid loading
- CNaOH :
-
Concentration of NaOH in distilled water
References
Alvarez-Ayuso E, Querol X, Tomas A (2006) Environmental impact of a coal combustion-desulphurisation plant: abatement capacity of desulphurisation process and environmental characterisation of combustion by-products. Chemosphere 65:2009–2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.070
Ashrit S, Banerjee PK, Chatti RV et al (2015) Characterization of gypsum synthesized from LD slag fines generated at a waste recycling plant of a steel plant. New J Chem 39:4128–4134. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NJ02023E
Asolekar SR, Desai D, Deshpande PK, Kumar R (1985) Effect of surface resistance on gas absorption accompanied by a chemical reaction in a gas–liquid contactor. Can J Chem Eng 63:336–339
Bandyopadhyay A, Biswas MN (2006) SO2 scrubbing in a tapered bubble column scrubber. Chem Eng Commun 193:1562–1580. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986440600584466
Belo I, García-abuín A, Gómez-díaz D (2011) Effect of Tween 80 on bubble size and mass transfer in a bubble contactor. Chem Eng Technol 80:1790–1796. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201100140
Biswas J, Kumar R (1981) mass transfer with chemical reaction in a froth bed reactor. Chem Eng Commun 178:103–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986440008912178
Dagaonkar MV, Beenackers AACM, Pangarkar VG (2001) Enhancement of gas–liquid mass transfer by small reactive particles at realistically high mass transfer coefficients: absorption of sulfur dioxide into aqueous slurries of Ca(OH)2 and Mg(OH)2 particles. Chem Eng J 81:203–212
Dou B, Pan W, Jin Q et al (2009) Prediction of SO2 removal efficiency for wet flue gas desulfurization. Energy Convers Manag 50:2547–2553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.06.012
García-abuín A, Gómez-díaz D, Navaza JM (2015) Influence of surfactant upon SO2 absorption with and without chemical reaction. Indian J Chem Technol 22:171–173
Guan B, Jiang G, Wu Z et al (2011a) Preparation of α-calcium sulfate hemihydrate from calcium sulfate dihydrate in methanol-water solution under mild conditions. J Am Ceram Soc 94:3261–3266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04470.x
Guan B, Yang L, Fu H et al (2011b) α-Calcium sulfate hemihydrate preparation from FGD gypsum in recycling mixed salt solutions. Chem Eng J 174:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.09.033
Huang K, Le Chen Y, Zhang XM et al (2014) SO2 absorption in acid salt ionic liquids/sulfolane binary mixtures: experimental study and thermodynamic analysis. Chem Eng J 237:478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.050
Jana SK, Bhaskarwar AN (2011) Gas absorption accompanied by chemical reaction in a system of three-phase slurry-foam reactors in series. Chem Eng Res Des 89:793–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.09.011
Kairies CL, Schroeder KT, Cardone CR (2006) Mercury in gypsum produced from flue gas desulfurization. Fuel 85:2530–2536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.04.027
Khatib JM, Wright L, Mangat PS (2013) Effect of fly ash-gypsum blend on porosity and pore size distribution of cement pastes. Adv Appl Ceram 112:197–201. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743676112Y.0000000032
Lu Z, Streets DG, Zhang Q et al (2010) Sulfur dioxide emissions in China and sulfur trends in east Asia since 2000. Atmos Chem Phys 10:6311–6331. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6311-2010
Lu Z, Zhang Q, Streets DG (2011) Sulfur dioxide and primary carbonaceous aerosol emissions in China and India, 1996–2010. Atmos Chem Phys 11:9839–9864. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9839-2011
Lu Z, Streets DG, de Foy B et al (2013) Ozone Monitoring Instrument observations of interannual increases in SO2 emissions from Indian coal-fired power plants during 2005–2012. Environ Sci Technol 47:13993–14000. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4039648
Miao M, Feng X, Wang G et al (2015) Direct transformation of FGD gypsum to calcium sulfate hemihydrate whiskers: preparation, simulations, and process analysis. Particuology 19:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2014.04.010
Mondal MK, Chelluboyana VR (2013) New experimental results of combined SO2 and NO removal from simulated gas stream by NaClO as low-cost absorbent. Chem Eng J 217:48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.002
Nosov VN, Frolova NG, Kamyshov VF (1976) IR spectra of calcium sulfate semihydrates. J Appl Spectrosc 24:509–511
Pan Z, Lou Y, Yang G et al (2013) Preparation of calcium sulfate dihydrate and calcium sulfate hemihydrate with controllable crystal morphology by using ethanol additive. Ceram Int 39:5495–5502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.061
Rashad MM, Mahmoud MHH, Ibrahim IA, Abdel-Aal EA (2004) Crystallization of calcium sulfate dihydrate under simulated conditions of phosphoric acid production in the presence of aluminum and magnesium ions. J Cryst Growth 267:372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.03.060
Shah PS, Mahalingam R (1984) Mass transfer with chemical reaction in. AIChE J 30:924–934
Shih WY, Rahardianto A, Lee RW et al (2005) Morphometric characterization of calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum) scale on reverseosmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 252:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.023
Song X, Zhang L, Zhao J et al (2011) Preparation of calcium sulfate whiskers using waste calcium chloride by reactive crystallization. Cryst Res Technol 46:166–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.201000420
Sun Z, Zhao Y, Gao H, Hu G (2010) Removal of SO2 from flue gas by sodium humate solution. Energy Fuels 24:1013–1019. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901052r
Wang X, Yang L, Zhu X, Yang J (2014) Preparation of calcium sulfate whiskers from FGD gypsum via hydrothermal crystallization in the H2SO4–NaCl–H2O system. Particuology 17:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2013.12.001
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Research Centre, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur for providing the laboratory support and Prof. S.K. Jana, Department of Chemical Engineering, MNIT, Jaipur, for his help during the experimentation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A. Desulfurization performance of sulfur dioxide and product characteristics in semi-batch bubble column and foam-bed contactor. Chem. Pap. 74, 2427–2439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-019-00979-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-019-00979-4