Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Staple Line Reinforcement in Laparoscopic SleeveGastrectomy: Experience in 1023 Consecutive Cases

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most frequently performed bariatric procedures performed worldwide. However, staple line-related complications have become a major challenge for bariatric surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the morbidity in a cohort of patients who underwent LSG with imbricated oversewing of the staple line at a single high-volume center.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data for all patients who underwent LSG to treat obesity at our institution from January 2010 to September 2016. All practitioners had undergone training with a single senior bariatric surgeon using oversewing as staple line reinforcement (SLR).

Results

In total, 1023 LSGs were performed (female, 67.3%; mean age, 40.6 ± 10.8 years; median preoperative body mass index, 37 ± 4.5 kg/m2). The mean operative time was 67.6 ± 23.4 min (range, 30–150 min). The rate of conversion to open surgery was 0.3%. Early complications were noted in 18 patients (1.8%), including 5 cases of bleeding (0.5%). No leaks, stenosis, or mortality occurred.

Conclusions

LSG is a safe technique, but staple line-associated complications can be life-threatening. In this series, no leaks occurred from the very beginning of the surgeons’ experience in LSG. Imbricated oversewing of the staple line, proper mentoring, and performance of surgery in appropriate settings are good approaches to decreasing complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponce J, Nguyen NT, Hutter M, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in the United States, 2011-2014. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(6):1199–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boza C, Daroch D, Barros D, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):1129–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rawlins L, Rawlins MP, Brown CC, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes of a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(1):21–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gagner M, Deitel M, Erickson AL, et al. Survey on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the Fourth International Consensus Summit on sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013;23(12):2013–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burgos AM, Braghetto I, Csendes A, et al. Gastric leak after laparoscopic-sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Obes Surg. 2009;19(12):1672–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):231–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1509–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakran N, Goitein D, Raziel A, et al. Gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter experience with 2,834 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;27(1):240–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noel P, Nedelcu M, Gagner M. Impact of the surgical experience on leak rate after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1782–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ali MR, Tichansky DS, Kothari SN, et al. Validation that a 1-year fellowship in minimally invasive and bariatric surgery can eliminate the learning curve for laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(1):138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Geubbels N, de Brauw LM, Acherman YIZ, et al. The preceding surgeon factor in bariatric surgery: a positive influence on the learning curve of subsequent surgeons. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1417–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gagner M, Buchwald JN. Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(4):713–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenthal RJ. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shikora SA, Mahoney CB. Clinical benefit of gastric staple line reinforcement (SLR) in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1133–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Moon RC, Shah N, Teixeira AF, et al. Management of staple line leak following sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(1):54–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson CE, Ahmad H, Menzo Lo E, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with esophagojejunal reconstruction for chronic staple line disruption after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(3):455–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Ugo S, Gentileschi P, Benavoli D, et al. Comparative use of different techniques for leak and bleeding prevention during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(3):450–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guetta O, Ovnat A, Shaked G, et al. Analysis of morbidity data of 308 cases of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—the Soroka experience. Obes Surg. 2015;25(11):2100–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi YY, Bae J, Hur KY, et al. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does it have advantages? A meta-analysis Obes Surg. 2012;22(8):1206–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM, et al. The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):464–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P, et al. The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1290–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim J, Azagury D, Eisenberg D, et al. ASMBS position statement on prevention, detection, and treatment of gastrointestinal leak after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, including the roles of imaging, surgical exploration, and nonoperative management. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):739–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Z, Dai X, Xie H, et al. The efficacy of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2016;25(C):145–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ser K-H, Lee W-J, Lee Y-C, et al. Experience in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbidly obese Taiwanese: staple-line reinforcement is important for preventing leakage. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(9):2253–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rogula T, Khorgami Z, Bazan M, et al. Comparison of reinforcement techniques using suture on staple-line in sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(11):2219–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aggarwal S, Sharma AP, Ramaswamy N. Outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with and without staple line oversewing in morbidly obese patients: a randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2013;23(11):895–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Benedix F, Benedix DD, Knoll C, et al. Are there risk factors that increase the rate of staple line leakage in patients undergoing primary sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity? Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1610–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sethi M, Zagzag J, Patel K, et al. Intraoperative leak testing has no correlation with leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):883–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bellanger DE, Greenway FL. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 529 cases without a leak: short-term results and technical considerations. Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):146–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sakran N, Raziel A, Goitein O, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity in 3003 patients: results at a high-volume bariatric center. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2045–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O'Reilly A, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. NEJM. 2013;369(15):1434–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Carandina S, Tabbara M, Bossi M, et al. Staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: absorbable monofilament, barbed suture, fibrin glue, or nothing? Results of a prospective randomized study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(2):361–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Hospital Dipreca, Vital Apoquindo 1200, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

    Matías Sepúlveda, Cristián Astorga & Juan P. Hermosilla

  2. School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Ejercito 233, Santiago, Chile

    Matías Sepúlveda & Juan P. Hermosilla

  3. Department of Surgery, Hospital El Carmen, Camino A Rinconada 1201, Maipú, Santiago, Chile

    Munir Alamo

Authors
  1. Matías Sepúlveda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristián Astorga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan P. Hermosilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Munir Alamo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matías Sepúlveda.

Ethics declarations

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sepúlveda, M., Astorga, C., Hermosilla, J.P. et al. Staple Line Reinforcement in Laparoscopic SleeveGastrectomy: Experience in 1023 Consecutive Cases. OBES SURG 27, 1474–1480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2530-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2530-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation