Skip to main content
Log in

The Preceding Surgeon Factor in Bariatric Surgery: a Positive Influence on the Learning Curve of Subsequent Surgeons

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery has been well investigated. The learning curve is defined by complications and/or by duration of surgery (DOS). Previous studies report an inverse relationship between patient outcome and patient volume. In this study, we investigate whether the learning curve of preceding bariatric surgeons is of additional influence for surgeons who start to perform LRYGB in the same centre.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analysed the records of all 713 consecutive primary LRYGB patients operated in our centre from December 2007 until July 2012. Surgeon 1 and 3 had previous laparoscopic bariatric experience whilst Surgeon 2 and 4 had not. We stratified the data between the four surgeons with different levels of experience and in a chronology of 50 cases.

Results

Sixty-seven (9.4 %) complications occurred in the study period. Surgeon 1 had more complications occurring within the first 50 cases than Surgeon 4 (10 versus 1, p < 0.05). There was no difference in complication rate between groups of 50 consecutive cases. None of the patients died. DOS decreased for every consecutive surgeon, irrespective of their experience. The learning curve defined by DOS was steepest for Surgeon 1, followed by Surgeon 2, 3 and 4.

Conclusion

In this study, we show that the learning curve of the preceding surgeon positively influences the learning curve of latter surgeons, irrespective of their experience. Therefore, the ‘preceding surgeon factor’ should be taken in account in addition to volume requirements when starting new bariatric facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sturm R, Hattori A. Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int. J. Obes. (Lond). [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group; 2012 [cited 2013 Jan 22];1–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22986681.

  2. Sjöstrom L, Lindroos AK, Petlonen M, et al. New Engl J Med. 2004;351:2683–93.

  3. Gonzalez R, Nelson LG, Murr MM. Does establishing a bariatric surgery fellowship training program influence operative outcomes? Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2006;21:109–14. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0860-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Suter M, Giusti V, Héraief E, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: initial 2-year experience. Arch Surg [Internet]. 2003;17:603–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12582767.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Breaux JA, Kennedy CI, Richardson WS. Advanced laparoscopic skills decrease the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2007;21:985–8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17623252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchwald H, Scopinaro N. Retiring the learning curve. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2009;19:541–2. doi:10.1007/s11695-009-9833-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deyo R, Cherkin D, Ciol M. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMaria EJ, Murr M, Byrne TK, et al. Validation of the obesity surgery mortality risk score in a multicenter study proves it stratifies mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2007;246:578–84. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17893494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarela AI, Dexter SPL, McMahon MJ. Use of the obesity surgery mortality risk score to predict complications of laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2011;21:1698–703. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0379-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2009;250:187–96. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19638912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2004;240:205–13. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00000658-200408000-00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. White PF, Kehlet H, Neal JM, et al. The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care. Anesth Analg [Internet]. 2007;104:1380–96. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00000539-200706000-00013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, et al. The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in Pennsylvania: a 3-year summary. Surgery [Internet]. 2003;134:613–21. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0039606003003064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2004;240:184–92. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00153307-200401220-00020.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Flum DR, Dellinger EP. Impact of gastric bypass operation on survival: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg [Internet]. 2004;199:543–51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15454136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JAB, et al. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA [Internet]. 2005;294:1903–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16234496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Murr MM, Martin T, Haines K, et al. A state-wide review of contemporary outcomes of gastric bypass in Florida: does provider volume impact outcomes? Ann Surg [Internet]. 2007;245:699–706. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1877059&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2003;17:212–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12457218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shikora SA, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2005;140:362–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sánchez-Santos R, Estévez S, Tomé C, et al. Training programs influence in the learning curve of laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2012;22:34–41. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0398-x. Springer-Verlag.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Søvik TT, Aasheim ET, Kristinsson J, et al. Establishing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: perioperative outcome and characteristics of the learning curve. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2008;19:158–65. doi:10.1007/s11695-008-9584-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Iordens GIT, Klaassen RA, van Lieshout EMM, et al. How to train surgical residents to perform laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safely. World J Surg [Internet]. 2012;36:2003–10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22576184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ballantyne GH, Ewing D, Capella RF, et al. The learning curve measured by operating times for laparoscopic and open gastric bypass: roles of surgeon’s experience, institutional experience, body mass index and fellowship training. Obes Surg. 2005;15:172–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. COEMBS Designation Requirements [Internet]. Available from: http://www.surgicalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/COEMBS-Requirements_Rev-02-2013.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. D. Moes, Dr. B. van den Heuvel and Dr. I. Kappers for their contribution in providing data and feedback for this paper.

Grant Information

None of the authors have received grants or any other kind of financial support to declare.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Informed Consent

Prior to surgery, an informed consent form is filled in by all patients that receive surgery in the Slotervaart Hospital. All patients agreed to the usage of their data in an anonymous form.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

Due to the retrospective nature of this study, formal consent is not required and has been waived by the hospital’s Medical Ethics Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noëlle Geubbels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geubbels, N., de Brauw, L.M., Acherman, Y.I.Z. et al. The Preceding Surgeon Factor in Bariatric Surgery: a Positive Influence on the Learning Curve of Subsequent Surgeons. OBES SURG 25, 1417–1424 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1538-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1538-x

Keywords

Navigation