Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors Related to Bleeding and Leak Rates After Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Robotic sleeve gastrectomy has been increasing in annual incidence in recent years. Although rare, post op bleeding and leak in these cases can lead to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization.

Objectives

To determine preop comorbidity risk factors and operative techniques associated with risk of bleeding or leak within 30 days of robotic sleeve gastrectomy.

Methods

The MBSAQIP database was analyzed. A total of 53,548 RSG cases were included in analysis. Surgeries took place from accredited centers in the USA from 2015 to 2019.

Conclusions

Preoperative anticoagulation, renal failure, COPD, and OSA were found to increase in the risk for transfusion requirements after SG. Receiving a transfusion and smoking increased the risk for leak. Staple line reinforcement significantly decreased transfusion and leak rates. Staple line oversewing did not have an impact on bleeding or leak.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morales-Marroquin E, Khatiwada S, Xie L, et al. Five year trends in the utilization of robotic bariatric surgery procedures, United States 2015–2019. Obes Surg. 2022;32(5):1539–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Acevedo E, Mazzei M, Zhao H, et al. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case–controlled study of the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(3):1353–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sebastian R, Howell MH, Chang KH, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015–2016, MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(5):1600–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304(4):435–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery “Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers, 2011-2020”, 2022, https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers. Accessed 6/1/23

  6. Kim J, Azagury D, Eisenberg D, et al. ASMBS position statement on prevention, detection, and treatment of gastrointestinal leak after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, including the roles of imaging, surgical exploration, and nonoperative management. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):739–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernández M, Beltrán Herrera H, Martínez García V, et al. Stent management of leaks after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and , meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2022;32(4):1034–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gore® SEAMGUARD®. Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement. In: Gore Medical. https://www.goremedical.com/products/seamguard?xcmp=21183805-en_seamguard-reliability-matters_gmp_sem_text_generalsurgery_search_ga. Accessed 6/1/23

  9. Echelon ENDOPATH™ Staple Line Reinforcement | Ethicon - J&J Medtech. https://www.jnjmedtech.com/en-US/product/echelon-endopath-staple-line-reinforcement. Accessed 6/1/23

  10. Peri-Strips Baxter Specialty Site, https://advancedsurgery.baxter.com/peri-strips.

  11. Tri-Staple™. 2.0 Reinforced Reload. In: Medtronic. https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-us/products/surgical-stapling/tri-staple-2-0-reinforced-reload.html. Accessed 6/1/23

  12. Shikora SA, Mahoney CB. Clinical benefit of gastric staple line reinforcement (SLR) in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1133–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Aiolfi A, Gagner M, Zappa MA, et al. Staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: systematic review and network meta-analysis of, randomized controlled trials. Obes Surg. 2022;32(5):1466–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gayrel X, Loureiro M, Skalli EM, et al. Clinical and economic evaluation of absorbable staple line buttressing in sleeve gastrectomy in high-risk patients. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1710–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Wesley Vosburg.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent does not apply.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• An increase in the utilization of a robotic platform has been found for sleeve gastrectomy performed in the USA.

• Utilization of staple line reinforcement in robotic sleeve gastrectomy cases is associated with a lower risk of bleeding and leak within 30 days of surgery.

• Staple line oversewing did not have an impact on the frequency of bleeding or leak after robotic sleeve gastrectomy.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vosburg, R.W. Factors Related to Bleeding and Leak Rates After Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 33, 2658–2661 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06712-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06712-1

Keywords

Navigation