Skip to main content
Log in

Weight Loss with an AI-Powered Digital Platform for Lifestyle Intervention

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lifestyle intervention remains the cornerstone of weight loss programs in addition to pharmacological or surgical therapies. Artificial intelligence (AI) and other digital technologies can offer individualized approaches to lifestyle intervention to enable people with obesity to reach successful weight loss.

Methods

SureMediks, a digital lifestyle intervention platform using AI, was tested by 391 participants (58% women) with a broad range of BMI (20–78 kg/m2), with the aim of losing weight over 24 weeks in a multinational field trial. SureMediks consists of a mobile app, an Internet-connected scale, and a discipline of artificial intelligence called Expert system to provide individualized guidance and weight-loss management.

Results

All participants lost body weight (average 14%, range 4–22%). Almost all (98.7%) participants lost at least 5% of body weight, 75% lost at least 10%, 43% at least 15%, and 9% at least 20%, suggesting that this AI-powered lifestyle intervention was also effective in reducing the burden of obesity co-morbidities. Weight loss was partially positively correlated with female sex, accountability circle size, and participation in challenges, while it was negatively correlated with sub-goal reassignment. The latter three variables are specific features of the SureMediks weight loss program.

Conclusion

An AI-assisted lifestyle intervention allowed people with different body sizes to lose 14% body weight on average, with 99% of them losing more than 5%, over 24 weeks. These results show that digital technologies and AI might provide a successful means to lose weight, before, during, and after pharmacological or surgical therapies.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(21):e984–1010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz MW, Seeley RJ, Zeltser LM, et al. Obesity Pathogenesis: an endocrine society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. 2017;38(4):267–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Donato KA, et al. Guidelines (2013) for managing overweight and obesity in adults. Obesity. 2014;22(S2):S1-410.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Butryn ML, Webb V, Wadden TA. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011;34(4):841–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Guidelines (2013) for managing overweight and obesity in adults. Preface to the executive summary. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22 Suppl 2:S4.

  6. Bettini S, Belligoli A, Fabris R, et al. Diet approach before and after bariatric surgery. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2020;21(3):297–306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kow L, Sharaiha RZ, O’Kane M, et al. Methodology and results of a joint IFSO-WGO Delphi survey of 94 intercontinental, interdisciplinary experts in obesity management. Obes Surg. 2023;33(11):3337–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams GC, Grow VM, Freedman ZR, et al. Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70(1):115–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soini S, Mustajoki P, Eriksson JG. Long-term weight maintenance after successful weight loss: motivational factors, support, difficulties, and success factors. Am J Health Behav. 2018;42(1):77–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. West DS, Gorin AA, Subak LL, et al. A motivation-focused weight loss maintenance program is an effective alternative to a skill-based approach. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(2):259–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bradford TW, Grier SA, Henderson GR. Weight loss through virtual support communities: a role for identity-based motivation in public commitment. J Interact Mark. 2017;40(1):9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang KO, Ottenbacher AJ, Green AP, et al. Social support in an Internet weight loss community. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(1):5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Islam MM, Poly TN, Walther BA, et al. Use of mobile phone app interventions to promote weight loss: meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(7):e17039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Antoun J, Itani H, Alarab N, et al. The effectiveness of combining nonmobile interventions with the use of smartphone apps with various features for weight loss: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(4):e35479.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Timpel P, Cesena FHY, da Silva CC, et al. Efficacy of gamification-based smartphone application for weight loss in overweight and obese adolescents: study protocol for a phase II randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2018;9(6):167–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Winpenny EM, Smith M, Penney T, et al. Changes in physical activity, diet, and body weight across the education and employment transitions of early adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2020;21(4):e12962.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hollis JF, Gullion CM, Stevens VJ, et al. Weight loss during the intensive intervention phase of the weight-loss maintenance trial. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):118–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McTiernan A, Sorensen B, Irwin ML, et al. Exercise effect on weight and body fat in men and women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(6):1496–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frie K, Hartmann-Boyce J, Jebb S, et al. Patterns in weight and physical activity tracking data preceding a stop in weight monitoring: observational analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(3):e15790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Stein N, Brooks K. A Fully Automated conversational artificial intelligence for weight loss: longitudinal observational study among overweight and obese adults. JMIR Diabetes. 2017;2(2):e28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Forman EM, Berry MP, Butryn ML, et al. Using artificial intelligence to optimize delivery of weight loss treatment: protocol for an efficacy and cost-effectiveness trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023;124:107029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Turner-McGrievy G, Tate D. Tweets, apps, and pods: results of the 6-month mobile pounds off digitally (mobile POD) randomized weight-loss intervention among adults. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeffery RW, Wing RR, Mayer RR. Are smaller weight losses or more achievable weight loss goals better in the long term for obese patients? J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66(4):641–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(11):989–1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wadden TA, Chao AM, Moore M, et al. The role of lifestyle modification with second-generation anti-obesity medications: comparisons, questions, and clinical opportunities. Curr Obes Rep. 2023;12(4):453–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryan DH, Yockey SR. Weight loss and improvement in comorbidity: differences at 5%, 10%, 15%, and over. Curr Obes Rep. 2017;6(2):187–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Chhabria K, Ross KM, Sacco SJ, et al. The assessment of supportive accountability in adults seeking obesity treatment: psychometric validation study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e17967.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Brien PE, Hindle A, Brennan L, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss at 10 or more years for all bariatric procedures and a single-centre review of 20-year outcomes after adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wadden TA, Tronieri JS, Butryn ML. Lifestyle modification approaches for the treatment of obesity in adults. Am Psychol. 2020;75(2):235–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our participants and their commitment to their dedicated time. Their compliance and dedication to our field trial were commendable. We would also like to thank Mr. Kannan Palaniswami for his efficient technical support and Ms. Helga Andersen for her moral support in completing the field trial and organizing the database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarfraz Khokhar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

Consent from all the participants was taken after they had read the details of the trial, understood, and voluntarily consented to participate in the field trial.

Conflict of Interest

Sarfraz Khokhar is a scientific officer at Rasimo Systems where SureMediks is a research and development project. Angelo Del Parigi is a senior advisor for Rasimo System. Catherine Toomer is a medical advisor for Rasimo System. John Holden has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• Lifestyle intervention is the cornerstone of weight loss programs and digital technologies can enhance personalization, engagement, and effectiveness.

• An AI-based digital weight loss platform consisting of a mobile app, an Internet-connected scale, and an AI-based system to provide individualized guidance and weight-loss management was tested in a multinational field trial.

• A sample of 391 participants with a broad range of BMI, accomplished 14% (range 4–22%) weight loss over 24 weeks.

• Almost all (99%) participants lost at least 5% of body weight, suggesting that this AI-powered lifestyle intervention can reduce the burden of obesity co-comorbidities.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khokhar, S., Holden, J., Toomer, C. et al. Weight Loss with an AI-Powered Digital Platform for Lifestyle Intervention. OBES SURG 34, 1810–1818 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07209-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07209-1

Keywords

Navigation