Analyzing the Psychometric Properties of the Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire in Patients with Obesity
- 9 Downloads
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire is a valuable and easy-to-use tool for the measurement of quality of life in patients with obesity. To become a widely used tool, the questionnaire must be validated in many different contexts. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the SF-36 questionnaire among patients with obesity in Bahrain.
The 36-item questionnaire was administered to a study cohort scheduled to undergo bariatric surgery at the Bahrain Defence Force Hospital in Bahrain. Demographic data were extracted. Principal component analysis was used to extract component factors. Factor analysis was used to determine construct validity and fit. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the extracted factors was used to determine the internal consistency reliability. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.0 and IBM AMOS version 22.0.
Most of the participants were female with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 43.24 kg/m2. A six-factor solution explaining 52.31% of variance was generated. The global fit parameter estimates indicated that the suggested model exhibited an acceptable-to-good fit. Overall, the internal consistency reliability estimate of the SF-36 questionnaire was greater than 0.70.
The identified six-factor model of the SF-36 questionnaire is a valuable tool for the measurement of quality of life among patients with obesity in Bahrain.
KeywordsHealth-related outcomes Quality of life Bahrain Obesity Questionnaire
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all the participants included in this study.
The study proposal was approved by the Research and Research Ethics Committee of the BDF Hospital in Bahrain. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 1.González-Muniesa P, Mártinez-González MA, Hu FB, et al. Obesity. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17034. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.34. Review.
- 2.World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. Media Centre. Available @ http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/ Accessed on 3–08-2017
- 3.Lenz M, Richter T, Mühlhauser I. The morbidity and mortality associated with overweight and obesity in adulthood: a systematic review. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009;106(40):641–8. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2009.0641. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
- 5.Al Khalifa K, Violato C, Al Ansari A. Reduction in weight and BMI and changes in co-morbidities following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure for morbidly obese patients in Bahrain: a five year longitudinal study. Spring. 2013;2(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fontaine KR, Barofsky I. Obesity and health-related quality of life. Obes Rev. 2001 Aug;2(3):173–82. ReviewGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hörchner R, Tuinebreijer MW, Kelder PH. Quality-of-life assessment of morbidly obese patients who have undergone a Lap-Band operation: 2-year follow-up study. Is the MOS SF-36 a useful instrument to measure quality of life in morbidly obese patients? Obes Surg. 2001;11(2):212–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Caprio S, Daniels SR, Drewnowski A, et al. Influence of race, ethnicity, and culture on childhood obesity: implications for prevention and treatment: a consensus statement of Shaping America’s Health and the Obesity Society. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(11):2211–21. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-9024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, et al. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care. 1995;33(Suppl 4):264–79.Google Scholar
- 16.World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2001, 79 (4)Google Scholar
- 17.Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, et al. Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0176-2. Review.