Abstract
Background
Obesity in the recipient is linked to inferior transplant outcome. Consequently, access to kidney transplantation (KT) is often restricted by body mass index (BMI) thresholds. Bariatric surgery (BS) has been established as a superior treatment for obesity compared to conservative measures, but it is unclear whether it is beneficial for patients on the waiting list.
Methods
A national survey consisting of 16 questions was sent to all heads of German KT centers. Current situation of KT candidates with obesity and the status of BS were queried.
Results
Center response rate was 100%. Obesity in KT candidates was considered an important issue (96.1%; n = 49/51) and 68.6% (n = 35/51) of departments responded to use absolute BMI thresholds for KT waiting list access with ≥ 35 kg/m2 (45.1%; n = 23/51) as the most common threshold. BS was considered an appropriate weight loss therapy (92.2%; n = 47/51), in particular before KT (88.2%; n = 45/51). Sleeve gastrectomy was the most favored procedure (77.1%; n = 37/51). Twenty-one (41.2%) departments responded to evaluate KT candidates with obesity by default but only 11 (21.6%) had experience with ≥ n = 5 transplants after BS. Concerns against BS were malabsorption of immunosuppressive therapy (39.2%; n = 20/51), perioperative morbidity (17.6%; n = 9/51), and malnutrition (13.7%; n = 7/51).
Conclusions
Obesity is potentially limiting access for KT. Despite commonly used BMI limits, only few German centers consider BS for obesity treatment in KT candidates by default. A national multicenter study is desired by nearly all heads of German transplant centers to prospectively assess the potentials, risks, and safety of BS in KT waitlisted patients.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The global pandemic of morbid obesity is strongly associated with the metabolic syndrome and related comorbidities like hypertension, atherosclerosis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus and affects 23% of the German population [1]. Each of abovementioned diagnoses alone or in combination is linked to increased morbidity and inferior patient survival and can aggravate chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [2,3,4]. Kidney transplantation (KT) is the only curative treatment of ESRD [5]. In KT, obesity is associated with higher rates of delayed organ function (DGF), primary non-function (PNF), wound complications, and poor graft survival [6, 7]. Therefore, most international and national transplant societies recommend weight reduction in KT candidates with morbid obesity to improve transplant outcome [8, 9]. However, sustainable conservative weight loss is hard to achieve and most KT candidates rather gain weight on chronic dialysis [10, 11]. The persistent organ shortage and the pressure to fulfill transplant quality metrics force many transplant centers to limit access to transplant waiting lists by utilizing institutional maximum body mass index (BMI) thresholds [12]. Bariatric surgery (BS) has been established as a superior treatment option for morbid obesity in the non-ESRD population and may also present a potential therapy for KT candidates with obesity [6, 13]. Although several centers offer BS in KT candidates, it is still not considered a standard treatment option in these patients. The aim of our study was to establish an overview of the current practice patterns of obesity management and the role of BS in the field of KT in Germany.
Methods
Data Acquisition
A web-based survey consisting of 16 questions was designed (Google Forms, Google Inc.) and submitted to all 39 German kidney transplant centers. Both surgical and nephrological heads of transplant programs at each center were addressed. The questionnaire covered the following topics: the role and the current situation of obesity in KT candidates at the addressed centers, the use and range of weight-related waiting list/transplant access restrictions (BMI thresholds), the applied weight reduction programs and bariatric techniques, and concerns on and expectations related to BS in the field of KT.
Statistical Analysis
All calculations and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software package, version 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Graphs were created using GraphPad Prism software version 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Comparison of answers to the query between surgeons and nephrologists was performed using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as applicable. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The primary aim of the study was to provide a concise overview of the current situation of obesity and BS in KT candidates in Germany. The study does not compare or rate strategies, nor does it draw causal conclusions.
Results
From all 39 German transplant centers, at least one responsible person responded to the questionnaire (response rate: 100%). Detailed results of the survey are shown in supplementary file 1. In 27 centers (69.2%), the reply to the query was performed by either the head of the nephrological (n = 11; 28.2%) or the surgical department (n = 16; 41%). In 12 centers (30.7%), heads of both departments responded. The response rate and distribution are shown in Fig. 1.
Obesity in KT candidates was considered to be a relevant issue in 96.1% (n = 49/51) of transplant departments and 66.7% (n = 34/51) stated to use obesity as a selection criterion for KT. In 27.5% (n = 34/51) of centers, a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 was considered a limit for KT evaluation, whereas 54.9% (n = 28/51) of centers did not consider obesity a contraindication evaluation for KT. Whilst 43.1% (n = 22/51) of transplant departments stated that the BMI is not an appropriate criterion for the selection of potential KT candidates, 68.6% (n = 35/51) reported to use BMI thresholds as sole exclusion criterion for KT listing. The most common BMI threshold for active KT listing was ≥ 35 kg/m2 in 45.1% of centers (n = 23/51). Only 8 (15.7%) centers considered active KT listing in candidates with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Nearly half of the centers (43.1%; n = 22/51) specified waist circumference (37.2%; n = 19/51), waist-to-hip ratio (27.4%; n = 14/51), and body fat percentage (17.6%; n = 9/51) as more appropriate alternative selection criteria for potential KT recipients compared to the BMI (multiple answers were possible; Fig. 2).
Almost all centers (94.1%; n = 48/51) deemed interdisciplinary weight loss programs as useful to treat obesity in KT candidates: Nutritional counseling (96.1%; n = 49/51), activity programs (94.1%; n = 48/51), and BS (92.2%; n = 47/51) were all considered appropriate weight reduction measures. The actually offered weight loss programs included nutritional counseling in 88.2% (n = 45/51), activity programs in 66.7% (n = 34/51), and BS in 72.5% (n = 37/51) of centers. Most transplant centers (88.2%; n = 45/51) favored BS before KT, and in 41.2% (n = 21/51) of centers, BS was offered regularly to KT waiting list candidates exceeding the BMI threshold. Sleeve gastrectomy was considered the most favored technique (77.1%; n = 37/51; Fig. 3). The most frequently mentioned benefits of BS before KT were weight loss (82.4%; n = 42/51) and the reduction of surgical complications (84.3%; n = 43/51), infections (54.9%; n = 28/51), and DGF rates (31.4%; n = 16/51). Only 2 (3.9%) center heads expressed the opinion that BS before KT does not provide any benefits. The biggest concerns against BS before or after KT were potential pharmacokinetic alterations in immunosuppressive therapy (39.2%; n = 20/51), increased morbidity on dialysis (17.6%; n = 9/51), and malnutrition (13.7%; n = 7/51). Surgeons had not significantly less concerns with regard to BS for patients with obesity waitlisted for KT (surgery 42.9% [n = 12/28] vs. 21.7% [n = 5/23] nephrology, p = 0.196). Regarding the experience with BS in the context of KT, only 5 (9.8%) of transplant centers had performed more than 25 KTs after BS, 6 (11.8%) centers had KT experience with 5–10 KTs after BS, and 11 (21.6%) centers reported not yet having performed a KT after BS. The interest in participating in a prospective multicenter trial evaluating the effects of BS in KT and to develop national standards was expressed in 90.2% (n = 46/51) of centers (Fig. 4).
Discussion
The growing discrepancy between organ demand and supply, an ageing population, the increase in marginal donors and recipients, and national or self-imposed quality standards are shaping the everyday life of transplantation medicine nowadays [12, 14, 15]. In 2020 a total of 7388 patients were listed for KT in Germany [16]. Obesity and especially morbid obesity have been reported to be associated with complications and impaired outcome in KT [17,18,19]. Hence, access to KT waiting lists is often restricted for high-risk ESRD candidates with obesity by BMI thresholds ranging from 35 to 45 kg/m2 [6, 12]. In 2012, Lentine et al. analyzed available recommendations and studies on obesity in the setting of KT and concluded that obesity in KT recipient is associated with inferior transplant outcome compared to KT recipients with normal body composition [8]. However, no data was found to support specific BMI thresholds and the authors concluded that the decision for each patient should be made individually depending on the overall condition of the patient. Additionally, most of the data used to argue waiting list access restrictions for KT candidates with obesity is based on studies from the 1990s and early 2000s [17, 20,21,22]. Several more recent studies have questioned the use of BMI thresholds [23, 24]. A literature review by Minh-Ha Tran et al. from 2016 found that albeit increased risk for surgical site infections and DGF rates in KT candidates with obesity compared to non-obese KT recipients, there was no impact on graft and patient survival [24].
Our survey found that obesity represents a relevant issue in nearly all German transplant centers (96.1%). Almost half of the centers considered BMI as an inappropriate criterion for KT selection (43%) and suggested to use waist-to-hip ratio or waist circumference as more proper parameters for obesity-related risk stratification. This assessment is supported by the results of a meta-analysis by Czernichow et al. [25]. The authors investigated the evidence of different obesity discriminators on cardiovascular disease mortality in 82,864 British citizens and found that measures of central adiposity (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference) were stronger predictors of cardiovascular mortality than BMI. At present, the reality looks different, and most centers worldwide still use BMI as a discriminator for obesity-related complications. This is most likely due to the fact that BMI measuring/updating is an easier task compared to the other discriminators. In our survey, more than half of German transplant centers (68.6%) reported to use BMI limits for KT access, albeit the rate was lower than in similar international questionnaires. In a survey of 67 KT centers in the USA, nearly all centers (99%) stated to use BMI thresholds for KT access, although the exact numbers and BMI limits have never been made publicly available [26]. A more recent query from Canada reported that 81% of transplant specialists use official obesity-related selection criteria for KT [27]. The authors found that if there was a BMI threshold, the most commonly used BMI limit for KT listing was 40 kg/m2 (62%), followed by ≥ 35 kg/m2 (36%). In our query, more than half of the centers had no BMI limit for waitlist evaluation. However, after waitlisting, most centers used BMI upper limits as a selection criterion for effective transplantation and the most common BMI threshold was ≥ 35 kg/m2. This result implies that there is a considerable number of patients on German KT waiting lists, who are denied KT after evaluation solely based on the diagnosis of morbid obesity. Interestingly, we found a consensus between surgeons and nephrologists concerning BMI limits for the access to the waiting list and the effective transplantation, although one would expect surgeons to be more restrictive.
Nearly all centers agreed that weight loss programs are useful measures for patients with obesity before KT. In our survey, 3 possible treatment approaches for weight reduction were eligible and we allowed multiple answering. There was unanimous consent that there is no single treatment option, but that a multimodal approach of nutritional counseling, activity programs, and BS seems appropriate. A discrepancy was found between the recommendation and what was actually offered to patients with obesity, especially for activity programs and BS. However, the availability of treatment options in German centers was considerably higher than that in the Canadian study, in which only 30% reported offering a weight loss program for KT candidates with obesity [27]. Nonetheless, our results indicate the potential to provide more personalized obesity treatment options to these patients.
In general, the reported BS expertise in KT candidates among German transplant centers was relatively low. The majority of centers had no BS experience or with less than 5 patients (78.5%). Only the minority oversaw more than 25 patients with BS prior to KT (10%). Interestingly, nephrologists (95.7%) were more open to considered BS an appropriate treatment option for ESRD patients with obesity than surgeons (89.3%); however, they had more concerns about BS than surgeons. Albeit nearly all centers agreed that BS should be offered before KT, less than half of them considered BS for obesity treatment in KT candidates by default. Based on the data of the current query, it is not possible to explain the actual causes of this discrepancy. The most common concern for BS in KT candidates were potential negative effects on pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive medication and malabsorption, whereas increased perioperative complications after BS were rarely considered a relevant issue (7.8%). In 2017, we investigated the impact of BS on alterations of immunosuppressive therapy in a systematic literature review and found that most authors reported no or negligible effects of immunosuppressive therapy regimes [6]. Sleeve gastrectomy was considered the most favored procedure in our survey (77.1%) and Roux-Y-gastric bypass did not appear to play a relevant role in this patient population. This is probably motivated by the fact that sleeve gastrectomy is considered the safer procedure in this patient cohort with regard to general and surgical site complication with less malnutritional and malabsorptive effects on vitamins and minerals [28,29,30].
The use of bariatric surgery to treat obesity in patients with ESRD inhears the potential to enable a broader access to KT waiting lists by overcoming national or self-imposed BMI thresholds. In summary, this survey addresses many relevant issues regarding obesity and its treatment in the field of KT. On the one hand, we obtained the perspectives from many heads of nephrological and surgical transplantation programs with a center response rate of 100%. On the other hand, we observed that the experience with BS in KT candidates does vary between centers and that there is still a lot of uncertainty on its therapeutic value in this population. All centers agreed that obesity in KT recipients presents a modifiable risk factor with potential treatment options. Despite the increasing number of case series reporting promising results, there is still a lack of high-quality prospective data to prove the efficacy and safety of BS in KT candidates [15]. Furthermore, the effects of BS on graft function and immunosuppressive medication have not yet been deeply investigated [16]. Hence, the first step to reach for a national policy is the interest of most centers to participate in a nationwide prospective study on the topic. The future goal should be that no patient is excluded from KT based solely on an obesity-related criterion without assessment for BS or a multidisciplinary approach.
Certainly, our study has limitations. First, the survey consisted solely of 16 core questions, and we did not perform a second questionnaire round to explore further details. Second, albeit 100% of all centers responded at least once to the query, some centers did not report both the nephrologists’ and surgeons’ perspectives on the questionnaire due to differing house politics. Furthermore, the survey did not distinguish between large and small centers. Therefore, no statements on selection or infrastructure biases can be made. This aspect should be considered in further studies. Last, the study was conducted in Germany, where the allocation system and donor pools differ from those in other countries. Therefore, some statements may not represent the situation for each country due to different policies in transplantation medicine. Additionally, there is no national registry for obese ESRD patients. Therefore, the exact number of patients who are refused KT due to obesity is still unknown. Furthermore, for a long time, access to BS was only granted after strict selection and exhaustion of all conservative measures in Germany. It was not until 2018 that the cumbersome and time-consuming approval process for BS was reformed for patients with particularly severe concomitant and secondary diseases. Therefore, BS was rarely considered for KT candidates before 2018 in Germany.
Conclusion
Obesity represents a pertinent topic in German KT waiting list policy and BMI limits are still used for KT access. No national policy consensus is currently available and the experience with BS in the field of KT is relatively low with only few centers considering BS for obesity treatment by default. However, there is an emerging trend on the horizon. Most heads of German transplant centers agree that BMI thresholds are improper selection criteria for KT, and BS may play a relevant role in a multimodal obesity treatment in KT candidates. Therefore, a national multicenter study seems to be the next proper step to address the concerns regarding the risks and safety of BS in KT candidates and could help to frame a unified national policy on this topic.
Abbreviations
- BS:
-
Bariatric surgery
- CKD:
-
Chronic kidney disease
- DGF:
-
Delayed graft functions
- ESRD:
-
End-stage renal disease
- KT:
-
Kidney transplantation
- PNF:
-
Primary non-function
References
Koch-Institut R. Übergewicht und Adipositas. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Themen/Uebergewicht_Adipositas/Uebergewicht_Adipositas_node.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2021.
Chade AR, Hall JE. Role of the renal microcirculation in progression of chronic kidney injury in obesity. Am J Nephrol. 2016;44(5):354–67.
Locke JE, Reed RD, Massie A, et al. Obesity increases the risk of end-stage renal disease among living kidney donors. Kidney Int. 2017;91(3):699–703.
Ladhani M, Craig JC, Irving M, Clayton PA, Wong G. Obesity and the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(3):439–49.
Axelrod DA. Economic and financial outcomes in transplantation: whose dime is it anyway? Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2013;18(2):222–8.
Dziodzio T, Biebl M, Ollinger R, Pratschke J, Denecke C. The role of bariatric surgery in abdominal organ transplantation-the next big challenge? Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2696–706.
Dziodzio T, Jara M, Hardt J, et al. Effects of expanded allocation programmes and organ and recipient quality metrics on transplant-related costs in kidney transplantation - an institutional analysis. Transpl Int. 2019;32(10):1074–84.
Lentine KL, Delos Santos R, Axelrod D, Schnitzler MA, Brennan DC, Tuttle-Newhall JE. Obesity and kidney transplant candidates: how big is too big for transplantation? Am J Nephrol. 2012;36(6):575–86.
Chintam K, Chang AR. Strategies to treat obesity in patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;77(3):427–39.
Diwan TS, Lee TC, Nagai S, et al. Obesity, transplantation, and bariatric surgery: an evolving solution for a growing epidemic. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(8):2143–55.
Park J, Ahmadi SF, Streja E, et al. Obesity paradox in end-stage kidney disease patients. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56(4):415–25.
Kostakis ID, Kassimatis T, Bianchi V, et al. UK renal transplant outcomes in low and high BMI recipients: the need for a national policy. J Nephrol. 2020;33(2):371–81.
Dobrzycka M, Proczko-Stepaniak M, Kaska L, Wilczynski M, Debska-Slizien A, Kobiela J. Weight loss after bariatric surgery in morbidly obese end-stage kidney disease patients as preparation for kidney transplantation. Matched pair analysis in a high-volume bariatric and transplant center. Obes Surg. 2020;30(7):2708–14.
Montgomery JR, Cohen JA, Brown CS, et al. Perioperative risks of bariatric surgery among patients with and without history of solid organ transplant. Am J Transplant. 2020.
Sharma H, Banerjee A, Lozano Lomichar P, et al. Bariatric surgery and transplantation: a bridge not so far. Am J Transplant. 2020.
German Organ Procurement Organization (DSO) Report 2020.
Johnson DW, Isbel NM, Brown AM, et al. The effect of obesity on renal transplant outcomes. Transplantation. 2002;74(5):675–81.
Mehta R, Shah G, Leggat JE, et al. Impact of recipient obesity on living donor kidney transplant outcomes: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2007;39(5):1421–3.
Fockens MM, Alberts VP, Bemelman FJ, van der Pant KA, Idu MM. Wound morbidity after kidney transplant. Prog Transplant. 2015;25(1):45–8.
Pirsch JD, Armbrust MJ, Knechtle SJ, et al. Obesity as a risk factor following renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1995;59(4):631–3.
Holley JL, Shapiro R, Lopatin WB, Tzakis AG, Hakala TR, Starzl TE. Obesity as a risk factor following cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1990;49(2):387–9.
Kasiske BL, Cangro CB, Hariharan S, et al. The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates: clinical practice guidelines. Am J Transplant. 2001;1(Suppl 2):3–95.
Ciardullo S, Ballabeni C, Trevisan R, Perseghin G. Metabolic syndrome, and not obesity, is associated with chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(8):666–72.
Tran MH, Foster CE, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Ichii H. Kidney transplantation in obese patients. World J Transplant. 2016;6(1):135–43.
Czernichow S, Kengne AP, Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Batty GD. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio: which is the better discriminator of cardiovascular disease mortality risk?: Evidence from an individual-participant meta-analysis of 82 864 participants from nine cohort studies. Obes Rev. 2011;12(9):680–7.
Pondrom S. The AJT report: news and issues that affect organ and tissue transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(7):1663–4.
Chan G, Soucisse M. Survey of Canadian kidney transplant specialists on the management of morbid obesity and the transplant waiting list. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2016;3:2054358116675344.
Kienzl-Wagner K, Pratschke J, Ollinger R. A double challenge transplant-horseshoe kidney meets obesity. First case of horseshoe kidney transplantation after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):89–91.
Jamal MH, Corcelles R, Daigle CR, et al. Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery in dialysis patients and kidney transplantation candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):419–23.
Lin MY, Tavakol MM, Sarin A, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is safe and efficacious for pretransplant candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):653–8.
Acknowledgements
We thank all contributing transplant centers (collaborators) for their participation and willingness to assist with this survey. Dr. T. Dziodzio, Dr. K.H. Hillebrandt, Dr. P.V. Ritschl, and Dr. B. Globke are participants in the BIH-Charité (Digital) Clinician Scientist Program funded by the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Berlin Institute of Health.
Collaborator List: Assfalg Volker, Bachmann Anette, Benoehr Peter, Billeter Adrian, Braun Felix, Brockmann Jens, Er Aydin, Foller Susan, Friedersdorff Frank, Fuehrer Andreas, Geks Josef, Grabitz Klaus, Guthoff Martina, Gwinner Wilfried, Halleck Fabian, Heise Michael, Herden Uta, Karakizlis Histros, Keese Michael, Kersting Stephan, Koch Martina, Krautter Markus, Kuhlmann Uwe, Kurschat Christine, Lang Sven, Liefeldt Lutz, Lokhande Shanti, Lopau Kai, Manekeller Steffen, Mönch Christian, Mühlfeld Anja, Nadalin Silvio, Nitschke Martin, Öllinger Robert, Opgenoorth Mirian, Pein Ulrich, Pession Ursula, Pisarski Przemyslaw, Putz Juliane, Rath Thomas, Schenker Peter, Seehofer Daniel, Siemer Stefan, Sommer Florian, Stroehlein Michael, Treckmann Jürgen Walter, Weinmann-Menke Julia, Weithofer Peter, Wiegand Karl, Zecher Daniel
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
All authors have made substantial contributions to the study and approved the submitted manuscript. TD and RÖ collected the data, drafted and wrote the manuscript, and designed and performed the research. KHH, SK, and MN collected data. KHH, SK, and MN performed the statistical analysis and revised the manuscript. BG, PVR, MB, CD, JR, and DK analyzed and critically revised the manuscript. GL, WS, MS, FH, AK, MF, KB, KUE, and JP interpreted the data, and critically revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent does not apply.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key points
• Most German transplant centers use absolute BMI thresholds as exclusion criteria for KT.
• The most common BMI threshold for KT candidates is ≥ 35 kg/m2 in Germany.
• In less than half of German transplant centers KT candidates with obesity are evaluated for bariatric surgery by default.
• Sleeve gastrectomy is the most favored procedure and preferentially performed before KT.
• Few German centers have regular experience with KT after bariatric surgery.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dziodzio, T., Hillebrandt, K.H., Knitter, S. et al. Body Mass Index Thresholds and the Use of Bariatric Surgery in the Field of Kidney Transplantation in Germany. OBES SURG 32, 1641–1648 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06000-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06000-4