Skip to main content
Log in

Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure—Revision to Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Roux-n-Y Gastric Bypass: a Multicenter Study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most popular bariatric procedure performed worldwide. However, many patients undergo secondary surgery due to either weight-related and complication-related reasons or both. Conversional options vary with one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-n-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) being the most common. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of converting failed LSG to either OAGB or RYGB, and compare weight-related results and post-conversion complications.

Methods

Retrospective review of hospital records of patients who underwent conversion from LSG to either RYGB or OAGB due to insufficient weight loss or weight regain in 7 bariatric centers between 2013 and 2019. Data retrieved included demographics, anthropometrics, comorbidities, indication for conversion, conversion type, complications, and weight loss.

Results

During the study period, 396 patients were included in the study. Eighty-four (21%) patients were lost to follow-up. RYGB and OAGB were performed in 119 and 144 patients, respectively. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) at revision were 44.2 years (range 19–72) and 40.6 ± 5.9 kg/m2 (range 35–71), respectively. Of these, 191 (73%) were female. Percent total body weight loss (%TWL) was 16% ± 1% for the RYGB group vs. 23% ± 12% for the OAGB group (p = 0.0007) at a median follow-up of 29 months (range 7–78 months) following conversion. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was significantly higher 1 year following conversion to OAGB vs. RYGB occurring in 25 (17.4%) and 9 (7.6%) patients, respectively (p = 0.018).

Conclusions

Conversion of LSG to OAGB, compared to RYGB, results in increased weight loss but a higher rate of GERD and potential nutritional deficiencies.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BPD/DS:

biliopancreatic diversion ± duodenal switch

GERD:

gastroesophageal reflux disease

IDA:

iron deficiency anemia

IWL:

inadequate weight loss

LSG:

laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

OAGB:

one-anastomosis gastric bypass

RYGB:

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

SADI:

single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass

TWL:

total weight loss

WR:

weight regain

References

  1. Welbourn R, Gagner M, Ottosson J, Naslund I, Kinsman R. The IFSO Global Registry. 2019. p. 1–100. Available from: https://www.ifso.com/pdf/5th-ifso-global-registry-report-september-2019.pdf. Accessed Sep 2019.

  2. Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018. Obes Surg. Obesity Surgery. 2019;29:782–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altieri MS, Yang J, Nie L, Blackstone R, Spaniolas K, Pryor A. Rate of revisions or conversion after bariatric surgery over 10 years in the state of New York. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2018;14:500–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.019.

  4. Parikh M, Ayoung-chee P, Romanos E, Lewis N, Pachter HL, Fielding G, et al. Comparison of rates of resolution of diabetes mellitus after gastric banding , gastric bypass , and biliopancreatic diversion. J Am Coll Surg 2019;631–635.

  5. Clapp B, Wynn M, Martyn C, Foster C, O’Dell M, Tyroch A. Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2018;14:741–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.027.

  6. Ponce J, DeMaria EJ, Nguyen NT, Hutter M, Sudan R, Morton JM. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in 2015 and surgeon workforce in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier; 2016;12:1637–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.08.488.

  7. Lazzati A, Bechet S, Jouma S, et al. Revision surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide study with 10 years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16:1497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Homan J, Betzel B, Aarts EO, Van Laarhoven KJHM, Janssen IMC, Berends FJ. Secondary surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier; 2015;11:771–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.029.

  9. Langer FB, Bohdjalian A, Shakeri-Leidenmühler S, et al. Conversion from sleeve gastrectomy to roux-en-y gastric bypass-indications and outcome. Obes Surg. 2010;20:835–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdemur A, Han SM, Lo Menzo E, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R. Reasons and outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for nonresponders. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier; 2016;12:113–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.04.005.

  11. Moszkowicz D, Rau C, Guenzi M, Zinzindohoué F, Berger A, Chevallier JM. Laparoscopic omega-loop gastric bypass for the conversion of failed sleeve gastrectomy: early experience. J Visc Surg. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2013;150:373–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.08.010.

  12. Musella M, Bruni V, Greco F, Raffaelli M, Lucchese M, Susa A, et al. Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2019;15:1332–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.026.

  13. Jamal MH, Elabd R, AlMutairi R, et al. The safety and efficacy of one anastomosis gastric bypass as a revision for sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. Obesity Surgery. 2020;30:2280–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimon O, Keidar A, Orgad R, et al. Long-term effectiveness of laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure. Obes Surg. Obesity Surgery. 2018;28:1724–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dijkhorst PJ, Boerboom AB, Janssen IMC, et al. Failed sleeve gastrectomy: single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? A multicenter cohort study. Obes Surg. Obesity Surgery. 2018;28:3834–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplan U, Romano-Zelekha O, Goitein D, et al. Trends in bariatric surgery: a 5-year analysis of the Israel National Bariatric Surgery Registry. Obes Surg. Obesity Surgery. 2020;30:1761–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de la Cruz M, Büsing M, Dukovska R, et al. Short- to medium-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass compared with one-anastomosis gastric bypass for weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16:1060–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Buchwald H. Revisional metabolic/bariatric surgery: a moral obligation. Obes Surg. 2015;25:547–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Park JY, Song D, Kim YJ. Causes and outcomes of revisional bariatric surgery: initial experience at a single center. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;86:295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohos E, Schmaldienst E, Prager M. Quality of life parameters, weight change and improvement of co-morbidities after laparoscopic roux y gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection-comparative study. Obes Surg. 2011;21:288–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Locke GR, Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1448–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Serag HB. Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hampel H, Abraham NS, El-Serag HB. Metaanalysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Yearb Med Inform. 2005;143:199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1450–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Borbély Y, Kröll D, Nett PC, Moreno P, Tutuian R, Lenglinger J. Radiologic, endoscopic, and functional patterns in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2018;14:764–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.028.

  27. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232:515–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Holmberg D, Santoni G, Xie S, et al. Gastric bypass surgery in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50:159–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Landreneau JP, Strong AT, Rodriguez JH, et al. Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. Obesity Surgery. 2018;28:3843–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yorke E, Sheppard C, Switzer NJ, Kim D, de Gara C, Karmali S, Kanji A, Birch D Revision of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a Canadian experience. Am J Surg. Elsevier Ltd; 2017;213:970–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.04.003.

  31. Georgiadou D, Sergentanis TN, Nixon A, Diamantis T, Tsigris C, Psaltopoulou T. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass. A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier; 2014;10:984–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.009.

  32. Runkel M, Runkel N. Esophago-gastric cancer after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Chir. 2019;114:686–92.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Carbajo M, García-Caballero M, Toledano M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy: results of the first 209 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:398–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Enani G, Bilgic E, Lebedeva E, Delisle M, Vergis A, Hardy K. The incidence of iron deficiency anemia post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. Springer US; 2020;34:3002–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07092-3.

  35. Jamal W, Zagzoog MM, Sait SH, et al. Initial outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass at a single institution. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. Obesity Surgery. 2017;27:1153–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shlomi Rayman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rayman, S., Assaf, D., Azran, C. et al. Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure—Revision to Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Roux-n-Y Gastric Bypass: a Multicenter Study. OBES SURG 31, 2927–2934 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05334-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05334-9

Keywords

Navigation