Skip to main content
Log in

Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research.

Material and Methods

After identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020.

Results

In this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items.

Conclusion

There is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1188–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carbajo M, Garcia-Caballero M, Toledano M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy: results of the first 209 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The First consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):303–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramos AC, Chevallier JM, Mahawar K, et al. IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) consensus conference statement on one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): results of a modified Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1625–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahawar KK, Kular KS, Parmar C, et al. Perioperative practices concerning one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass: a survey of 210 surgeons. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):204–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):951–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kassir R, Petrucciani N, Debs T, et al. Conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for biliary reflux resistant to medical treatment: lessons learned from a retrospective series of 2780 consecutive patients undergoing OAGB. Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2093–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1153–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brolin RE, Bradley LJ, Taliwal RV. Unsuspected cirrhosis discovered during elective obesity operations. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 1998;133(1):84–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parmar CD, Zakeri R, Mahawar K. A systematic review of one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass as a metabolic operation for patients with body mass index </= 35 kg/m(2). Obes Surg. 2020;30(2):725–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kular KS, Manchanda N, Cheema GK. Seven years of mini-gastric bypass in type II diabetes patients with a body mass index <35 kg/m(2). Obes Surg. 2016;26(7):1457–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim Z, Hur KY. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes: the preliminary report. World J Surg. 2011;35(3):631–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruiz-Tovar J, Carbajo MA, Jimenez JM, et al. Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(2):401–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parmar CD, Bryant C, Luque-de-Leon E, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients with BMI >/= 50 kg/m(2): a systematic review comparing it with Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):3039–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee WJ, Lin YH. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee WJ, Wang W, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: experience with tailored bypass limb according to body weight. Obes Surg. 2008;18(3):294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruiz-Tovar J, Carbajo MA, Jimenez JM, et al. Are there ideal small bowel limb lengths for one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to obtain optimal weight loss and remission of comorbidities with minimal nutritional deficiencies? World J Surg. 2020;44(3):855–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lo HC. The learning curve of one anastomosis gastric bypass and its impact as a preceding procedure to Roux-en Y gastric bypass: initial experience of one hundred and five consecutive cases. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruiz-Mar G, Ruelas-Ayala A, Ornelas-Onate LA, et al. The one anastomosis gastric bypass technique: results after one year of follow-up. Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery. 2019;32(4):e1476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scavone G, Caltabiano DC, Gulino F, et al. Laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass: anatomic features, imaging, efficacy and postoperative complications. Updat Surg. 2020;72(2):493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carbajo MA, Gonzalez-Ramirez G, Jimenez JM, et al. A 5-year follow-up in children and adolescents undergoing one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) at a European IFSO Excellence Center (EAC-BS). Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):2739–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. MGB-OAGB: effect of biliopancreatic limb length on nutritional deficiency, weight loss, and comorbidity resolution. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3439–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Apers J, Wijkmans R, Totte E, et al. Implementation of mini gastric bypass in the Netherlands: early and midterm results from a high-volume unit. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(9):3949–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deitel M, Rutledge R. Mini-gastric bypass: prevention and management of complications in performance and follow-up. Int J Surg (London, England). 2019;71:119–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Musella M, Susa A, Manno E, et al. Complications following the mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB): a multi-institutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 years) follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2956–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Neuberg M, Blanchet MC, Gignoux B, et al. Long-term outcomes after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1379–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Clapp B, Hahn J, Dodoo C, et al. Evaluation of the rate of marginal ulcer formation after bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(6):1890–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Carr WR, et al. Current status of mini-gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12(4):305–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WR, et al. Preoperative interventions for patients being considered for bariatric surgery: separating the fact from fiction. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1527–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruiz-Tovar J, Llavero C. Metabolic effect of the hepatic branch of the vagal nerve in one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). World J Surg. 2020;44(6):1939–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jedamzik J, Eilenberg M, Felsenreich DM, et al. Impact of limb length on nutritional status in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 3-year results. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2020;16(4):476–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2015;11(2):321–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shenouda MM, Harb SE, Mikhail SAA, et al. Bile gastritis following laparoscopic single anastomosis gastric bypass: pilot study to assess significance of bilirubin level in gastric aspirate. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):389–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kermansaravi M, Pishgahroudsari M, Kabir A, et al. Weight loss after one-anastomosis/mini-gastric bypass-the impact of biliopancreatic limb: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. 2020;25:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bhandari M, Nautiyal HK, Kosta S, et al. Comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of obesity: a 5-year study. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2019;15(12):2038–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hussain A, El-Hasani S. Short- and mid-term outcomes of 527 one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) operations: retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):262–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ansar H, Zamaninour N, Pazouki A, et al. Weight loss after one anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): patient-related perioperative predictive factors. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1316–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Soong TC, Almalki OM, Lee WJ, et al. Measuring the small bowel length may decrease the incidence of malnutrition after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass with tailored bypass limb. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2019;15(10):1712–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Genser L, Soprani A, Tabbara M, et al. Laparoscopic reversal of mini-gastric bypass to original anatomy for severe postoperative malnutrition. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2017;402(8):1263–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Saarinen T, Pietiläinen KH, Loimaala A, et al. Bile reflux is a common finding in the gastric pouch after one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2020;30(3):875–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Navarrete S, Leyba JL, Ll SN, et al. Results of the comparative study of 200 cases: one anastomosis gastric bypass vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2597–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Carbajo MA, Fong-Hirales A, Luque-de-León E, et al. Weight loss and improvement of lipid profiles in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 2-year follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):416–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mahawar KK, Reed AN, Graham YNH. Marginal ulcers after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass: a survey of surgeons. Clin Obes. 2017;7(3):151–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kermansaravi M, Kabir A, Mousavimaleki A, et al. Association between hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after one-anastomosis/mini gastric bypass. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2020;16(7):863–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chiappetta S, Stier C, Scheffel O, et al. Mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a second step procedure after sleeve gastrectomy-a retrospective cohort study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):819–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rheinwalt KP, Plamper A, Ruckbeil MV, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)-a mid-term cohort study with 612 patients. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1230–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kermansaravi M, Kazazi M, Pazouki A. Petersen’s space internal hernia after laparoscopic one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. Case reports in surgery. 2018;2018:9576120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Camacho Fernandez-Pacheco B, Lopez-Tomassetti Fernandez E, Hernandez Hernandez JR. Surgery and considerations for the repair of Petersen’s space hernia after mini gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):58–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Abbas A, Kermansaravi M, Eghbali F, et al. Another Petersen’s space hernia after one anastomosis gastric bypass: a video case report. Obes Surg. 2019;29(11):3776–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. AlZarooni N, Abou Hussein B, Al Marzouqi O, et al. Gastric remnant perforation caused by Peterson’s hernia following one anastomosis gastric bypass: a rare complication. Obes Surg. 2020;30(8):3229–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Graham Y. One anastomosis gastric bypass: key technical features, and prevention and management of procedure-specific complications. Minerva Chir. 2019;74(2):126–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):697–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2016;26(5):926–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Boyle M, Mahawar K. One anastomosis gastric bypass performed with a 150-cm biliopancreatic limb delivers weight loss outcomes similar to those with a 200-cm biliopancreatic limb at 18 -24 months. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1258–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mahmoudieh M, Keleidari B, Afshin N, et al. The early results of the laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass on patients with different body mass index. J Obes. 2020;7572153:2020.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Komaei I, Sarra F, Lazzara C, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass with tailored biliopancreatic limb length formula relative to small bowel length: preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):3062–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kermansaravi M, Mahawar KK, Jazi AHD, et al. Revisional surgery after one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass: a narrative review. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2020;25(1):62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses-first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1430–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bolckmans R, Arman G, Himpens J. Efficiency and risks of laparoscopic conversion of omega anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(8):2572–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lee WJ, Lee YC, Ser KH, et al. Revisional surgery for laparoscopic minigastric bypass. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2011;7(4):486–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Taha O, Abdelaal M, Abozeid M, et al. Outcomes of omega loop gastric bypass, 6-years experience of 1520 cases. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):1952–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Johnson WH, Fernanadez AZ, Farrell TM, et al. Surgical revision of loop (“mini”) gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2007;3(1):37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Younis F, Shnell M, Gluck N, et al. Endoscopic treatment of early leaks and strictures after laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Beaupel N, Bruzzi M, Voron T, et al. Management of acute intra-abdominal sepsis caused by leakage after one anastomosis gastric bypass. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2017;13(8):1297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Keleidari B, Mahmoudieh M, Shahabi S, et al. Reversing one-anastomosis gastric bypass surgery due to severe and refractory hypoalbuminemia. World J Surg. 2020;44(4):1200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Liagre A, Queralto M, Juglard G, et al. Multidisciplinary management of leaks after one-anastomosis gastric bypass in a single-center series of 2780 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5):1452–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kermansaravi M, Abdolhosseini MR, Kabir A, et al. Severe hypoalbuminemia and steatohepatitis leading to death in a young vegetarian female, 8 months after mini gastric bypass: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;31:17–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WRJ, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):37–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. O’Kane M PJ, Aasheim E, Barth J, et al. BOMSS Guidelines on perioperative and postoperative biochemical monitoring and micronutrient replacement for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Adopted by BOMSS Council September 2014 [Internet].. uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/BOMSS-guidelines-Finalversion1Oct14.pdf [cited 2020, Aug 16].

  71. Madhok BM, Mahawar KK, Hadfield JN, et al. Haematological indices and haematinic levels after mini gastric bypass: a matched comparison with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Clin Obes. 2018;8(1):43–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kumar P, Hamza N, Madhok B, et al. Copper deficiency after gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(6):1335–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Mahawar KK, Bhasker AG, Bindal V, et al. Zinc deficiency after gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):522–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Mahawar KK, Reid A, Graham Y, et al. Oral vitamin B12 supplementation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):1916–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2020;28(4):O1–o58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Brown WA. Johari Halim Shah Y, Balalis G, Bashir A, Ramos A, Kow L, et al. IFSO position statement on the role of esophago-gastro-duodenal endoscopy prior to and after bariatric and metabolic surgery procedures. Obes Surg. 2020;30(8):3135–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Wu CC, Lee WJ, Ser KH, et al. Gastric cancer after mini-gastric bypass surgery: a case report and literature review. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013;6(4):303–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Runkel M, Pauthner M, Runkel N. The first case report of a carcinoma of the gastric cardia (AEG II) after OAGB-MGB. Obes Surg. 2020;30(2):753–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Aggarwal S, Bhambri A. Singla V. Sharma A. Adenocarcinoma of oesophagus involving gastro-oesophageal junction following mini-gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass. Journal of minimal access surgery: Dash NR; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Musella M, Berardi G, Bocchetti A, et al. Esophagogastric neoplasms following bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review. Obes Surg. 2019;29(8):2660–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Mahawar K. Care for patients who have undergone one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery. British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing). 2019;28(3):157–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Musella M, Susa A, Greco F, et al. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multicenter review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(1):156–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Faul A, Chevallier JM, Poghosyan T. Dilated gastric pouch resizing for weight loss failure after one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3406–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Parmar CD, Gan J, Stier C, et al. One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional bariatric surgery after failed primary adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG): a systematic review of 1075 patients. Int J Surg (London, England). 2020;81:32-38.

  85. Schmidt HJ, Lee EW, Amianda EA, et al. Large series examining laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding as a salvage solution for failed gastric bypass. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2018;14(12):1869–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Brunaldi VO, Jirapinyo P, de Moura DTH, et al. Endoscopic Treatment of Weight Regain Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):266–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2956–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Godina M, Nagliati C, Menegon P, et al. Emergency laparoscopic conversion from mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass to modified Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass due to acute bleeding from a recurrent marginal ulcer. Updat Surg. 2017;69(3):421–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Musella M, Berardi G, Vitiello AJSfO, Diseases R. Laparoscopic conversion from MGB/OAGB to RYGB for perforated marginal ulcer: video case report. 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chetan D. Parmar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval Statement

Ethics approval is not needed for this article.

Consent of Patients

This is not needed for such article.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kermansaravi, M., DavarpanahJazi, A.H., ShahabiShahmiri, S. et al. Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review. OBES SURG 31, 2453–2463 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2

Keywords

Navigation