Contraception, Menstruation, and Sexuality after Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Cohort Study
- 411 Downloads
Women with a history of bariatric surgery are recommended to avoid pregnancy at least 12 months after surgery. Evidence on the impact of bariatric surgery on contraception, menstrual cycle, and sexuality in the first year postoperative is therefore indispensable.
The objective of this paper is to prospectively study changes in contraception, menstrual cycle and sexuality in women of reproductive age following bariatric surgery.
The study was conducted in two secondary medical centers and a tertiary academic medical center.
Women attending for bariatric surgery or who recently underwent bariatric surgery completed online questionnaires about contraception, menstrual cycle, and sexual behavior before surgery and 6 and 12 months after surgery.
The study included data from 71 women, including 70 and 47 women at 6 and 12 months after bariatric surgery, respectively. Preoperatively, 43.6% (n = 31/71) used a short-acting hormonal contraceptive, the usage of which decreased significantly to, respectively, 32.8% (n = 23/70; p = .031) and 27.7% (n = 13/47; p = .022) 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Usage of long-acting contraceptive methods increased from 26.7% (n = 19/71) preoperatively to 38.6% (n = 27/70; p = .021) and 42.6% (n = 20/47; p = .004) at 6 and 12 months. Combined oral contraceptives (COC) remained used (39.4% preoperatively, 27.1 and 14.9% at 6 and 12 months postoperatively). Menstrual cycle (frequency, pattern, duration of the cycle, and the menstruation itself) and sexual behavior (intimate relationship, frequency of intercourse, and satisfaction) did not differ significantly before and after surgery.
Women undergoing bariatric surgery appear to switch their type of contraceptive from oral, short-acting hormonal contraceptives to non-oral, long-acting contraceptives. No changes in menstrual cycle and sexual behavior were shown.
KeywordsBariatric surgery Contraception Menstruation Sexuality
Contribution to Authorship
Author 1 performed the analysis on the results of the study and drafted the manuscript. Author 2, Author 5, and Author 12 have made substantial contributions to the design of the study and have been involved in drafting the manuscript. Author 3 advised in analyses of results and drafting of the manuscript. Author 4, Author 6, Author 7, Author 8, Author 9, Author 10, and Author 11 have been involved in revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the central Ethical Committee of the University Hospitals of Leuven and all local Ethical Committees.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Edison E, Whyte M, van Vlymen J, et al. Bariatric surgery in obese women of reproductive age improves conditions that underlie fertility and pregnancy outcomes: retrospective cohort study of UK National Bariatric Surgery Registry (NBSR). Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2837–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2202-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Paulen M, Zapata L, Cansino C, et al. Contraceptive use among women with a history of bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Contraception. 2010;82(1):86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Merhi Z. Revisiting optimal hormonal contraception following bariatric surgery. Contraception. 2013;87(2):131–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jatlaoui T, Cordes S, Goedken P, et al. Family planning knowledge, attitudes and practices among bariatric healthcare providers. Contraception. 2016;93(5):455–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Charafeddine R. Seksuele gezondheid. In: Gisle L, Demarest S, et al., editors. Gezondheidsenquête 2013. Rapport 2: Gezondheidsgedrag en leefstijl. Brussel: WIV-ISP; 2014.Google Scholar
- 19.Graham Y, Mansour D, Small P, et al. A survey of bariatric surgical and reproductive health professionals’knowledge and provision of contraception to reproductive-aged bariatric surgical patients. Obes Surg. 2016(8):1918-23. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-2037-4.
- 21.Edelman AB. SFP clinical guidelines: contraceptive considerations in obese women. Contraception. 2009;80(6):583–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar